Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

[Guest guest]

SB, S

 

yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

 

fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down further

and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

 

the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of JYOTISH

FLOODED THE group space sadly

 

with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

 

 

- G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

Sateesh Batas <makara

 

Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

 

 

In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

 

========

 

-

Sudhir

 

Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

 

Regards'

Sudhir

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

 

-

Sateesh Batas

Jyotish Remedies

Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this " stationing "

time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the upsurge in list

posting amounts.

 

Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet, etc)...

 

Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Prashant,

 

 

I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to Jyotish, and

not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

 

 

Back to the subject...

 

 

Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has (astrologically)

been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent station-time?

 

 

Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say time of)

over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems, and so

on.

 

 

Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

 

 

Best - Sateesh.

 

========

 

-

Prashant Kumar G B

 

Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

 

 

SB, S

 

yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

 

fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down further

and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

 

the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of JYOTISH

FLOODED THE group space sadly

 

with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

 

- G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

 

________________________________

Sateesh Batas <makara

 

Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

 

 

In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

 

========

 

-

Sudhir

 

Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

 

Regards'

Sudhir

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

 

-

Sateesh Batas

Jyotish Remedies

Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this " stationing "

time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the upsurge in list

posting amounts.

 

Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet, etc)...

 

Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

SB

 

I am sure u know the answer if u r in anh grp for some length of time IT HAS

HAPPENED CONSISTANTLY Budha vakri has given all the problems u listed

 

and u can find ppl of Vrischika rasi more in such boilers othe Budha nakshatras

r also there but vrischika rasi all 3 stars r involved u can look back even in

JR from  dec 06 i did notice such posts on Budha varki's role and ppl involved

in such heat exchanges

 

I DONT HAVE THE NAKSHATRA OR birth details of the present conflict zone ppl so

can't say more.

 

 G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

Sateesh Batas <makara

 

Mon, January 18, 2010 9:49:39 PM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

 

 

Dear Prashant,

 

I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to Jyotish, and

not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

 

Back to the subject...

 

Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has (astrologically)

been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent station-time?

 

Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say time of)

over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems, and so

on.

 

Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

 

Best - Sateesh.

 

========

 

-

Prashant Kumar G B

 

Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

SB, S

 

yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

 

fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down further

and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

 

the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of JYOTISH

FLOODED THE group space sadly

 

with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

 

- G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database? method=reportRow

s & tbl=6

 

____________ _________ _________ __

Sateesh Batas <makara

 

Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

 

========

 

-

Sudhir

 

Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

 

Regards'

Sudhir

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

 

-

Sateesh Batas

Jyotish Remedies

Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this " stationing "

time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the upsurge in list

posting amounts.

 

Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet, etc)...

 

Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

 

 

[Guest guest]

As sometimes happens, one bad apple has indirectly HELPED the group - without

meaning to!

 

 

Astrologically, the DX, RX, FDX motion of a planet (in this case Mercury) causes

the problems on the RX sweep, but then clears them out on the FDX sweep.

 

 

Or in other words - Reverse gear for a while - then back to First gear to

move forward again.

 

 

========

 

-

Prashant Kumar G B

 

Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

 

with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Prashant,

 

 

Yes, I have observed for lists, and also personally

 

 

- my question was asking the group that in their (off-list) activities, and on a

more general note. Not necessarily in relation ONLY to what they see happening

on Astro-lists like this one. I did not make that clear in my below message, so

apologies.

 

 

By internet in this case, I meant not only on the lists but also (for example)

people having personally internet connection problems, or phonelines down, and

so on.

 

 

Also Travel issues, as Mercury being the Karaka for this.

 

 

Best - Sateesh.

 

========

 

 

 

-

Prashant Kumar G B

 

Monday, January 18, 2010 4:38 PM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

 

 

SB

 

I am sure u know the answer if u r in anh grp for some length of time IT HAS

HAPPENED CONSISTANTLY Budha vakri has given all the problems u listed

 

and u can find ppl of Vrischika rasi more in such boilers othe Budha nakshatras

r also there but vrischika rasi all 3 stars r involved u can look back even in

JR from dec 06 i did notice such posts on Budha varki's role and ppl involved

in such heat exchanges

 

I DONT HAVE THE NAKSHATRA OR birth details of the present conflict zone ppl so

can't say more.

 

G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

 

________________________________

Sateesh Batas <makara

 

Mon, January 18, 2010 9:49:39 PM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

 

 

Dear Prashant,

 

I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to Jyotish, and

not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

 

Back to the subject...

 

Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has (astrologically)

been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent station-time?

 

Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say time of)

over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems, and so

on.

 

Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

 

Best - Sateesh.

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Prashant ji,

 

The JR chart is very strong and has lagnesh strong even if in the 8th (exalted,

retrograde) and aspected by moon's dispositor from the Dhan-bhav. The saturn is

weak in shadbala and in 6th with rahu (samadharmis in 6th in parakrampada!).

Sadesathi will not affect it adversely, though it may test it from time to time!

Lagnesh is pitrikaraka and blesses from randhra the debilitated

saptamesh-dashamesh placed with bhagyesh. There is satwik blessing on this

forum.

 

Now if jupiter or venus were weak and assuming weak roles, then the outcome

would have been different, during sadesathi :-)

 

RR

 

, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar

wrote:

>

> SB, S

>

> yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

>

> fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down further

and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

>

> the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of

JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

>

> with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

>

>

> - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

>

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

>

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> Sateesh Batas <makara

>

> Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

>

>  

>

> In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

>

> ========

>

> -

> Sudhir

>

> Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

>

> And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

>

> Regards'

> Sudhir

> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

>

> -

> Sateesh Batas

> Jyotish Remedies

> Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

>

> Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

>

> Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet,

etc)...

>

> Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear shri sateesh,

Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

whether transits are affecting.

so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

 

regards,

k.gopu

 

 

 

--- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara wrote:

 

 

Sateesh Batas <makara

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Prashant,

 

I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to Jyotish, and

not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

 

Back to the subject...

 

Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has (astrologically)

been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent station-time?

 

Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say time of)

over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems, and so

on.

 

Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

 

Best - Sateesh.

 

========

 

-

Prashant Kumar G B

 

Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

SB, S

 

yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

 

fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down further

and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

 

the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of JYOTISH

FLOODED THE group space sadly

 

with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

 

- G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database? method=reportRow

s & tbl=6

 

____________ _________ _________ __

Sateesh Batas <makara

 

Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

 

========

 

-

Sudhir

 

Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

 

Regards'

Sudhir

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

 

-

Sateesh Batas

Jyotish Remedies

Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this " stationing "

time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the upsurge in list

posting amounts.

 

Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet, etc)...

 

Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Gopu

 

The chart of the involved people are affected during this period.

 

Regards

Sudhir

--

 

 

 

-

K Gopu

Tuesday, January 19, 2010 11:57 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

 

 

Dear shri sateesh,

Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

whether transits are affecting.

so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

 

regards,

k.gopu

 

--- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara wrote:

 

Sateesh Batas <makara

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

 

 

 

Dear Prashant,

 

I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to Jyotish,

and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

 

Back to the subject...

 

Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has (astrologically)

been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent station-time?

 

Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say time

of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems, and

so on.

 

Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

 

Best - Sateesh.

 

========

 

-

Prashant Kumar G B

Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

SB, S

 

yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

 

fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down further

and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

 

the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of

JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

 

with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

 

- G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database? method=reportRow

s & tbl=6

 

____________ _________ _________ __

Sateesh Batas <makara

Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

 

========

 

-

Sudhir

Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

 

Regards'

Sudhir

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

 

-

Sateesh Batas

Jyotish Remedies

Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

 

Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet,

etc)...

 

Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

 

[Guest guest]

GOPU JI,

 

WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish group, AIA TOO

[AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents to this

effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

 

u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not take any nes

except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till then overall

scene was normal

 

any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow from that

point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

 

pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for the mess but

surely

 

if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini and a couple

more did

all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst. and the

reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in spite of

appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic limit...

 

i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of that period

and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we don';t need

dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r welcome

 

thanks

- G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

K Gopu <kgopu_24

 

Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

 

Dear shri sateesh,

Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

whether transits are affecting.

so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

 

regards,

k.gopu

 

--- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara wrote:

 

Sateesh Batas <makara

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

 

 

 

Dear Prashant,

 

I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to Jyotish, and

not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

 

Back to the subject...

 

Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has (astrologically)

been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent station-time?

 

Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say time of)

over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems, and so

on.

 

Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

 

Best - Sateesh.

 

========

 

-

Prashant Kumar G B

 

Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

SB, S

 

yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

 

fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down further

and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

 

the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of JYOTISH

FLOODED THE group space sadly

 

with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

 

- G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database? method=reportRow

s & tbl=6

 

____________ _________ _________ __

Sateesh Batas <makara

 

Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

 

========

 

-

Sudhir

 

Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

 

Regards'

Sudhir

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

 

-

Sateesh Batas

Jyotish Remedies

Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this " stationing "

time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the upsurge in list

posting amounts.

 

Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet, etc)...

 

Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Sudhir,

 

Now you got involved too ;-)

 

RR

 

 

 

, " Sudhir " <taurus.sudhir wrote:

>

> Dear Gopu

>

> The chart of the involved people are affected during this period.

>

> Regards

> Sudhir

>

--

>

>

>

> -

> K Gopu

>

> Tuesday, January 19, 2010 11:57 AM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01

?

>

>

>

> Dear shri sateesh,

> Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

> happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

> co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

> to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

> whether transits are affecting.

> so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

>

> regards,

> k.gopu

>

> --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara wrote:

>

> Sateesh Batas <makara

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01

?

>

> Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

>

>

>

> Dear Prashant,

>

> I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to Jyotish,

and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

>

> Back to the subject...

>

> Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has (astrologically)

been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent station-time?

>

> Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say time

of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems, and

so on.

>

> Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

>

> Best - Sateesh.

>

> ========

>

> -

> Prashant Kumar G B

>

> Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01

?

>

> SB, S

>

> yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

>

> fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down

further and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

>

> the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of

JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

>

> with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

>

> - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Sateesh Batas <makara

>

> Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

>

> In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

>

> ========

>

> -

> Sudhir

>

> Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

>

> And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

>

> Regards'

> Sudhir

> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

>

> -

> Sateesh Batas

> Jyotish Remedies

> Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

>

> Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

>

> Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet,

etc)...

>

> Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Gopu,

 

 

Agreed with your points overall - however my point was not exclusive to the

whole of the RX of Mercury - more that the maximum disturbance happened when

Mercury was at its " turning point " , i.e. the few days where it began to turn

from RX to FDX - as that was its slowest speed.

 

 

So in other words not right throughout the RX motion necessarily, but the first

(DX to RX) and last (RX to FDX) couple of days.

 

 

The chart data of the Group as you say would give the exact answer.

 

 

On a similar note...Saturn dead-stationed to turn RX also a few days ago - I

guess more or less exact in line with the upsurge in posts - so depending on

the Lordship/s of the Group's birth-chart, it may be due to either/or

Mercury/Saturn station-points.

 

 

Hmm, and Saturn is in Mercury's MT sign too...

 

 

Best - Sateesh.

 

========

 

 

-

K Gopu

 

Tuesday, January 19, 2010 6:27 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

 

 

Dear shri sateesh,

Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

whether transits are affecting.

so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

 

regards,

k.gopu

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

A quote that should inspire all of us!!

 

It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man

stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit

belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust

and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and

again; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a

worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement,

and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while DARING GREATLY so that

his place shall never be with those timid souls who know neither victory or

defeat.

 

Lilly

 

, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar

wrote:

>

> GOPU JI,

>

> WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish group, AIA TOO

[AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents to this

effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

>

> u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not take any nes

except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till then overall

scene was normal

>

> any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow from that

point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

>

> pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for the mess

but surely

>

> if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini and a couple

more did

> all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst. and the

reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in spite of

appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic limit...

>

> i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of that

period and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we

don';t need dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r

welcome

>

> thanks

> - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

>

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

>

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> K Gopu <kgopu_24

>

> Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

>

>

> Dear shri sateesh,

> Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

> happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

> co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

> to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

> whether transits are affecting.

> so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

>

> regards,

> k.gopu

>

> --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara wrote:

>

> Sateesh Batas <makara

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

>

> Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

>

>

>

> Dear Prashant,

>

> I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to Jyotish,

and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

>

> Back to the subject...

>

> Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has (astrologically)

been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent station-time?

>

> Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say time

of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems, and

so on.

>

> Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

>

> Best - Sateesh.

>

> ========

>

> -

> Prashant Kumar G B

>

> Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

>

> SB, S

>

> yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

>

> fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down further

and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

>

> the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of

JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

>

> with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

>

> - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database? method=reportRow

s & tbl=6

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Sateesh Batas <makara

>

> Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

>

> In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

>

> ========

>

> -

> Sudhir

>

> Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

>

> And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

>

> Regards'

> Sudhir

> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

>

> -

> Sateesh Batas

> Jyotish Remedies

> Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

>

> Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

>

> Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet,

etc)...

>

> Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

>

>

[Guest guest]

Where was that from?! Keep those coming in Lilly!

 

I hope our gracious Moderator allows them to.

 

Regards,

Nandini

 

, " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005 wrote:

>

> A quote that should inspire all of us!!

>

> It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man

stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit

belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust

and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and

again; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a

worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement,

and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while DARING GREATLY so that

his place shall never be with those timid souls who know neither victory or

defeat.

>

> Lilly

>

> , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@>

wrote:

> >

> > GOPU JI,

> >

> > WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish group, AIA

TOO [AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents to this

effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

> >

> > u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not take any

nes except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till then overall

scene was normal

> >

> > any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow from that

point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

> >

> > pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for the mess

but surely

> >

> > if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini and a

couple more did

> > all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst. and the

reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in spite of

appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic limit...

> >

> > i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of that

period and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we

don';t need dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r

welcome

> >

> > thanks

> > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> >

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ________________________________

> > K Gopu <kgopu_24@>

> >

> > Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

> > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01

?

> >

> >

> > Dear shri sateesh,

> > Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

> > happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

> > co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

> > to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

> > whether transits are affecting.

> > so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

> >

> > regards,

> > k.gopu

> >

> > --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara@> wrote:

> >

> > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01

?

> >

> > Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Prashant,

> >

> > I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to Jyotish,

and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

> >

> > Back to the subject...

> >

> > Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has (astrologically)

been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent station-time?

> >

> > Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say time

of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems, and

so on.

> >

> > Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

> >

> > Best - Sateesh.

> >

> > ========

> >

> > -

> > Prashant Kumar G B

> >

> > Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

> > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01

?

> >

> > SB, S

> >

> > yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

> >

> > fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down

further and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

> >

> > the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of

JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

> >

> > with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

> >

> > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> >

> > Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

> >

> > In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

> >

> > ========

> >

> > -

> > Sudhir

> >

> > Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

> >

> > And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

> >

> > Regards'

> > Sudhir

> > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> >

> > -

> > Sateesh Batas

> > Jyotish Remedies

> > Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> > Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

> >

> > Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

> >

> > Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet,

etc)...

> >

> > Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

dear shri prashant,

Well my intention was to put an end to eccentric approaches of Sri RR.

If not for may mail, he will continue to send his one liners mostly in

form of riddles or using his command over english which is not required

in this forum. What the forum requires is simple english which can be

understood by one and all.

Yes deviation from astro is always welcome but in the last few days

deviations has become the main and astro has become secondary because

of these people.

Unless and until there are periodical cheks the group will go haywire.

In AIA there is no question of advt, no chart reading. It will be only

in the form of quiz or of late it is more focussed towards KP's method.

So there I dont fine RR's contribution, though he is a member and if

at all he behaves in this manner the group will ban his id as to what

they did for Lalith.

 

regards,

k.gopu

 

 

 

 

--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar wrote:

 

 

Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 12:56 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

GOPU JI,

 

WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish group, AIA TOO

[AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents to this

effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

 

u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not take any nes

except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till then overall

scene was normal

 

any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow from that

point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

 

pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for the mess but

surely

 

if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini and a couple

more did

all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst. and the

reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in spite of

appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic limit...

 

i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of that period

and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we don';t need

dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r welcome

 

thanks

- G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database? method=reportRow

s & tbl=6

 

____________ _________ _________ __

K Gopu <kgopu_24 (AT) (DOT) co.uk>

 

Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

Dear shri sateesh,

Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

whether transits are affecting.

so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

 

regards,

k.gopu

 

--- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara wrote:

 

Sateesh Batas <makara

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

 

Dear Prashant,

 

I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to Jyotish, and

not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

 

Back to the subject...

 

Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has (astrologically)

been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent station-time?

 

Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say time of)

over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems, and so

on.

 

Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

 

Best - Sateesh.

 

========

 

-

Prashant Kumar G B

 

Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

SB, S

 

yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

 

fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down further

and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

 

the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of JYOTISH

FLOODED THE group space sadly

 

with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

 

- G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database? method=reportRow

s & tbl=6

 

____________ _________ _________ __

Sateesh Batas <makara

 

Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

 

========

 

-

Sudhir

 

Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

 

Regards'

Sudhir

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

 

-

Sateesh Batas

Jyotish Remedies

Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

 

Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this " stationing "

time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the upsurge in list

posting amounts.

 

Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet, etc)...

 

Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Gopu,

 

Ah the RR-BASH_FEST continues, with new fire-wood venting their frustrations!

:-)

 

Well, at least you are not spreading FILTH about me or throwing your mental

filth at me! I would be surprised if you would, truth be told!

 

What makes you think, Oh All-Knowing One, that I am a member of AIA? I sampled

it for a few days and then d long long time ago!

 

Always, think of the obvious, and do not conjure up imaginary scenarios! It is

bad for those who are serious about astrology!

 

Rohiniranjan

 

 

, K Gopu <kgopu_24 wrote:

>

> dear shri prashant,

> Well my intention was to put an end to eccentric approaches of Sri RR.

> If not for may mail, he will continue to send his one liners mostly in

> form of riddles or using his command over english which is not required

> in this forum. What the forum requires is simple english which can be

> understood by one and all.

> Yes deviation from astro is always welcome but in the last few days

> deviations has become the main and astro has become secondary because

> of these people.

> Unless and until there are periodical cheks the group will go haywire.

> In AIA there is no question of advt, no chart reading. It will be only

> in the form of quiz or of late it is more focussed towards KP's method.

> So there I dont fine RR's contribution, though he is a member and if

> at all he behaves in this manner the group will ban his id as to what

> they did for Lalith.

>  

> regards,

> k.gopu

>

>

>

>

> --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar wrote:

>

>

> Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

>

> Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 12:56 PM

>

>

>  

>

>

>

> GOPU JI,

>

> WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish group, AIA TOO

[AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents to this

effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

>

> u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not take any nes

except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till then overall

scene was normal

>

> any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow from that

point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

>

> pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for the mess

but surely

>

> if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini and a couple

more did

> all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst. and the

reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in spite of

appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic limit...

>

> i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of that

period and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we

don';t need dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r

welcome

>

> thanks

> - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database? method=reportRow

s & tbl=6

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> K Gopu <kgopu_24 (AT) (DOT) co.uk>

>

> Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

>

> Dear shri sateesh,

> Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

> happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

> co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

> to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

> whether transits are affecting.

> so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

>

> regards,

> k.gopu

>

> --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara wrote:

>

> Sateesh Batas <makara

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

>

> Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

>

> Dear Prashant,

>

> I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to Jyotish,

and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

>

> Back to the subject...

>

> Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has (astrologically)

been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent station-time?

>

> Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say time

of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems, and

so on.

>

> Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

>

> Best - Sateesh.

>

> ========

>

> -

> Prashant Kumar G B

>

> Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

>

> SB, S

>

> yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

>

> fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down further

and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

>

> the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of

JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

>

> with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

>

> - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database? method=reportRow

s & tbl=6

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Sateesh Batas <makara

>

> Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

>

> In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

>

> ========

>

> -

> Sudhir

>

> Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

>

> And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

>

> Regards'

> Sudhir

> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

>

> -

> Sateesh Batas

> Jyotish Remedies

> Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

>

> Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

>

> Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet,

etc)...

>

> Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

>

>

[Guest guest]

That came from an American diplomat from WWII..Don't remember his name off

hand..I am not sure if moderator will allow much of quotes on this group since

this is primarily a joytish remedy forum.

 

Lilly

 

, " nandini " <kakan_leo wrote:

>

> Where was that from?! Keep those coming in Lilly!

>

> I hope our gracious Moderator allows them to.

>

> Regards,

> Nandini

>

> , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@> wrote:

> >

> > A quote that should inspire all of us!!

> >

> > It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong

man stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit

belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust

and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and

again; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a

worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement,

and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while DARING GREATLY so that

his place shall never be with those timid souls who know neither victory or

defeat.

> >

> > Lilly

> >

> > , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@>

wrote:

> > >

> > > GOPU JI,

> > >

> > > WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish group, AIA

TOO [AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents to this

effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

> > >

> > > u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not take any

nes except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till then overall

scene was normal

> > >

> > > any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow from

that point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

> > >

> > > pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for the

mess but surely

> > >

> > > if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini and a

couple more did

> > > all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst. and the

reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in spite of

appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic limit...

> > >

> > > i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of that

period and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we

don';t need dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r

welcome

> > >

> > > thanks

> > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > >

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ________________________________

> > > K Gopu <kgopu_24@>

> > >

> > > Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

> > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear shri sateesh,

> > > Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

> > > happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

> > > co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

> > > to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

> > > whether transits are affecting.

> > > so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

> > >

> > > regards,

> > > k.gopu

> > >

> > > --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > >

> > > Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Prashant,

> > >

> > > I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to

Jyotish, and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

> > >

> > > Back to the subject...

> > >

> > > Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has

(astrologically) been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent

station-time?

> > >

> > > Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say

time of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems,

and so on.

> > >

> > > Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

> > >

> > > Best - Sateesh.

> > >

> > > ========

> > >

> > > -

> > > Prashant Kumar G B

> > >

> > > Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

> > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > >

> > > SB, S

> > >

> > > yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

> > >

> > > fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down

further and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

> > >

> > > the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of

JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

> > >

> > > with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

> > >

> > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > >

> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > >

> > > Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

> > >

> > > In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

> > >

> > > ========

> > >

> > > -

> > > Sudhir

> > >

> > > Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

> > >

> > > And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

> > >

> > > Regards'

> > > Sudhir

> > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> > >

> > > -

> > > Sateesh Batas

> > > Jyotish Remedies

> > > Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> > > Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

> > >

> > > Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

> > >

> > > Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet,

etc)...

> > >

> > > Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

JYOtish, not JOY-tish, Tigress!

 

Transpositions of letters can get problematical and mis-leading! We are all very

SERIOUS here! :-(

 

RR

 

, " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005 wrote:

>

>

> That came from an American diplomat from WWII..Don't remember his name off

hand..I am not sure if moderator will allow much of quotes on this group since

this is primarily a joytish remedy forum.

>

> Lilly

>

> , " nandini " <kakan_leo@> wrote:

> >

> > Where was that from?! Keep those coming in Lilly!

> >

> > I hope our gracious Moderator allows them to.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Nandini

> >

> > , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@> wrote:

> > >

> > > A quote that should inspire all of us!!

> > >

> > > It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong

man stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit

belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust

and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and

again; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a

worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement,

and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while DARING GREATLY so that

his place shall never be with those timid souls who know neither victory or

defeat.

> > >

> > > Lilly

> > >

> > > , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@>

wrote:

> > > >

> > > > GOPU JI,

> > > >

> > > > WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish group,

AIA TOO [AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents to

this effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

> > > >

> > > > u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not take

any nes except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till then

overall scene was normal

> > > >

> > > > any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow from

that point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

> > > >

> > > > pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for the

mess but surely

> > > >

> > > > if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini and a

couple more did

> > > > all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst. and

the reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in spite

of appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic limit...

> > > >

> > > > i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of

that period and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we

don';t need dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r

welcome

> > > >

> > > > thanks

> > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > >

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ________________________________

> > > > K Gopu <kgopu_24@>

> > > >

> > > > Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear shri sateesh,

> > > > Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

> > > > happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

> > > > co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

> > > > to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

> > > > whether transits are affecting.

> > > > so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > > k.gopu

> > > >

> > > > --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > >

> > > > Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Prashant,

> > > >

> > > > I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to

Jyotish, and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

> > > >

> > > > Back to the subject...

> > > >

> > > > Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has

(astrologically) been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent

station-time?

> > > >

> > > > Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say

time of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems,

and so on.

> > > >

> > > > Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

> > > >

> > > > Best - Sateesh.

> > > >

> > > > ========

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > Prashant Kumar G B

> > > >

> > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > >

> > > > SB, S

> > > >

> > > > yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

> > > >

> > > > fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down

further and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

> > > >

> > > > the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of

JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

> > > >

> > > > with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

> > > >

> > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > >

> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > >

> > > > Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > >

> > > > In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

> > > >

> > > > ========

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > Sudhir

> > > >

> > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > >

> > > > And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

> > > >

> > > > Regards'

> > > > Sudhir

> > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > Sateesh Batas

> > > > Jyotish Remedies

> > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> > > > Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

> > > >

> > > > Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

> > > >

> > > > Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet,

etc)...

> > > >

> > > > Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

> > > >

> > > >

[Guest guest]

Sorry PAPA, I failed hinglish spelling, and grammar school again!:-(

 

Lilly

 

 

, " rohinicrystal " <jyotish_vani

wrote:

>

> JYOtish, not JOY-tish, Tigress!

>

> Transpositions of letters can get problematical and mis-leading! We are all

very SERIOUS here! :-(

>

> RR

>

> , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > That came from an American diplomat from WWII..Don't remember his name off

hand..I am not sure if moderator will allow much of quotes on this group since

this is primarily a joytish remedy forum.

> >

> > Lilly

> >

> > , " nandini " <kakan_leo@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Where was that from?! Keep those coming in Lilly!

> > >

> > > I hope our gracious Moderator allows them to.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Nandini

> > >

> > > , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@>

wrote:

> > > >

> > > > A quote that should inspire all of us!!

> > > >

> > > > It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the

strong man stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The

credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by

dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again

and again; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself

in a worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high

achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while DARING

GREATLY so that his place shall never be with those timid souls who know neither

victory or defeat.

> > > >

> > > > Lilly

> > > >

> > > > , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@>

wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > GOPU JI,

> > > > >

> > > > > WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish group,

AIA TOO [AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents to

this effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

> > > > >

> > > > > u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not take

any nes except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till then

overall scene was normal

> > > > >

> > > > > any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow from

that point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

> > > > >

> > > > > pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for the

mess but surely

> > > > >

> > > > > if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini and

a couple more did

> > > > > all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst. and

the reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in spite

of appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic limit...

> > > > >

> > > > > i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of

that period and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we

don';t need dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r

welcome

> > > > >

> > > > > thanks

> > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > >

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ________________________________

> > > > > K Gopu <kgopu_24@>

> > > > >

> > > > > Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear shri sateesh,

> > > > > Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

> > > > > happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

> > > > > co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

> > > > > to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

> > > > > whether transits are affecting.

> > > > > so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > > k.gopu

> > > > >

> > > > > --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Prashant,

> > > > >

> > > > > I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to

Jyotish, and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

> > > > >

> > > > > Back to the subject...

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has

(astrologically) been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent

station-time?

> > > > >

> > > > > Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say

time of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems,

and so on.

> > > > >

> > > > > Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

> > > > >

> > > > > Best - Sateesh.

> > > > >

> > > > > ========

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > Prashant Kumar G B

> > > > >

> > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > > >

> > > > > SB, S

> > > > >

> > > > > yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

> > > > >

> > > > > fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down

further and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

> > > > >

> > > > > the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS

Of JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

> > > > >

> > > > > with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before

becoming mis-adventorous again

> > > > >

> > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > > >

> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > >

> > > > > Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > > >

> > > > > In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

> > > > >

> > > > > ========

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > Sudhir

> > > > >

> > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > > >

> > > > > And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards'

> > > > > Sudhir

> > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > Sateesh Batas

> > > > > Jyotish Remedies

> > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> > > > > Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

> > > > >

> > > > > Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

> > > > >

> > > > > Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like

Internet, etc)...

> > > > >

> > > > > Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

> > > > >

> > > > >

[Guest guest]

You passed Hinglish with flying colours!

 

You are ready for Jyotish :-)

 

RR_,

 

 

 

, " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005 wrote:

>

>

> Sorry PAPA, I failed hinglish spelling, and grammar school again!:-(

>

> Lilly

>

>

> , " rohinicrystal " <jyotish_vani@>

wrote:

> >

> > JYOtish, not JOY-tish, Tigress!

> >

> > Transpositions of letters can get problematical and mis-leading! We are all

very SERIOUS here! :-(

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > That came from an American diplomat from WWII..Don't remember his name off

hand..I am not sure if moderator will allow much of quotes on this group since

this is primarily a joytish remedy forum.

> > >

> > > Lilly

> > >

> > > , " nandini " <kakan_leo@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Where was that from?! Keep those coming in Lilly!

> > > >

> > > > I hope our gracious Moderator allows them to.

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > > Nandini

> > > >

> > > > , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@>

wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > A quote that should inspire all of us!!

> > > > >

> > > > > It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the

strong man stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The

credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by

dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again

and again; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself

in a worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high

achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while DARING

GREATLY so that his place shall never be with those timid souls who know neither

victory or defeat.

> > > > >

> > > > > Lilly

> > > > >

> > > > > , Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > GOPU JI,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish

group, AIA TOO [AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents

to this effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not

take any nes except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till

then overall scene was normal

> > > > > >

> > > > > > any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow

from that point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

> > > > > >

> > > > > > pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for

the mess but surely

> > > > > >

> > > > > > if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini

and a couple more did

> > > > > > all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst.

and the reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in

spite of appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic

limit...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of

that period and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we

don';t need dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r

welcome

> > > > > >

> > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > > >

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ________________________________

> > > > > > K Gopu <kgopu_24@>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 20/01 ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear shri sateesh,

> > > > > > Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

> > > > > > happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

> > > > > > co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

> > > > > > to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then

chek

> > > > > > whether transits are affecting.

> > > > > > so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > k.gopu

> > > > > >

> > > > > > --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 20/01 ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Prashant,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to

Jyotish, and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Back to the subject...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has

(astrologically) been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent

station-time?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or

say time of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection

problems, and so on.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Best - Sateesh.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ========

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > Prashant Kumar G B

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 20/01 ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > SB, S

> > > > > >

> > > > > > yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s

down further and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

> > > > > >

> > > > > > the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish,

LESS Of JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

> > > > > >

> > > > > > with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before

becoming mis-adventorous again

> > > > > >

> > > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 2010

> > > > > >

> > > > > > In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ========

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > Sudhir

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 2010

> > > > > >

> > > > > > And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi

Saturn.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards'

> > > > > > Sudhir

> > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > Sateesh Batas

> > > > > > Jyotish Remedies

> > > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> > > > > > Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like

Internet, etc)...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

[Guest guest]

Serious here to learn something and able to discuss meanngfully .Some body has

to have remdey for the wrong things and to hope for betterment.Before somebody

whistles and points out as  a foul, we need to know  that remedy lies in

prevention.

 

 

Vattem Krishnan

Cyber Jyotish Services

(For all counseling services)

Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them "

Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma

 

 

--- On Tue, 1/19/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani wrote:

 

 

rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 9:08 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

JYOtish, not JOY-tish, Tigress!

 

Transpositions of letters can get problematical and mis-leading! We are all very

SERIOUS here! :-(

 

RR

 

, " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@ ...>

wrote:

>

>

> That came from an American diplomat from WWII..Don't remember his name off

hand..I am not sure if moderator will allow much of quotes on this group since

this is primarily a joytish remedy forum.

>

> Lilly

>

> , " nandini " <kakan_leo@> wrote:

> >

> > Where was that from?! Keep those coming in Lilly!

> >

> > I hope our gracious Moderator allows them to.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Nandini

> >

> > , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@ >

wrote:

> > >

> > > A quote that should inspire all of us!!

> > >

> > > It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong

man stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit

belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust

and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and

again; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a

worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement,

and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while DARING GREATLY so that

his place shall never be with those timid souls who know neither victory or

defeat.

> > >

> > > Lilly

> > >

> > > , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@>

wrote:

> > > >

> > > > GOPU JI,

> > > >

> > > > WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish group,

AIA TOO [AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents to

this effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

> > > >

> > > > u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not take

any nes except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till then

overall scene was normal

> > > >

> > > > any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow from

that point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

> > > >

> > > > pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for the

mess but surely

> > > >

> > > > if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini and a

couple more did

> > > > all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst. and

the reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in spite

of appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic limit...

> > > >

> > > > i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of

that period and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we

don';t need dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r

welcome

> > > >

> > > > thanks

> > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > K Gopu <kgopu_24@>

> > > >

> > > > Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear shri sateesh,

> > > > Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

> > > > happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

> > > > co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

> > > > to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

> > > > whether transits are affecting.

> > > > so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > > k.gopu

> > > >

> > > > --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > >

> > > > Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Prashant,

> > > >

> > > > I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to

Jyotish, and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

> > > >

> > > > Back to the subject...

> > > >

> > > > Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has

(astrologically) been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent

station-time?

> > > >

> > > > Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say

time of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems,

and so on.

> > > >

> > > > Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

> > > >

> > > > Best - Sateesh.

> > > >

> > > > ========

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > Prashant Kumar G B

> > > >

> > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > >

> > > > SB, S

> > > >

> > > > yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

> > > >

> > > > fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down

further and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

> > > >

> > > > the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of

JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

> > > >

> > > > with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

> > > >

> > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > >

> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > >

> > > > Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > >

> > > > In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

> > > >

> > > > ========

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > Sudhir

> > > >

> > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > >

> > > > And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

> > > >

> > > > Regards'

> > > > Sudhir

> > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > Sateesh Batas

> > > > Jyotish Remedies

> > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> > > > Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

> > > >

> > > > Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

> > > >

> > > > Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet,

etc)...

> > > >

> > > > Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

> > > >

> > > >

[Guest guest]

Members

 

as Budha has become direct and in normal motuion I hope the past baggage is left

behind and we move on, as most have thankfully many of the DRY NUMBERS have

dwindled, lets have more substance flowing in whatever we do other than ofcourse

personal duals, left to private domain.

 

G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99

 

Wed, January 20, 2010 12:56:13 PM

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

 

Serious here to learn something and able to discuss meanngfully .Some body has

to have remdey for the wrong things and to hope for betterment.Before somebody

whistles and points out as a foul, we need to know that remedy lies in

prevention.

 

Vattem Krishnan

Cyber Jyotish Services

(For all counseling services)

Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While Wisemen Can Control Them "

Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma

 

 

--- On Tue, 1/19/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ hotmail.com> wrote:

 

rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ hotmail.com>

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 9:08 PM

 

 

 

JYOtish, not JOY-tish, Tigress!

 

Transpositions of letters can get problematical and mis-leading! We are all very

SERIOUS here! :-(

 

RR

 

, " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@ ...>

wrote:

>

>

> That came from an American diplomat from WWII..Don't remember his name off

hand..I am not sure if moderator will allow much of quotes on this group since

this is primarily a joytish remedy forum.

>

> Lilly

>

> , " nandini " <kakan_leo@> wrote:

> >

> > Where was that from?! Keep those coming in Lilly!

> >

> > I hope our gracious Moderator allows them to.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Nandini

> >

> > , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@ >

wrote:

> > >

> > > A quote that should inspire all of us!!

> > >

> > > It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong

man stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit

belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust

and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and

again; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a

worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement,

and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while DARING GREATLY so that

his place shall never be with those timid souls who know neither victory or

defeat.

> > >

> > > Lilly

> > >

> > > , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@>

wrote:

> > > >

> > > > GOPU JI,

> > > >

> > > > WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish group,

AIA TOO [AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents to

this effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

> > > >

> > > > u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not take

any nes except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till then

overall scene was normal

> > > >

> > > > any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow from

that point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

> > > >

> > > > pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for the

mess but surely

> > > >

> > > > if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini and a

couple more did

> > > > all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst. and

the reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in spite

of appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic limit...

> > > >

> > > > i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of

that period and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we

don';t need dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r

welcome

> > > >

> > > > thanks

> > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > K Gopu <kgopu_24@>

> > > >

> > > > Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear shri sateesh,

> > > > Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

> > > > happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

> > > > co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

> > > > to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

> > > > whether transits are affecting.

> > > > so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > > k.gopu

> > > >

> > > > --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > >

> > > > Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Prashant,

> > > >

> > > > I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to

Jyotish, and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

> > > >

> > > > Back to the subject...

> > > >

> > > > Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has

(astrologically) been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent

station-time?

> > > >

> > > > Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say

time of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems,

and so on.

> > > >

> > > > Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

> > > >

> > > > Best - Sateesh.

> > > >

> > > > ========

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > Prashant Kumar G B

> > > >

> > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > >

> > > > SB, S

> > > >

> > > > yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

> > > >

> > > > fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down

further and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

> > > >

> > > > the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS Of

JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

> > > >

> > > > with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before becoming

mis-adventorous again

> > > >

> > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > >

> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > >

> > > > Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > >

> > > > In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

> > > >

> > > > ========

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > Sudhir

> > > >

> > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > >

> > > > And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

> > > >

> > > > Regards'

> > > > Sudhir

> > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > Sateesh Batas

> > > > Jyotish Remedies

> > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> > > > Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

> > > >

> > > > Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

> > > >

> > > > Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like Internet,

etc)...

> > > >

> > > > Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

> > > >

> > > >

[Guest guest]

Dear Prashant_ji and other Member_jees,

 

Since we are expected to discuss Jyotish and patronizing, sarcastic remarks

tossed out of the corners of the mouths (an expression!) by high, medium and

*low* and the usage of english often taunted at by all and sundry -- while I

realize that western astrology and their followers have turned mercury

retrograde into a big star item and blamed it on miscommunication, computer

breakage, malfunction, mail not being delivered, payments delayed and similar

seemingly conceivable events much of this has been anecdotal! This kind of

one-factor casual astrology is often seen in lighter western astro writing and

astro-conversations (Often appearing in Mountain Astrologer and I have noticed

the tendency in that school of astrology in other eclectic forums). Such as oh

this is so because her neptune is squring her Vesta or Chiron is hiding behind

his pluto!

 

Where in Jyotish literature, pray tell, has mercury retrograde been associated

with all the drama that was permitted to unfold on Jyotish Remedies? Why was

only J_R affected?

 

What are these 'baggages' that Prashant jee is referring to?

 

Mercury is the planet that often retrogrades, if it indeed must be blamed for

everything, somewhat lazily, then why does this not occur more often?

 

I do not think serious practitioners should really use this kind of planetary

scapegoating, such as blame it on mercury! Particularly in the jyotish domain

which does not relate to such effects of mercury retrograde, sensational though

it may seem to some minds!

 

Rohiniranjan

 

, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar

wrote:

>

> Members

>

> as Budha has become direct and in normal motuion I hope the past baggage is

left behind and we move on, as most have thankfully many of the DRY NUMBERS have

dwindled, lets have more substance flowing in whatever we do other than ofcourse

personal duals, left to private domain.

>

> G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

>

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

>

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99

>

> Wed, January 20, 2010 12:56:13 PM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

>

>

> Serious here to learn something and able to discuss meanngfully .Some body has

to have remdey for the wrong things and to hope for betterment.Before somebody

whistles and points out as a foul, we need to know that remedy lies in

prevention.

>

> Vattem Krishnan

> Cyber Jyotish Services

> (For all counseling services)

> Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While Wisemen Can Control Them "

> Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma

>

>

> --- On Tue, 1/19/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ hotmail.com> wrote:

>

> rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ hotmail.com>

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

>

> Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 9:08 PM

>

>

>

> JYOtish, not JOY-tish, Tigress!

>

> Transpositions of letters can get problematical and mis-leading! We are all

very SERIOUS here! :-(

>

> RR

>

> , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@ ...>

wrote:

> >

> >

> > That came from an American diplomat from WWII..Don't remember his name off

hand..I am not sure if moderator will allow much of quotes on this group since

this is primarily a joytish remedy forum.

> >

> > Lilly

> >

> > , " nandini " <kakan_leo@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Where was that from?! Keep those coming in Lilly!

> > >

> > > I hope our gracious Moderator allows them to.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Nandini

> > >

> > > , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@ >

wrote:

> > > >

> > > > A quote that should inspire all of us!!

> > > >

> > > > It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the

strong man stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The

credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by

dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again

and again; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself

in a worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high

achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while DARING

GREATLY so that his place shall never be with those timid souls who know neither

victory or defeat.

> > > >

> > > > Lilly

> > > >

> > > > , Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > GOPU JI,

> > > > >

> > > > > WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish group,

AIA TOO [AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents to

this effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

> > > > >

> > > > > u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not take

any nes except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till then

overall scene was normal

> > > > >

> > > > > any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow from

that point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

> > > > >

> > > > > pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for the

mess but surely

> > > > >

> > > > > if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini and

a couple more did

> > > > > all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst. and

the reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in spite

of appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic limit...

> > > > >

> > > > > i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of

that period and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we

don';t need dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r

welcome

> > > > >

> > > > > thanks

> > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > K Gopu <kgopu_24@>

> > > > >

> > > > > Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear shri sateesh,

> > > > > Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

> > > > > happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

> > > > > co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

> > > > > to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

> > > > > whether transits are affecting.

> > > > > so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > > k.gopu

> > > > >

> > > > > --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Prashant,

> > > > >

> > > > > I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to

Jyotish, and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

> > > > >

> > > > > Back to the subject...

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has

(astrologically) been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent

station-time?

> > > > >

> > > > > Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say

time of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems,

and so on.

> > > > >

> > > > > Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

> > > > >

> > > > > Best - Sateesh.

> > > > >

> > > > > ========

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > Prashant Kumar G B

> > > > >

> > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > > >

> > > > > SB, S

> > > > >

> > > > > yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

> > > > >

> > > > > fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down

further and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

> > > > >

> > > > > the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS

Of JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

> > > > >

> > > > > with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before

becoming mis-adventorous again

> > > > >

> > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > > >

> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > >

> > > > > Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > > >

> > > > > In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

> > > > >

> > > > > ========

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > Sudhir

> > > > >

> > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > > >

> > > > > And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards'

> > > > > Sudhir

> > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > Sateesh Batas

> > > > > Jyotish Remedies

> > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> > > > > Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

> > > > >

> > > > > Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

> > > > >

> > > > > Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like

Internet, etc)...

> > > > >

> > > > > Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

> > > > >

> > > > >

[Guest guest]

Dada,

Retrograde planets by dictum are never weak.Mercury,altering the gear to slow is

dictated by the King of Cosmic World.(Sun).It is not that some thing intentional

or unintentional that events occured.let's rest them and agree that the role of

transit has their own share of 30-40% to reflect..The baggages r our efforts to

accumulate and to make weary in our attempts to project the light of vedas in

proper perspectives. 

 

Vattem Krishnan

Cyber Jyotish Services

(For all counseling services)

Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them "

Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma

 

 

--- On Wed, 1/20/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani wrote:

 

 

rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 5:57 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Prashant_ji and other Member_jees,

 

Since we are expected to discuss Jyotish and patronizing, sarcastic remarks

tossed out of the corners of the mouths (an expression!) by high, medium and

*low* and the usage of english often taunted at by all and sundry -- while I

realize that western astrology and their followers have turned mercury

retrograde into a big star item and blamed it on miscommunication, computer

breakage, malfunction, mail not being delivered, payments delayed and similar

seemingly conceivable events much of this has been anecdotal! This kind of

one-factor casual astrology is often seen in lighter western astro writing and

astro-conversations (Often appearing in Mountain Astrologer and I have noticed

the tendency in that school of astrology in other eclectic forums). Such as oh

this is so because her neptune is squring her Vesta or Chiron is hiding behind

his pluto!

 

Where in Jyotish literature, pray tell, has mercury retrograde been associated

with all the drama that was permitted to unfold on Jyotish Remedies? Why was

only J_R affected?

 

What are these 'baggages' that Prashant jee is referring to?

 

Mercury is the planet that often retrogrades, if it indeed must be blamed for

everything, somewhat lazily, then why does this not occur more often?

 

I do not think serious practitioners should really use this kind of planetary

scapegoating, such as blame it on mercury! Particularly in the jyotish domain

which does not relate to such effects of mercury retrograde, sensational though

it may seem to some minds!

 

Rohiniranjan

 

, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ...>

wrote:

>

> Members

>

> as Budha has become direct and in normal motuion I hope the past baggage is

left behind and we move on, as most have thankfully many of the DRY NUMBERS have

dwindled, lets have more substance flowing in whatever we do other than ofcourse

personal duals, left to private domain.

>

> G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database? method=reportRow

s & tbl=6

>

>

>

>

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@. ..>

>

> Wed, January 20, 2010 12:56:13 PM

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

>

>

> Serious here to learn something and able to discuss meanngfully .Some body has

to have remdey for the wrong things and to hope for betterment.Before somebody

whistles and points out as a foul, we need to know that remedy lies in

prevention.

>

> Vattem Krishnan

> Cyber Jyotish Services

> (For all counseling services)

> Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While Wisemen Can Control Them "

> Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma

>

>

> --- On Tue, 1/19/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ hotmail.com> wrote:

>

> rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ hotmail.com>

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

>

> Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 9:08 PM

>

>

>

> JYOtish, not JOY-tish, Tigress!

>

> Transpositions of letters can get problematical and mis-leading! We are all

very SERIOUS here! :-(

>

> RR

>

> , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@ ...>

wrote:

> >

> >

> > That came from an American diplomat from WWII..Don't remember his name off

hand..I am not sure if moderator will allow much of quotes on this group since

this is primarily a joytish remedy forum.

> >

> > Lilly

> >

> > , " nandini " <kakan_leo@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Where was that from?! Keep those coming in Lilly!

> > >

> > > I hope our gracious Moderator allows them to.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Nandini

> > >

> > > , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@ >

wrote:

> > > >

> > > > A quote that should inspire all of us!!

> > > >

> > > > It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the

strong man stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done them better.. The

credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by

dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again

and again; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself

in a worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high

achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while DARING

GREATLY so that his place shall never be with those timid souls who know neither

victory or defeat.

> > > >

> > > > Lilly

> > > >

> > > > , Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > GOPU JI,

> > > > >

> > > > > WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish group,

AIA TOO [AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents to

this effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

> > > > >

> > > > > u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not take

any nes except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till then

overall scene was normal

> > > > >

> > > > > any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow from

that point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

> > > > >

> > > > > pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for the

mess but surely

> > > > >

> > > > > if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini and

a couple more did

> > > > > all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst. and

the reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in spite

of appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic limit...

> > > > >

> > > > > i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of

that period and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we

don';t need dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r

welcome

> > > > >

> > > > > thanks

> > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > K Gopu <kgopu_24@>

> > > > >

> > > > > Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear shri sateesh,

> > > > > Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

> > > > > happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

> > > > > co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

> > > > > to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then chek

> > > > > whether transits are affecting.

> > > > > so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > > k.gopu

> > > > >

> > > > > --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Prashant,

> > > > >

> > > > > I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to

Jyotish, and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

> > > > >

> > > > > Back to the subject...

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has

(astrologically) been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent

station-time?

> > > > >

> > > > > Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or say

time of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection problems,

and so on.

> > > > >

> > > > > Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

> > > > >

> > > > > Best - Sateesh.

> > > > >

> > > > > ========

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > Prashant Kumar G B

> > > > >

> > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

20/01 ?

> > > > >

> > > > > SB, S

> > > > >

> > > > > yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

> > > > >

> > > > > fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s down

further and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

> > > > >

> > > > > the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish, LESS

Of JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

> > > > >

> > > > > with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before

becoming mis-adventorous again

> > > > >

> > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > > >

> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > >

> > > > > Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > > >

> > > > > In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

> > > > >

> > > > > ========

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > Sudhir

> > > > >

> > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > > >

> > > > > And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi Saturn.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards'

> > > > > Sudhir

> > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > Sateesh Batas

> > > > > Jyotish Remedies

> > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> > > > > Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 2010

> > > > >

> > > > > Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

> > > > >

> > > > > Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like

Internet, etc)...

> > > > >

> > > > > Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

> > > > >

> > > > >

[Guest guest]

Seegrochcha - Mandochchaa!

 

It is well known -- I wonder why the debate even arises! :-)

 

, Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99 wrote:

>

> Dada,

> Retrograde planets by dictum are never weak.Mercury,altering the gear to slow

is dictated by the King of Cosmic World.(Sun).It is not that some thing

intentional or unintentional that events occured.let's rest them and agree that

the role of transit has their own share of 30-40% to reflect..The baggages r our

efforts to accumulate and to make weary in our attempts to project the light of

vedas in proper perspectives. 

>

> Vattem Krishnan

> Cyber Jyotish Services

> (For all counseling services)

> Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them "

> Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma

>  

>

> --- On Wed, 1/20/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani wrote:

>

>

> rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

>

> Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 5:57 PM

>

>

>  

>

>

>

> Dear Prashant_ji and other Member_jees,

>

> Since we are expected to discuss Jyotish and patronizing, sarcastic remarks

tossed out of the corners of the mouths (an expression!) by high, medium and

*low* and the usage of english often taunted at by all and sundry -- while I

realize that western astrology and their followers have turned mercury

retrograde into a big star item and blamed it on miscommunication, computer

breakage, malfunction, mail not being delivered, payments delayed and similar

seemingly conceivable events much of this has been anecdotal! This kind of

one-factor casual astrology is often seen in lighter western astro writing and

astro-conversations (Often appearing in Mountain Astrologer and I have noticed

the tendency in that school of astrology in other eclectic forums). Such as oh

this is so because her neptune is squring her Vesta or Chiron is hiding behind

his pluto!

>

> Where in Jyotish literature, pray tell, has mercury retrograde been associated

with all the drama that was permitted to unfold on Jyotish Remedies? Why was

only J_R affected?

>

> What are these 'baggages' that Prashant jee is referring to?

>

> Mercury is the planet that often retrogrades, if it indeed must be blamed for

everything, somewhat lazily, then why does this not occur more often?

>

> I do not think serious practitioners should really use this kind of planetary

scapegoating, such as blame it on mercury! Particularly in the jyotish domain

which does not relate to such effects of mercury retrograde, sensational though

it may seem to some minds!

>

> Rohiniranjan

>

> , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ...>

wrote:

> >

> > Members

> >

> > as Budha has become direct and in normal motuion I hope the past baggage is

left behind and we move on, as most have thankfully many of the DRY NUMBERS have

dwindled, lets have more substance flowing in whatever we do other than ofcourse

personal duals, left to private domain.

> >

> > G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@ ..>

> >

> > Wed, January 20, 2010 12:56:13 PM

> > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01

?

> >

> >

> > Serious here to learn something and able to discuss meanngfully .Some body

has to have remdey for the wrong things and to hope for betterment.Before

somebody whistles and points out as a foul, we need to know that remedy lies in

prevention.

> >

> > Vattem Krishnan

> > Cyber Jyotish Services

> > (For all counseling services)

> > Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While Wisemen Can Control Them "

> > Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma

> >

> >

> > --- On Tue, 1/19/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ hotmail.com> wrote:

> >

> > rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ hotmail.com>

> > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01

?

> >

> > Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 9:08 PM

> >

> >

> >

> > JYOtish, not JOY-tish, Tigress!

> >

> > Transpositions of letters can get problematical and mis-leading! We are all

very SERIOUS here! :-(

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@ ...>

wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > That came from an American diplomat from WWII..Don't remember his name off

hand..I am not sure if moderator will allow much of quotes on this group since

this is primarily a joytish remedy forum.

> > >

> > > Lilly

> > >

> > > , " nandini " <kakan_leo@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Where was that from?! Keep those coming in Lilly!

> > > >

> > > > I hope our gracious Moderator allows them to.

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > > Nandini

> > > >

> > > > , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@ >

wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > A quote that should inspire all of us!!

> > > > >

> > > > > It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the

strong man stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done them better.. The

credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by

dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again

and again; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself

in a worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high

achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while DARING

GREATLY so that his place shall never be with those timid souls who know neither

victory or defeat.

> > > > >

> > > > > Lilly

> > > > >

> > > > > , Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > GOPU JI,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish

group, AIA TOO [AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents

to this effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not

take any nes except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till

then overall scene was normal

> > > > > >

> > > > > > any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow

from that point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

> > > > > >

> > > > > > pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for

the mess but surely

> > > > > >

> > > > > > if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini

and a couple more did

> > > > > > all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst.

and the reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in

spite of appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic

limit...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of

that period and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we

don';t need dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r

welcome

> > > > > >

> > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > > K Gopu <kgopu_24@>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 20/01 ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear shri sateesh,

> > > > > > Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

> > > > > > happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

> > > > > > co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

> > > > > > to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then

chek

> > > > > > whether transits are affecting.

> > > > > > so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > k.gopu

> > > > > >

> > > > > > --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 20/01 ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Prashant,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to

Jyotish, and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Back to the subject...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has

(astrologically) been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent

station-time?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or

say time of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection

problems, and so on.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Best - Sateesh.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ========

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > Prashant Kumar G B

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 20/01 ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > SB, S

> > > > > >

> > > > > > yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s

down further and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

> > > > > >

> > > > > > the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish,

LESS Of JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

> > > > > >

> > > > > > with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before

becoming mis-adventorous again

> > > > > >

> > > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 2010

> > > > > >

> > > > > > In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ========

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > Sudhir

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 2010

> > > > > >

> > > > > > And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi

Saturn.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards'

> > > > > > Sudhir

> > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > Sateesh Batas

> > > > > > Jyotish Remedies

> > > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> > > > > > Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like

Internet, etc)...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

[Guest guest]

Mostly aptly referred terms.Needs refreshing as these terms when read as

mentioned (in classics) does not need to continue the thread.

 

 

Vattem Krishnan

Cyber Jyotish Services

(For all counseling services)

Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them "

Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma

 

 

--- On Wed, 1/20/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani wrote:

 

 

rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani

Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

 

Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 10:03 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seegrochcha - Mandochchaa!

 

It is well known -- I wonder why the debate even arises! :-)

 

, Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@. ..>

wrote:

>

> Dada,

> Retrograde planets by dictum are never weak.Mercury, altering the gear to slow

is dictated by the King of Cosmic World.(Sun). It is not that some thing

intentional or unintentional that events occured.let' s rest them and agree that

the role of transit has their own share of 30-40% to reflect..The baggages r our

efforts to accumulate and to make weary in our attempts to project the light

of vedas in proper perspectives. 

>

> Vattem Krishnan

> Cyber Jyotish Services

> (For all counseling services)

> Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them "

> Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma

>  

>

> --- On Wed, 1/20/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ ...> wrote:

>

>

> rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ ...>

> Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01 ?

>

> Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 5:57 PM

>

>

>  

>

>

>

> Dear Prashant_ji and other Member_jees,

>

> Since we are expected to discuss Jyotish and patronizing, sarcastic remarks

tossed out of the corners of the mouths (an expression!) by high, medium and

*low* and the usage of english often taunted at by all and sundry -- while I

realize that western astrology and their followers have turned mercury

retrograde into a big star item and blamed it on miscommunication, computer

breakage, malfunction, mail not being delivered, payments delayed and similar

seemingly conceivable events much of this has been anecdotal! This kind of

one-factor casual astrology is often seen in lighter western astro writing and

astro-conversations (Often appearing in Mountain Astrologer and I have noticed

the tendency in that school of astrology in other eclectic forums). Such as oh

this is so because her neptune is squring her Vesta or Chiron is hiding behind

his pluto!

>

> Where in Jyotish literature, pray tell, has mercury retrograde been associated

with all the drama that was permitted to unfold on Jyotish Remedies? Why was

only J_R affected?

>

> What are these 'baggages' that Prashant jee is referring to?

>

> Mercury is the planet that often retrogrades, if it indeed must be blamed for

everything, somewhat lazily, then why does this not occur more often?

>

> I do not think serious practitioners should really use this kind of planetary

scapegoating, such as blame it on mercury! Particularly in the jyotish domain

which does not relate to such effects of mercury retrograde, sensational though

it may seem to some minds!

>

> Rohiniranjan

>

> , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ...>

wrote:

> >

> > Members

> >

> > as Budha has become direct and in normal motuion I hope the past baggage is

left behind and we move on, as most have thankfully many of the DRY NUMBERS have

dwindled, lets have more substance flowing in whatever we do other than ofcourse

personal duals, left to private domain.

> >

> > G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@ ..>

> >

> > Wed, January 20, 2010 12:56:13 PM

> > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01

?

> >

> >

> > Serious here to learn something and able to discuss meanngfully .Some body

has to have remdey for the wrong things and to hope for betterment.Before

somebody whistles and points out as a foul, we need to know that remedy lies in

prevention.

> >

> > Vattem Krishnan

> > Cyber Jyotish Services

> > (For all counseling services)

> > Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While Wisemen Can Control Them "

> > Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma

> >

> >

> > --- On Tue, 1/19/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ hotmail.com> wrote:

> >

> > rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ hotmail.com>

> > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January 20/01

?

> >

> > Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 9:08 PM

> >

> >

> >

> > JYOtish, not JOY-tish, Tigress!

> >

> > Transpositions of letters can get problematical and mis-leading! We are all

very SERIOUS here! :-(

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@ ....>

wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > That came from an American diplomat from WWII..Don't remember his name off

hand..I am not sure if moderator will allow much of quotes on this group since

this is primarily a joytish remedy forum.

> > >

> > > Lilly

> > >

> > > , " nandini " <kakan_leo@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Where was that from?! Keep those coming in Lilly!

> > > >

> > > > I hope our gracious Moderator allows them to.

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > > Nandini

> > > >

> > > > , " Lilly " <tigresslilly2005@ >

wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > A quote that should inspire all of us!!

> > > > >

> > > > > It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the

strong man stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done them better.. The

credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by

dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again

and again; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself

in a worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high

achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while DARING

GREATLY so that his place shall never be with those timid souls who know neither

victory or defeat.

> > > > >

> > > > > Lilly

> > > > >

> > > > > , Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > GOPU JI,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > WELL THIS HAS happened here manytimes, same scene with Jyotish

group, AIA TOO [AIA when i was a member did observ] and have read many commnents

to this effect. probably the grp and and the fiery elements also have a role esp

transitory ones on them as well.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > u can relate to them on ur own will be good, impartial, will not

take any nes except urs as u had brought in the post fromVA here may be till

then overall scene was normal

> > > > > >

> > > > > > any light u can throw on why VA HAD TAT scene, andhow did it flow

from that point a summery will do no few required max quote msg nos

> > > > > >

> > > > > > pl remember I am not holding u r anyone singulalry responsible for

the mess but surely

> > > > > >

> > > > > > if u look urs sateesh, manoj sharma, RRji, Lilly, nipuna//nandini

and a couple more did

> > > > > > all have a role in it, least i can say is ur post was a catalyst.

and the reactiion was acidic strangely from all the players in the reaction in

spite of appeals, pleas,mwarnings nothing worked till a point of the elastic

limit...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > i can safely coment on this now as all have realised the futility of

that period and fortunately msg numbers have come down to meaningful levels. we

don';t need dry numbers.a few quality wise in astrology,gen welfare, humor r

welcome

> > > > > >

> > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > > K Gopu <kgopu_24@>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Tue, January 19, 2010 11:57:16 AM

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 20/01 ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear shri sateesh,

> > > > > > Retro mercury shud have affected the other astro groups. it has not

> > > > > > happened. Probably transit mercury or any planet has to be

> > > > > > co-related with the natal chart of the group as such. A chart has

> > > > > > to prepared on the date of formation with time and place and then

chek

> > > > > > whether transits are affecting.

> > > > > > so generalised transit theory cannot be applied.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > k.gopu

> > > > > >

> > > > > > --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Sateesh Batas <makara@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 20/01 ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:49 PM

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Prashant,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I too was pleasantly surprised at seeing ALL mails today related to

Jyotish, and not " instant-message type chat " - quality not quantity is the key.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Back to the subject...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks for confirming - and perhaps the volume of mails has

(astrologically) been due to the increase in speed of Mercury, after it's recent

station-time?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Certainly in my experience, the Mercury RX is often a cause of (or

say time of) over-communication / mis-understandings / Internet connection

problems, and so on.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Has anyone else noticed this pattern in their view?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Best - Sateesh.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ========

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > Prashant Kumar G B

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 1:21 PM

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 20/01 ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > SB, S

> > > > > >

> > > > > > yes onviously as RR ji had given its inception time, date.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > fortunately today we have less mails max 70 odd how this comes s

down further and more meaningful ones even if a few r good

> > > > > >

> > > > > > the past few days 2 days 100+ 2 days of 200+ or more of rubbish,

LESS Of JYOTISH FLOODED THE group space sadly

> > > > > >

> > > > > > with one ban sure members will take the issue seriously before

becoming mis-adventorous again

> > > > > >

> > > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS.

> > > > > > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

method=reportRow s & tbl=6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > > Sateesh Batas <makara@>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mon, January 18, 2010 11:25:26 AM

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 2010

> > > > > >

> > > > > > In respect of which chart? The JR birth chart?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ========

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > Sudhir

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 5:16 AM

> > > > > > Re: Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts -

mid-January 2010

> > > > > >

> > > > > > And the difference of opinion and abuse was due to saade sathi

Saturn.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards'

> > > > > > Sudhir

> > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > Sateesh Batas

> > > > > > Jyotish Remedies

> > > > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 10:39 AM

> > > > > > Slow speed of Mercury - JR List posts - mid-January

2010

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mercury changed from RX to FDX over the last few days - during this

" stationing " time, I wonder if the slow apparent speed contributed to the

upsurge in list posting amounts.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Since Mercury is for Communication, amongst other things (like

Internet, etc)...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hope that is Astrological enough a post!

> > > > > >

> > > > > >