Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Dear Members, due to unexpected commitments was not at home till 6.35 pm came back and approved messages no 71709-12 just now, I had for a 11 week period left the group unmoderated except some trouble makers in the past. and all NEW MEMBERS from 28/4/08 to 21/11/09 WERE moderated depending on their 100 day peaceful conduct unmoderated the as well in this one whom i can't remove from unmoderated ones are who had issues with many people not just in this group other groups JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject similarly when some questions the very pillars of the subject we do defend them with the sacredness they deserve. and for anyone countering them have to be patient in proving them otherwise even today morn I had sent a mail before going out that NOTABLE HOROSCOPE TALKS of different famous people and limits its content on each case to the area of their status/fame no where is other issues mentioned like soblings, family additions, deaths, change in financial status it is just brief so can we say they did not know them? the msg also said Gandhi had 13 siblings, 5 childreen etc which are also not covered in the analysis of chart, these r public facts so it is possible to add them for analysis no one writes a book that is fairly specific in nature as the title goes and gives ASTRO BIOGRAPHIES and who are we to judge them to say they did not know so they did not cover it. I approved all msgs that were even abusing me in some level some r beyond th elevel to pass. seniors here have from time to time seen and expressed their views frankly on this even when I faltered without any hesitation they have added value to the forum by also sharing the responsibilities of maintain the subject. there r many messages on the thread of birth time of swami vivekanand here where ppl have differed or aded their bit to it. and like me accept the situation that it can approximate in many celebrities cases. and that his chart is not as important in todays world today as well. i treat messages 71585 amd 71588 the same way there is a role we perform as fairly as possible. best wishes - G B Prashant Kumar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Dear Members, When v share our views on matters relating to jyotish certainly we need to keep in mind it is part of vedas and known as vedanga.there is every need to maintain respect and decorum so as to hold jyotish on highest pedestal.In this context there can never be a 2nd opinion.It is the duty of one and all to respect the subject and there by we also gain respect.Posibly some where there might be difference in views as well as expressions but all such messages will be held in respect if only they carry attaicacy and decorum undoubtedly There by we r respecting://JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject// 2These views as:.//here is a role we perform as fairly as possible.// is most essential and no room for any doubt should be there.Meaningful views and appropriate to the items/thread/heading need no interjection what so ever.probably this is how v also have an occasion to understand and get educated so that the man hours v spent become most positive and give enlightment. Vattem Krishnan Cyber Jyotish Services(For all counseling services)Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them " Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma --- On Sun, 2/14/10, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar wrote: Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar Msg 71709-71712 - approved at 6.40om " jyotish remedies " Sunday, February 14, 2010, 10:12 AM  Dear Members, due to unexpected commitments was not at home till 6.35 pm came back and approved messages no 71709-12 just now, I had for a 11 week period left the group unmoderated except some trouble makers in the past. and all NEW MEMBERS from 28/4/08 to 21/11/09 WERE moderated depending on their 100 day peaceful conduct unmoderated the as well in this one whom i can't remove from unmoderated ones are who had issues with many people not just in this group other groups JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject similarly when some questions the very pillars of the subject we do defend them with the sacredness they deserve. and for anyone countering them have to be patient in proving them otherwise even today morn I had sent a mail before going out that NOTABLE HOROSCOPE TALKS of different famous people and limits its content on each case to the area of their status/fame no where is other issues mentioned like soblings, family additions, deaths, change in financial status it is just brief so can we say they did not know them? the msg also said Gandhi had 13 siblings, 5 childreen etc which are also not covered in the analysis of chart, these r public facts so it is possible to add them for analysis no one writes a book that is fairly specific in nature as the title goes and gives ASTRO BIOGRAPHIES and who are we to judge them to say they did not know so they did not cover it. I approved all msgs that were even abusing me in some level some r beyond th elevel to pass. seniors here have from time to time seen and expressed their views frankly on this even when I faltered without any hesitation they have added value to the forum by also sharing the responsibilities of maintain the subject. there r many messages on the thread of birth time of swami vivekanand here where ppl have differed or aded their bit to it. and like me accept the situation that it can approximate in many celebrities cases. and that his chart is not as important in todays world today as well. i treat messages 71585 amd 71588 the same way there is a role we perform as fairly as possible. best wishes - G B Prashant Kumar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Dear Krishna ji, thanks for the support and understanding the situation, I have only stood by stated, well respected pilliars of astrology and never abused anyone also said it is a task/responsiblity for Lalit todo the needful, this can happen if he stops attacking the elders in the subject. just presenting what he wants tos ay rest public can decide this way it can have opp results. - G B Prashant Kumar Life Member ICAS. /database?method=reportRows & tbl=6 ________________________________ Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99 Sun, February 14, 2010 10:58:22 PM Re: Msg 71709-71712 - approved at 6.40om Dear Members, When v share our views on matters relating to jyotish certainly we need to keep in mind it is part of vedas and known as vedanga.there is every need to maintain respect and decorum so as to hold jyotish on highest pedestal.In this context there can never be a 2nd opinion.It is the duty of one and all to respect the subject and there by we also gain respect.Posibly some where there might be difference in views as well as expressions but all such messages will be held in respect if only they carry attaicacy and decorum undoubtedly There by we r respecting:/ /JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject// 2These views as:.//here is a role we perform as fairly as possible.// is most essential and no room for any doubt should be there.Meaningful views and appropriate to the items/thread/ heading need no interjection what so ever.probably this is how v also have an occasion to understand and get educated so that the man hours v spent become most positive and give enlightment. Vattem Krishnan Cyber Jyotish Services(For all counseling services)Dr. B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While Wisemen Can Control Them " Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma --- On Sun, 2/14/10, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > wrote: Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > Msg 71709-71712 - approved at 6.40om " jyotish remedies " <> Sunday, February 14, 2010, 10:12 AM Dear Members, due to unexpected commitments was not at home till 6.35 pm came back and approved messages no 71709-12 just now, I had for a 11 week period left the group unmoderated except some trouble makers in the past. and all NEW MEMBERS from 28/4/08 to 21/11/09 WERE moderated depending on their 100 day peaceful conduct unmoderated the as well in this one whom i can't remove from unmoderated ones are who had issues with many people not just in this group other groups JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject similarly when some questions the very pillars of the subject we do defend them with the sacredness they deserve. and for anyone countering them have to be patient in proving them otherwise even today morn I had sent a mail before going out that NOTABLE HOROSCOPE TALKS of different famous people and limits its content on each case to the area of their status/fame no where is other issues mentioned like soblings, family additions, deaths, change in financial status it is just brief so can we say they did not know them? the msg also said Gandhi had 13 siblings, 5 childreen etc which are also not covered in the analysis of chart, these r public facts so it is possible to add them for analysis no one writes a book that is fairly specific in nature as the title goes and gives ASTRO BIOGRAPHIES and who are we to judge them to say they did not know so they did not cover it. I approved all msgs that were even abusing me in some level some r beyond th elevel to pass. seniors here have from time to time seen and expressed their views frankly on this even when I faltered without any hesitation they have added value to the forum by also sharing the responsibilities of maintain the subject. there r many messages on the thread of birth time of swami vivekanand here where ppl have differed or aded their bit to it. and like me accept the situation that it can approximate in many celebrities cases. and that his chart is not as important in todays world today as well. i treat messages 71585 amd 71588 the same way there is a role we perform as fairly as possible. best wishes - G B Prashant Kumar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Dear Mr Krishnan, Are you supporting demeanure of GB Prashant kumar that he has shown during we were discussing Swami Vivekananda's horoscope. In a debate/dispute between two people who he is to pass comments on behalf of other person with an intention to lower other's status. He is no advocate of BV Raman also ... members know how to resepect his work. If GB Prashant has capability, he could have participated in discussions but he was playing his game like a shrewd politician, it's condemned, pls clear your stand on his demeanure. regards, Utkal , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99 wrote: > > Dear Members, > When v share our views on matters relating to jyotish certainly we need to keep in mind it is part of vedas and known as vedanga.there is every need to maintain respect and decorum so as to hold jyotish on highest pedestal.In this context there can never be a 2nd opinion.It is the duty of one and all to respect the subject and there by we also gain respect.Posibly some where there might be difference in views as well as expressions but all such messages will be held in respect if only they carry attaicacy and decorum undoubtedly There by we r respecting://JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject// > 2These views as:.//here is a role we perform as fairly as possible.// is most essential and no room for any doubt should be there.Meaningful views and appropriate to the items/thread/heading need no interjection what so ever.probably this is how v also have an occasion to understand and get educated so that the man hours v spent become most positive and give enlightment. > > > > Vattem Krishnan Cyber Jyotish Services(For all counseling services)Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them " Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma > > --- On Sun, 2/14/10, Prashant Kumar G B gbp_kumar wrote: > > Prashant Kumar G B gbp_kumar > Msg 71709-71712 - approved at 6.40om > " jyotish remedies " > Sunday, February 14, 2010, 10:12 AM >  > > > Dear Members, > > > > due to unexpected commitments was not at home till 6.35 pm came back and approved messages no 71709-12 just now, > > > > I had for a 11 week period left the group unmoderated except some trouble makers in the past. > > and all NEW MEMBERS from 28/4/08 to 21/11/09 WERE moderated depending on their 100 day peaceful conduct unmoderated the as well > > > > in this one whom i can't remove from unmoderated ones are who had issues with many people not just in this group other groups > > > > JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject > > > > similarly when some questions the very pillars of the subject we do defend them with the sacredness they deserve. and for anyone countering them have to be patient in proving them otherwise > > > > even today morn I had sent a mail before going out that NOTABLE HOROSCOPE TALKS of different famous people and limits its content on each case to the area of their status/fame no where is other issues mentioned like soblings, family additions, deaths, change in financial status it is just brief so can we say they did not know them? > > > > the msg also said Gandhi had 13 siblings, 5 childreen etc which are also not covered in the analysis of chart, these r public facts so it is possible to add them for analysis no one writes a book that is fairly specific in nature as the title goes and gives ASTRO BIOGRAPHIES > > and who are we to judge them to say they did not know so they did not cover it. > > > > I approved all msgs that were even abusing me in some level some r beyond th elevel to pass. seniors here have from time to time seen and expressed their views frankly on this even when I faltered without any hesitation they have added value to the forum by also sharing the responsibilities of maintain the subject. > > > > there r many messages on the thread of birth time of swami vivekanand here where ppl have differed or aded their bit to it. and like me accept the situation that it can approximate in many celebrities cases. > > > > and that his chart is not as important in todays world today as well. > > > > i treat messages > > > > 71585 amd 71588 the same way there is a role we perform as fairly as possible. > > > > best wishes > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Forum is currently experiencing vakri neech mangal in the 8th house and influencing the 2nd and 3rd houses of communication :-) Perhaps we should all do some mauna japam till May or perhaps give mungaa in Daana ;-) RR_, , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99 wrote: > > Dear Members, > When v share our views on matters relating to jyotish certainly we need to keep in mind it is part of vedas and known as vedanga.there is every need to maintain respect and decorum so as to hold jyotish on highest pedestal.In this context there can never be a 2nd opinion.It is the duty of one and all to respect the subject and there by we also gain respect.Posibly some where there might be difference in views as well as expressions but all such messages will be held in respect if only they carry attaicacy and decorum undoubtedly There by we r respecting://JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject// > 2These views as:.//here is a role we perform as fairly as possible.// is most essential and no room for any doubt should be there.Meaningful views and appropriate to the items/thread/heading need no interjection what so ever.probably this is how v also have an occasion to understand and get educated so that the man hours v spent become most positive and give enlightment. > > > > Vattem Krishnan Cyber Jyotish Services(For all counseling services)Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them " Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma > > --- On Sun, 2/14/10, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar wrote: > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > Msg 71709-71712 - approved at 6.40om > " jyotish remedies " > Sunday, February 14, 2010, 10:12 AM >  > > > Dear Members, > > > > due to unexpected commitments was not at home till 6.35 pm came back and approved messages no 71709-12 just now, > > > > I had for a 11 week period left the group unmoderated except some trouble makers in the past. > > and all NEW MEMBERS from 28/4/08 to 21/11/09 WERE moderated depending on their 100 day peaceful conduct unmoderated the as well > > > > in this one whom i can't remove from unmoderated ones are who had issues with many people not just in this group other groups > > > > JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject > > > > similarly when some questions the very pillars of the subject we do defend them with the sacredness they deserve. and for anyone countering them have to be patient in proving them otherwise > > > > even today morn I had sent a mail before going out that NOTABLE HOROSCOPE TALKS of different famous people and limits its content on each case to the area of their status/fame no where is other issues mentioned like soblings, family additions, deaths, change in financial status it is just brief so can we say they did not know them? > > > > the msg also said Gandhi had 13 siblings, 5 childreen etc which are also not covered in the analysis of chart, these r public facts so it is possible to add them for analysis no one writes a book that is fairly specific in nature as the title goes and gives ASTRO BIOGRAPHIES > > and who are we to judge them to say they did not know so they did not cover it. > > > > I approved all msgs that were even abusing me in some level some r beyond th elevel to pass. seniors here have from time to time seen and expressed their views frankly on this even when I faltered without any hesitation they have added value to the forum by also sharing the responsibilities of maintain the subject. > > > > there r many messages on the thread of birth time of swami vivekanand here where ppl have differed or aded their bit to it. and like me accept the situation that it can approximate in many celebrities cases. > > > > and that his chart is not as important in todays world today as well. > > > > i treat messages > > > > 71585 amd 71588 the same way there is a role we perform as fairly as possible. > > > > best wishes > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Daan Lene ke liye koi pandit ji chahiye.maunjap ka permission bhi moderator se maangana hai kya? Vattem Krishnan Cyber Jyotish Services(For all counseling services)Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them " Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma --- On Sun, 2/14/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani wrote: rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani Re: Msg 71709-71712 - approved at 6.40om Sunday, February 14, 2010, 3:26 PM  Forum is currently experiencing vakri neech mangal in the 8th house and influencing the 2nd and 3rd houses of communication :-) Perhaps we should all do some mauna japam till May or perhaps give mungaa in Daana ;-) RR_, , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@. ..> wrote: > > Dear Members, > When v share our views on matters relating to jyotish certainly we need to keep in mind it is part of vedas and known as vedanga.there is every need to maintain respect and decorum so as to hold jyotish on highest pedestal.In this context there can never be a 2nd opinion.It is the duty of one and all to respect the subject and there by we also gain respect.Posibly some where there might be difference in views as well as expressions but all such messages will be held in respect if only they carry attaicacy and decorum undoubtedly There by we r respecting:/ /JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject// > 2These views as:.//here is a role we perform as fairly as possible.// is most essential and no room for any doubt should be there.Meaningful views and appropriate to the items/thread/ heading need no interjection what so ever.probably this is how v also have an occasion to understand and get educated so that the man hours v spent become most positive and give enlightment. > > > > Vattem Krishnan Cyber Jyotish Services(For all counseling services)Dr. B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them " Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma > > --- On Sun, 2/14/10, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..> wrote: > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..> > Msg 71709-71712 - approved at 6.40om > " jyotish remedies " <> > Sunday, February 14, 2010, 10:12 AM > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > Dear Members, > > > > due to unexpected commitments was not at home till 6.35 pm came back and approved messages no 71709-12 just now, > > > > I had for a 11 week period left the group unmoderated except some trouble makers in the past. > > and all NEW MEMBERS from 28/4/08 to 21/11/09 WERE moderated depending on their 100 day peaceful conduct unmoderated the as well > > > > in this one whom i can't remove from unmoderated ones are who had issues with many people not just in this group other groups > > > > JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject > > > > similarly when some questions the very pillars of the subject we do defend them with the sacredness they deserve. and for anyone countering them have to be patient in proving them otherwise > > > > even today morn I had sent a mail before going out that NOTABLE HOROSCOPE TALKS of different famous people and limits its content on each case to the area of their status/fame no where is other issues mentioned like soblings, family additions, deaths, change in financial status it is just brief so can we say they did not know them? > > > > the msg also said Gandhi had 13 siblings, 5 childreen etc which are also not covered in the analysis of chart, these r public facts so it is possible to add them for analysis no one writes a book that is fairly specific in nature as the title goes and gives ASTRO BIOGRAPHIES > > and who are we to judge them to say they did not know so they did not cover it. > > > > I approved all msgs that were even abusing me in some level some r beyond th elevel to pass. seniors here have from time to time seen and expressed their views frankly on this even when I faltered without any hesitation they have added value to the forum by also sharing the responsibilities of maintain the subject. > > > > there r many messages on the thread of birth time of swami vivekanand here where ppl have differed or aded their bit to it. and like me accept the situation that it can approximate in many celebrities cases. > > > > and that his chart is not as important in todays world today as well. > > > > i treat messages > > > > 71585 amd 71588 the same way there is a role we perform as fairly as possible. > > > > best wishes > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 By 'mungaa/coral-daana', I meant sacrificing aggression between us all, Dada :-) Sacrifice is when we give up something that comes naturally, or that we like or which gives us enjoyment etc. It is a very simple remedial procedure that I came upon. It does not cost at all, but is rather difficult to carry out. But when done, it demands self-0bservation and self-discipline. The basic principle is essentially what invokes Saturn Blessings as we learned in the rather touching and difficult journey of Raja Harishchandra in Shani Mahaatmay(a). .... Rohiniranjan , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99 wrote: > > Daan Lene ke liye koi pandit ji chahiye.maunjap ka permission bhi moderator se maangana hai kya? > > Vattem Krishnan Cyber Jyotish Services(For all counseling services)Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them " Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma > > --- On Sun, 2/14/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani wrote: > > rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani > Re: Msg 71709-71712 - approved at 6.40om > > Sunday, February 14, 2010, 3:26 PM >  > > > Forum is currently experiencing vakri neech mangal in the 8th house and influencing the 2nd and 3rd houses of communication :-) > > > > Perhaps we should all do some mauna japam till May or perhaps give mungaa in Daana ;-) > > > > RR_, > > > > , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@ ..> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Members, > > > When v share our views on matters relating to jyotish certainly we need to keep in mind it is part of vedas and known as vedanga.there is every need to maintain respect and decorum so as to hold jyotish on highest pedestal.In this context there can never be a 2nd opinion.It is the duty of one and all to respect the subject and there by we also gain respect.Posibly some where there might be difference in views as well as expressions but all such messages will be held in respect if only they carry attaicacy and decorum undoubtedly There by we r respecting:/ /JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject// > > > 2These views as:.//here is a role we perform as fairly as possible.// is most essential and no room for any doubt should be there.Meaningful views and appropriate to the items/thread/ heading need no interjection what so ever.probably this is how v also have an occasion to understand and get educated so that the man hours v spent become most positive and give enlightment. > > > > > > > > > > > > Vattem Krishnan Cyber Jyotish Services(For all counseling services)Dr. B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them " Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma > > > > > > --- On Sun, 2/14/10, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote: > > > > > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ..> > > > Msg 71709-71712 - approved at 6.40om > > > " jyotish remedies " <> > > > Sunday, February 14, 2010, 10:12 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > due to unexpected commitments was not at home till 6.35 pm came back and approved messages no 71709-12 just now, > > > > > > > > > > > > I had for a 11 week period left the group unmoderated except some trouble makers in the past. > > > > > > and all NEW MEMBERS from 28/4/08 to 21/11/09 WERE moderated depending on their 100 day peaceful conduct unmoderated the as well > > > > > > > > > > > > in this one whom i can't remove from unmoderated ones are who had issues with many people not just in this group other groups > > > > > > > > > > > > JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject > > > > > > > > > > > > similarly when some questions the very pillars of the subject we do defend them with the sacredness they deserve. and for anyone countering them have to be patient in proving them otherwise > > > > > > > > > > > > even today morn I had sent a mail before going out that NOTABLE HOROSCOPE TALKS of different famous people and limits its content on each case to the area of their status/fame no where is other issues mentioned like soblings, family additions, deaths, change in financial status it is just brief so can we say they did not know them? > > > > > > > > > > > > the msg also said Gandhi had 13 siblings, 5 childreen etc which are also not covered in the analysis of chart, these r public facts so it is possible to add them for analysis no one writes a book that is fairly specific in nature as the title goes and gives ASTRO BIOGRAPHIES > > > > > > and who are we to judge them to say they did not know so they did not cover it. > > > > > > > > > > > > I approved all msgs that were even abusing me in some level some r beyond th elevel to pass. seniors here have from time to time seen and expressed their views frankly on this even when I faltered without any hesitation they have added value to the forum by also sharing the responsibilities of maintain the subject. > > > > > > > > > > > > there r many messages on the thread of birth time of swami vivekanand here where ppl have differed or aded their bit to it. and like me accept the situation that it can approximate in many celebrities cases. > > > > > > > > > > > > and that his chart is not as important in todays world today as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > i treat messages > > > > > > > > > > > > 71585 amd 71588 the same way there is a role we perform as fairly as possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Certainly these remedies have effect and only need practice and adoptation.Raja Dasaradha mentioned way of appeasing Shani Maharaj when followed it makes lives better progressively.THe evil lies in our attachments and Vday clebs Vattem Krishnan Cyber Jyotish Services(For all counseling services)Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them " Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma --- On Sun, 2/14/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani wrote: rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani Re: Msg 71709-71712 - approved at 6.40om Sunday, February 14, 2010, 9:21 PM  By 'mungaa/coral- daana', I meant sacrificing aggression between us all, Dada :-) Sacrifice is when we give up something that comes naturally, or that we like or which gives us enjoyment etc. It is a very simple remedial procedure that I came upon. It does not cost at all, but is rather difficult to carry out. But when done, it demands self-0bservation and self-discipline. The basic principle is essentially what invokes Saturn Blessings as we learned in the rather touching and difficult journey of Raja Harishchandra in Shani Mahaatmay(a) . .... Rohiniranjan , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@. ..> wrote: > > Daan Lene ke liye koi pandit ji chahiye.maunjap ka permission bhi moderator se maangana hai kya? > > Vattem Krishnan Cyber Jyotish Services(For all counseling services)Dr. B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them " Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma > > --- On Sun, 2/14/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ ...> wrote: > > rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ ...> > Re: Msg 71709-71712 - approved at 6.40om > > Sunday, February 14, 2010, 3:26 PM > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > Forum is currently experiencing vakri neech mangal in the 8th house and influencing the 2nd and 3rd houses of communication :-) > > > > Perhaps we should all do some mauna japam till May or perhaps give mungaa in Daana ;-) > > > > RR_, > > > > , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@ ..> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Members, > > > When v share our views on matters relating to jyotish certainly we need to keep in mind it is part of vedas and known as vedanga.there is every need to maintain respect and decorum so as to hold jyotish on highest pedestal.In this context there can never be a 2nd opinion.It is the duty of one and all to respect the subject and there by we also gain respect.Posibly some where there might be difference in views as well as expressions but all such messages will be held in respect if only they carry attaicacy and decorum undoubtedly There by we r respecting:/ /JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject// > > > 2These views as:.//here is a role we perform as fairly as possible.// is most essential and no room for any doubt should be there.Meaningful views and appropriate to the items/thread/ heading need no interjection what so ever.probably this is how v also have an occasion to understand and get educated so that the man hours v spent become most positive and give enlightment. > > > > > > > > > > > > Vattem Krishnan Cyber Jyotish Services(For all counseling services)Dr. B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them " Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma > > > > > > --- On Sun, 2/14/10, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote: > > > > > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ..> > > > Msg 71709-71712 - approved at 6.40om > > > " jyotish remedies " <> > > > Sunday, February 14, 2010, 10:12 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > due to unexpected commitments was not at home till 6.35 pm came back and approved messages no 71709-12 just now, > > > > > > > > > > > > I had for a 11 week period left the group unmoderated except some trouble makers in the past. > > > > > > and all NEW MEMBERS from 28/4/08 to 21/11/09 WERE moderated depending on their 100 day peaceful conduct unmoderated the as well > > > > > > > > > > > > in this one whom i can't remove from unmoderated ones are who had issues with many people not just in this group other groups > > > > > > > > > > > > JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject > > > > > > > > > > > > similarly when some questions the very pillars of the subject we do defend them with the sacredness they deserve. and for anyone countering them have to be patient in proving them otherwise > > > > > > > > > > > > even today morn I had sent a mail before going out that NOTABLE HOROSCOPE TALKS of different famous people and limits its content on each case to the area of their status/fame no where is other issues mentioned like soblings, family additions, deaths, change in financial status it is just brief so can we say they did not know them? > > > > > > > > > > > > the msg also said Gandhi had 13 siblings, 5 childreen etc which are also not covered in the analysis of chart, these r public facts so it is possible to add them for analysis no one writes a book that is fairly specific in nature as the title goes and gives ASTRO BIOGRAPHIES > > > > > > and who are we to judge them to say they did not know so they did not cover it. > > > > > > > > > > > > I approved all msgs that were even abusing me in some level some r beyond th elevel to pass. seniors here have from time to time seen and expressed their views frankly on this even when I faltered without any hesitation they have added value to the forum by also sharing the responsibilities of maintain the subject. > > > > > > > > > > > > there r many messages on the thread of birth time of swami vivekanand here where ppl have differed or aded their bit to it. and like me accept the situation that it can approximate in many celebrities cases. > > > > > > > > > > > > and that his chart is not as important in todays world today as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > i treat messages > > > > > > > > > > > > 71585 amd 71588 the same way there is a role we perform as fairly as possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 Dear Sir, Here the interest we evince is towards facts and figures and we do not consider names as the knowledge and authenticity indicatesbasically intention of our participation is to know and learn by different leans.This is the value addition which every member looks forward. If in the course of their approaches they involve their personalities,we do not want the issue to be prolonged with out significant facts and appreciation. Vattem Krishnan Cyber Jyotish Services(For all counseling services)Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them " Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma --- On Sun, 2/14/10, utkal.panigrahi <utkal.panigrahi wrote: utkal.panigrahi <utkal.panigrahi Re: Msg 71709-71712 - approved at 6.40om Sunday, February 14, 2010, 2:45 PM  Dear Mr Krishnan, Are you supporting demeanure of GB Prashant kumar that he has shown during we were discussing Swami Vivekananda' s horoscope. In a debate/dispute between two people who he is to pass comments on behalf of other person with an intention to lower other's status. He is no advocate of BV Raman also ... members know how to resepect his work. If GB Prashant has capability, he could have participated in discussions but he was playing his game like a shrewd politician, it's condemned, pls clear your stand on his demeanure. regards, Utkal , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@. ..> wrote: > > Dear Members, > When v share our views on matters relating to jyotish certainly we need to keep in mind it is part of vedas and known as vedanga.there is every need to maintain respect and decorum so as to hold jyotish on highest pedestal.In this context there can never be a 2nd opinion.It is the duty of one and all to respect the subject and there by we also gain respect.Posibly some where there might be difference in views as well as expressions but all such messages will be held in respect if only they carry attaicacy and decorum undoubtedly There by we r respecting:/ /JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject// > 2These views as:.//here is a role we perform as fairly as possible.// is most essential and no room for any doubt should be there.Meaningful views and appropriate to the items/thread/ heading need no interjection what so ever.probably this is how v also have an occasion to understand and get educated so that the man hours v spent become most positive and give enlightment. > > > > Vattem Krishnan Cyber Jyotish Services(For all counseling services)Dr. B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them " Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma > > --- On Sun, 2/14/10, Prashant Kumar G B gbp_kumar@.. . wrote: > > Prashant Kumar G B gbp_kumar@.. . > Msg 71709-71712 - approved at 6.40om > " jyotish remedies " > Sunday, February 14, 2010, 10:12 AM > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > Dear Members, > > > > due to unexpected commitments was not at home till 6.35 pm came back and approved messages no 71709-12 just now, > > > > I had for a 11 week period left the group unmoderated except some trouble makers in the past. > > and all NEW MEMBERS from 28/4/08 to 21/11/09 WERE moderated depending on their 100 day peaceful conduct unmoderated the as well > > > > in this one whom i can't remove from unmoderated ones are who had issues with many people not just in this group other groups > > > > JYOTISH IS SACRED NO individual is higher than the subject > > > > similarly when some questions the very pillars of the subject we do defend them with the sacredness they deserve. and for anyone countering them have to be patient in proving them otherwise > > > > even today morn I had sent a mail before going out that NOTABLE HOROSCOPE TALKS of different famous people and limits its content on each case to the area of their status/fame no where is other issues mentioned like soblings, family additions, deaths, change in financial status it is just brief so can we say they did not know them? > > > > the msg also said Gandhi had 13 siblings, 5 childreen etc which are also not covered in the analysis of chart, these r public facts so it is possible to add them for analysis no one writes a book that is fairly specific in nature as the title goes and gives ASTRO BIOGRAPHIES > > and who are we to judge them to say they did not know so they did not cover it. > > > > I approved all msgs that were even abusing me in some level some r beyond th elevel to pass. seniors here have from time to time seen and expressed their views frankly on this even when I faltered without any hesitation they have added value to the forum by also sharing the responsibilities of maintain the subject. > > > > there r many messages on the thread of birth time of swami vivekanand here where ppl have differed or aded their bit to it. and like me accept the situation that it can approximate in many celebrities cases. > > > > and that his chart is not as important in todays world today as well. > > > > i treat messages > > > > 71585 amd 71588 the same way there is a role we perform as fairly as possible. > > > > best wishes > > > > - G B Prashant Kumar > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.