Guest guest Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Dear friends, Jyotish is science or not, this type of anxious feelings,although to a far lesser extent, are also felt by Homeopaths.But many resolve it by saying that Homeopathy is 50% Science and 50% Art.[This perhaps make them happy being safely in two boats]. Similia Similibus Curenturn--Let likes be cured by likes -is a solid scienfic principle alongwith many rules regarding potency, consitutional types etc.Huge amount of scientific provings of each medicines recorded is a real research work that has been done or still in progerss. Still the Homeopath has to understand the patient-her/his psycology,philosphy, traits, charaterstics, anxieties,likings-dislikings,childhood, repressed fears etc etc, and you require a real 'Artist' to work out the real costitution of the patient and watch her/his personality how medicine is working/curing. Then 101 poems written by Sylvia Chatroux on each medicine-- " Oh Camphora, freezing cold ,the utter chill of you,I have seen you throw the cover off, you feel an icy blue........ " And you know Homeopathy is treated as humbug science and trashed by Scietific world and Rationals etc.But Homeopaths are not much much worried. I think Astrologers should also grow similar attitude.Why worry to prove your point to non-believer of astrology-that astrology is a Science. Why anxious about this. Inder , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99 wrote: > > Dear members, > Probably it is all out of specific manner of comprehension and the way try to take it up broadly..Science or Art meant for people,of people and by the people. to derive some benifit.But then if we just think in a moulded or systematic manner it ends up with discontentment.If we consider in a broad manner the scope becomes as it will be enoromous for one to think and work on various issues. > > Vattem Krishnan Cyber Jyotish Services(For all counseling services)Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While  Wisemen Can Control Them " Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma > > --- On Thu, 3/25/10, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani wrote: > > rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani > I DISAGREE -- Re: NOTE... 9/02 > > Thursday, March 25, 2010, 5:36 PM >  > > > Chandrashekhar jee, > > > > It really bothers me that some jyotishis (for many decades) have spend too much time and breath on trying to justify that Jyotish is a science as if that is some Badge of Honour that Jyotish must receive before the boy-jyotish turns into a man-jyotish (rites of passage!) or something like that! > > > > Fact of the matter is that pure science and even some recent sciences have only been able to scale and study the physical reality, the world of matter and particles and some waves. Psychology perhaps has taken a longer leap but as I see it, it is still in mid-air and has not landed fully! And, many pure scientists still do not consider it as full science. The part of psychology (neuropsychology) that is based on organic/chemical objective biological evidence has probably a bit more credibility in Science circles than the earlier subjective, analytic psychoanalytic type psychology! > > > > Astrology is on a different plane altogether and sure it uses techniques, uses rules and strategies, but so does art! There are rules in art, there are materials (paints, brushes) needed but those do not turn Art into a Science! Shastra to me indicates something procedural, something where there is a protocol and structure but there is a lot of interpretation (involvement of the human mind, soul, thinking!) involved. Astrology from that perspective is a shaastra and of course a formidable Shastr(a) too in wrong hands :-) > > > > Regards, > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > , " Chandrashekhar " <sharma.chandrashek har@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Rohini Ranjan, > > > > > > In a way I agree with you. Jyotish is a shastra which is based on certain philosophy and is therefore more than a science. I still do not understand why shastra is translated as science. We had 36 shastras and 64 kalas and they do not match what is called science or arts/humanities in the western world. An example is Natya shastra is not categorized as science by the west. > > > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > - > > > rohinicrystal > > > > > > Thursday, March 25, 2010 4:32 AM > > > I DISAGREE -- Re: NOTE... 9/02 > > > > > > > > > > > > Dada, > > > > > > Why do you assume as an axiom that Jyotish is a Science! (Your point #2)! > > > > > > Why this infatuation of Jyotishis (full-timers and part-timers) with this WOOLMARK of global acceptance -- seemingly! This gold-medal known as Science? > > > > > > Would the utility of Jyotish have diminished one bit if it were say, an art? Or craft?? Like Ashtamangalaa for instance? > > > > > > Why must we try to fit something that COVERS and CONTAINS the entire human experience as a DESCRIPTOR into the small box known as SCIENCE? > > > > > > RR_, > > > > > > , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Shri Kulbir Ji and members, > > > > 1.Exam system,cheating by Gurus and students and purchase of degrees maladies that can not be blunted are actually different issues. That kind of corruption or cheating(what evr is appropriate) is a different issues which we should leave to the conscious of those who acquired and their later competencies and success in life. > > > > 2.Jyotish like any other science is also potential subject for people interested in taking up research.How far it can be viable.Some reputed universities get funding for research on jyotish.Even services of jyotish have been used for training potential people for choosing team for in the last olympics.A very senior person having high reputation in Astrology but belonging to judicial services has studied skills vis-a-vis their fortune to get medals in olympics. > > > > 3.In the forum some memebers find very drab and frustating to take up same topics with different names.Instead they feel quizzing becomes more interesting than day in and day out attend the queries (being made and answered become stereo types) Even we have seen members at the age of 16 yrs too v have been getting worried about future and pose questions out of curiosity. > > > > Also after 4th dat of the birth people ask whether my son has potential to become Astrologer etc/.Evidently there is lot of curiosity is seen and observed in the activities of the forum. > > > > A girl in 20s asks what type of husband I will get AND WILL HAVE happy married life? > > > > 4.All these questions might be sound but b4 commencing the life they want to have the curiosity fulfilled.This is what shri Tanveer ji has been mentioning about. > > > > 5.Research funding is an issue and whther this can be constituted through the introduction of professional approach by fee and invest more time in furthering the jyotish studies. > > > > 6.I agree with you in the perils of getting degrees by way of mass copying etc.The remedy for this lies beyond our scope in the forum as what ever we sum up and conslude here is of no value for the administrators of exam system. > > > > Of course,this has been realised and the root cause of corruption needs to be tackled by changing various things including present politiacal vinatage.Iam sure shri Baba Ramdev Ji has expressed openly to reform society and bring freshness and ideals. > > > > 7.In the forum however collective wisdom can contribute to the growth and development of jyotish and come out with models that can answer successfully possibilities of good monsoon or otherwise and find people to take leadership and identify etc would serve as a better cause than to get involved in routine and curious queries. > > > > 8.we have learned members but getting bogged down with routine issues instead they might look for space to promote and unravel jyotish research > > > > Vattem Krishnan > > > > Cyber Jyotish Services > > > > (For all counseling services) > > > > Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While Wisemen Can Control Them " > > > > Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Dear Rohini Ranjan, I agree that Jyotish is a powerful shastra that sometimes goes to wrong hands. Take care, Chandrashekhar. - rohinicrystal Friday, March 26, 2010 3:06 AM I DISAGREE -- Re: NOTE... 9/02 Chandrashekhar jee, It really bothers me that some jyotishis (for many decades) have spend too much time and breath on trying to justify that Jyotish is a science as if that is some Badge of Honour that Jyotish must receive before the boy-jyotish turns into a man-jyotish (rites of passage!) or something like that! Fact of the matter is that pure science and even some recent sciences have only been able to scale and study the physical reality, the world of matter and particles and some waves. Psychology perhaps has taken a longer leap but as I see it, it is still in mid-air and has not landed fully! And, many pure scientists still do not consider it as full science. The part of psychology (neuropsychology) that is based on organic/chemical objective biological evidence has probably a bit more credibility in Science circles than the earlier subjective, analytic psychoanalytic type psychology! Astrology is on a different plane altogether and sure it uses techniques, uses rules and strategies, but so does art! There are rules in art, there are materials (paints, brushes) needed but those do not turn Art into a Science! Shastra to me indicates something procedural, something where there is a protocol and structure but there is a lot of interpretation (involvement of the human mind, soul, thinking!) involved. Astrology from that perspective is a shaastra and of course a formidable Shastr(a) too in wrong hands :-) Regards, Rohiniranjan , " Chandrashekhar " <sharma.chandrashekhar wrote: > > Dear Rohini Ranjan, > > In a way I agree with you. Jyotish is a shastra which is based on certain philosophy and is therefore more than a science. I still do not understand why shastra is translated as science. We had 36 shastras and 64 kalas and they do not match what is called science or arts/humanities in the western world. An example is Natya shastra is not categorized as science by the west. > > Chandrashekhar. > - > rohinicrystal > > Thursday, March 25, 2010 4:32 AM > I DISAGREE -- Re: NOTE... 9/02 > > > > Dada, > > Why do you assume as an axiom that Jyotish is a Science! (Your point #2)! > > Why this infatuation of Jyotishis (full-timers and part-timers) with this WOOLMARK of global acceptance -- seemingly! This gold-medal known as Science? > > Would the utility of Jyotish have diminished one bit if it were say, an art? Or craft?? Like Ashtamangalaa for instance? > > Why must we try to fit something that COVERS and CONTAINS the entire human experience as a DESCRIPTOR into the small box known as SCIENCE? > > RR_, > > , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > Dear Shri Kulbir Ji and members, > > 1.Exam system,cheating by Gurus and students and purchase of degrees maladies that can not be blunted are actually different issues. That kind of corruption or cheating(what evr is appropriate) is a different issues which we should leave to the conscious of those who acquired and their later competencies and success in life. > > 2.Jyotish like any other science is also potential subject for people interested in taking up research.How far it can be viable.Some reputed universities get funding for research on jyotish.Even services of jyotish have been used for training potential people for choosing team for in the last olympics.A very senior person having high reputation in Astrology but belonging to judicial services has studied skills vis-a-vis their fortune to get medals in olympics. > > 3.In the forum some memebers find very drab and frustating to take up same topics with different names.Instead they feel quizzing becomes more interesting than day in and day out attend the queries (being made and answered become stereo types) Even we have seen members at the age of 16 yrs too v have been getting worried about future and pose questions out of curiosity. > > Also after 4th dat of the birth people ask whether my son has potential to become Astrologer etc/.Evidently there is lot of curiosity is seen and observed in the activities of the forum. > > A girl in 20s asks what type of husband I will get AND WILL HAVE happy married life? > > 4.All these questions might be sound but b4 commencing the life they want to have the curiosity fulfilled.This is what shri Tanveer ji has been mentioning about. > > 5.Research funding is an issue and whther this can be constituted through the introduction of professional approach by fee and invest more time in furthering the jyotish studies. > > 6.I agree with you in the perils of getting degrees by way of mass copying etc.The remedy for this lies beyond our scope in the forum as what ever we sum up and conslude here is of no value for the administrators of exam system. > > Of course,this has been realised and the root cause of corruption needs to be tackled by changing various things including present politiacal vinatage.Iam sure shri Baba Ramdev Ji has expressed openly to reform society and bring freshness and ideals. > > 7.In the forum however collective wisdom can contribute to the growth and development of jyotish and come out with models that can answer successfully possibilities of good monsoon or otherwise and find people to take leadership and identify etc would serve as a better cause than to get involved in routine and curious queries. > > 8.we have learned members but getting bogged down with routine issues instead they might look for space to promote and unravel jyotish research > > Vattem Krishnan > > Cyber Jyotish Services > > (For all counseling services) > > Dr.B.V.Raman " Fools Obey Planets While Wisemen Can Control Them " > > Planets are neutral Controllers of Mans Karma > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.