How to analyse charts of this type /Nmero.../Verse from Bhavarthha..

[Guest guest]

I knew we might run into concordance prob, given that the copy now

with me is from Ranjan Publications.

 

Well, the (first) verse (under Bhagya Yoga)goes:

 

Yad-bhavakaarako lagnad-byaye thisthhathi chedyadi

Thasya bhabasya sarvasya bhagyayoga udeerithah.

 

The 7th from this verse is:

 

Pitrukaaraka bhaanoscha bhaagyabhaabeswaropi baa

Ubhau tau byayago-syaathaam pitrubhaagyamudeeritham.

 

 

Now, Vernalagnia (why this iffy nettonym?), the operative word is

12th from lagna. It is bhaavakaaraka as different from bhaava lord.

 

Look at the other verse. It says kaaraka Bhanu and

bhaagyabhaaveswara (9th lord) together in the 12th give rise to

pitrubhagya.

 

So much for 12th as Ripha! Take heed and argufy as fervidly as you

can.

 

RK

 

 

 

, " vernalagnia "

<vernalagnia wrote:

>

> , " arkaydash "

> <arkaydash@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Here you are. Ch 8, Vrs 6 (also secondarily Vrs 13). Let's

delve.

> I'll

> > cite tomorrow if there is warrant. Too tied-up today.

>

>

> Thanks RK.

>

> Verse 6: If the lords of the lagna, 9th and 4th are in the 10th,

lagna

> or 7th in association with the 10th lord, during the dasas and

bhuktis

> of such lords, the native will become very fortunate

>

> Verse 13 doesn't connect at all, though. Am I missing something?

>

> +++

>

[Guest guest]

, " arkaydash "

<arkaydash wrote:

>

>

> I knew we might run into concordance prob, given that the copy now

> with me is from Ranjan Publications.

 

 

I only have an English translation by BV Raman.

 

 

> Well, the (first) verse (under Bhagya Yoga)goes:

>

> Yad-bhavakaarako lagnad-byaye thisthhathi chedyadi

> Thasya bhabasya sarvasya bhagyayoga udeerithah.

>

> The 7th from this verse is:

>

> Pitrukaaraka bhaanoscha bhaagyabhaabeswaropi baa

> Ubhau tau byayago-syaathaam pitrubhaagyamudeeritham.

 

 

Not much use at all because I'm Sanskrit-illiterate

 

 

> Now, Vernalagnia (why this iffy nettonym?)

 

Titled after an affliction I can't rid myself of

 

 

> the operative word is 12th from lagna. It is bhaavakaaraka as

> different from bhaava lord.

 

> Look at the other verse. It says kaaraka Bhanu and

> bhaagyabhaaveswara (9th lord) together in the 12th give rise to

> pitrubhagya.

>

> So much for 12th as Ripha! Take heed and argufy as fervidly as you

> can.

 

 

Argument can only be when one knows something I just seek all the

time (:

 

Thanks a lot.

 

+++

[Guest guest]

Dear RK ji,

The problem is that now I know something about this horoscope.

Conveyed by Verna ji himself. So stay away from the discussion, but

provides a pointer. I think Vernaji won't be angry, when it can

help in our understanding of astrology.

* It was said earlier that the chart should be read from Mo.

* 8th lord from Mo is debilitated and combusted. It is also the 7th

lord. The Dasa of Ke, placed in 7th already running. Mo eclipsed due

to the presence of Ra. Lagna is weak. The Navamsa of Ke falls in 8th.

The 12th lord from Mo is with the 8th lord.

Does it convay anything? That is why the comments of Verna ji is

very much valid.

 

P.S.: It is all Sanskrit in the eyes of a common man, and arguments

leads no where. And that is the truth, Verna ji is pointing at. But

does, this encoded Sanskrit decipher anything to us? Remember my

comments on this issue have no value now onwards, since the info is

already convayed to me.

 

Love,

Sreenadh

 

, " vernalagnia "

<vernalagnia wrote:

 

> , " arkaydash "

> <arkaydash@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > I knew we might run into concordance prob, given that the copy

now

> > with me is from Ranjan Publications.

>

>

> I only have an English translation by BV Raman.

>

>

> > Well, the (first) verse (under Bhagya Yoga)goes:

> >

> > Yad-bhavakaarako lagnad-byaye thisthhathi chedyadi

> > Thasya bhabasya sarvasya bhagyayoga udeerithah.

> >

> > The 7th from this verse is:

> >

> > Pitrukaaraka bhaanoscha bhaagyabhaabeswaropi baa

> > Ubhau tau byayago-syaathaam pitrubhaagyamudeeritham.

>

>

> Not much use at all because I'm Sanskrit-illiterate

>

>

> > Now, Vernalagnia (why this iffy nettonym?)

>

> Titled after an affliction I can't rid myself of

>

>

> > the operative word is 12th from lagna. It is bhaavakaaraka as

> > different from bhaava lord.

>

> > Look at the other verse. It says kaaraka Bhanu and

> > bhaagyabhaaveswara (9th lord) together in the 12th give rise to

> > pitrubhagya.

> >

> > So much for 12th as Ripha! Take heed and argufy as fervidly as

you

> > can.

>

>

> Argument can only be when one knows something I just seek all the

> time (:

>

> Thanks a lot.

>

> +++

>