Guest guest Posted June 2, 2007 Report Share Posted June 2, 2007 Dear Dhanapal ji, It is better to speak what we 'know', and not to speak about what we don't. The only method to see light is to see light and nothing else. The only method to hear sound is hear sound. The words can't explain. The decriptions fail, because we don't know, even though may have 'experienced(?)'. So forget where kundalini is and start meditating. You will find where it is, or is it there at all. I usually refrain from speaking 'about' spirituality or yoga. Because the discussion will go 'about' 'about' 'around' 'around' and won't touch the core. So my suggestion is to try any of the following methods to have a taste of the original first- 1) Dynamic meditation of Osho 2) Sudarsana kriya of Ravisankar 3) Transidental meditation of Maharshi mahesh yogi There are manay other similar good techniques as well, all of which revolve around the same core, trying to give a taste of meditative mood to anyone within a short span of time (with less effort). But still these methods just takes one upto the gate only and not inside the dom. (But if one is preapred this could happen naturally, then and there itself). The point even these methods emphasis is, meditation can not be taught. But try them, you may get an instantanious taste and the questions will vanish. Love, Sreenadh , Dhanapal T <tdhanapal_logic wrote: > > > Dear Sreenadh ji and other respected friends, > > Does astrology talk about kundalini? What it is and where it is in our body? Does it have any relationship with time? > > -Dhanapal > > Sreenadh <sreesog wrote: > Well said! > Love, > Sreenadh > , Krishnamurthy > Seetharama <krishna_1998@> wrote: > > > > Dear Sreenadh ji, > > > > I used the term 'concept' to indicate God for the following > > reasons: > > > > - No one is able to properly define what God is. As yourself has > > stated that God is beyond everything that the fragmented mind > > can percieve. I agree. > > > > - If you ask 100 people what God is, your will get more than 100 > > answers. This is because it can be understood only in the > > abstract plane. Concepts are also abstracts. > > > > - If one reads 'Before the beginning and After the End' by Rishi > > Kumar Mishra, he/she will get a peek into the nature of God. > > Just to give an example, according to our Vedas, the term > > Prajapati is defined as: " Prajapati is the first supraphysical > > 'individual' to evolve from the three realities, or > > supraphysical forces of Mana, Prana and Wak. Every individual in > > this universe, from a very largest to the tiniest, is a > > Prajapati, and innumerable Prajapatis together constitute this > > Universe " . > > > > It appears that the bits and pieces are taken from a Quantum > > Physiscs book. No, this is from our vedas. Here the explanation > > is focussed on the creation of the universe and the role of > > Prajapati as the building block of this Universe. > > > > Coming to the usefulness of God, I don't have any doubts. If one > > believes in God (in whatever form), he/she would get a Guru, a > > Guide and companion who constantly guides them in the path of > > life. A belief that God is with me and helping to releives lot > > of stress in this stressful world. If this is not useful then > > what is? > > > > I have tried to explain what I believe in. I don't expect > > everyone to believe what I believe. > > > > Regards, > > Krishna > > > > > > --- Sreenadh <sreesog@> wrote: > > > > > Dear Krishna ji, > > > => > > > >I don't think it is necessary to mix Maths and God. > > > ==> > > > I agree. > > > ==> > > > Each of them have their own use. > > > <== > > > ??!! I am a bit confuced about this statment. This statements > > > > > > transilates into " Maths has its own use " and " God has its own > > > use!! " . The second statement is true only if God is a mere > > > concept > > > and not reality. Is it so?! Another question that arise is > > > " Does god > > > has any USE? " Is god (the ulimate) supposed to be useful to > > > you? Or > > > is it that you are supposed to be useful to god?! Or is it > > > that both > > > these statements which includes the word " useful " > > > (meterialistic!) > > > is wrong? Going inside, the above statement is both confusing > > > and > > > wrong, due to the wrong association of the word 'Useful' with > > > the > > > ultimate (degrading it to a concept alone). > > > ==> > > > > One is more of a tool and the other one is a concept. > > > <== > > > !!! This again wrong! The statement mixes and matches > > > uncompairable > > > things! Maths is a subject which contains thousands of > > > concepts and > > > facts. God is neither a concept nor a fact - it is beyond all > > > these > > > classifications of the fragmented mind. > > > Even if for argument sake if it is accepted that god is a > > > concept, > > > then too the statement is wrong since concpet/tool is not the > > > correct pair, but rather concept/fact. The statement is > > > misleading. > > > Krishna ji, you are mixing Maths and God, even afer stating: > > > I > > > don't think it is necessary to mix Maths and God. > > > ==> > > > > Well, it does not matter from whom you learn Astrology, one > > > > can't ignore Maths. > > > <== > > > I agree completely. > > > Love, > > > Sreenadh > > > > > > , Krishnamurthy > > > > > > Seetharama <krishna_1998@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Well, it does not matter from whom you learn Astrology, one > > > > can't ignore Maths. As far as God is concerned, people do > > > have > > > > different belief systems. I don't think it is necessary to > > > mix > > > > Maths and God. Each of them have their own use. One is more > > > of a > > > > tool and the other one is a concept. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Krishna > > > > > > > > > > > > --- kaushikack <kaushikack@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sunil John ; I wish to point to your statment- > > > > > > > > > > The late Richard Hock, the great jyotishi who could > > > > > predict the date of events with fantastic accuracy, was > > > asked > > > > > which > > > > > mantra he uses for his predictions he said Maths. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Sunil John > > > > > > > > > > It seems you have learnt your Jyotish from a Christian > > > > > Missionary. > > > > > > > > > > Because if you had learnt Jyotish from a capable Guru & if > > > you > > > > > ever had > > > > > delved into books, you wouldn't find MATHS or TRIGNOMETRY > > > > > > > > > > but words like Devi, Isht Kripa, > > > > > > > > > > & can your mathematician friend explain God & Destiny by > > > help > > > > > of Maths. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________ > > > _______________ > > > > Luggage? GPS? Comic books? > > > > Check out fitting gifts for grads at Search > > > > http://search./search? > > > fr=oni_on_mail & p=graduation+gifts & cs=bz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________ > _______________ > > Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative > vehicles. Visit the Auto Green Center. > > http://autos./green_center/ > > > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. > Answers - Check it out. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.