Guest guest Posted June 15, 2007 Report Share Posted June 15, 2007 vedic astrology , KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM <munisevitham wrote: Namaste, Some time ago when Sri.Partha said,I wondered ,now you have explained how come Nabhasa yoga 1800.Thank you. --- Sreenadh <sreelid wrote: > Dear RAAGHAVAM ji, > Let us address the qn, > Why Nabhasa yogas are 1800 in number? > ===================================== > Akrithi yogas = 23 nos. > Sankhya yogas = 127 nos. (permutation combination > of basic 7 sankhya > yogas) > Total = 127 + 23 = 150 yogas. > The signs are 12 in number. If we consider the > possible combination > of various signs as well, then, > Total number of Nabhasa yogas = 150 x 12 = 1800 > nos. > Hope this will makes things more clear. This also > means that there > are actually only 2 types of Nabhasa yogas. That is, > 1) Akrithi yogas (Bhava-Planet combination) > 2) Sankya yogas (Sign-Planet combination) > This makes clear why 'Saravali' states that 'the > Yavanacharya has > increased the number of Nabhasa yogas to 1800 just > by applying > permutation combination methods'. > With warm regards, > Sreenadh > > > > > vedic astrology , KARUNAAKARAM > RAAGHAVAM > <munisevitham> wrote: > > > > Namaste, > > > Thank you very much for your good explanations. > During > > the course of explanations you have grouped them > into > > four, is there any special reasons for not > grouping > > Akrithi & Dela in one group and the other two > Sankhya > > & Asraya in one group. > > > > > > --- Sreenadh <sreelid> wrote: > > > > > I have seen that in some of the previous mails > a > > > debate on 'whether > > > to apply Nabhasa yogas on divisional charts or > not?' > > > was going on. > > > Several gurus are quoted but none seemed to > discuss > > > the issue in its > > > theoretical and historical perspective. Some of > my > > > humble observations > > > are given below. > > > Nabhasa Yoga > > > ============ > > > These yogas can give results in any desa. We > cannot > > > say that only in > > > this or that particular desa a Nabhasa yoga will > > > give result. This is > > > the opinion of acharyas like Varaha Mihira. > Nabhasa > > > yogas are not > > > related to any particular planet. Desa and > Gochara > > > are related to > > > planets that serve as the significator of > something. > > > Nabhasa yogas are > > > not related to any particular planet and that is > why > > > based on Desa or > > > Gochara we cannot locate the period in which > these > > > yogas will become > > > fruitful. Because of this fundamental flaw it is > not > > > right to give > > > Nabhasa yogas more importance than it deserves. > > > Nabhasa yogas are classified into four. They > are- > > > 1) Akrithi yogas (Told by: Kausika hora, Gargi > > > hora, Brihat > > > prajapathyam) > > > 2) Sankhya yogas (Told by: Brihat prajapathyam) > > > 3) Asraya yogas (Told by: Sathyacharya) > > > 4) Dela yogas (Told by: Parasara) > > > All these yogas are related to the thought > 'what > > > special prediction > > > should be given if the planets are in 1 sign, 2 > > > signs, 3 signs etc'. > > > If these signs happen to be kendra, trikona, > > > panapara, apoklima, > > > chara, sthira, ubhaya some thought that special > > > importance should be > > > given. Even though first indicated by Rishi > horas, > > > the Yavanacharyas > > > are the one who gave this system this much > > > propaganda. By permutation > > > combination they have increased the number of > > > Nabhasa yogas to 1800. > > > 1) Akrithi yogas > > > ------------- > > > Gada, Sakata, Vihaga (Antaja), Sringataka, > Hala, > > > Vajra, Yava, Abja > > > (Kamala), Vapi, Uoopa, Ishu, Sakthi, Denda, Nou, > > > Koota, Cathra, Chapa, > > > Samudra, Chathra etc. All these yogas are > produced > > > as a result of > > > Bhava-Planet combination. > > > 2) Sankhya yogas > > > ------------- > > > Vallaki, Dama, Pasa, Kedara, Soola, Yuga, > Gola. > > > These are produced > > > as a result of Sign-Planet combination. > > > 3) Asraya yogas > > > ------------- > > > Ranju, Musala, Nala. These are produced as a > > > result of Sign-Planet > > > combination. > > > 4) Dela yogas > > > ------------- > > > Srek, Sarpa. These are produced as a result of > > > Bhava-Planet > > > combination. > > > > > > These yogas and the hundreds of other yogas > the > > > names of which are > > > not mentioned, all comes under the simple and > > > fundamental rules of > > > Bhava-Planet combination and Sign-Planet > > > combination. Every learned > > > astrologer know that almost the whole astrology > (or > > > all the yogas > > > mentioned in astrology) comes under the > > > classifications and results > > > generated by: > > > 1) Sign > > > 2) Bhava > > > 3) Planet > > > 4) Sign-Planet combination > > > 5) Bhava-Planet combination > > > 6) Sign-Bhava combination > > > 7) Sign-Bhava-Planet combination > > > If you systematically study these > classifications > > > and the results > > > generated by them, then the whole astrology is > > > almost over! Look at > > > this sloka of Vashishtahora- > > > Stanato bhavathaH khetaiH > stanabhavanabhascharai > > > Stanabhava samayogat bhavakhechara yogathaH > > > Yogasyu shadvidha sthanakhecharabhyam to > sapthadhaH > > > stanabhavagrehaiproktha yoga ye yogahethava > > > Meaning, 'the combinations can be classified > into > > > 7. They are 1) Sign > > > 2) Bhava 3) Planet 4) Sign-Planet 5) > Bhava-Planet 6) > > > Sign-Bhava and 7) > > > Sign-Bhava-Planet'. > > > Why this 7-fold classification is important? I > will > > > explain. > > > 1) Sign > > > All the results I predict based on the > > > classification and qualities > > > of signs such as Chara, Agneya, Gramya etc comes > > > under this. > > > 2) Bhava > > > If the lord of the 6th house is in 7th, I > predict > > > something. All > > > such results come under this. > > > 3) Planet > > > If Sun-Moon, guru-Satern etc are together I > > > predict something. All > > > such 2 planet, 3 planet etc combinations and the > > > corresponding results > > > comes under this. > > > 4) Sign-Planet > > > If Sun is in Aris I predict something. All > such > === message truncated === Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.