Fwd: Re:A Call for Higher Standards on WAVES

[Guest guest]

WAVES-Vedic , kedarnath <smartxpark wrote:

 

namasthe,

 

 

 

harih om

 

sahana bhavathu sahana bhunakthu

saha veeryam karvavahai

tejasvinaam vadhithamastu

ma vid vishavaava hai

 

om shanti shanti shanti

 

vyaaghri yathaa hareta putraan

damastrabhyaam na ca piiDayet

bhiitapatanadhedabhyaam

tadvad varNaan prayojayet

 

Things of the Vid have to be learnt and practiced.

 

I dont know sri wilkinson nor dr avatar kishen kaul ji nor razdaan

ji, personally.

 

It appears to me most apalling that Sri. RE Wilkinson, as member

of an august body is campaigning irrationally for expulsion of

another member for expressing his views. I do congratulate the

moderator for using his native magnanimity in allowing this post by

sri wilkinson.

 

I most certainly will not proscribe to what appears RE Wilkinson's

immature nonsense.

 

Veda is always " apaurusheya " - meaning no personalities - only

principles that must be extended in all aspects life. sanathana

dharma enshrined in the veda is no nonsense. It leads if followed

else will drag if resisted - hence it is sanathana.

 

learned kaul ji states things that i do not know - and it is my

duty to regard him as " guru " to understand why he is saying things

that are shocking to me. it has goaded me to more and more study.

 

i guess wilkinsen is a guru of sorts too. he has goaded me to

practice panini's admonition much against the coarse language i can

use. i have learnt about things not to do. my learning is very

shallow if were to allow cacophonies to disturb my understanding of

the saying " manushyo bhava "

 

i believe that it is the duty of all group members to put forth

evidence concrete enough for the satyam in it to convince dr.ak.kaul

that there is possibility that he is wrong and where he is wrong and

what indeed is right. he matters the most as he is in minority but

he may be absolutely right too.

 

the word jyothi appears in the veda but jyothishya - predictive

astrology does not in my handicapped search. It does though in

shaastra that panditji says has crept in from non vedic sources. it

is absolute satyam that vedic scholars claim that not a single

phoneme has been disturbed in veda mantra (whatever is now available

with us) - there is substantial evidence that shaastras have been

tampered with over time.

 

vedic history has evidence of yajnya bhanga by raakshasa or

raakshasa guNa - surely most respected dr.avatar kishen ji does not

exhibited any of raakshasa Guna nor is is he a raakshasa that must

be kept away so that " manufactured " and wishy washy unlearning from

universities is discussed hoarse.

 

shubhamastu

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

kedarnath jonnalagadda - Bharath - India

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the Internet in your pocket:

mail, news, photos & more.

 

--- End forwarded message ---