Guest guest Posted June 17, 2007 Report Share Posted June 17, 2007 WAVES-Vedic , " Avtar Krishen Kaul " <jyotirved wrote: Dear friends, Namaskar! There was a post from a gentleman that I must be censored since I had been advocating a Sayana Rashichakra through my ephmeris etc. earlier for over a decade and all of a sudden, I have changed my views. When that gentleman was a member of HinduCalendar forum, he had rasied a similar " objection " . His mentor, on whose behalf he is pleading vociferously, also had raised a hue and cry on the same grounds when she was a member of that forum. I had drawn the attention of both those scholars to a post on HinduCalendar forum. But like the Bourborn both of them appear to have learnt nothing and forgoteen nothing (or is it that they have forgotten everything!). It also appears to me that they have got stuck with a Greek Rashichakra which I was myself harbouring for sometime, whereas I have evolved further! In any case, the members are better judges and I shall await their views on the following post (No. 624 of April 5, 2006 of HinduCalendar forum) With regards, Avtar Krishen Kaul HinduCalendar , " jyotirved " <jyotirved@> wrote: Dear Shri Deepak Gore ji, Namaste! How can I forget you! You had been kind enough to send me the missing pages of " Bharatiya Jyotish " in Marathi by Pt. S. B. Dikshit (I hope I have spelt the name correctly this time!) besides a lot of information about the fact that we were being taken for a ride by " Vedic Jyotishis " by such statements as " The Vedas have referred to a nirayana Rashichakra " . I am sure that these days you must be celebrating all your festivals, fairs and muhurtas on the basis of the real spirit of the Vedas! It is so thoughtful of you to suggest that we should make the articles of my " Shri Krishen Universal Ephemeris & Panchang " from 1996 to 2001 available to the general public in PDF format. However, I am reluctant to do so, not because you will not do justice to those articles but because of the following reasons: 1. There is a saying that no man ever bathes in the same river! It is actually because the waters keep on flowing and the particular ebb or tide that we used earlier to have a bath in has already passed by. It is only a pond in which we can bathe in the same water, but then that water is stagnant and may even become putrid by the time we want to have a bath in it the next time! Similarly, there was a time when I was myself hypnotized by " Vedic Jyotish " -- the only difference being that I had thought that the Vedas had delineated our horoscopes as per a sayana Rashichakra! This is what I had tried to plead for in my ephemerides up to almost 2000. However, thanks to " Bharatiya Jyotihsa " and other works besides the Report of the " Saha Calendar Reform Committee " I was wonder struck to find that they had said that there were no rashis in the Vedas! I did not believe them and literally scourged all the four Vedas, Brahmanas, Upanishads etc. etc. myself, and it was a fact that our Vedic Rishis had not, even by mistake, alluded to any Rashis like Mesha etc. or planets like Mangal, Shani etc. As such, the dichotomy of nirayana and Sayana was just a bogey raised by selfish Hindu astrologers who call themselves " Vedic Jyotishis " these days. 2. On probing still deeper, thanks again to " Bharatiya Jyotisha (summary of the Vedanga period) " etc., I found that the Vedanga Jyotisha of Lagadha was just the only astronomical work of the ancient Vedic period (about 13/14th century BC) and even that work contains nothing but methodology of calculating the tithi, nakshatra and the Tapah-cum-Magha etc. months starting from the Uttarayana! If you peruse it thoroughly, you will be convinced that Maharshi Lagadha was not even aware of any planetary calculations and leave alone Mesha etc. Rashis. Then he also has made the nakshatras start from Krittikas as in most of the Vedas. And just see the temerity(actually ignorance!) of " Vedic jyotishis " -- they say that since there is a book named " Vedanga Jyotisha " they are entitled to call their predictive hocus pocus as " Vedanga Jyotisha " ! 3. The same is the story with Yajur-Jyotisham and Atharva Jyotisha, both of which have been discussed exhaustively by Pt. S. B. Dikshit in his monumental work " Bharatiya Jyotish " . 4. What made me literally mad was the fact that none of the original Hindu sidhantas viz. the Pitamaha Sidhanta or Vasishtha Sidhanta (of Pancha Sidhantika) has anything to do with planetary calculations or Mesha etc. Rashis! They have just followed the footsteps of the Vedanga Jyotisha! 5. It all boiled down to the fact that Surya Sidhanta was the only work with which had started planetary calculations and the farce of Mesha etc. Rashis in India. And when Maya himself says that he is a Yavana - a mlechha -- who are we to deny him that privilege and thrust our NRI status on him forcibly! In fact that is the blunder we have committed all along --- considered the Surya Sidhanta as the " Arsha-kula Sidhanta " and lapped up the funniest things adumbrated by Maya the mlechha! He has actually made a fool of us by saying that he had obtained that knowledge from Surya Bhagwan by dint of his Tapasya in the early part of Satya Yuga! Can you otherwise imagine that we would have been taken for a ride by anybody, unless he had instilled the fear in us that it was a divine work revealed by the Surya Bhagwan, that we would have believed that the mean longitudes of all the planets were zero just a few thousand years back! All our " favorite " astronomers like Aryabhata, Brahma Gupta, Lalla, Munjala, Latadeva and even Bhasakaracharya of Sidhanta Shirmonai had suffered from the same fear psychosis with the result that they did not question the parameters fixed by Maya the mlechha, lest they annoy the Surya Bhagwan! What is all the more disgusting is that Ganesha Daivagya, through his Graha Laghavam, did his best (actually it was the worst!) to concoct a planetary phenomenon that would emulate the Surya Sidhanta of Yavana the mlechha! We have all along been making " beeja corrections " and the latest fad is " Lahiri Beeja correction " in the Surya Sidhanta without even realizing for a moment as to how obnoxious the meaning of such a statement is! We should have thrown Surya Sidhanta into a dustbin ages back and gone by the Vedanga Jyotisha, but then our " Jyotishis " - who called themselves " Hindu Jyotishis " initially and later, on the promptings of " Vamadevas " from overseas countries, stated calling themselves " Vedic Jyotishis " ---prevented us from doing so! These " jyotishis " are actually a slur on the Vedas and stooges of Maya the mlechha and now imported " Vamadevas " bent on doing the maximum damage to the real fabric of Indian culture by proclaiming, without any proof, that the farce they are teaching as " Vedic Jyotisha " is expounded by Vedic Rishis! 6. Thus it is phalita jyotisha, whether the so called nirayana or the so called sayana, that has to be delinked from our ethos and completely eradicated/uprooted from our dictionary. It has done the maximum damage to us already and if we do not put a full stop to it, it will continue to hurtle us towards abyss, as happened to the Bharatiya Janata Party. THE TRAGIC FACT IS THAT OUR DHARMACHARYAS, INCLUDING SHANKARACHARYAS, HAVE BECOME DEPENDENT ON JYTISHIS TO KNOW THEIR FUTURE WHEN THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE TRIKALADARSHIS---KNOWING THEIR PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE LIKE THE PALMS OF THEIR HANDS! AND WHEN THESE DHARMACHARYAS APPOINT SOME PEOPLE AS " JYOTISH CONSULTANTS " YOU CAN WELL IMAGINE AS TO WHAT TYPE OF DHARMACHARYAS THEY ARE AND AS TO WHAT TYPE OF REFORMISTS THOSE " JYOTISH CONSULTANTS " ARE. From the above, I hope you will forgive me when I say that what I had written in my earlier ephemeredes was not the last word and there have been further improvements in my own thinking since then. I am a student and will remain so and continue to learn every moment of my life! Maybe, after some time I will do " editing " of my own works and request you to present them in PDF etc. formats, but then may be it will be much easier then to re-write the entire thing rather than give cosmetic touches to those articles. I am keeping my fingers crossed! With kind regards, Avtar Krishen Kaul _____ HinduCalendar [HinduCalendar ] On Behalf Of Deepak Gore Tuesday, April 04, 2006 9:19 PM HinduCalendar Re: [HinduCalendar] We are celebrating all our festivals and muhurtas on wrong days! Dear Shri. Kaul saheb Remember me ? I will come straight to the point. You have published in your Sri Krishna Ephemeres, over the last ten years or so, several learned articles about Sayana Jyotish. They were remarkable because you have extensively quoted from Hindu scriptures, to show that there is no such thing like nirayana panchang. Most of our Nirayana astrologers do not even know Sanskrit, and so do not take the trouble of going to the source documents, viz, Vedas I have one proposal. I intend to scan them, convert them into PDF format and post them in your . This will have two advantages. Firstly, all people who do not have copies of your earlier ephemeres will be able to read them. Secondly, since the documents will be in PDF format, it will not be necessary for readers to take the trouble of installing some special fonts to read Sanskrit / Hindi quotations. Kindly reply and let me know whether you have any objection. With sincere regards and all best wishes Yours sincerely Deepak Gore jyotirved <jyotirved@> wrote: Dear Friends, Namaste In this regard, I have uploaded a file " 1999b.doc " in MSWORD format on this forum. It contains almost all the proofs that are required to substantiate my contention that we must celebrate all our festivals and muhurtas in accordance with the seasonal year and align our lunar festivals besides adhika/kshyaya masa to the same. Unfortunately, these days we are aligning all our festivals and .. _____ --- End forwarded message --- --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.