Predicting with Navamsa (9th division of sign)

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

Pradeep ji, promised us to start a

discussion on Navamsa – Let us start with asking doubts to him on "Results that

should be derived from Moon's navamsa in various signs" (If he feels that

some other example is better to discus Navamsa, let him start with that – let

we all be his students on the same) Of course if you don't leave him he will

come out with very good answers, which would be beneficial to all of us. Let us

proceed – and let us have the fun of learning. By the way the thread on

Navamsa would be owned by Pradeep ji and so I won't do any posting on that

thread. All attacks to Pradeep ji on the same! Pradeep ji owns that thread.

Note that the discussion is just

about Navamsa (9th division of sign), and no divisional chart

involved. We are speaking about 9th division of a sign and NOT about

any chart, as many usually misunderstand. Navamsa means 9th

division; at times it is also termed 9th Varga (9th

multiple) since multiplying the longitude with 9 can give the longitude

corresponding to the 9th

division. Thus Nava-Amsa (9th

Division) and Nava-Varga (9th multiple) essentially mean the same.

Pradeep ji will shed more light on all these. If you have doubt, ask him to

provide clarification on this.

Love,

Sreenadh

[Guest guest]

Dear Shri Sreenadh

 

You do not need to address me with respect(ji) by any means.

I feel the threads on Lagna Lord in various houses etc are going in

the right direction and we need not confuses it with vargas etc for

the time being.As you have rightly mentioned let it follow the right

sequence.

 

Thank you for the trust in me.I have very few years of experience

and knowledge as compared to many in this group and hence would

collectively contribute and learn when time comes.I am learning from

the current threads.

 

Pradeep

, " Sreenadh "

<sreesog wrote:

>

>

>

> Dear All,

>

> Pradeep ji, promised us to start a discussion on Navamsa – Let us

> start with asking doubts to him on " Results that should be derived

> from Moon's navamsa in various signs " (If he feels that some

> other example is better to discus Navamsa, let him start with

that –

> let we all be his students on the same) Of course if you don't

leave

> him he will come out with very good answers, which would be

beneficial

> to all of us. Let us proceed – and let us have the fun of learning.

> By the way the thread on Navamsa would be owned by Pradeep ji

and so

> I won't do any posting on that thread. All attacks to Pradeep ji on

> the same! Pradeep ji owns that thread.

>

> Note that the discussion is just about Navamsa (9th division of

sign),

> and no divisional chart involved. We are speaking about 9th

division of

> a sign and NOT about any chart, as many usually misunderstand.

Navamsa

> means 9th division; at times it is also termed 9th Varga (9th

multiple)

> since multiplying the longitude with 9 can give the longitude

> corresponding to the 9th division. Thus Nava-Amsa (9th Division)

and

> Nava-Varga (9th multiple) essentially mean the same. Pradeep ji

will

> shed more light on all these. If you have doubt, ask him to provide

> clarification on this.

>

> Love,

>

> Sreenadh

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Pradeep,

It is our right to give respect Anyway as you say i am avoiding

the ji.

It is ok - you can start a discussion on Navamsa - we won't go into

much depths but let it be there. We will know where we are - and were

we reached in the course of the discussion. In the mean while the

other threads will also mature. So start it without worries - I would

say. We will all contribute.

Love and Hugs,

Sreenadh

 

, " vijayadas_pradeep "

<vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Shri Sreenadh

>

> You do not need to address me with respect(ji) by any means.

> I feel the threads on Lagna Lord in various houses etc are going in

> the right direction and we need not confuses it with vargas etc for

> the time being.As you have rightly mentioned let it follow the

right

> sequence.

>

> Thank you for the trust in me.I have very few years of experience

> and knowledge as compared to many in this group and hence would

> collectively contribute and learn when time comes.I am learning

from

> the current threads.

>

> Pradeep

> , " Sreenadh "

> <sreesog@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear All,

> >

> > Pradeep ji, promised us to start a discussion on Navamsa – Let us

> > start with asking doubts to him on " Results that should be derived

> > from Moon's navamsa in various signs " (If he feels that some

> > other example is better to discus Navamsa, let him start with

> that –

> > let we all be his students on the same) Of course if you don't

> leave

> > him he will come out with very good answers, which would be

> beneficial

> > to all of us. Let us proceed – and let us have the fun of

learning.

> > By the way the thread on Navamsa would be owned by Pradeep ji

> and so

> > I won't do any posting on that thread. All attacks to Pradeep ji

on

> > the same! Pradeep ji owns that thread.

> >

> > Note that the discussion is just about Navamsa (9th division of

> sign),

> > and no divisional chart involved. We are speaking about 9th

> division of

> > a sign and NOT about any chart, as many usually misunderstand.

> Navamsa

> > means 9th division; at times it is also termed 9th Varga (9th

> multiple)

> > since multiplying the longitude with 9 can give the longitude

> > corresponding to the 9th division. Thus Nava-Amsa (9th

Division)

> and

> > Nava-Varga (9th multiple) essentially mean the same. Pradeep ji

> will

> > shed more light on all these. If you have doubt, ask him to

provide

> > clarification on this.

> >

> > Love,

> >

> > Sreenadh

> >

>