Guest guest Posted November 25, 2007 Report Share Posted November 25, 2007 SreenadhHi Astro (the mere id), First of all stop all of your FOOLISH TESTINGS! You are just providing a chart about which you only knows, and is trying to degrade people??? What right you have got to do this? And why should you EXPECT something from Durga ji? Are you paying some thing to her? Do you think she is obliged to you in any way? Simply learn to be decent - otherwise you will be BANNED from this group - take it as warning. The groups is supposed to follow some norms and procedure in such excursuses and you are violating them out of total ignorance! * Why should you expect that some astrologer will be ALWAYS right? * Why should you believe that she will always make right predictions ONLY?* Or that why others should believe that what you are saying is right? * Why should an astrologer like Durga ji, bother to convince a fool like you? If she tried it is simple her greatness of mind. If it was me, I would have just kicked your mail, and question out of my mind, and would have NEVER listened to it. * Dasadhyayi and Prasnamarga says - "Na prishta kasyachid brooyat na cha anyayena cha prischata Vijanannahi medhavi jalavallokamacharet"[The astrologer shouldn't predict before the querent asks (then the prediction may go wrong). (Even when he asks) if the question is UNJUSTIFIABLE (i.e. if the question is asked to test the astrology or astrology, if it is asked to forcefully squeeze out a reading, or if the question is asked with purposeful intention to degrade the astrologer) after evaluating the intentions properly the astrologer should not respond(otherwise the prediction may go wrong). If the astrologer violates this rule - he may get insulted in public] Due to her sincerity Durga ji violated this rule - and the prediction went wrong. Also some result derivations going wrong is natural and happens to all astrologers - No body is perfect, and it is simply natural to go wrong in several occasions. But you ignorant fool - * don't have the ability to understand this * don't have the patience to wait and see in the further exercise * don't have the decency to use a horoscope that is known to more than one person in the group, never submitted the details to any third party. * violated the group norms - since it is mentioned earlier itself that such free reading requests, and blind charts submitting by any one is not allowed (Only the sincere earlier participants have the earned the RIGHT to present blind charts, I have mentioned earlier itself - from the moderator perspective) So the choice for you is - * Either be decent and follow the group morals OR get out! Hope this is clear enough. Note: Some one may feel that my response is a bit over reaction, but sorry the moderators has discussed this issue, and this warning is well supported by them. Regards,Sreenadh , "astro_2345" <astro_2345 wrote:>> Dear Durgaji,> > You are absoutely right. You dont have to disclose your pincode or > working address or anything of the sort. I never asked it neither > will I ask for it. Whatever you wrote after that doesnt need any > comments from my side because I never questioned your eligibility > and intentions to join this group. So all those explanations are > unnecessary. > > My question I thought is clear to everybody. It is as simple as this:> > "I strongly believe that you knew to whom the chart belonged to, and > his life history". Can you promise upon Mother Kali that you didnt > have any prior knowledge of the person before you gave the readings?> > I have lost faith in even the so called pandits and scholars because > I have seen them dying to do anything for publicity. And the rest > are made fools.> > Finally what you gave as "readings on the test chart", are they > readings? I thought you knew what astrologers mean by readings. I > know the basics of astrology. And I know in the test chart Mercury > is the lagna lord and is in trika 8th joining venus. I know Mars is > debilated. I know except the natural benefic, Jupiter, no other > planets are in kendra. These are not predictions. This is not the > kind of prediction I expected from you.> > The only prediction you made was "Though mercury & 8th house, may > mean "going in for adoption" giving preponderance to the weakness of > the horoscope , in my reading , the girl died in mercury MD"> > And let me say the girl is still ALIVE. Since you havent said > anything about what ever I asked,I am not disclosing the same too.> > (People who do not know to whom the quiz chart belongs to may not > find anything odd at Durgajis predictions. But people who know the > history of the person, will surely be amazed at the accuracy of your > predictions. And I am not a person who is going to believe that you > made those predictions without knowing anything about him.)> > Regards,> Astro > > > > > > , "durga050" > durga050@ wrote:> >> > > > Hello astro_2345,> > > > I am sad that my participation in a quiz had stirred a > controversy to> > the extent of questioning my . integrity> > > > .I don't think it is mandatory to disclose ones zip code and > contact> > address in a group meant for astrology.> > > > You know to whom you are communicating , a privilage you deny > others in> > the group becoz you are not revealing your identity.> > > > I hope I didn't land in the wrong place . I still can't make > out the> > reason why you are taking the cudgel against me.> > > > You have posted a test question and wanted me to answer the number > of> > siblings. Do you know any astrological rules to predict the number > of> > siblings ? I don't know any rule to count the number of siblings > though> > some linked with drekkana fails in actual practise. If I was able > to> > predict the number of siblings , children etc , I would have been> > elevated to the status of real "Durga" and would't have joined your> > list.> > > > I don't have any malafide intention in joining your list.Anway, I > am> > posting my reading in the test chart .> > > > 1, Mercury, the Lagan Lord in trika 8th joining venus the marak> > > > 2,Moon in debilitation and mars, the 8th lord of longevity , in> > debilitation> > > > 3, Malefics in the Lagan aspected by malefics without any benefic> > influence> > > > 4, No benefic occupy the angles from moon Lagaan> > > > 5, The dasa sequence was of mercury> kethu> venus . Mercury as > 8th lord> > from Moon Lagaan was in 6th .> > > > Though mercury & 8th house, may mean "going in for adoption" giving> > preponderance to the weakness of the horoscope , in my reading , > the> > girl died in mercury MD> > > > I thank all those who congratulated me> > > > > > > > Durga> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "astro_2345"> > <astro_2345@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Durgaji,> > >> > > I am impressed by the accurate predictions made by you on the > quiz> > > chart. But I dont mind admitting the fact that I havent still > really> > > believed that somebody can make such accurate predictions.Nobody > else> > > but you can clarify my doubts. I know you dont have any need to> > > convince doubting Thomases like me. But still, I would like to > give> > > you a chart. Can you please comment on it? Please, I beg you. The> > > chart is not mine. More than testing you, this is a test on> > > astrology. If you can correctly predict about this person, it > will be> > > a great reassurance for people like me.> > >> > > You know there are hundreds of astrologers in India. Most of > them are> > > famous. In my observation, not because of their predicting > abilities.> > > But instead because they might have written some books on > astrology,> > > they might have conducted so much of research, they might have > made a> > > software and so on. How many astrologers are really well-known> > > because of their accurate predictions? And are there any > astrologers> > > who can consistently make accurate predictions? These are my > doubts> > > that always haunted me. Making a group, discussing astrology ,> > > researching on it -what is all these for? Theory is useless if > not> > > put into practice. So I find, you are one of the people who has > put> > > into practice your knwoledge correctly. But as I said, my mind > doesnt> > > believe. Sorry for saying this outright. But that is the truth. > I am> > > totally surprised at your accurate predictions.> > >> > > So here is a chart:> > >> > > March 29, 1978,> > > time: 5.37 pm (17:37:00)> > > place: trivandrum.> > >> > > I would like to know:> > > 1. About the childhood of this girl, life with parents (this is > the> > > chart of a female).> > > 2. how many sisters, brothers.> > > 3. About her marriage, married life, husband, children.> > > 4. Profession.> > > 5. Appearence.> > > 6. Finance.> > >> > > Hope you will consider my request.> > >> > > Srinadhji, I hope you dont interfere and say "this is a diversion> > > from the group aim". This is my personal request to Durgaji. > Others> > > if interested can give their opinions too.> > >> > > Regards,> > > astro.> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 Dear Srinadhji, I havent so far said anything 'indecent'. I have been so far polite in asking Durgaji whatever I felt in my mind. My questions were only to her, and I didnt even drag anybody else in this matter. You can ban me. I am not afraid of your warnings (pls dont take this as an indication that I will be pestering again, I wont be doing that) because there is nothing for me to be afraid of. I have never thought of degrading the group. I just raised my concerns. Thats all. About the adoption, I gave the chart of the girl, not her mother. So when Durgaji said, " may go for an adoption " it means the native will adopt a child, and not the native " WILL BE " adpopted by somebody. I hope my understanding is correct. You jumped overboard to criticise me. Hope you wont ban this mail. This is my last clarification on this. Anyways thanks a lot for your 'decent' reply. Regards, Astro , " Sreenadh " <sreesog wrote: > > > SreenadhHi Astro (the mere id), > First of all stop all of your FOOLISH TESTINGS! You are just > providing a chart about which you only knows, and is trying to degrade > people??? What right you have got to do this? And why should you EXPECT > something from Durga ji? Are you paying some thing to her? Do you think > she is obliged to you in any way? Simply learn to be decent - otherwise > you will be BANNED from this group - take it as warning. The groups is > supposed to follow some norms and procedure in such excursuses and you > are violating them out of total ignorance! > * Why should you expect that some astrologer will be ALWAYS right? > * Why should you believe that she will always make right predictions > ONLY? > * Or that why others should believe that what you are saying is right? > * Why should an astrologer like Durga ji, bother to convince a fool like > you? If she tried it is simple her greatness of mind. If it was me, I > would have just kicked your mail, and question out of my mind, and would > have NEVER listened to it. > * Dasadhyayi and Prasnamarga says - > " Na prishta kasyachid brooyat na cha anyayena cha prischata > Vijanannahi medhavi jalavallokamacharet " > [The astrologer shouldn't predict before the querent asks (then the > prediction may go wrong). (Even when he asks) if the question is > UNJUSTIFIABLE (i.e. if the question is asked to test the astrology or > astrology, if it is asked to forcefully squeeze out a reading, or if the > question is asked with purposeful intention to degrade the astrologer) > after evaluating the intentions properly the astrologer should not > respond(otherwise the prediction may go wrong). If the astrologer > violates this rule - he may get insulted in public] > Due to her sincerity Durga ji violated this rule - and the prediction > went wrong. Also some result derivations going wrong is natural and > happens to all astrologers - No body is perfect, and it is simply > natural to go wrong in several occasions. > But you ignorant fool - > * don't have the ability to understand this > * don't have the patience to wait and see in the further exercise > * don't have the decency to use a horoscope that is known to more > than one person in the group, never submitted the details to any third > party. > * violated the group norms - since it is mentioned earlier itself > that such free reading requests, and blind charts submitting by any one > is not allowed (Only the sincere earlier participants have the earned > the RIGHT to present blind charts, I have mentioned earlier itself - > from the moderator perspective) > So the choice for you is - > * Either be decent and follow the group morals OR get out! > Hope this is clear enough. > Note: Some one may feel that my response is a bit over reaction, but > sorry the moderators has discussed this issue, and this warning is well > supported by them. > Regards, > Sreenadh > > , " astro_2345 " > <astro_2345@> wrote: > > > > Dear Durgaji, > > > > You are absoutely right. You dont have to disclose your pincode or > > working address or anything of the sort. I never asked it neither > > will I ask for it. Whatever you wrote after that doesnt need any > > comments from my side because I never questioned your eligibility > > and intentions to join this group. So all those explanations are > > unnecessary. > > > > My question I thought is clear to everybody. It is as simple as this: > > > > " I strongly believe that you knew to whom the chart belonged to, and > > his life history " . Can you promise upon Mother Kali that you didnt > > have any prior knowledge of the person before you gave the readings? > > > > I have lost faith in even the so called pandits and scholars because > > I have seen them dying to do anything for publicity. And the rest > > are made fools. > > > > Finally what you gave as " readings on the test chart " , are they > > readings? I thought you knew what astrologers mean by readings. I > > know the basics of astrology. And I know in the test chart Mercury > > is the lagna lord and is in trika 8th joining venus. I know Mars is > > debilated. I know except the natural benefic, Jupiter, no other > > planets are in kendra. These are not predictions. This is not the > > kind of prediction I expected from you. > > > > The only prediction you made was " Though mercury & 8th house, may > > mean " going in for adoption " giving preponderance to the weakness of > > the horoscope , in my reading , the girl died in mercury MD " > > > > And let me say the girl is still ALIVE. Since you havent said > > anything about what ever I asked,I am not disclosing the same too. > > > > (People who do not know to whom the quiz chart belongs to may not > > find anything odd at Durgajis predictions. But people who know the > > history of the person, will surely be amazed at the accuracy of your > > predictions. And I am not a person who is going to believe that you > > made those predictions without knowing anything about him.) > > > > Regards, > > Astro > > > > > > > > > > > > , " durga050 " > > durga050@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello astro_2345, > > > > > > I am sad that my participation in a quiz had stirred a > > controversy to > > > the extent of questioning my . integrity > > > > > > .I don't think it is mandatory to disclose ones zip code and > > contact > > > address in a group meant for astrology. > > > > > > You know to whom you are communicating , a privilage you deny > > others in > > > the group becoz you are not revealing your identity. > > > > > > I hope I didn't land in the wrong place . I still can't make > > out the > > > reason why you are taking the cudgel against me. > > > > > > You have posted a test question and wanted me to answer the number > > of > > > siblings. Do you know any astrological rules to predict the number > > of > > > siblings ? I don't know any rule to count the number of siblings > > though > > > some linked with drekkana fails in actual practise. If I was able > > to > > > predict the number of siblings , children etc , I would have been > > > elevated to the status of real " Durga " and would't have joined your > > > list. > > > > > > I don't have any malafide intention in joining your list.Anway, I > > am > > > posting my reading in the test chart . > > > > > > 1, Mercury, the Lagan Lord in trika 8th joining venus the marak > > > > > > 2,Moon in debilitation and mars, the 8th lord of longevity , in > > > debilitation > > > > > > 3, Malefics in the Lagan aspected by malefics without any benefic > > > influence > > > > > > 4, No benefic occupy the angles from moon Lagaan > > > > > > 5, The dasa sequence was of mercury> kethu> venus . Mercury as > > 8th lord > > > from Moon Lagaan was in 6th . > > > > > > Though mercury & 8th house, may mean " going in for adoption " giving > > > preponderance to the weakness of the horoscope , in my reading , > > the > > > girl died in mercury MD > > > > > > I thank all those who congratulated me > > > > > > > > > > > > Durga > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " astro_2345 " > > > <astro_2345@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Durgaji, > > > > > > > > I am impressed by the accurate predictions made by you on the > > quiz > > > > chart. But I dont mind admitting the fact that I havent still > > really > > > > believed that somebody can make such accurate predictions.Nobody > > else > > > > but you can clarify my doubts. I know you dont have any need to > > > > convince doubting Thomases like me. But still, I would like to > > give > > > > you a chart. Can you please comment on it? Please, I beg you. The > > > > chart is not mine. More than testing you, this is a test on > > > > astrology. If you can correctly predict about this person, it > > will be > > > > a great reassurance for people like me. > > > > > > > > You know there are hundreds of astrologers in India. Most of > > them are > > > > famous. In my observation, not because of their predicting > > abilities. > > > > But instead because they might have written some books on > > astrology, > > > > they might have conducted so much of research, they might have > > made a > > > > software and so on. How many astrologers are really well- known > > > > because of their accurate predictions? And are there any > > astrologers > > > > who can consistently make accurate predictions? These are my > > doubts > > > > that always haunted me. Making a group, discussing astrology , > > > > researching on it -what is all these for? Theory is useless if > > not > > > > put into practice. So I find, you are one of the people who has > > put > > > > into practice your knwoledge correctly. But as I said, my mind > > doesnt > > > > believe. Sorry for saying this outright. But that is the truth. > > I am > > > > totally surprised at your accurate predictions. > > > > > > > > So here is a chart: > > > > > > > > March 29, 1978, > > > > time: 5.37 pm (17:37:00) > > > > place: trivandrum. > > > > > > > > I would like to know: > > > > 1. About the childhood of this girl, life with parents (this is > > the > > > > chart of a female). > > > > 2. how many sisters, brothers. > > > > 3. About her marriage, married life, husband, children. > > > > 4. Profession. > > > > 5. Appearence. > > > > 6. Finance. > > > > > > > > Hope you will consider my request. > > > > > > > > Srinadhji, I hope you dont interfere and say " this is a diversion > > > > from the group aim " . This is my personal request to Durgaji. > > Others > > > > if interested can give their opinions too. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > astro. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 Dear Astro, If some chart is given and longevity is under discussion - what are the things discussed in classics? And what should we look into? If you have even a MINIMUM understanding of the CONTEXT of discussion of this subject in astrological classics - you could have easily understood that, the use of word "going in for adoption" by Durga ji IS pointing to the fact that "The native (the owner of the chart) will get adopted" and NOT that she will adobpt some one! ==>> About the adoption, I gave the chart of the girl, not her mother. So > when Durgaji said, "may go for an adoption" it means the native will > adopt a child, and not the native "WILL BE " adopted by somebody. I > hope my understanding is correct.<== Your understanding is totally wrong - because your an UNAWARE of the CONTEXT of such longevity discussion and the related predictions given there in those ancient astrological classics like Brihat Jataka, Yavana Jataka, Saravali etc. If you do, you would had known that birth, longevity (sudden death after birth), adoption (just after birth in childhood), life after that and the other combinations present in the chart are dealt with in those classics in order. So whether "will be going in for adoption and thus survive OR survive without any trouble nourished by the same parents" is one of the questions that would be addressed by any truly knowledgeable astrologer - while dealing with birth and longevity - especially when there is a doubt about longevity and the strength of the chart. Actually it reveals that she met with 2 choices in her analysis - 1) adoption by some one OR 2) death in Mercury MD in her analysis. And also that out of these 2 choices she chose the wrong one. But the total story only reveals the credibility and depth of knowledge Durga ji only because - how many is there in this group who can even reach up to this?? Truly the above derivation itself confirms that Durga ji is well versed and familiar with all these classics and the derivations given there in. Now stop this nonsense and let us go back to astrology. Hope this helps.Regards,Sreenadh , "astro_2345" <astro_2345 wrote:>> Dear Srinadhji,> > I havent so far said anything 'indecent'. I have been so far polite > in asking Durgaji whatever I felt in my mind. My questions were only > to her, and I didnt even drag anybody else in this matter. > You can ban me. I am not afraid of your warnings (pls dont take this > as an indication that I will be pestering again, I wont be doing > that) because there is nothing for me to be afraid of. I have never > thought of degrading the group. I just raised my concerns. Thats > all. > > About the adoption, I gave the chart of the girl, not her mother. So > when Durgaji said, "may go for an adoption" it means the native will > adopt a child, and not the native "WILL BE " adpopted by somebody. I > hope my understanding is correct. You jumped overboard to criticise > me. > > Hope you wont ban this mail. This is my last clarification on this.> > Anyways thanks a lot for your 'decent' reply. > > Regards,> Astro > > > , "Sreenadh" > sreesog@ wrote:> >> > > > SreenadhHi Astro (the mere id),> > First of all stop all of your FOOLISH TESTINGS! You are just> > providing a chart about which you only knows, and is trying to > degrade> > people??? What right you have got to do this? And why should you > EXPECT> > something from Durga ji? Are you paying some thing to her? Do you > think> > she is obliged to you in any way? Simply learn to be decent - > otherwise> > you will be BANNED from this group - take it as warning. The > groups is> > supposed to follow some norms and procedure in such excursuses and > you> > are violating them out of total ignorance!> > * Why should you expect that some astrologer will be ALWAYS right?> > * Why should you believe that she will always make right > predictions> > ONLY?> > * Or that why others should believe that what you are saying is > right?> > * Why should an astrologer like Durga ji, bother to convince a > fool like> > you? If she tried it is simple her greatness of mind. If it was > me, I> > would have just kicked your mail, and question out of my mind, and > would> > have NEVER listened to it.> > * Dasadhyayi and Prasnamarga says -> > "Na prishta kasyachid brooyat na cha anyayena cha prischata> > Vijanannahi medhavi jalavallokamacharet"> > [The astrologer shouldn't predict before the querent asks (then the> > prediction may go wrong). (Even when he asks) if the question is> > UNJUSTIFIABLE (i.e. if the question is asked to test the astrology > or> > astrology, if it is asked to forcefully squeeze out a reading, or > if the> > question is asked with purposeful intention to degrade the > astrologer)> > after evaluating the intentions properly the astrologer should not> > respond(otherwise the prediction may go wrong). If the astrologer> > violates this rule - he may get insulted in public]> > Due to her sincerity Durga ji violated this rule - and the > prediction> > went wrong. Also some result derivations going wrong is natural > and> > happens to all astrologers - No body is perfect, and it is simply> > natural to go wrong in several occasions.> > But you ignorant fool -> > * don't have the ability to understand this> > * don't have the patience to wait and see in the further > exercise> > * don't have the decency to use a horoscope that is known to > more> > than one person in the group, never submitted the details to any > third> > party.> > * violated the group norms - since it is mentioned earlier > itself> > that such free reading requests, and blind charts submitting by > any one> > is not allowed (Only the sincere earlier participants have the > earned> > the RIGHT to present blind charts, I have mentioned earlier > itself -> > from the moderator perspective)> > So the choice for you is -> > * Either be decent and follow the group morals OR get out!> > Hope this is clear enough.> > Note: Some one may feel that my response is a bit over > reaction, but> > sorry the moderators has discussed this issue, and this warning is > well> > supported by them.> > Regards,> > Sreenadh> > > > , "astro_2345"> > <astro_2345@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Durgaji,> > >> > > You are absoutely right. You dont have to disclose your pincode > or> > > working address or anything of the sort. I never asked it neither> > > will I ask for it. Whatever you wrote after that doesnt need any> > > comments from my side because I never questioned your eligibility> > > and intentions to join this group. So all those explanations are> > > unnecessary.> > >> > > My question I thought is clear to everybody. It is as simple as > this:> > >> > > "I strongly believe that you knew to whom the chart belonged to, > and> > > his life history". Can you promise upon Mother Kali that you > didnt> > > have any prior knowledge of the person before you gave the > readings?> > >> > > I have lost faith in even the so called pandits and scholars > because> > > I have seen them dying to do anything for publicity. And the rest> > > are made fools.> > >> > > Finally what you gave as "readings on the test chart", are they> > > readings? I thought you knew what astrologers mean by readings. I> > > know the basics of astrology. And I know in the test chart > Mercury> > > is the lagna lord and is in trika 8th joining venus. I know Mars > is> > > debilated. I know except the natural benefic, Jupiter, no other> > > planets are in kendra. These are not predictions. This is not the> > > kind of prediction I expected from you.> > >> > > The only prediction you made was "Though mercury & 8th house, may> > > mean "going in for adoption" giving preponderance to the > weakness of> > > the horoscope , in my reading , the girl died in mercury MD"> > >> > > And let me say the girl is still ALIVE. Since you havent said> > > anything about what ever I asked,I am not disclosing the same > too.> > >> > > (People who do not know to whom the quiz chart belongs to may not> > > find anything odd at Durgajis predictions. But people who know > the> > > history of the person, will surely be amazed at the accuracy of > your> > > predictions. And I am not a person who is going to believe that > you> > > made those predictions without knowing anything about him.)> > >> > > Regards,> > > Astro> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > , "durga050"> > > durga050@ wrote:> > > >> > > >> > > > Hello astro_2345,> > > >> > > > I am sad that my participation in a quiz had stirred a> > > controversy to> > > > the extent of questioning my . integrity> > > >> > > > .I don't think it is mandatory to disclose ones zip code and> > > contact> > > > address in a group meant for astrology.> > > >> > > > You know to whom you are communicating , a privilage you deny> > > others in> > > > the group becoz you are not revealing your identity.> > > >> > > > I hope I didn't land in the wrong place . I still can't make> > > out the> > > > reason why you are taking the cudgel against me.> > > >> > > > You have posted a test question and wanted me to answer the > number> > > of> > > > siblings. Do you know any astrological rules to predict the > number> > > of> > > > siblings ? I don't know any rule to count the number of > siblings> > > though> > > > some linked with drekkana fails in actual practise. If I was > able> > > to> > > > predict the number of siblings , children etc , I would have > been> > > > elevated to the status of real "Durga" and would't have joined > your> > > > list.> > > >> > > > I don't have any malafide intention in joining your > list.Anway, I> > > am> > > > posting my reading in the test chart .> > > >> > > > 1, Mercury, the Lagan Lord in trika 8th joining venus the marak> > > >> > > > 2,Moon in debilitation and mars, the 8th lord of longevity , in> > > > debilitation> > > >> > > > 3, Malefics in the Lagan aspected by malefics without any > benefic> > > > influence> > > >> > > > 4, No benefic occupy the angles from moon Lagaan> > > >> > > > 5, The dasa sequence was of mercury> kethu> venus . Mercury as> > > 8th lord> > > > from Moon Lagaan was in 6th .> > > >> > > > Though mercury & 8th house, may mean "going in for adoption" > giving> > > > preponderance to the weakness of the horoscope , in my > reading ,> > > the> > > > girl died in mercury MD> > > >> > > > I thank all those who congratulated me> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Durga> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > , "astro_2345"> > > > <astro_2345@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Durgaji,> > > > >> > > > > I am impressed by the accurate predictions made by you on the> > > quiz> > > > > chart. But I dont mind admitting the fact that I havent still> > > really> > > > > believed that somebody can make such accurate > predictions.Nobody> > > else> > > > > but you can clarify my doubts. I know you dont have any need > to> > > > > convince doubting Thomases like me. But still, I would like > to> > > give> > > > > you a chart. Can you please comment on it? Please, I beg > you. The> > > > > chart is not mine. More than testing you, this is a test on> > > > > astrology. If you can correctly predict about this person, it> > > will be> > > > > a great reassurance for people like me.> > > > >> > > > > You know there are hundreds of astrologers in India. Most of> > > them are> > > > > famous. In my observation, not because of their predicting> > > abilities.> > > > > But instead because they might have written some books on> > > astrology,> > > > > they might have conducted so much of research, they might > have> > > made a> > > > > software and so on. How many astrologers are really well-> known> > > > > because of their accurate predictions? And are there any> > > astrologers> > > > > who can consistently make accurate predictions? These are my> > > doubts> > > > > that always haunted me. Making a group, discussing > astrology ,> > > > > researching on it -what is all these for? Theory is useless > if> > > not> > > > > put into practice. So I find, you are one of the people who > has> > > put> > > > > into practice your knwoledge correctly. But as I said, my > mind> > > doesnt> > > > > believe. Sorry for saying this outright. But that is the > truth.> > > I am> > > > > totally surprised at your accurate predictions.> > > > >> > > > > So here is a chart:> > > > >> > > > > March 29, 1978,> > > > > time: 5.37 pm (17:37:00)> > > > > place: trivandrum.> > > > >> > > > > I would like to know:> > > > > 1. About the childhood of this girl, life with parents (this > is> > > the> > > > > chart of a female).> > > > > 2. how many sisters, brothers.> > > > > 3. About her marriage, married life, husband, children.> > > > > 4. Profession.> > > > > 5. Appearence.> > > > > 6. Finance.> > > > >> > > > > Hope you will consider my request.> > > > >> > > > > Srinadhji, I hope you dont interfere and say "this is a > diversion> > > > > from the group aim". This is my personal request to Durgaji.> > > Others> > > > > if interested can give their opinions too.> > > > >> > > > > Regards,> > > > > astro.> > > > >> > > >> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.