Guest guest Posted May 10, 2008 Report Share Posted May 10, 2008 Hare rama krishna dear grp , the messge of neelam ji got turnicated by and i am re posting the balance of post and i congratulate all ppl who took part in this great exercise esp pradeep ji and madhu nairji also my sincere thanks for madam neelam ji for this great experience and all can come out and teach us abt their observations regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah absolutely to-the-point readings, I have put the close-enough readings in green. Those who are somewhere near the truth, are in yellow. Red is only when nothing is close to reality.This table shows that out of the 12 areas of native's life, each participant has given how many correct readings, how many close readings and how many they've totally missed. I have also given as to how many they have not attempted at all. Name abbr Correct Readings Somewhat close Totally missed in Not Attempted Vijaydas Pradeep VP 7 3 2 0 Madhu Nair MN 5 4 2 1 Sunil Nair SN 3 7 1 1 Sreenadh SR 3 6 2 2 Sreeram Srinivas SS 2 2 1 7 GA 2 4 6 0 Krishna Seetharama KS 2 3 4 3 Souvik Dutta SD 2 4 5 1 Chandra Hari CH 2 3 3 4 nameisego NA 1 3 6 2 Vinita VI 1 1 0 10 Chandu2Chill CC 2 1 5 4 Aditya AD 1 2 8 1 Bob BO 0 3 1 8 Renu RE 0 2 2 8 K. Gopu KG 0 2 3 7 Anirudh AN 0 1 7 4 Chakravarty CK 0 1 9 2 Dushyant DU 0 1 5 6Now I'll start posting my comments on individual readings. Hope everyone enjoyed the exercise.Thanks and RegardsNeelam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2008 Report Share Posted May 10, 2008 There is NOT a single soul, friend or foe, who would not join in me saying this - Hats off to this lady (Neelam-ji) in taking so much time and effort for this exercise. She is an asset in any group. Regards, Souvik , " sunil nair " <astro_tellerkerala wrote: > > > > > Hare rama krishna > > dear grp , > > the messge of neelam ji got turnicated by and i am re posting the > balance of post and i congratulate all ppl who took part in this great > exercise esp pradeep ji and madhu nairji > > also my sincere thanks for madam neelam ji for this great experience and > all can come out and teach us abt their observations > > regrds sunil nair > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah > > absolutely to-the-point readings, I have put the close-enough readings > in green. Those who are somewhere near the truth, are in yellow. Red is > only when nothing is close to reality. > > This table shows that out of the 12 areas of native's life, each > participant has given how many correct readings, how many close readings > and how many they've totally missed. I have also given as to how many > they have not attempted at all. > > > Name > > abbr > > Correct > > Readings > > Somewhat close > > Totally missed in > > Not Attempted > > Vijaydas Pradeep > > VP > > 7 > > 3 > > 2 > > 0 > > Madhu Nair > > MN > > 5 > > 4 > > 2 > > 1 > > Sunil Nair > > SN > > 3 > > 7 > > 1 > > 1 > > Sreenadh > > SR > > 3 > > 6 > > 2 > > 2 > > Sreeram Srinivas > > SS > > 2 > > 2 > > 1 > > 7 > > > > GA > > 2 > > 4 > > 6 > > 0 > > Krishna Seetharama > > KS > > 2 > > 3 > > 4 > > 3 > > Souvik Dutta > > SD > > 2 > > 4 > > 5 > > 1 > > Chandra Hari > > CH > > 2 > > 3 > > 3 > > 4 > > nameisego > > NA > > 1 > > 3 > > 6 > > 2 > > Vinita > > VI > > 1 > > 1 > > 0 > > 10 > > Chandu2Chill > > CC > > 2 > > 1 > > 5 > > 4 > > Aditya > > AD > > 1 > > 2 > > 8 > > 1 > > Bob > > BO > > 0 > > 3 > > 1 > > 8 > > Renu > > RE > > 0 > > 2 > > 2 > > 8 > > K. Gopu > > KG > > 0 > > 2 > > 3 > > 7 > > Anirudh > > AN > > 0 > > 1 > > 7 > > 4 > > Chakravarty > > CK > > 0 > > 1 > > 9 > > 2 > > Dushyant > > DU > > 0 > > 1 > > 5 > > 6 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now I'll start posting my comments on individual readings. Hope everyone > enjoyed the exercise. > > Thanks and Regards > Neelam > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2008 Report Share Posted May 10, 2008 Dear Souvik ji, The pain staking effort under took by Neelam ji is beyond thanks. Let us hope that she will inspire us by undertaking some more such efforts. My affectionate hugs to her with regards. Her efforts are beneficial to the whole group - and we are all learning together. Love and regards,Sreenadh , "Souvik Dutta" <explore_vulcan wrote:>> There is NOT a single soul, friend or foe, who would not join in me > saying this - Hats off to this lady (Neelam-ji) in taking so much > time and effort for this exercise.> > She is an asset in any group.> > Regards,> > Souvik> > , "sunil nair" > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> >> > > > > > > > Hare rama krishna> > > > dear grp ,> > > > the messge of neelam ji got turnicated by and i am re posting > the> > balance of post and i congratulate all ppl who took part in this > great> > exercise esp pradeep ji and madhu nairji> > > > also my sincere thanks for madam neelam ji for this great > experience and> > all can come out and teach us abt their observations> > > > regrds sunil nair> > > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah> > > > absolutely to-the-point readings, I have put the close-enough > readings> > in green. Those who are somewhere near the truth, are in yellow. > Red is> > only when nothing is close to reality.> > > > This table shows that out of the 12 areas of native's life, each> > participant has given how many correct readings, how many close > readings> > and how many they've totally missed. I have also given as to how > many> > they have not attempted at all.> > > > > > Name> > > > abbr> > > > Correct> > > > Readings> > > > Somewhat close> > > > Totally missed in> > > > Not Attempted> > > > Vijaydas Pradeep> > > > VP> > > > 7> > > > 3> > > > 2> > > > 0> > > > Madhu Nair> > > > MN> > > > 5> > > > 4> > > > 2> > > > 1> > > > Sunil Nair> > > > SN> > > > 3> > > > 7> > > > 1> > > > 1> > > > Sreenadh> > > > SR> > > > 3> > > > 6> > > > 2> > > > 2> > > > Sreeram Srinivas> > > > SS> > > > 2> > > > 2> > > > 1> > > > 7> > > > > > > > GA> > > > 2> > > > 4> > > > 6> > > > 0> > > > Krishna Seetharama> > > > KS> > > > 2> > > > 3> > > > 4> > > > 3> > > > Souvik Dutta> > > > SD> > > > 2> > > > 4> > > > 5> > > > 1> > > > Chandra Hari> > > > CH> > > > 2> > > > 3> > > > 3> > > > 4> > > > nameisego> > > > NA> > > > 1> > > > 3> > > > 6> > > > 2> > > > Vinita> > > > VI> > > > 1> > > > 1> > > > 0> > > > 10> > > > Chandu2Chill> > > > CC> > > > 2> > > > 1> > > > 5> > > > 4> > > > Aditya> > > > AD> > > > 1> > > > 2> > > > 8> > > > 1> > > > Bob> > > > BO> > > > 0> > > > 3> > > > 1> > > > 8> > > > Renu> > > > RE> > > > 0> > > > 2> > > > 2> > > > 8> > > > K. Gopu> > > > KG> > > > 0> > > > 2> > > > 3> > > > 7> > > > Anirudh> > > > AN> > > > 0> > > > 1> > > > 7> > > > 4> > > > Chakravarty> > > > CK> > > > 0> > > > 1> > > > 9> > > > 2> > > > Dushyant> > > > DU> > > > 0> > > > 1> > > > 5> > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now I'll start posting my comments on individual readings. Hope > everyone> > enjoyed the exercise.> > > > Thanks and Regards> > Neelam> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2008 Report Share Posted May 10, 2008 Dear All, First of all I appreciate Neelam ji for conducting such a wonderful exersise. Secondly, my heart felt congratulations to the winners viz. Vijayadas ji, Madhu ji, Sunil ji etc for the very close to truth readings. It was truely a wonderful experience! I have some regrets (and some suggested extra work that, I hope some one will undertake) as listed below - * Even though I see mention of colors like Red, Green, Blue in Neelam ji's post; I fear that part of the mail is missing. Look at these statements -==>Given below is a comparative chart to show how everyone has fared. The columns are about the performance of participants with rows giving the areas defined. (1-19)Green – CorrectYellow – somewhat correctRed – missedGrey – not attempted <== I looked for that colors and couldn't find it in the rest of the mail . Then in the repost Sunil ji quoted -==>absolutely to-the-point readings, I have put the close-enough readings in green. Those who are somewhere near the truth, are in yellow. Red is only when nothing is close to reality.<== Then again I looked for red and green and couldn't find it. Neelam ji, Sunil ji your posts are too valuable - please don't put us in dark; and I am expecting more mails from you in this regard. * I would request neelam ji to present her compartison of readings done by different members (Quoting the statements provided by the respective members), if possible, with links to the corresponding messages. * Last but not the least, a humble request to conduct one more similar blind chart exersise.. Love and regards,Sreenadh , "neelam gupta" <neelamgupta07 wrote:>> Dear All,> > Here I am submitting the comparative results for all the participants in the> exercise. Later I will take each case and send my comments for all the> readings, one by one. I also wish to state that I have compiled these> results to the best of my ability without any biasness. Still if you find> any error in judging or presentation, please feel free to correct me.> > *Pradeepji was simply outstanding* in judging correctly almost all the> spheres of native's life. 7 correct fields, 3 close and only 2 missed areas.> And he attempted all areas. Congratulations Pradeepji for the wonderful> observations. He was quite crisp and to-the point. He judged not only looks> and nature, but also education, marriage, multiple affairs, etc quite> closely.> > *Madhu ji* was also superb in judging 5 fields correctly, and in 4 areas he> is close. He comes closest in judging the profession. I also appreciate> Madhu ji's effort in giving us some peculiarities in the chart, many of> which are quite true.> > *Sunil ji* was also fantastic with 3 correct hits and close in almost all> the areas. He is the one who clearly said about two marriages. He also gave> good points about personality etc.> > *Sreenadh ji* was excellent in giving correct readings in 3 fields and> almost there in 6 others. He was very close about siblings and nature and> personality.> > *Chandra Hari ji* would need a special mention as he had tried to be precise> with his comments and readings (not indulging in mumbo-jumbo). Like Madhu> ji, he has also tried to touch upon some specificities in the chart of which> many are true. I shall be giving my comments on those.> > And the best reading from Chandra Hari ji is* **his observation on a still> birth in 1989.* He misses the period by a few months, but the observation is> incredible. He would tell us how he saw this. Though his other observations> about children are not true.> > *Gaurav, Krishna ji, Souvik ji* also did very well as they were correct in a> couple of areas and close in many others. They also attempted almost all> fields.> > *Nameisego ji* was correct about her being a non-medico doctor, but could> not judge the line of work. He also was close in saying that she is a> writer.> > *Sreeram ji* had been travelling and so we could get only a few points from> him. He is correct about two and close about another two. I wish he's taken> up a complete reading for the benefit of the group.> > Same for *Vinita ji*, she refrained from commenting, though she wasn't going> wrong.> > And *Renu ji* who for some reason didn't take a whole-hearted attempt.> Special appreciation for *Bob *(caz2r92) who was analytical in approach but> lacked confidence to make a confirmed statement. But his analysis for the> fields he took up was good.> > *Chanduchillji, Anirudh, Aditya, Dushyant, Chakravarti ji* all have been> correct in getting to the looks and personality. I'm sure for the rest they> will see where they went wrong.> > I thank all of you for lively interaction keen participation.> > Given below is a comparative chart to show how everyone has fared. The> columns are about the performance of participants with rows giving the areas> defined. (1-19)> > Green – Correct> Yellow – somewhat correct> Red – missed> Grey – not attempted> > 1. Aditya (AD)> 2. Anirudh (AN)> 3. Bob (BO)> 4. Chakravarty (CK)> 5. Chandra Hari (CH)> 6. Chandu2Chill (CC)> 7. Dushyant (DU)> 8. (GA)> 9. K. Gopu (KG)> 10. Krishna Seetharama (KS)> 11. Madhu Nair (MN)> 12. nameisego (NA)> 13. Renu (RE)> 14. Souvik Dutta (SD)> 15. Sreenadh (SR)> 16. Sreeram Srinivas (SS)> 17. Sunil Nair (SN)> 18. Vijaydas Pradeep (VP)> 19. Vinita (VI)> > > > > > > AD> > AN> > BO> > CK> > CH> > CC> > DU> > GA> > KG> > KS> > MN> > NA> > RE> > SD> > SR> > SS> > SN> > VP> > VI> > > > > > 1> > 2> > 3> > 4> > 5> > 6> > 7> > 8> > 9> > 10> > 11> > 12> > 13> > 14> > 15> > 16> > 17> > 18> > 19> > 1> > Looks> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2> > Nature> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3> > Family> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4> > Siblings> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5> > Education> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6> > Marriage> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7> > Children> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8> > Profession> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 9> > Assets> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 10> > Fin. Status> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 11> > Soc. status> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12> > Other pecul.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since it is very difficult to get absolutely to-the-point readings, I have> put the close-enough readings in green. Those who are somewhere near the> truth, are in yellow. Red is only when nothing is close to reality.> > This table shows that out of the 12 areas of native's life, each participant> has given how many correct readings, how many close readings and how many> they've totally missed. I have also given as to how many they have not> attempted at all.> > Name> > abbr> > Correct> > Readings> > Somewhat close> > Totally missed in> > Not Attempted> > Vijaydas Pradeep> > VP> > 7> > 3> > 2> > 0> > Madhu Nair> > MN> > 5> > 4> > 2> > 1> > Sunil Nair> > SN> > 3> > 7> > 1> > 1> > Sreenadh> > SR> > 3> > 6> > 2> > 2> > Sreeram Srinivas> > SS> > 2> > 2> > 1> > 7> > > > GA> > 2> > 4> > 6> > 0> > Krishna Seetharama> > KS> > 2> > 3> > 4> > 3> > Souvik Dutta> > SD> > 2> > 4> > 5> > 1> > Chandra Hari> > CH> > 2> > 3> > 3> > 4> > nameisego> > NA> > 1> > 3> > 6> > 2> > Vinita> > VI> > 1> > 1> > 0> > 10> > Chandu2Chill> > CC> > 2> > 1> > 5> > 4> > Aditya> > AD> > 1> > 2> > 8> > 1> > Bob> > BO> > 0> > 3> > 1> > 8> > Renu> > RE> > 0> > 2> > 2> > 8> > K. Gopu> > KG> > 0> > 2> > 3> > 7> > Anirudh> > AN> > 0> > 1> > 7> > 4> > Chakravarty> > CK> > 0> > 1> > 9> > 2> > Dushyant> > DU> > 0> > 1> > 5> > 6> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now I'll start posting my comments on individual readings. Hope everyone> enjoyed the exercise.> > Thanks and Regards> Neelam> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2008 Report Share Posted May 10, 2008 Hare rama krishna dear sreenadh ji a file of blind reading results has uploaded in file sections by Nellam ji every one can view it and in the original messge ,the messge and color scheme got turnicated by . pls check in file sections sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah , "Sreenadh" <sreesog wrote:>> > Dear All,> First of all I appreciate Neelam ji for conducting such a wonderful> exersise. Secondly, my heart felt congratulations to the winners viz.> Vijayadas ji, Madhu ji, Sunil ji etc for the very close to truth> readings. It was truely a wonderful experience!> I have some regrets (and some suggested extra work that, I hope some> one will undertake) as listed below -> * Even though I see mention of colors like Red, Green, Blue in> Neelam ji's post; I fear that part of the mail is missing. Look at these> statements -> ==>> Given below is a comparative chart to show how everyone has fared. The> columns are about the performance of participants with rows giving the> areas defined. (1-19)> > Green – Correct> Yellow – somewhat correct> Red – missed> Grey – not attempted> > <==> I looked for that colors and couldn't find it in the rest of the mail> [] . Then in the repost Sunil ji quoted -> ==>> absolutely to-the-point readings, I have put the close-enough readings> in green. Those who are somewhere near the truth, are in yellow. Red is> only when nothing is close to reality.> <==> Then again I looked for red and green and couldn't find it. []> > Neelam ji, Sunil ji your posts are too valuable - please don't put us> in dark; and I am expecting more mails from you in this regard.> > * I would request neelam ji to present her compartison of readings> done by different members (Quoting the statements provided by the> respective members), if possible, with links to the corresponding> messages.> > * Last but not the least, a humble request to conduct one more> similar blind chart exersise.. [>]> > Love and regards,> Sreenadh> > > > , "neelam gupta"> neelamgupta07@ wrote:> >> > Dear All,> >> > Here I am submitting the comparative results for all the participants> in the> > exercise. Later I will take each case and send my comments for all the> > readings, one by one. I also wish to state that I have compiled these> > results to the best of my ability without any biasness. Still if you> find> > any error in judging or presentation, please feel free to correct me.> >> > *Pradeepji was simply outstanding* in judging correctly almost all the> > spheres of native's life. 7 correct fields, 3 close and only 2 missed> areas.> > And he attempted all areas. Congratulations Pradeepji for the> wonderful> > observations. He was quite crisp and to-the point. He judged not only> looks> > and nature, but also education, marriage, multiple affairs, etc quite> > closely.> >> > *Madhu ji* was also superb in judging 5 fields correctly, and in 4> areas he> > is close. He comes closest in judging the profession. I also> appreciate> > Madhu ji's effort in giving us some peculiarities in the chart, many> of> > which are quite true.> >> > *Sunil ji* was also fantastic with 3 correct hits and close in almost> all> > the areas. He is the one who clearly said about two marriages. He also> gave> > good points about personality etc.> >> > *Sreenadh ji* was excellent in giving correct readings in 3 fields and> > almost there in 6 others. He was very close about siblings and nature> and> > personality.> >> > *Chandra Hari ji* would need a special mention as he had tried to be> precise> > with his comments and readings (not indulging in mumbo-jumbo). Like> Madhu> > ji, he has also tried to touch upon some specificities in the chart of> which> > many are true. I shall be giving my comments on those.> >> > And the best reading from Chandra Hari ji is* **his observation on a> still> > birth in 1989.* He misses the period by a few months, but the> observation is> > incredible. He would tell us how he saw this. Though his other> observations> > about children are not true.> >> > *Gaurav, Krishna ji, Souvik ji* also did very well as they were> correct in a> > couple of areas and close in many others. They also attempted almost> all> > fields.> >> > *Nameisego ji* was correct about her being a non-medico doctor, but> could> > not judge the line of work. He also was close in saying that she is a> > writer.> >> > *Sreeram ji* had been travelling and so we could get only a few points> from> > him. He is correct about two and close about another two. I wish he's> taken> > up a complete reading for the benefit of the group.> >> > Same for *Vinita ji*, she refrained from commenting, though she wasn't> going> > wrong.> >> > And *Renu ji* who for some reason didn't take a whole-hearted attempt.> > Special appreciation for *Bob *(caz2r92) who was analytical in> approach but> > lacked confidence to make a confirmed statement. But his analysis for> the> > fields he took up was good.> >> > *Chanduchillji, Anirudh, Aditya, Dushyant, Chakravarti ji* all have> been> > correct in getting to the looks and personality. I'm sure for the rest> they> > will see where they went wrong.> >> > I thank all of you for lively interaction keen participation.> >> > Given below is a comparative chart to show how everyone has fared. The> > columns are about the performance of participants with rows giving the> areas> > defined. (1-19)> >> > Green – Correct> > Yellow – somewhat correct> > Red – missed> > Grey – not attempted> >> > 1. Aditya (AD)> > 2. Anirudh (AN)> > 3. Bob (BO)> > 4. Chakravarty (CK)> > 5. Chandra Hari (CH)> > 6. Chandu2Chill (CC)> > 7. Dushyant (DU)> > 8. (GA)> > 9. K. Gopu (KG)> > 10. Krishna Seetharama (KS)> > 11. Madhu Nair (MN)> > 12. nameisego (NA)> > 13. Renu (RE)> > 14. Souvik Dutta (SD)> > 15. Sreenadh (SR)> > 16. Sreeram Srinivas (SS)> > 17. Sunil Nair (SN)> > 18. Vijaydas Pradeep (VP)> > 19. Vinita (VI)> >> >> >> >> >> >> > AD> >> > AN> >> > BO> >> > CK> >> > CH> >> > CC> >> > DU> >> > GA> >> > KG> >> > KS> >> > MN> >> > NA> >> > RE> >> > SD> >> > SR> >> > SS> >> > SN> >> > VP> >> > VI> >> >> >> >> >> > 1> >> > 2> >> > 3> >> > 4> >> > 5> >> > 6> >> > 7> >> > 8> >> > 9> >> > 10> >> > 11> >> > 12> >> > 13> >> > 14> >> > 15> >> > 16> >> > 17> >> > 18> >> > 19> >> > 1> >> > Looks> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 2> >> > Nature> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 3> >> > Family> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 4> >> > Siblings> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 5> >> > Education> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 6> >> > Marriage> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 7> >> > Children> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 8> >> > Profession> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 9> >> > Assets> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 10> >> > Fin. Status> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 11> >> > Soc. status> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 12> >> > Other pecul.> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Since it is very difficult to get absolutely to-the-point readings, I> have> > put the close-enough readings in green. Those who are somewhere near> the> > truth, are in yellow. Red is only when nothing is close to reality.> >> > This table shows that out of the 12 areas of native's life, each> participant> > has given how many correct readings, how many close readings and how> many> > they've totally missed. I have also given as to how many they have not> > attempted at all.> >> > Name> >> > abbr> >> > Correct> >> > Readings> >> > Somewhat close> >> > Totally missed in> >> > Not Attempted> >> > Vijaydas Pradeep> >> > VP> >> > 7> >> > 3> >> > 2> >> > 0> >> > Madhu Nair> >> > MN> >> > 5> >> > 4> >> > 2> >> > 1> >> > Sunil Nair> >> > SN> >> > 3> >> > 7> >> > 1> >> > 1> >> > Sreenadh> >> > SR> >> > 3> >> > 6> >> > 2> >> > 2> >> > Sreeram Srinivas> >> > SS> >> > 2> >> > 2> >> > 1> >> > 7> >> > > >> > GA> >> > 2> >> > 4> >> > 6> >> > 0> >> > Krishna Seetharama> >> > KS> >> > 2> >> > 3> >> > 4> >> > 3> >> > Souvik Dutta> >> > SD> >> > 2> >> > 4> >> > 5> >> > 1> >> > Chandra Hari> >> > CH> >> > 2> >> > 3> >> > 3> >> > 4> >> > nameisego> >> > NA> >> > 1> >> > 3> >> > 6> >> > 2> >> > Vinita> >> > VI> >> > 1> >> > 1> >> > 0> >> > 10> >> > Chandu2Chill> >> > CC> >> > 2> >> > 1> >> > 5> >> > 4> >> > Aditya> >> > AD> >> > 1> >> > 2> >> > 8> >> > 1> >> > Bob> >> > BO> >> > 0> >> > 3> >> > 1> >> > 8> >> > Renu> >> > RE> >> > 0> >> > 2> >> > 2> >> > 8> >> > K. Gopu> >> > KG> >> > 0> >> > 2> >> > 3> >> > 7> >> > Anirudh> >> > AN> >> > 0> >> > 1> >> > 7> >> > 4> >> > Chakravarty> >> > CK> >> > 0> >> > 1> >> > 9> >> > 2> >> > Dushyant> >> > DU> >> > 0> >> > 1> >> > 5> >> > 6> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Now I'll start posting my comments on individual readings. Hope> everyone> > enjoyed the exercise.> >> > Thanks and Regards> > Neelam> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2008 Report Share Posted May 10, 2008 Dear All, I just found that Neelam ji has uploaded the results in pdf form in the files section within the folder "Neelam Gupta". The URL is: Neelam%20Gupta/Blind%20chart%20results.pdf Interested people cab download the same to get the complete post given by Neelam ji.Regards,Sreenadh , "Sreenadh" <sreesog wrote:>> > Dear All,> First of all I appreciate Neelam ji for conducting such a wonderful> exersise. Secondly, my heart felt congratulations to the winners viz.> Vijayadas ji, Madhu ji, Sunil ji etc for the very close to truth> readings. It was truely a wonderful experience!> I have some regrets (and some suggested extra work that, I hope some> one will undertake) as listed below -> * Even though I see mention of colors like Red, Green, Blue in> Neelam ji's post; I fear that part of the mail is missing. Look at these> statements -> ==>> Given below is a comparative chart to show how everyone has fared. The> columns are about the performance of participants with rows giving the> areas defined. (1-19)> > Green – Correct> Yellow – somewhat correct> Red – missed> Grey – not attempted> > <==> I looked for that colors and couldn't find it in the rest of the mail> [] . Then in the repost Sunil ji quoted -> ==>> absolutely to-the-point readings, I have put the close-enough readings> in green. Those who are somewhere near the truth, are in yellow. Red is> only when nothing is close to reality.> <==> Then again I looked for red and green and couldn't find it. []> > Neelam ji, Sunil ji your posts are too valuable - please don't put us> in dark; and I am expecting more mails from you in this regard.> > * I would request neelam ji to present her compartison of readings> done by different members (Quoting the statements provided by the> respective members), if possible, with links to the corresponding> messages.> > * Last but not the least, a humble request to conduct one more> similar blind chart exersise.. [>]> > Love and regards,> Sreenadh> > > > , "neelam gupta"> neelamgupta07@ wrote:> >> > Dear All,> >> > Here I am submitting the comparative results for all the participants> in the> > exercise. Later I will take each case and send my comments for all the> > readings, one by one. I also wish to state that I have compiled these> > results to the best of my ability without any biasness. Still if you> find> > any error in judging or presentation, please feel free to correct me.> >> > *Pradeepji was simply outstanding* in judging correctly almost all the> > spheres of native's life. 7 correct fields, 3 close and only 2 missed> areas.> > And he attempted all areas. Congratulations Pradeepji for the> wonderful> > observations. He was quite crisp and to-the point. He judged not only> looks> > and nature, but also education, marriage, multiple affairs, etc quite> > closely.> >> > *Madhu ji* was also superb in judging 5 fields correctly, and in 4> areas he> > is close. He comes closest in judging the profession. I also> appreciate> > Madhu ji's effort in giving us some peculiarities in the chart, many> of> > which are quite true.> >> > *Sunil ji* was also fantastic with 3 correct hits and close in almost> all> > the areas. He is the one who clearly said about two marriages. He also> gave> > good points about personality etc.> >> > *Sreenadh ji* was excellent in giving correct readings in 3 fields and> > almost there in 6 others. He was very close about siblings and nature> and> > personality.> >> > *Chandra Hari ji* would need a special mention as he had tried to be> precise> > with his comments and readings (not indulging in mumbo-jumbo). Like> Madhu> > ji, he has also tried to touch upon some specificities in the chart of> which> > many are true. I shall be giving my comments on those.> >> > And the best reading from Chandra Hari ji is* **his observation on a> still> > birth in 1989.* He misses the period by a few months, but the> observation is> > incredible. He would tell us how he saw this. Though his other> observations> > about children are not true.> >> > *Gaurav, Krishna ji, Souvik ji* also did very well as they were> correct in a> > couple of areas and close in many others. They also attempted almost> all> > fields.> >> > *Nameisego ji* was correct about her being a non-medico doctor, but> could> > not judge the line of work. He also was close in saying that she is a> > writer.> >> > *Sreeram ji* had been travelling and so we could get only a few points> from> > him. He is correct about two and close about another two. I wish he's> taken> > up a complete reading for the benefit of the group.> >> > Same for *Vinita ji*, she refrained from commenting, though she wasn't> going> > wrong.> >> > And *Renu ji* who for some reason didn't take a whole-hearted attempt.> > Special appreciation for *Bob *(caz2r92) who was analytical in> approach but> > lacked confidence to make a confirmed statement. But his analysis for> the> > fields he took up was good.> >> > *Chanduchillji, Anirudh, Aditya, Dushyant, Chakravarti ji* all have> been> > correct in getting to the looks and personality. I'm sure for the rest> they> > will see where they went wrong.> >> > I thank all of you for lively interaction keen participation.> >> > Given below is a comparative chart to show how everyone has fared. The> > columns are about the performance of participants with rows giving the> areas> > defined. (1-19)> >> > Green – Correct> > Yellow – somewhat correct> > Red – missed> > Grey – not attempted> >> > 1. Aditya (AD)> > 2. Anirudh (AN)> > 3. Bob (BO)> > 4. Chakravarty (CK)> > 5. Chandra Hari (CH)> > 6. Chandu2Chill (CC)> > 7. Dushyant (DU)> > 8. (GA)> > 9. K. Gopu (KG)> > 10. Krishna Seetharama (KS)> > 11. Madhu Nair (MN)> > 12. nameisego (NA)> > 13. Renu (RE)> > 14. Souvik Dutta (SD)> > 15. Sreenadh (SR)> > 16. Sreeram Srinivas (SS)> > 17. Sunil Nair (SN)> > 18. Vijaydas Pradeep (VP)> > 19. Vinita (VI)> >> >> >> >> >> >> > AD> >> > AN> >> > BO> >> > CK> >> > CH> >> > CC> >> > DU> >> > GA> >> > KG> >> > KS> >> > MN> >> > NA> >> > RE> >> > SD> >> > SR> >> > SS> >> > SN> >> > VP> >> > VI> >> >> >> >> >> > 1> >> > 2> >> > 3> >> > 4> >> > 5> >> > 6> >> > 7> >> > 8> >> > 9> >> > 10> >> > 11> >> > 12> >> > 13> >> > 14> >> > 15> >> > 16> >> > 17> >> > 18> >> > 19> >> > 1> >> > Looks> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 2> >> > Nature> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 3> >> > Family> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 4> >> > Siblings> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 5> >> > Education> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 6> >> > Marriage> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 7> >> > Children> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 8> >> > Profession> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 9> >> > Assets> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 10> >> > Fin. Status> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 11> >> > Soc. status> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 12> >> > Other pecul.> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Since it is very difficult to get absolutely to-the-point readings, I> have> > put the close-enough readings in green. Those who are somewhere near> the> > truth, are in yellow. Red is only when nothing is close to reality.> >> > This table shows that out of the 12 areas of native's life, each> participant> > has given how many correct readings, how many close readings and how> many> > they've totally missed. I have also given as to how many they have not> > attempted at all.> >> > Name> >> > abbr> >> > Correct> >> > Readings> >> > Somewhat close> >> > Totally missed in> >> > Not Attempted> >> > Vijaydas Pradeep> >> > VP> >> > 7> >> > 3> >> > 2> >> > 0> >> > Madhu Nair> >> > MN> >> > 5> >> > 4> >> > 2> >> > 1> >> > Sunil Nair> >> > SN> >> > 3> >> > 7> >> > 1> >> > 1> >> > Sreenadh> >> > SR> >> > 3> >> > 6> >> > 2> >> > 2> >> > Sreeram Srinivas> >> > SS> >> > 2> >> > 2> >> > 1> >> > 7> >> > > >> > GA> >> > 2> >> > 4> >> > 6> >> > 0> >> > Krishna Seetharama> >> > KS> >> > 2> >> > 3> >> > 4> >> > 3> >> > Souvik Dutta> >> > SD> >> > 2> >> > 4> >> > 5> >> > 1> >> > Chandra Hari> >> > CH> >> > 2> >> > 3> >> > 3> >> > 4> >> > nameisego> >> > NA> >> > 1> >> > 3> >> > 6> >> > 2> >> > Vinita> >> > VI> >> > 1> >> > 1> >> > 0> >> > 10> >> > Chandu2Chill> >> > CC> >> > 2> >> > 1> >> > 5> >> > 4> >> > Aditya> >> > AD> >> > 1> >> > 2> >> > 8> >> > 1> >> > Bob> >> > BO> >> > 0> >> > 3> >> > 1> >> > 8> >> > Renu> >> > RE> >> > 0> >> > 2> >> > 2> >> > 8> >> > K. Gopu> >> > KG> >> > 0> >> > 2> >> > 3> >> > 7> >> > Anirudh> >> > AN> >> > 0> >> > 1> >> > 7> >> > 4> >> > Chakravarty> >> > CK> >> > 0> >> > 1> >> > 9> >> > 2> >> > Dushyant> >> > DU> >> > 0> >> > 1> >> > 5> >> > 6> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Now I'll start posting my comments on individual readings. Hope> everyone> > enjoyed the exercise.> >> > Thanks and Regards> > Neelam> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.