Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 Dear Mr. Leela, 1) To find birth data of a member in the group is NOT a surprise. Tell me why should it surprise you, when none has expressed it, nor anyone asked for a personal reading on that birth data. 2) You wanted to revolutionarize the astrology taking credentials of your jyotish Guru's name, Sripathi & Varahamihira...etc.. We have provided a platform of interested to learn astrologers of varied knowledge. 3) You accept or reject or decide to keep your proposals in hiding, till you get feedback from other , is your decision. We are comfortable either way. 4) But expect less rhetoric on your claims. 5) Let us keep focussed on astrology. Else, we are not interested irrespective of your vast knowledgebase - to which we are ignorant - believe others also agree with me on this. With regards, Sreeram_Srinivas , " vrajleela " <vrajleela wrote: > > Dear Members > > > Sunilji, you have invited me to this group by pasting my postings from > other group, and assured me that there will be no personal readings but > subject discussion - but I am dumb found when I saw birth details of Mr > Sreenadhji!!? > Moreover, Sreeramji and Sreenadhji have jumped to conclusions that I may > be searching for Sishyas (Sreenadhji's opinion) and on/offline tutorial > (Sreeramji's opinion). I haven't disclosed my proposals yet, but these > two persons are feeling such, which I request to sort such > misunderstandings for the benefit of True seekers > > Jai Jaimini > Jai Varahamihira > Jairadhe > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 Dear Members, I remember when blind chart exercise was about to begin, Mr. Sreenadh remarked in his post that 'many idols will fall...'. How true these words proved. In era of internet where virtual group exists, nobody is usre about the credentials of other persons. Only way to gauge their knowledge is their postings, their recalling names of sages, referring to old classics. In general, whoever is quoting old scriptures on subject, namimg old classics and using loads of jargons, is held in awe by many in the group. Whatever amount of readings one has of old classics, cramming of slokas, including tall claims of researches, fact remains that any one who can predict with more accuracy more frequently, that person alone is knowledgeable. There were 2 types. One who participated, they need to be lauded for courage. Other who did not participate. second types belong to the category who create many excuses like crashing of computers, failing of internet etc. curiously in today's era of computers, rectification of computers faults still take those many days which suit them. 'Many Idols will fall...' and indeed many have fallen. Falling of persons in predicting is inevitable, but it is painful for those whose pretensions of knowledge of astrology are as tall as their claims. Many thanks to Neelamji who made exercise very interesting and learning experience. Even a new member like me, who is having very little knowledge of subject, was benefitted. This group's reputation has indeed enhanced by her presence, which is ably supported by Mr. Sreenadh, Nairji, SSji. Thanks to all moderators for proving learning ground for people like me. I hope people may not say to me that i am not an authority on subject to say all above, but writing above requires little commonsense and little understanding of dynamics of group. With best regards, Anirudh , " sreeram srinivas " <sreeram64 wrote: > > > Dear Mr. Leela, > > 1) To find birth data of a member in the group is NOT a surprise. Tell > me why should it surprise you, when none has expressed it, nor anyone > asked for a personal reading on that birth data. > > 2) You wanted to revolutionarize the astrology taking credentials of > your jyotish Guru's name, Sripathi & Varahamihira...etc.. We have > provided a platform of interested to learn astrologers of varied > knowledge. > > 3) You accept or reject or decide to keep your proposals in hiding, till > you get feedback from other , is your decision. We are > comfortable either way. > > 4) But expect less rhetoric on your claims. > > 5) Let us keep focussed on astrology. Else, we are not interested > irrespective of your vast knowledgebase - to which we are ignorant - > believe others also agree with me on this. > > With regards, > > Sreeram_Srinivas > > > , " vrajleela " > <vrajleela@> wrote: > > > > Dear Members > > > > > > Sunilji, you have invited me to this group by pasting my postings from > > other group, and assured me that there will be no personal readings > but > > subject discussion - but I am dumb found when I saw birth details of > Mr > > Sreenadhji!!? > > Moreover, Sreeramji and Sreenadhji have jumped to conclusions that I > may > > be searching for Sishyas (Sreenadhji's opinion) and on/offline > tutorial > > (Sreeramji's opinion). I haven't disclosed my proposals yet, but these > > two persons are feeling such, which I request to sort such > > misunderstandings for the benefit of True seekers > > > > Jai Jaimini > > Jai Varahamihira > > Jairadhe > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 Dear Anirudh ji, Thanks for the clear observations and good words.Love and regards,Sreenadh , "anirudh_us" <anirudh_us wrote:>> Dear Members,> I remember when blind chart exercise was about to begin, Mr. Sreenadh > remarked in his post that 'many idols will fall...'. How true these > words proved.> > In era of internet where virtual group exists, nobody is usre about > the credentials of other persons. Only way to gauge their knowledge > is their postings, their recalling names of sages, referring to old > classics. In general, whoever is quoting old scriptures on subject, > namimg old classics and using loads of jargons, is held in awe by > many in the group.> > Whatever amount of readings one has of old classics, cramming of > slokas, including tall claims of researches, fact remains that any > one who can predict with more accuracy more frequently, that person > alone is knowledgeable. > > There were 2 types. One who participated, they need to be lauded for > courage. Other who did not participate. second types belong to the > category who create many excuses like crashing of computers, failing > of internet etc. curiously in today's era of computers, rectification > of computers faults still take those many days which suit them.> > 'Many Idols will fall...' and indeed many have fallen. Falling of > persons in predicting is inevitable, but it is painful for those > whose pretensions of knowledge of astrology are as tall as their > claims.> > Many thanks to Neelamji who made exercise very interesting and > learning experience. Even a new member like me, who is having very > little knowledge of subject, was benefitted. This group's reputation > has indeed enhanced by her presence, which is ably supported by Mr. > Sreenadh, Nairji, SSji.> > Thanks to all moderators for proving learning ground for people like > me.> > I hope people may not say to me that i am not an authority on subject > to say all above, but writing above requires little commonsense and > little understanding of dynamics of group.> > With best regards,> > Anirudh > > , "sreeram srinivas" > sreeram64@ wrote:> >> > > > Dear Mr. Leela,> > > > 1) To find birth data of a member in the group is NOT a surprise. > Tell> > me why should it surprise you, when none has expressed it, nor > anyone> > asked for a personal reading on that birth data.> > > > 2) You wanted to revolutionarize the astrology taking credentials of> > your jyotish Guru's name, Sripathi & Varahamihira...etc.. We have> > provided a platform of interested to learn astrologers of varied> > knowledge.> > > > 3) You accept or reject or decide to keep your proposals in hiding, > till> > you get feedback from other , is your decision. We are> > comfortable either way.> > > > 4) But expect less rhetoric on your claims.> > > > 5) Let us keep focussed on astrology. Else, we are not interested> > irrespective of your vast knowledgebase - to which we are > ignorant -> > believe others also agree with me on this.> > > > With regards,> > > > Sreeram_Srinivas> > > > > > , "vrajleela"> > <vrajleela@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Members> > >> > >> > > Sunilji, you have invited me to this group by pasting my postings > from> > > other group, and assured me that there will be no personal > readings> > but> > > subject discussion - but I am dumb found when I saw birth details > of> > Mr> > > Sreenadhji!!?> > > Moreover, Sreeramji and Sreenadhji have jumped to conclusions > that I> > may> > > be searching for Sishyas (Sreenadhji's opinion) and on/offline> > tutorial> > > (Sreeramji's opinion). I haven't disclosed my proposals yet, but > these> > > two persons are feeling such, which I request to sort such> > > misunderstandings for the benefit of True seekers> > >> > > Jai Jaimini> > > Jai Varahamihira> > > Jairadhe> > >> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.