Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 Hon' Gurus, How is Abhijeet Nakshatra to be interpreted mathematically ? Should it be like Pandit Rath has put or for the purpose of Sarvatobhadrachakra we need to divide the whole zodiac of 360 degrees in 28 equal parts ? Why is Abhijeet nakshatra derived in this manner (some part of Uttara Ashadha and Shravan) rather than assigning one independent part to it ? Why we have to consider Abhijeet nakshatra in special cases only ? Kedar Damle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 Dear Mr. Kedar Damle, We are totally new to this theory of Abhijit Nakshatra as mentioned in your mail. We have NO gurus in this group, so cannot answer your query for the logics does not belong this group. We would discuss this subject in our own style later. With regards, Sreeram_Srinivas , " damked " <damked wrote: > > Hon' Gurus, > > How is Abhijeet Nakshatra to be interpreted mathematically ? Should it > be like Pandit Rath has put or for the purpose of Sarvatobhadrachakra > we need to divide the whole zodiac of 360 degrees in 28 equal parts ? > Why is Abhijeet nakshatra derived in this manner (some part of Uttara > Ashadha and Shravan) rather than assigning one independent part to > it ? Why we have to consider Abhijeet nakshatra in special cases only ? > > Kedar Damle > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.