Fwd: [Ohm_Namah_Sivaya] Judging the Longivity - Blind chart exersise

[Guest guest]

Dear All, The following is data provided for a Longevity determination exercise happened in Ohm_Namah_Sivaya . It was a BC quiz in which I failed miserably. But still it was fun. Many active/major members of this group who are members of Ohm_Namah_Sivaya group are already aware of this set of data and the related result. This data is for the benefit of others who are not present in ONS group - and would like to play a game of BC Longivity prediction exercise. It was revealed by Neelam ji that the chart provided by her (the first chart) is of an already dead individual; Madhu ji provided the second data without revealing whether the second native is alive or not. The participants are requested to assess the longevity of the natives and if dead, then to determine at which Period Dasa-Antara the death occurred; if possible an indication of the cause of death was also appreciated. Since the out come is already known, the members of ONS group will not attempt this quiz again; But if interested others can.Love and regards,SreenadhOhm_Namah_Sivaya , "neelam gupta" <neelamgupta07 wrote:

Re: [Ohm_Namah_Sivaya] Re: Judging the Longivity - Blind chart exersises....A suggestion/request

Dear Nameisego ji,Your suggestions are apt and since this is the first quiz in ohm_namah_sivaya, lets number it ohm_001_ne.So the details for the quiz are:No: ohm_001_ne BT: 29.8.1963/8.45 hrs IST/DelhiLongevity assessmentDate of Closing: 18.5.2008/24.00hrs ISTposted by Neelam GuptaWe have another data posted by Madhuji where this native also gets the same lagna and a very similar configuration of planets. I am sure it will make an interesting study and comparison. The details are:No. ohm_002_maBT: 29.8.1963/7.49 hrs IST/Thiruvalla, Kottayam, Kerala.Longevity assessmentposted by Madhu NairI would appreciate if everyone attempts a comparative analysis. RegardsNeelam--- End forwarded message ---

[Guest guest]

Respected Sreenadhji

Pranam,

My try on these two charts: The first chart person might

have died in the period of Mars main and Saturn sub. Date about 28th

April 2008 to 11th may 2008. Second person is alive.

Thanks, Please give the correct answer

Aditya

 

 

 

 

, " Sreenadh "

<sreesog wrote:

>

>

> Dear All,

> The following is data provided for a Longevity determination

exercise

> happened in Ohm_Namah_Sivaya . It was a BC quiz in

which I

> failed miserably. [] But still it was fun. [] Many

active/major

> members of this group who are members of Ohm_Namah_Sivaya group are

> already aware of this set of data and the related result. This

data is

> for the benefit of others who are not present in ONS group - and

would

> like to play a game of BC Longivity prediction exercise.

> It was revealed by Neelam ji that the chart provided by her (the

first

> chart) is of an already dead individual; Madhu ji provided the

second

> data without revealing whether the second native is alive or not.

The

> participants are requested to assess the longevity of the natives

and if

> dead, then to determine at which Period Dasa-Antara the death

occurred;

> if possible an indication of the cause of death was also

appreciated.

> Since the out come is already known, the members of ONS group

will not

> attempt this quiz again; But if interested others can.

> Love and regards,

> Sreenadh

>

> Ohm_Namah_Sivaya , " neelam gupta "

> <neelamgupta07@> wrote:

>

>

> Re: [Ohm_Namah_Sivaya] Re: Judging the Longivity - Blind chart

> exersises....A suggestion/request

> Dear Nameisego ji,

>

> Your suggestions are apt and since this is the first quiz in

> ohm_namah_sivaya, lets number it ohm_001_ne.

>

> So the details for the quiz are:

>

> No: ohm_001_ne

> BT: 29.8.1963/8.45 hrs IST/Delhi

> Longevity assessment

> Date of Closing: 18.5.2008/24.00hrs IST

> posted by Neelam Gupta

>

> We have another data posted by Madhuji where this native also gets

the

> same lagna and a very similar configuration of planets. I am sure it

> will make an interesting study and comparison. The details are:

>

> No. ohm_002_ma

> BT: 29.8.1963/7.49 hrs IST/Thiruvalla, Kottayam, Kerala.

> Longevity assessment

> posted by Madhu Nair

>

> I would appreciate if everyone attempts a comparative analysis.

>

> Regards

> Neelam

>

> --- End forwarded message ---

>

[Guest guest]

Sreenadh Ji,

 

Dispositor of 8H is Ma and it is in Kendra, with its dispositor

exalted and in lagna lord. (By the way native should be very

intelligent ) Hence, native does not have balaristha. However, 7HL is

neither in kendra nor in corner and hence, native might have Madhya

aayu.

 

For this native, Maraka can be Ve (2HL) and Ju (7HL). But Ju being

malefic and is in its own sign. Ju is most satwik in Meena, hence, Ju

is ruled out. Ve might be considered as maraka, but it is 9th from Mo

and hence its maraka effect is mitigated. But Su is in conjuction

with Ve and hence it also qualifies as Maraka. But I rule out this

also as I said that it is 9th from Mo and lord of 9th. Secondly, at

the end of Su MD, native might have been 31 years, which is not

Madhya aayu.

 

3HL is Ke and Ma. Hence, Ke may also be maraka. Mo is in conjuction

with it. The dispositor Ju is also 7HL, which maraka house. But

native has already passed ke MD, when he was childbut balarishtha is

ruled out hence, Ke might not kill. But conjuct Mo is in Mool

nakshatra which is owned by Ke. Hence, Mo will give result of Ke.

Beside Mo, is malefic for native as he was born in shukla dasami.

(thus fulfilling condition of malefic in association with 3HL)Thus Mo

can be very critical. Mo ran from 31 yrs of native life to 41 yrs,

which is Madhya Aayu ( I take 35 yrs+ as Madhya AAyu). It can be Mo-

Sa dasa which qualifies as worst.

 

After, Ma MD might also be very critical. Malefic being 8HL.

Hence my conclusion is native might have faced almost death like

situation in Mo dasa or in Ma MD. My take is 1999-2001 as MD and Ad

lords are at 2-12 position and this qualifies to be Madhya aayu.

 

Regards,

Anirudh

 

 

, " Sreenadh "

<sreesog wrote:

>

>

> Dear All,

> The following is data provided for a Longevity determination

exercise

> happened in Ohm_Namah_Sivaya . It was a BC quiz in

which I

> failed miserably. [] But still it was fun. [] Many

active/major

> members of this group who are members of Ohm_Namah_Sivaya group are

> already aware of this set of data and the related result. This

data is

> for the benefit of others who are not present in ONS group - and

would

> like to play a game of BC Longivity prediction exercise.

> It was revealed by Neelam ji that the chart provided by her (the

first

> chart) is of an already dead individual; Madhu ji provided the

second

> data without revealing whether the second native is alive or not.

The

> participants are requested to assess the longevity of the natives

and if

> dead, then to determine at which Period Dasa-Antara the death

occurred;

> if possible an indication of the cause of death was also

appreciated.

> Since the out come is already known, the members of ONS group

will not

> attempt this quiz again; But if interested others can.

> Love and regards,

> Sreenadh

>

> Ohm_Namah_Sivaya , " neelam gupta "

> <neelamgupta07@> wrote:

>

>

> Re: [Ohm_Namah_Sivaya] Re: Judging the Longivity - Blind chart

> exersises....A suggestion/request

> Dear Nameisego ji,

>

> Your suggestions are apt and since this is the first quiz in

> ohm_namah_sivaya, lets number it ohm_001_ne.

>

> So the details for the quiz are:

>

> No: ohm_001_ne

> BT: 29.8.1963/8.45 hrs IST/Delhi

> Longevity assessment

> Date of Closing: 18.5.2008/24.00hrs IST

> posted by Neelam Gupta

>

> We have another data posted by Madhuji where this native also gets

the

> same lagna and a very similar configuration of planets. I am sure it

> will make an interesting study and comparison. The details are:

>

> No. ohm_002_ma

> BT: 29.8.1963/7.49 hrs IST/Thiruvalla, Kottayam, Kerala.

> Longevity assessment

> posted by Madhu Nair

>

> I would appreciate if everyone attempts a comparative analysis.

>

> Regards

> Neelam

>

> --- End forwarded message ---

>

[Guest guest]

There is typo. Ju is benefic(not malefic) and this native, whose

birth data is one which was posted by neelam ji

 

Regards

anirudh

 

, " anirudh_us "

<anirudh_us wrote:

>

> Sreenadh Ji,

>

> Dispositor of 8H is Ma and it is in Kendra, with its dispositor

> exalted and in lagna lord. (By the way native should be very

> intelligent ) Hence, native does not have balaristha. However, 7HL

is

> neither in kendra nor in corner and hence, native might have Madhya

> aayu.

>

> For this native, Maraka can be Ve (2HL) and Ju (7HL). But Ju being

> malefic and is in its own sign. Ju is most satwik in Meena, hence,

Ju

> is ruled out. Ve might be considered as maraka, but it is 9th from

Mo

> and hence its maraka effect is mitigated. But Su is in conjuction

> with Ve and hence it also qualifies as Maraka. But I rule out this

> also as I said that it is 9th from Mo and lord of 9th. Secondly, at

> the end of Su MD, native might have been 31 years, which is not

> Madhya aayu.

>

> 3HL is Ke and Ma. Hence, Ke may also be maraka. Mo is in conjuction

> with it. The dispositor Ju is also 7HL, which maraka house. But

> native has already passed ke MD, when he was childbut balarishtha

is

> ruled out hence, Ke might not kill. But conjuct Mo is in Mool

> nakshatra which is owned by Ke. Hence, Mo will give result of Ke.

> Beside Mo, is malefic for native as he was born in shukla dasami.

> (thus fulfilling condition of malefic in association with 3HL)Thus

Mo

> can be very critical. Mo ran from 31 yrs of native life to 41 yrs,

> which is Madhya Aayu ( I take 35 yrs+ as Madhya AAyu). It can be Mo-

> Sa dasa which qualifies as worst.

>

> After, Ma MD might also be very critical. Malefic being 8HL.

> Hence my conclusion is native might have faced almost death like

> situation in Mo dasa or in Ma MD. My take is 1999-2001 as MD and Ad

> lords are at 2-12 position and this qualifies to be Madhya aayu.

>

> Regards,

> Anirudh

>

>

> , " Sreenadh "

> <sreesog@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear All,

> > The following is data provided for a Longevity determination

> exercise

> > happened in Ohm_Namah_Sivaya . It was a BC quiz in

> which I

> > failed miserably. [] But still it was fun. [] Many

> active/major

> > members of this group who are members of Ohm_Namah_Sivaya group

are

> > already aware of this set of data and the related result. This

> data is

> > for the benefit of others who are not present in ONS group - and

> would

> > like to play a game of BC Longivity prediction exercise.

> > It was revealed by Neelam ji that the chart provided by her

(the

> first

> > chart) is of an already dead individual; Madhu ji provided the

> second

> > data without revealing whether the second native is alive or

not.

> The

> > participants are requested to assess the longevity of the natives

> and if

> > dead, then to determine at which Period Dasa-Antara the death

> occurred;

> > if possible an indication of the cause of death was also

> appreciated.

> > Since the out come is already known, the members of ONS group

> will not

> > attempt this quiz again; But if interested others can.

> > Love and regards,

> > Sreenadh

> >

> > Ohm_Namah_Sivaya , " neelam gupta "

> > <neelamgupta07@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Re: [Ohm_Namah_Sivaya] Re: Judging the Longivity - Blind chart

> > exersises....A suggestion/request

> > Dear Nameisego ji,

> >

> > Your suggestions are apt and since this is the first quiz in

> > ohm_namah_sivaya, lets number it ohm_001_ne.

> >

> > So the details for the quiz are:

> >

> > No: ohm_001_ne

> > BT: 29.8.1963/8.45 hrs IST/Delhi

> > Longevity assessment

> > Date of Closing: 18.5.2008/24.00hrs IST

> > posted by Neelam Gupta

> >

> > We have another data posted by Madhuji where this native also

gets

> the

> > same lagna and a very similar configuration of planets. I am sure

it

> > will make an interesting study and comparison. The details are:

> >

> > No. ohm_002_ma

> > BT: 29.8.1963/7.49 hrs IST/Thiruvalla, Kottayam, Kerala.

> > Longevity assessment

> > posted by Madhu Nair

> >

> > I would appreciate if everyone attempts a comparative analysis.

> >

> > Regards

> > Neelam

> >

> > --- End forwarded message ---

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Anirudh ji and Aditya ji,

Aditya ji was right in stating that the first individual is already

dead and the second alive. Unlike Anirudh ji stated, the first

individual died in Moon-Ra around the 36-37 as informed by Neelam ji.

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

, " anirudh_us "

<anirudh_us wrote:

>

> There is typo. Ju is benefic(not malefic) and this native, whose

> birth data is one which was posted by neelam ji

>

> Regards

> anirudh

>

> , " anirudh_us "

> <anirudh_us@> wrote:

> >

> > Sreenadh Ji,

> >

> > Dispositor of 8H is Ma and it is in Kendra, with its dispositor

> > exalted and in lagna lord. (By the way native should be very

> > intelligent ) Hence, native does not have balaristha. However,

7HL

> is

> > neither in kendra nor in corner and hence, native might have

Madhya

> > aayu.

> >

> > For this native, Maraka can be Ve (2HL) and Ju (7HL). But Ju

being

> > malefic and is in its own sign. Ju is most satwik in Meena,

hence,

> Ju

> > is ruled out. Ve might be considered as maraka, but it is 9th

from

> Mo

> > and hence its maraka effect is mitigated. But Su is in conjuction

> > with Ve and hence it also qualifies as Maraka. But I rule out

this

> > also as I said that it is 9th from Mo and lord of 9th. Secondly,

at

> > the end of Su MD, native might have been 31 years, which is not

> > Madhya aayu.

> >

> > 3HL is Ke and Ma. Hence, Ke may also be maraka. Mo is in

conjuction

> > with it. The dispositor Ju is also 7HL, which maraka house. But

> > native has already passed ke MD, when he was childbut balarishtha

> is

> > ruled out hence, Ke might not kill. But conjuct Mo is in Mool

> > nakshatra which is owned by Ke. Hence, Mo will give result of

Ke.

> > Beside Mo, is malefic for native as he was born in shukla dasami.

> > (thus fulfilling condition of malefic in association with 3HL)

Thus

> Mo

> > can be very critical. Mo ran from 31 yrs of native life to 41

yrs,

> > which is Madhya Aayu ( I take 35 yrs+ as Madhya AAyu). It can be

Mo-

> > Sa dasa which qualifies as worst.

> >

> > After, Ma MD might also be very critical. Malefic being 8HL.

> > Hence my conclusion is native might have faced almost death like

> > situation in Mo dasa or in Ma MD. My take is 1999-2001 as MD and

Ad

> > lords are at 2-12 position and this qualifies to be Madhya aayu.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Anirudh

> >

> >

> > , " Sreenadh "

> > <sreesog@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear All,

> > > The following is data provided for a Longevity determination

> > exercise

> > > happened in Ohm_Namah_Sivaya . It was a BC quiz in

> > which I

> > > failed miserably. [] But still it was fun. [] Many

> > active/major

> > > members of this group who are members of Ohm_Namah_Sivaya group

> are

> > > already aware of this set of data and the related result. This

> > data is

> > > for the benefit of others who are not present in ONS group -

and

> > would

> > > like to play a game of BC Longivity prediction exercise.

> > > It was revealed by Neelam ji that the chart provided by her

> (the

> > first

> > > chart) is of an already dead individual; Madhu ji provided the

> > second

> > > data without revealing whether the second native is alive or

> not.

> > The

> > > participants are requested to assess the longevity of the

natives

> > and if

> > > dead, then to determine at which Period Dasa-Antara the death

> > occurred;

> > > if possible an indication of the cause of death was also

> > appreciated.

> > > Since the out come is already known, the members of ONS

group

> > will not

> > > attempt this quiz again; But if interested others can.

> > > Love and regards,

> > > Sreenadh

> > >

> > > Ohm_Namah_Sivaya , " neelam gupta "

> > > <neelamgupta07@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Re: [Ohm_Namah_Sivaya] Re: Judging the Longivity - Blind chart

> > > exersises....A suggestion/request

> > > Dear Nameisego ji,

> > >

> > > Your suggestions are apt and since this is the first quiz in

> > > ohm_namah_sivaya, lets number it ohm_001_ne.

> > >

> > > So the details for the quiz are:

> > >

> > > No: ohm_001_ne

> > > BT: 29.8.1963/8.45 hrs IST/Delhi

> > > Longevity assessment

> > > Date of Closing: 18.5.2008/24.00hrs IST

> > > posted by Neelam Gupta

> > >

> > > We have another data posted by Madhuji where this native also

> gets

> > the

> > > same lagna and a very similar configuration of planets. I am

sure

> it

> > > will make an interesting study and comparison. The details are:

> > >

> > > No. ohm_002_ma

> > > BT: 29.8.1963/7.49 hrs IST/Thiruvalla, Kottayam, Kerala.

> > > Longevity assessment

> > > posted by Madhu Nair

> > >

> > > I would appreciate if everyone attempts a comparative analysis.

> > >

> > > Regards

> > > Neelam

> > >

> > > --- End forwarded message ---

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Sreenadh Ji,

My take was Mo-Sa dasa, but native died in Mo-Ra. Hence I was off by

2 years.

 

Thanks and regards

 

Anirudh

 

, " Sreenadh "

<sreesog wrote:

>

> Dear Anirudh ji and Aditya ji,

> Aditya ji was right in stating that the first individual is

already

> dead and the second alive. Unlike Anirudh ji stated, the first

> individual died in Moon-Ra around the 36-37 as informed by Neelam

ji.

> Love and regards,

> Sreenadh

>

> , " anirudh_us "

> <anirudh_us@> wrote:

> >

> > There is typo. Ju is benefic(not malefic) and this native, whose

> > birth data is one which was posted by neelam ji

> >

> > Regards

> > anirudh

> >

> > , " anirudh_us "

> > <anirudh_us@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Sreenadh Ji,

> > >

> > > Dispositor of 8H is Ma and it is in Kendra, with its dispositor

> > > exalted and in lagna lord. (By the way native should be very

> > > intelligent ) Hence, native does not have balaristha. However,

> 7HL

> > is

> > > neither in kendra nor in corner and hence, native might have

> Madhya

> > > aayu.

> > >

> > > For this native, Maraka can be Ve (2HL) and Ju (7HL). But Ju

> being

> > > malefic and is in its own sign. Ju is most satwik in Meena,

> hence,

> > Ju

> > > is ruled out. Ve might be considered as maraka, but it is 9th

> from

> > Mo

> > > and hence its maraka effect is mitigated. But Su is in

conjuction

> > > with Ve and hence it also qualifies as Maraka. But I rule out

> this

> > > also as I said that it is 9th from Mo and lord of 9th.

Secondly,

> at

> > > the end of Su MD, native might have been 31 years, which is not

> > > Madhya aayu.

> > >

> > > 3HL is Ke and Ma. Hence, Ke may also be maraka. Mo is in

> conjuction

> > > with it. The dispositor Ju is also 7HL, which maraka house. But

> > > native has already passed ke MD, when he was childbut

balarishtha

> > is

> > > ruled out hence, Ke might not kill. But conjuct Mo is in Mool

> > > nakshatra which is owned by Ke. Hence, Mo will give result of

> Ke.

> > > Beside Mo, is malefic for native as he was born in shukla

dasami.

> > > (thus fulfilling condition of malefic in association with 3HL)

> Thus

> > Mo

> > > can be very critical. Mo ran from 31 yrs of native life to 41

> yrs,

> > > which is Madhya Aayu ( I take 35 yrs+ as Madhya AAyu). It can

be

> Mo-

> > > Sa dasa which qualifies as worst.

> > >

> > > After, Ma MD might also be very critical. Malefic being 8HL.

> > > Hence my conclusion is native might have faced almost death

like

> > > situation in Mo dasa or in Ma MD. My take is 1999-2001 as MD

and

> Ad

> > > lords are at 2-12 position and this qualifies to be Madhya aayu.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Anirudh

> > >

> > >

> > > , " Sreenadh "

> > > <sreesog@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear All,

> > > > The following is data provided for a Longevity

determination

> > > exercise

> > > > happened in Ohm_Namah_Sivaya . It was a BC quiz

in

> > > which I

> > > > failed miserably. [] But still it was fun. [] Many

> > > active/major

> > > > members of this group who are members of Ohm_Namah_Sivaya

group

> > are

> > > > already aware of this set of data and the related result.

This

> > > data is

> > > > for the benefit of others who are not present in ONS group -

> and

> > > would

> > > > like to play a game of BC Longivity prediction exercise.

> > > > It was revealed by Neelam ji that the chart provided by her

> > (the

> > > first

> > > > chart) is of an already dead individual; Madhu ji provided

the

> > > second

> > > > data without revealing whether the second native is alive or

> > not.

> > > The

> > > > participants are requested to assess the longevity of the

> natives

> > > and if

> > > > dead, then to determine at which Period Dasa-Antara the death

> > > occurred;

> > > > if possible an indication of the cause of death was also

> > > appreciated.

> > > > Since the out come is already known, the members of ONS

> group

> > > will not

> > > > attempt this quiz again; But if interested others can.

> > > > Love and regards,

> > > > Sreenadh

> > > >

> > > > Ohm_Namah_Sivaya , " neelam gupta "

> > > > <neelamgupta07@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Re: [Ohm_Namah_Sivaya] Re: Judging the Longivity - Blind chart

> > > > exersises....A suggestion/request

> > > > Dear Nameisego ji,

> > > >

> > > > Your suggestions are apt and since this is the first quiz in

> > > > ohm_namah_sivaya, lets number it ohm_001_ne.

> > > >

> > > > So the details for the quiz are:

> > > >

> > > > No: ohm_001_ne

> > > > BT: 29.8.1963/8.45 hrs IST/Delhi

> > > > Longevity assessment

> > > > Date of Closing: 18.5.2008/24.00hrs IST

> > > > posted by Neelam Gupta

> > > >

> > > > We have another data posted by Madhuji where this native also

> > gets

> > > the

> > > > same lagna and a very similar configuration of planets. I am

> sure

> > it

> > > > will make an interesting study and comparison. The details

are:

> > > >

> > > > No. ohm_002_ma

> > > > BT: 29.8.1963/7.49 hrs IST/Thiruvalla, Kottayam, Kerala.

> > > > Longevity assessment

> > > > posted by Madhu Nair

> > > >

> > > > I would appreciate if everyone attempts a comparative

analysis.

> > > >

> > > > Regards

> > > > Neelam

> > > >

> > > > --- End forwarded message ---

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Respected Shreenadhji,

Pranam,

Thank you very much for your answer. As you have given age when death happened as 36/37 so Dasha at that time was Saturn in Moon. (using lahiri ayanasha) It means at least anterdasha I have selected is correct.( I have selected Saturn anterdasha in Mars) Actual event happened in Moon MD and Saturn antradasha. I am happy that at least the antra lord I have selected is correct.

Thanks and regards

Aditya

Sreenadh <sreesog Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 6:44:53 PM Fwd: [Ohm_Namah_Sivaya] Re: Judging the Longivity - Blind chart exersise

 

Dear Anirudh ji and Aditya ji,Aditya ji was right in stating that the first individual is already dead and the second alive. Unlike Anirudh ji stated, the first individual died in Moon-Ra around the 36-37 as informed by Neelam ji.Love and regards,Sreenadh ancient_indian_ astrology, "anirudh_us" <anirudh_us@ ...> wrote:>> There is typo. Ju is benefic(not malefic) and this native, whose > birth data is one which was posted by neelam ji> > Regards> anirudh> > ancient_indian_ astrology, "anirudh_us" >

<anirudh_us@ > wrote:> >> > Sreenadh Ji,> > > > Dispositor of 8H is Ma and it is in Kendra, with its dispositor > > exalted and in lagna lord. (By the way native should be very > > intelligent ) Hence, native does not have balaristha. However, 7HL > is > > neither in kendra nor in corner and hence, native might have Madhya > > aayu.> > > > For this native, Maraka can be Ve (2HL) and Ju (7HL). But Ju being > > malefic and is in its own sign. Ju is most satwik in Meena, hence, > Ju > > is ruled out. Ve might be considered as maraka, but it is 9th from > Mo > > and hence its maraka effect is mitigated. But Su is in conjuction > > with Ve and hence it also qualifies as Maraka. But I rule out this > > also as I said that it is 9th from Mo and lord of 9th.

Secondly, at > > the end of Su MD, native might have been 31 years, which is not > > Madhya aayu. > > > > 3HL is Ke and Ma. Hence, Ke may also be maraka. Mo is in conjuction > > with it. The dispositor Ju is also 7HL, which maraka house. But > > native has already passed ke MD, when he was childbut balarishtha > is > > ruled out hence, Ke might not kill. But conjuct Mo is in Mool > > nakshatra which is owned by Ke. Hence, Mo will give result of Ke. > > Beside Mo, is malefic for native as he was born in shukla dasami. > > (thus fulfilling condition of malefic in association with 3HL)Thus > Mo > > can be very critical. Mo ran from 31 yrs of native life to 41 yrs, > > which is Madhya Aayu ( I take 35 yrs+ as Madhya AAyu). It can be Mo-> > Sa dasa which qualifies as worst.> >

> > After, Ma MD might also be very critical. Malefic being 8HL.> > Hence my conclusion is native might have faced almost death like > > situation in Mo dasa or in Ma MD. My take is 1999-2001 as MD and Ad > > lords are at 2-12 position and this qualifies to be Madhya aayu.> > > > Regards,> > Anirudh> > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, "Sreenadh" > > <sreesog@> wrote:> > >> > > > > > Dear All,> > > The following is data provided for a Longevity determination > > exercise> > > happened in Ohm_Namah_Sivaya . It was a BC quiz in > > which I> > > failed

miserably. [] But still it was fun. [] Many > > active/major> > > members of this group who are members of Ohm_Namah_Sivaya group > are> > > already aware of this set of data and the related result. This > > data is> > > for the benefit of others who are not present in ONS group - and > > would> > > like to play a game of BC Longivity prediction exercise.> > > It was revealed by Neelam ji that the chart provided by her > (the > > first> > > chart) is of an already dead individual; Madhu ji provided the > > second> > > data without revealing whether the second native is alive or > not. > > The> > > participants are requested to assess the longevity of the natives > > and if> > > dead, then to determine at which Period Dasa-Antara the

death > > occurred;> > > if possible an indication of the cause of death was also > > appreciated.> > > Since the out come is already known, the members of ONS group > > will not> > > attempt this quiz again; But if interested others can.> > > Love and regards,> > > Sreenadh> > > > > > Ohm_Namah_Sivaya, "neelam gupta"> > > <neelamgupta07@ > wrote:> > > > > > > > > Re: [Ohm_Namah_Sivaya] Re: Judging the Longivity - Blind chart> > > exersises... .A suggestion/request> > > Dear Nameisego ji,> > > > > > Your suggestions are apt and since this is the first quiz

in> > > ohm_namah_sivaya, lets number it ohm_001_ne.> > > > > > So the details for the quiz are:> > > > > > No: ohm_001_ne> > > BT: 29.8.1963/8. 45 hrs IST/Delhi> > > Longevity assessment> > > Date of Closing: 18.5.2008/24. 00hrs IST> > > posted by Neelam Gupta> > > > > > We have another data posted by Madhuji where this native also > gets > > the> > > same lagna and a very similar configuration of planets. I am sure > it> > > will make an interesting study and comparison. The details are:> > > > > > No. ohm_002_ma> > > BT: 29.8.1963/7. 49 hrs IST/Thiruvalla, Kottayam, Kerala.> > > Longevity assessment> > > posted by Madhu Nair> > > > > > I would

appreciate if everyone attempts a comparative analysis.> > > > > > Regards> > > Neelam> > > > > > --- End forwarded message ---> > >> >>

[Guest guest]

Dear Aditya, Anirudh and others,The native passed away on 11 Jan 1997. It was Mo-ra-ra according to Lahiri's ayanamsha.

RegardsNeelam

[Guest guest]

Dear Aditya ji,

In the said chart, death happened in " Jan 1997 " as informed by

Neelam ji. It seems that you are wrong regarding the above statement

of Moon-Saturn, what ever Ayanamsa you choose. Hope this helps.

Love,

Sreenadh

 

, Aditya Maheshwari

<aditya7272 wrote:

>

> Respected Shreenadhji,

> Pranam,

>                    Thank you very much for your answer. As you have

given age when death happened as 36/37 so Dasha at that time was

Saturn in Moon. (using lahiri ayanasha) It means at least anterdasha

I have selected is correct.( I have selected Saturn anterdasha in

Mars) Actual event happened in Moon MD and Saturn antradasha. I am

happy that at least the antra lord I have selected is correct.

> Thanks and regards

> Aditya

>

>

>

> Sreenadh <sreesog

>

> Monday, May 26, 2008 6:44:53 PM

> Fwd: [Ohm_Namah_Sivaya] Re:

Judging the Longivity - Blind chart exersise

>

>

> Dear Anirudh ji and Aditya ji,

> Aditya ji was right in stating that the first individual is already

> dead and the second alive. Unlike Anirudh ji stated, the first

> individual died in Moon-Ra around the 36-37 as informed by Neelam

ji.

> Love and regards,

> Sreenadh

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, " anirudh_us "

> <anirudh_us@ ...> wrote:

> >

> > There is typo. Ju is benefic(not malefic) and this native, whose

> > birth data is one which was posted by neelam ji

> >

> > Regards

> > anirudh

> >

> > ancient_indian_ astrology, " anirudh_us "

> > <anirudh_us@ > wrote:

> > >

> > > Sreenadh Ji,

> > >

> > > Dispositor of 8H is Ma and it is in Kendra, with its dispositor

> > > exalted and in lagna lord. (By the way native should be very

> > > intelligent ) Hence, native does not have balaristha. However,

> 7HL

> > is

> > > neither in kendra nor in corner and hence, native might have

> Madhya

> > > aayu.

> > >

> > > For this native, Maraka can be Ve (2HL) and Ju (7HL). But Ju

> being

> > > malefic and is in its own sign. Ju is most satwik in Meena,

> hence,

> > Ju

> > > is ruled out. Ve might be considered as maraka, but it is 9th

> from

> > Mo

> > > and hence its maraka effect is mitigated. But Su is in

conjuction

> > > with Ve and hence it also qualifies as Maraka. But I rule out

> this

> > > also as I said that it is 9th from Mo and lord of 9th.

Secondly,

> at

> > > the end of Su MD, native might have been 31 years, which is not

> > > Madhya aayu.

> > >

> > > 3HL is Ke and Ma. Hence, Ke may also be maraka. Mo is in

> conjuction

> > > with it. The dispositor Ju is also 7HL, which maraka house. But

> > > native has already passed ke MD, when he was childbut

balarishtha

> > is

> > > ruled out hence, Ke might not kill. But conjuct Mo is in Mool

> > > nakshatra which is owned by Ke. Hence, Mo will give result of

> Ke.

> > > Beside Mo, is malefic for native as he was born in shukla

dasami.

> > > (thus fulfilling condition of malefic in association with 3HL)

> Thus

> > Mo

> > > can be very critical. Mo ran from 31 yrs of native life to 41

> yrs,

> > > which is Madhya Aayu ( I take 35 yrs+ as Madhya AAyu). It can

be

> Mo-

> > > Sa dasa which qualifies as worst.

> > >

> > > After, Ma MD might also be very critical. Malefic being 8HL.

> > > Hence my conclusion is native might have faced almost death

like

> > > situation in Mo dasa or in Ma MD. My take is 1999-2001 as MD

and

> Ad

> > > lords are at 2-12 position and this qualifies to be Madhya aayu.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Anirudh

> > >

> > >

> > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " Sreenadh "

> > > <sreesog@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear All,

> > > > The following is data provided for a Longevity determination

> > > exercise

> > > > happened in Ohm_Namah_Sivaya . It was a BC quiz in

> > > which I

> > > > failed miserably. [] But still it was fun. [] Many

> > > active/major

> > > > members of this group who are members of Ohm_Namah_Sivaya

group

> > are

> > > > already aware of this set of data and the related result.

This

> > > data is

> > > > for the benefit of others who are not present in ONS group -

> and

> > > would

> > > > like to play a game of BC Longivity prediction exercise.

> > > > It was revealed by Neelam ji that the chart provided by her

> > (the

> > > first

> > > > chart) is of an already dead individual; Madhu ji provided

the

> > > second

> > > > data without revealing whether the second native is alive or

> > not.

> > > The

> > > > participants are requested to assess the longevity of the

> natives

> > > and if

> > > > dead, then to determine at which Period Dasa-Antara the death

> > > occurred;

> > > > if possible an indication of the cause of death was also

> > > appreciated.

> > > > Since the out come is already known, the members of ONS

> group

> > > will not

> > > > attempt this quiz again; But if interested others can.

> > > > Love and regards,

> > > > Sreenadh

> > > >

> > > > Ohm_Namah_Sivaya, " neelam gupta "

> > > > <neelamgupta07@ > wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Re: [Ohm_Namah_Sivaya] Re: Judging the Longivity - Blind chart

> > > > exersises... .A suggestion/request

> > > > Dear Nameisego ji,

> > > >

> > > > Your suggestions are apt and since this is the first quiz in

> > > > ohm_namah_sivaya, lets number it ohm_001_ne.

> > > >

> > > > So the details for the quiz are:

> > > >

> > > > No: ohm_001_ne

> > > > BT: 29.8.1963/8. 45 hrs IST/Delhi

> > > > Longevity assessment

> > > > Date of Closing: 18.5.2008/24. 00hrs IST

> > > > posted by Neelam Gupta

> > > >

> > > > We have another data posted by Madhuji where this native also

> > gets

> > > the

> > > > same lagna and a very similar configuration of planets. I am

> sure

> > it

> > > > will make an interesting study and comparison. The details

are:

> > > >

> > > > No. ohm_002_ma

> > > > BT: 29.8.1963/7. 49 hrs IST/Thiruvalla, Kottayam, Kerala.

> > > > Longevity assessment

> > > > posted by Madhu Nair

> > > >

> > > > I would appreciate if everyone attempts a comparative

analysis.

> > > >

> > > > Regards

> > > > Neelam

> > > >

> > > > --- End forwarded message ---

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Namaste Neelam

 

Regarding: No. ohm_002_ma

BT: 29.8.1963/7. 49 hrs IST/Thiruvalla, Kottayam, Kerala

 

Did the native’s younger sibling pass

away?

 

Thanks and regards ……

 

Jai Sita Ram

 

Ram

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of neelam gupta

27 May 2008 05:31

 

Re:

Fwd: [Ohm_Namah_Sivaya] Re: Judging the Longivity -

Blind chart exersise

 

 

 

 

 

Dear

Aditya, Anirudh and others,

 

The native passed away on 11 Jan 1997.

It was Mo-ra-ra according to Lahiri's

ayanamsha.

 

Regards

Neelam