Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 Dear Members, I do concur with Mr. Chandra Hari that many visible signs are possible when we look at 7HL and the dispositor in cases of multiple marriages.... we do not need to keep shifting the houses....just because it is 2nd or 3rd...etc.. I recall a lady in VA or some group, posted her own data saying she is pregnant and wanted to know the gender of that baby still in womb, also probable date /week/month of preganancy or delivery..... I was one of those responding to that Quiz or Query or Poser - I predicted that she had multiple cases of - miscarriage / abortions....... got her baby's gender wrong.....predicted girl, it turned out to be a boy.... got things almost correct on her MONTH of pregnancy ..etc.. There were two more people who were also correct like me - got the gender wrong. Later when she revealed - that the baby was her 3rd Child, but had almost 4-5 instances of miscarriage or abortions.......on her own admission. Most of the responders thought it was a first case of pregnancy.....everybody then gave her a good blasting for posting a insufficient a query with insufficient information or mis-guiding the members. This lady was from Meerut. I based on using the normal classics rules for progeny. Conclusion : Single or Multiple marriages can be deduced from 7H & 7HL placement using vargas. With regards, Sreeram_Srinivas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 Dear Members, I have observed some people with a very unhappy abusive first marriage leading to divorce (or unhappy end of first marriage due to sudden, untimely and traumatic onset of widowhood or widowerhood in young/middle age) but very compatible and happy second marriage with longetivity. If the criteria to judge marriages is same for multiple marriages i.e. 7 house, 7 HL then would it not be the case that the type of spouse, the quality of marriage and it's longetivity would remain the same for the person throughout life no matter the number of times they marry? Thanks,Ramesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 Dear Mr. Ramesh, Try using 7HL, planets in 7H, navamsa dispositors...etc.. coupled with changing dasha pattern.... you will get surprising answers...... no need for considering 9H or 11H..etc.. .. that was my basis of prediction in the example case of child bearing I have given... { stated in my earlier mail under this thread}.... In a very Internet Popular chart, discussed by every responding astrologer till date on internet.....a girl from Mumbai...who often comes or drops in chat messenger...and discusses vargas ....and an SJC fan..... got a reading from me.....infact...an reading out of my anger & frustation of her frequent dropping and shooting queries.... told of her - multiple affairs....with specific details of characters .....she admitted candidly....that was the last time I saw her....to my relief..... this was based on 7H & 7HL. Can share her details OFFLINE should you be interested....get facts directly from her for assurance..... analysis was done purely on dasha patterns... Even rishis says Second Marriage we need be tough on matchting except seeing the character of person and rajayogas etc { a borrowed astro quote from a knowledgeable astro} Do you have any cases to discuss with....?? We will analyze them..... With regards, Sreeram_Srinivas , Nadi Research <nadiresearch wrote: Dear Members, I have observed some people with a very unhappy abusive first marriage leading to divorce (or unhappy end of first marriage due to sudden, untimely and traumatic onset of widowhood or widowerhood in young/middle age) but very compatible and happy second marriage with longetivity. If the criteria to judge marriages is same for multiple marriages i.e. 7 house, 7 HL then would it not be the case that the type of spouse, the quality of marriage and it's longetivity would remain the same for the person throughout life no matter the number of times they marry? Thanks,Ramesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 Dear Members, To me saying the 1st house would correspond to the second marriage because it's 7th from the 7th seems construed and speculative. Multiple marriages were common at all stages of human history, including the Vedic period and including the Mahabharat period. As such, if a 2nd or 3rd wife or husband would have a focal point outside of the 7th house clearly the founding sages such as Sri Parashar would have told us so in their essential books, like the Brihat Parashara Hora Sashtra. I believe this type of thinking stems from something I myself am repeatedly guilty of: over-complicating an inherently simple situation. Simply put, the 5th House will tell you about love affairs, the 7th house will tell you about marriage affairs, and the 9th will tell you about religious devotion. There are enough probabilities of unique combinations of factors to influence the 7th house which could give us details on all sorts of multiple and singular marriage situations. There is no need to go fishing about for wanting another house to look at. Thanks, Vic On May 29, 2008, at 8:04 AM, Nadi Research wrote: > > Dear Members, > > > I have observed some people with a very unhappy abusive first > marriage leading to divorce (or unhappy end of first marriage due to > sudden, untimely and traumatic onset of widowhood or widowerhood in > young/middle age) but very compatible and happy second marriage with > longetivity. > > > If the criteria to judge marriages is same for multiple marriages > i.e. 7 house, 7 HL then would it not be the case that the type of > spouse, the quality of marriage and it's longetivity would remain > the same for the person throughout life no matter the number of > times they marry? > > > Thanks, > Ramesh > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 Dear Sreeram, I do concur with your conclusions. Multiplicity of any signification has to be answered by the house itself and of course the triangle may have some influence. Bhavat bhavam etc play their role but house must hold the key. I will be away from net for next few weeks if not months. Leaving Ahmedabad for Baroda. Baroda is the place of Nakulisa - most important of all incarnations of Siva. Place Kayavarohan is at 14 Km and it marks the spot where he is believed to have changed his body. chandra hari , " sreeram srinivas " <sreeram64 wrote: > > Dear Members, > > I do concur with Mr. Chandra Hari that many visible signs are possible > when we look at 7HL and the dispositor in cases of multiple > marriages.... we do not need to keep shifting the houses....just because > it is 2nd or 3rd...etc.. > > I recall a lady in VA or some group, posted her own data saying she is > pregnant and wanted to know the gender of that baby still in womb, also > probable date /week/month of preganancy or delivery..... > > I was one of those responding to that Quiz or Query or Poser - I > predicted that she had multiple cases of - miscarriage / > abortions....... got her baby's gender wrong.....predicted girl, it > turned out to be a boy.... got things almost correct on her MONTH of > pregnancy ..etc.. There were two more people who were also correct like > me - got the gender wrong. > > Later when she revealed - that the baby was her 3rd Child, but had > almost 4-5 instances of miscarriage or abortions.......on her own > admission. > > Most of the responders thought it was a first case of > pregnancy.....everybody then gave her a good blasting for posting a > insufficient a query with insufficient information or mis-guiding the > members. This lady was from Meerut. > > I based on using the normal classics rules for progeny. > > Conclusion : > > Single or Multiple marriages can be deduced from 7H & 7HL placement > using vargas. > > With regards, > > Sreeram_Srinivas > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Dear Mr. Naadi Researcher- Ramesh, Let me pose you a few counter points to drive home the point that the H & HL would suffice in most cases. You may use other criterias to go into details- which we are currently NOT discussing now. Case-1: Do you apply the same extended logics of first / second / third marriage to one's career ?? i.e. First Job- 10H, Second Job - 7H, Third Job-4H, Fourth Job-Lagna...etc.. Case-2: Do you apply the same to residence ?? Taking an Indian life style context - First residence with Parents - 4H, Then bachelorhood-Hostel, Then Your own house after marriage, Change of residence due to office transfers, Change of residence to children's house in old age ....etc.. You see in the above, the futility of logics !! So do NOT mis-interpret or Complicate things what is stated in classics with our modern outlook .. Make effort to de-mystify the complexity of hororscope reading or analysis. With regards, Sreeram_Srinivas On May 29, 2008, at 8:04 AM, Nadi Research wrote: Dear Members, I have observed some people with a very unhappy abusive first marriage leading to divorce (or unhappy end of first marriage due to sudden, untimely and traumatic onset of widowhood or widowerhood in young/middle age) but very compatible and happy second marriage with longetivity. If the criteria to judge marriages is same for multiple marriages i.e. 7 house, 7 HL then would it not be the case that the type of spouse, the quality of marriage and it's longetivity would remain the same for the person throughout life no matter the number of times they marry? Thanks, Ramesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.