Understanding Raman on marriage timing:

[Guest guest]

Dear members,

 

1) In my personal opinion, Moon is same whether it is male or female.

In ancient India, husband{logic predominant} was a spiritual mentor to

wife {emotion predominant} in a generic sense. However, in modern

world, we do see qualities of - She in HE & He in SHE. To that effect

Jupiter role comes into play. The cryptic clues in the classics

indicate Mars as the key planet of marital partner.

 

2) I concur with Mr. Vic-di-cara on the 10H & 9H connections to

marriage.

 

3) Yes, Navamsa does hold importance. The navamsa dispositor of 7HL,

also needs to be cosidered.

 

With regards,

 

Sreeram_Srinivas

 

 

, Vic D <vicdicara

wrote:

>

> On May 24, 2008, at 10:13 AM, kiran.rama wrote:

> > I am quoting BV Raman from his " How to Judge a horoscope - Vol II "

> > [...]

> >

> > 3. Moon

> > (DISAGREE, HOW CAN MOON give marriage in his period unless he is in

> > his own house or exalted?)

> >

> Well i think you might get more on BV Raman's wavelength with this

> topic if you use the pronoun " she " in connection with our lovely Moon.

> =)

>

> I see an angle to agree with the esteemed BV Raman like this: Moon

> brings feminine qualities to the inner nature. For a man, this

> inclines him to look for and want marriage and children.

>

> For a woman, apply the principle not to the Moon, but to Jupiter.

>

> > 5. 10th Lord

> > (DISAGREE, 10th house is no way connected to marriage)

> >

> 10 is 4 from 7. 10th lord can dispose emotions towards marriage.

>

> > 6. 9th lord

> > (DISAGREE, 9th house is in no way connected to marriage. Only way we

> > can justify is that 9th is 3rd from 7th - house of marriage and is

> > upachaya house)

> >

> 9th is general Bhagya. Marriage is one of the primary bhagyas.

>

> ~~~

>

> Additionally - should we not ascribe importance to the Navamsha

> situations? How about ascendant lord and 7th lord of Navamsha?

>

> Yours,

> Vic

>