Visha kanyaka yogas --a diffrnt combinations

[Guest guest]

Dear grp and learned scholars

here is another list of visha kanaya yogas

its day and nakshtra combinations

1)sun day coincide with Bharani.

2)Monday coincides with chitra

3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus sign )

4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta)

5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta )

6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi )

7)saturday with revathi

pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones who is above marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post exceptions to this ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s dont know or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or best gunamilan and approves the match .

 

regrds sunil nair

om shrem mahalaxmai namah .

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Sunilji

Below is a chart with yr mentioned combo - native is v happily married.

Natal Chart

July 14, 1965Time: 3:10:00 amTime Zone: 10:00:00 (East of GMT)Place: 151 E 45' 00", 32 S 55' 00" Newcastle, AustraliaVedic Weekday: Tuesday (Ma)Nakshatra: Uttarashadha (Su) (91.76% left)

rgds, Su

 

, "sunil nair" <astro_tellerkerala wrote:> Dear grp and learned scholars> > here is another list of visha kanaya yogas> > its day and nakshtra combinations> > 1)sun day coincide with Bharani.> > 2)Monday coincides with chitra> > 3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus sign )> > 4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta)> > 5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta )> > 6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi )> > 7)saturday with revathi> > pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones who is above> marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post exceptions to this> ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s dont know> or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or best> gunamilan and approves the match .> > > > regrds sunil nair> > om shrem mahalaxmai namah .>

[Guest guest]

Hare rama krishna

dear su

Thanks for the chart ,pls tell me this is male or female and day of marriage if possible ( or how long is they r married ) and if possible the chart of the spouce etc .And if ny other details u can giv .

because i wanted to study how the excemptions are working .Also how deep is the dosha .As this is var ( day ) and nakshtra dosha so the factors can dilute or aggravate a problem .

Any this is another example which again proves the sjc theory is wrong -of venus in 12th house in navamsa does deny marriage (if the chart is authentic ( i must say so as i dont know personaly this nativ and i am prooving some thing -actualy nothing against u su ,hope u understand )

 

regrds sunil nair

om shreem mahalaxmai namah .

 

 

 

, "illusive_2" <vreality_au wrote:>> > Dear Sunilji> > Below is a chart with yr mentioned combo - native is v happily married.> > Natal Chart> > July 14, 1965> Time: 3:10:00 am> Time Zone: 10:00:00 (East of GMT)> Place: 151 E 45' 00", 32 S 55' 00"> Newcastle, Australia> > Vedic Weekday: Tuesday (Ma)> Nakshatra: Uttarashadha (Su) (91.76% left)> > > rgds, Su> > > > > , "sunil nair"> astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> > > Dear grp and learned scholars> >> > here is another list of visha kanaya yogas> >> > its day and nakshtra combinations> >> > 1)sun day coincide with Bharani.> >> > 2)Monday coincides with chitra> >> > 3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus sign )> >> > 4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta)> >> > 5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta )> >> > 6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi )> >> > 7)saturday with revathi> >> > pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones who is above> > marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post exceptions to> this> > ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s dont know> > or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or best> > gunamilan and approves the match .> >> >> >> > regrds sunil nair> >> > om shrem mahalaxmai namah .> >>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sunilji

 

She was married 21st November '87. Tog with the same man for more

than 20 yrs now, and v happily so. 2 kids - boy and girl.

 

I dont hve husbands birth time [tho I hve the date.] Apparently his

mom was v ill during his birth and didnt note the time. She says

about 9 p but Im reluctant to trust her memory more than 40 yrs after

the event.

 

Yea I think we already established tht sjc theory is wrong and tht 1

combo doesnt deny/break a marriage. I hve another chart with ve in 12

nav - female, v happily married. It would be difficult to find

marriages happier than those of these 2 with ve in 12 nav. If one

were to base rules on inadequate research one might even say tht ve

in 12 nav makes for a v happy marriage! :-))

 

//...if the chart is authentic ( i must say so as i dont know

personaly this nativ and i am prooving some thing -actualy nothing

against u su ,hope u understand )//

 

Point understood and no offence taken - tho it wouldve been more

tactful to question the accuracy of birth data rather than the

authenticity of the chart :-)))

 

rgds, Su

 

, " sunil nair "

<astro_tellerkerala wrote:

 

> Hare rama krishna

>

> dear su

>

> Thanks for the chart ,pls tell me this is male or female and day

of

> marriage if possible ( or how long is they r married ) and if

possible

> the chart of the spouce etc .And if ny other details u can giv .

>

> because i wanted to study how the excemptions are working .Also

how

> deep is the dosha .As this is var ( day ) and nakshtra dosha so the

> factors can dilute or aggravate a problem .

>

> Any this is another example which again proves the sjc theory is

wrong

> -of venus in 12th house in navamsa does deny marriage (if the chart

is

> authentic ( i must say so as i dont know personaly this nativ and i

am

> prooving some thing -actualy nothing against u su ,hope u

understand )

>

>

>

> regrds sunil nair

>

> om shreem mahalaxmai namah .

>

>

, " illusive_2 "

> <vreality_au@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear Sunilji

> >

> > Below is a chart with yr mentioned combo - native is v happily

> married.

> >

> > Natal Chart

> >

> > July 14, 1965

> > Time: 3:10:00 am

> > Time Zone: 10:00:00 (East of GMT)

> > Place: 151 E 45' 00 " , 32 S 55' 00 "

> > Newcastle, Australia

> >

> > Vedic Weekday: Tuesday (Ma)

> > Nakshatra: Uttarashadha (Su) (91.76% left)

> >

> >

> > rgds, Su

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , " sunil nair "

> > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:

> >

> > > Dear grp and learned scholars

> > >

> > > here is another list of visha kanaya yogas

> > >

> > > its day and nakshtra combinations

> > >

> > > 1)sun day coincide with Bharani.

> > >

> > > 2)Monday coincides with chitra

> > >

> > > 3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus sign )

> > >

> > > 4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta)

> > >

> > > 5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta )

> > >

> > > 6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi )

> > >

> > > 7)saturday with revathi

> > >

> > > pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones who is

> above

> > > marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post

exceptions to

> > this

> > > ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s

dont

> know

> > > or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or best

> > > gunamilan and approves the match .

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > regrds sunil nair

> > >

> > > om shrem mahalaxmai namah .

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Hare rama krishna

dear su

 

Thanks .thanks for feed backs .i wanted the gender to declare the results ( as its for my own reserch too )

this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions or Nakshtras ( decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor .

see the day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day morning almost now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day morning ) so almost diluted .

 

again if u see moon pournami finshed and prathama day( again if u see moon and sun degrees or see percentage of thithi u can find that just strted only the next thithti ) ,so moon is very power ful .also nite birth .

 

another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other trikonas and 7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so moon is strong varesh is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties

next and most imp ,see the panchanga yoga of that day ,vaidrithi ruled by jup ( day yoga means combined power of sun and moon in a chart ) so u can see yoga Lord is jup and in lagna ,so lagna ,sun and moon ( 3 power of lagnas ) become more benefic to giv good results

 

hope u understnd

 

we shud use all panchnaga like this for complete chart results ,other wise what is the use of panchanga in chart ,u can see every one write it and no one knows how to use it and its real uses in dasa reading .

 

i am typing so many mails and reports and same time in many chats too,so in hurry some times words need not reflect my intention as after mailed at times i see i gone wrong in spelling or i miss one word which can make all communication with a diffnrt meaning ,so ppl those who r familiar with me knows this ,so they manages it .and pardons for this kind of flaws too

 

thank u

 

 

regrds sunil nair

om shreem mahalaxmai namah

, "illusive_2" <vreality_au wrote:>> Dear Sunilji> > She was married 21st November '87. Tog with the same man for more > than 20 yrs now, and v happily so. 2 kids - boy and girl. > > I dont hve husbands birth time [tho I hve the date.] Apparently his > mom was v ill during his birth and didnt note the time. She says > about 9 p but Im reluctant to trust her memory more than 40 yrs after > the event.> > Yea I think we already established tht sjc theory is wrong and tht 1 > combo doesnt deny/break a marriage. I hve another chart with ve in 12 > nav - female, v happily married. It would be difficult to find > marriages happier than those of these 2 with ve in 12 nav. If one > were to base rules on inadequate research one might even say tht ve > in 12 nav makes for a v happy marriage! :-))> > //...if the chart is authentic ( i must say so as i dont know > personaly this nativ and i am prooving some thing -actualy nothing > against u su ,hope u understand )//> > Point understood and no offence taken - tho it wouldve been more > tactful to question the accuracy of birth data rather than the > authenticity of the chart :-)))> > rgds, Su> > , "sunil nair" > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> > > Hare rama krishna> > > > dear su> > > > Thanks for the chart ,pls tell me this is male or female and day > of> > marriage if possible ( or how long is they r married ) and if > possible> > the chart of the spouce etc .And if ny other details u can giv .> > > > because i wanted to study how the excemptions are working .Also > how> > deep is the dosha .As this is var ( day ) and nakshtra dosha so the> > factors can dilute or aggravate a problem .> > > > Any this is another example which again proves the sjc theory is > wrong> > -of venus in 12th house in navamsa does deny marriage (if the chart > is> > authentic ( i must say so as i dont know personaly this nativ and i > am> > prooving some thing -actualy nothing against u su ,hope u > understand )> > > > > > > > regrds sunil nair> > > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah .> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "illusive_2"> > <vreality_au@> wrote:> > >> > >> > > Dear Sunilji> > >> > > Below is a chart with yr mentioned combo - native is v happily> > married.> > >> > > Natal Chart> > >> > > July 14, 1965> > > Time: 3:10:00 am> > > Time Zone: 10:00:00 (East of GMT)> > > Place: 151 E 45' 00", 32 S 55' 00"> > > Newcastle, Australia> > >> > > Vedic Weekday: Tuesday (Ma)> > > Nakshatra: Uttarashadha (Su) (91.76% left)> > >> > >> > > rgds, Su> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > , "sunil nair"> > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> > >> > > > Dear grp and learned scholars> > > >> > > > here is another list of visha kanaya yogas> > > >> > > > its day and nakshtra combinations> > > >> > > > 1)sun day coincide with Bharani.> > > >> > > > 2)Monday coincides with chitra> > > >> > > > 3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus sign )> > > >> > > > 4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta)> > > >> > > > 5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta )> > > >> > > > 6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi )> > > >> > > > 7)saturday with revathi> > > >> > > > pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones who is> > above> > > > marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post > exceptions to> > > this> > > > ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s > dont> > know> > > > or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or best> > > > gunamilan and approves the match .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > regrds sunil nair> > > >> > > > om shrem mahalaxmai namah .> > > >> > >> >>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sunil ji, ==>another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other trikonas and 7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so moon is strong varesh is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties<== There is a sloka which tells us that if Jupiter aspect is present, then Vishakanya Yoga SHOULD NOT be considered and that it will not give its expected bad results. Love and regards,Sreenadh , "sunil nair" <astro_tellerkerala wrote:>> > > > Hare rama krishna> > dear su> > > > Thanks .thanks for feed backs .i wanted the gender to declare the> results ( as its for my own reserch too )> > this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions or> Nakshtras ( decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor .> > see the day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day morning> almost now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day morning> ) so almost diluted .> > > > again if u see moon pournami finshed and prathama day( again if u see> moon and sun degrees or see percentage of thithi u can find that just> strted only the next thithti ) ,so moon is very power ful .also nite> birth .> > > > another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other> trikonas and 7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so> moon is strong varesh is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties> > next and most imp ,see the panchanga yoga of that day ,vaidrithi ruled> by jup ( day yoga means combined power of sun and moon in a chart ) so u> can see yoga Lord is jup and in lagna ,so lagna ,sun and moon ( 3 power> of lagnas ) become more benefic to giv good results> > > > hope u understnd> > > > we shud use all panchnaga like this for complete chart results ,other> wise what is the use of panchanga in chart ,u can see every one write it> and no one knows how to use it and its real uses in dasa reading .> > > > i am typing so many mails and reports and same time in many chats too,so> in hurry some times words need not reflect my intention as after mailed> at times i see i gone wrong in spelling or i miss one word which can> make all communication with a diffnrt meaning ,so ppl those who r> familiar with me knows this ,so they manages it .and pardons for this> kind of flaws too> > > > thank u> > > > > > regrds sunil nair> > om shreem mahalaxmai namah> > > , "illusive_2"> vreality_au@ wrote:> >> > Dear Sunilji> >> > She was married 21st November '87. Tog with the same man for more> > than 20 yrs now, and v happily so. 2 kids - boy and girl.> >> > I dont hve husbands birth time [tho I hve the date.] Apparently his> > mom was v ill during his birth and didnt note the time. She says> > about 9 p but Im reluctant to trust her memory more than 40 yrs after> > the event.> >> > Yea I think we already established tht sjc theory is wrong and tht 1> > combo doesnt deny/break a marriage. I hve another chart with ve in 12> > nav - female, v happily married. It would be difficult to find> > marriages happier than those of these 2 with ve in 12 nav. If one> > were to base rules on inadequate research one might even say tht ve> > in 12 nav makes for a v happy marriage! :-))> >> > //...if the chart is authentic ( i must say so as i dont know> > personaly this nativ and i am prooving some thing -actualy nothing> > against u su ,hope u understand )//> >> > Point understood and no offence taken - tho it wouldve been more> > tactful to question the accuracy of birth data rather than the> > authenticity of the chart :-)))> >> > rgds, Su> >> > , "sunil nair"> > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> >> > > Hare rama krishna> > >> > > dear su> > >> > > Thanks for the chart ,pls tell me this is male or female and day> > of> > > marriage if possible ( or how long is they r married ) and if> > possible> > > the chart of the spouce etc .And if ny other details u can giv .> > >> > > because i wanted to study how the excemptions are working .Also> > how> > > deep is the dosha .As this is var ( day ) and nakshtra dosha so the> > > factors can dilute or aggravate a problem .> > >> > > Any this is another example which again proves the sjc theory is> > wrong> > > -of venus in 12th house in navamsa does deny marriage (if the chart> > is> > > authentic ( i must say so as i dont know personaly this nativ and i> > am> > > prooving some thing -actualy nothing against u su ,hope u> > understand )> > >> > >> > >> > > regrds sunil nair> > >> > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah .> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > , "illusive_2"> > > <vreality_au@> wrote:> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Sunilji> > > >> > > > Below is a chart with yr mentioned combo - native is v happily> > > married.> > > >> > > > Natal Chart> > > >> > > > July 14, 1965> > > > Time: 3:10:00 am> > > > Time Zone: 10:00:00 (East of GMT)> > > > Place: 151 E 45' 00", 32 S 55' 00"> > > > Newcastle, Australia> > > >> > > > Vedic Weekday: Tuesday (Ma)> > > > Nakshatra: Uttarashadha (Su) (91.76% left)> > > >> > > >> > > > rgds, Su> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > , "sunil nair"> > > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> > > >> > > > > Dear grp and learned scholars> > > > >> > > > > here is another list of visha kanaya yogas> > > > >> > > > > its day and nakshtra combinations> > > > >> > > > > 1)sun day coincide with Bharani.> > > > >> > > > > 2)Monday coincides with chitra> > > > >> > > > > 3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus sign )> > > > >> > > > > 4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta)> > > > >> > > > > 5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta )> > > > >> > > > > 6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi )> > > > >> > > > > 7)saturday with revathi> > > > >> > > > > pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones who is> > > above> > > > > marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post> > exceptions to> > > > this> > > > > ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s> > dont> > > know> > > > > or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or best> > > > > gunamilan and approves the match .> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > regrds sunil nair> > > > >> > > > > om shrem mahalaxmai namah .> > > > >> > > >> > >> >>

[Guest guest]

Hare ramakrishna

dear sreenadh ji

 

sure ,also another shloka Lakhsam dosham guru hanti ( jup can cancell one lac doshas in charts ) .but here i use more wider analysis .

thanks for remindiing it

 

regrds sunil nair

om shreem mahalaxmai namah .

, "Sreenadh" <sreesog wrote:>> > Dear Sunil ji,> ==>> another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other> trikonas and 7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so> moon is strong varesh is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties> <==> There is a sloka which tells us that if Jupiter aspect is present,> then Vishakanya Yoga SHOULD NOT be considered and that it will not give> its expected bad results.> Love and regards,> Sreenadh> > > , "sunil nair"> astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> >> >> >> >> > Hare rama krishna> >> > dear su> >> >> >> > Thanks .thanks for feed backs .i wanted the gender to declare the> > results ( as its for my own reserch too )> >> > this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions or> > Nakshtras ( decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor .> >> > see the day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day> morning> > almost now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day> morning> > ) so almost diluted .> >> >> >> > again if u see moon pournami finshed and prathama day( again if u see> > moon and sun degrees or see percentage of thithi u can find that just> > strted only the next thithti ) ,so moon is very power ful .also nite> > birth .> >> >> >> > another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other> > trikonas and 7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so> > moon is strong varesh is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties> >> > next and most imp ,see the panchanga yoga of that day ,vaidrithi ruled> > by jup ( day yoga means combined power of sun and moon in a chart ) so> u> > can see yoga Lord is jup and in lagna ,so lagna ,sun and moon ( 3> power> > of lagnas ) become more benefic to giv good results> >> >> >> > hope u understnd> >> >> >> > we shud use all panchnaga like this for complete chart results ,other> > wise what is the use of panchanga in chart ,u can see every one write> it> > and no one knows how to use it and its real uses in dasa reading .> >> >> >> > i am typing so many mails and reports and same time in many chats> too,so> > in hurry some times words need not reflect my intention as after> mailed> > at times i see i gone wrong in spelling or i miss one word which can> > make all communication with a diffnrt meaning ,so ppl those who r> > familiar with me knows this ,so they manages it .and pardons for this> > kind of flaws too> >> >> >> > thank u> >> >> >> >> >> > regrds sunil nair> >> > om shreem mahalaxmai namah> >> >> > , "illusive_2"> > vreality_au@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sunilji> > >> > > She was married 21st November '87. Tog with the same man for more> > > than 20 yrs now, and v happily so. 2 kids - boy and girl.> > >> > > I dont hve husbands birth time [tho I hve the date.] Apparently his> > > mom was v ill during his birth and didnt note the time. She says> > > about 9 p but Im reluctant to trust her memory more than 40 yrs> after> > > the event.> > >> > > Yea I think we already established tht sjc theory is wrong and tht 1> > > combo doesnt deny/break a marriage. I hve another chart with ve in> 12> > > nav - female, v happily married. It would be difficult to find> > > marriages happier than those of these 2 with ve in 12 nav. If one> > > were to base rules on inadequate research one might even say tht ve> > > in 12 nav makes for a v happy marriage! :-))> > >> > > //...if the chart is authentic ( i must say so as i dont know> > > personaly this nativ and i am prooving some thing -actualy nothing> > > against u su ,hope u understand )//> > >> > > Point understood and no offence taken - tho it wouldve been more> > > tactful to question the accuracy of birth data rather than the> > > authenticity of the chart :-)))> > >> > > rgds, Su> > >> > > , "sunil nair"> > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> > >> > > > Hare rama krishna> > > >> > > > dear su> > > >> > > > Thanks for the chart ,pls tell me this is male or female and day> > > of> > > > marriage if possible ( or how long is they r married ) and if> > > possible> > > > the chart of the spouce etc .And if ny other details u can giv .> > > >> > > > because i wanted to study how the excemptions are working .Also> > > how> > > > deep is the dosha .As this is var ( day ) and nakshtra dosha so> the> > > > factors can dilute or aggravate a problem .> > > >> > > > Any this is another example which again proves the sjc theory is> > > wrong> > > > -of venus in 12th house in navamsa does deny marriage (if the> chart> > > is> > > > authentic ( i must say so as i dont know personaly this nativ and> i> > > am> > > > prooving some thing -actualy nothing against u su ,hope u> > > understand )> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > regrds sunil nair> > > >> > > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > , "illusive_2"> > > > <vreality_au@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Dear Sunilji> > > > >> > > > > Below is a chart with yr mentioned combo - native is v happily> > > > married.> > > > >> > > > > Natal Chart> > > > >> > > > > July 14, 1965> > > > > Time: 3:10:00 am> > > > > Time Zone: 10:00:00 (East of GMT)> > > > > Place: 151 E 45' 00", 32 S 55' 00"> > > > > Newcastle, Australia> > > > >> > > > > Vedic Weekday: Tuesday (Ma)> > > > > Nakshatra: Uttarashadha (Su) (91.76% left)> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > rgds, Su> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > , "sunil nair"> > > > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> > > > >> > > > > > Dear grp and learned scholars> > > > > >> > > > > > here is another list of visha kanaya yogas> > > > > >> > > > > > its day and nakshtra combinations> > > > > >> > > > > > 1)sun day coincide with Bharani.> > > > > >> > > > > > 2)Monday coincides with chitra> > > > > >> > > > > > 3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus sign )> > > > > >> > > > > > 4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta)> > > > > >> > > > > > 5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta )> > > > > >> > > > > > 6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi )> > > > > >> > > > > > 7)saturday with revathi> > > > > >> > > > > > pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones who> is> > > > above> > > > > > marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post> > > exceptions to> > > > > this> > > > > > ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s> > > dont> > > > know> > > > > > or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or> best> > > > > > gunamilan and approves the match .> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > regrds sunil nair> > > > > >> > > > > > om shrem mahalaxmai namah .> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >>

[Guest guest]

Namaste,> .....Lakhsam dosham guru hanti....It is my long felt desire to know the detailed list of one lac doshas which is being nullified by GURU.I hope some of the Astrologers may have this list of one lac doshas / some other web references where one can have knowledge about them.Please advise. --- On Wed, 8/6/08, sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala wrote:sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a diffrnt combinations Date: Wednesday, August 6,

2008, 10:05 AM

 

 

Hare ramakrishna

dear sreenadh ji

 

sure ,also another shloka Lakhsam dosham guru hanti ( jup can cancell one lac doshas in charts ) .but here i use more wider analysis .

thanks for remindiing it

 

regrds sunil nair

om shreem mahalaxmai namah .

ancient_indian_ astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreesog wrote:>> > Dear Sunil ji,> ==>> another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other> trikonas and 7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so> moon is strong varesh is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties> <==> There is a sloka which tells us that if Jupiter aspect is present,> then Vishakanya Yoga SHOULD NOT be considered and that it will not give> its expected bad results.> Love and regards,> Sreenadh> > > ancient_indian_ astrology, "sunil nair"> astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> >> >> >> >> > Hare rama krishna> >> > dear su> >> >> >> > Thanks .thanks for feed backs .i wanted the gender

to declare the> > results ( as its for my own reserch too )> >> > this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions or> > Nakshtras ( decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor .> >> > see the day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day> morning> > almost now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day> morning> > ) so almost diluted .> >> >> >> > again if u see moon pournami finshed and prathama day( again if u see> > moon and sun degrees or see percentage of thithi u can find that just> > strted only the next thithti ) ,so moon is very power ful .also nite> > birth .> >> >> >> > another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other> > trikonas and 7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as

natural benefic .so> > moon is strong varesh is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties> >> > next and most imp ,see the panchanga yoga of that day ,vaidrithi ruled> > by jup ( day yoga means combined power of sun and moon in a chart ) so> u> > can see yoga Lord is jup and in lagna ,so lagna ,sun and moon ( 3> power> > of lagnas ) become more benefic to giv good results> >> >> >> > hope u understnd> >> >> >> > we shud use all panchnaga like this for complete chart results ,other> > wise what is the use of panchanga in chart ,u can see every one write> it> > and no one knows how to use it and its real uses in dasa reading .> >> >> >> > i am typing so many mails and reports and same time in many chats> too,so> > in hurry

some times words need not reflect my intention as after> mailed> > at times i see i gone wrong in spelling or i miss one word which can> > make all communication with a diffnrt meaning ,so ppl those who r> > familiar with me knows this ,so they manages it .and pardons for this> > kind of flaws too> >> >> >> > thank u> >> >> >> >> >> > regrds sunil nair> >> > om shreem mahalaxmai namah> >> >> > ancient_indian_ astrology, "illusive_2"> > vreality_au@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sunilji> > >> > > She was married 21st November '87. Tog with the same man for more> > > than 20 yrs now, and v happily so. 2 kids - boy and girl.> > >> > > I dont hve

husbands birth time [tho I hve the date.] Apparently his> > > mom was v ill during his birth and didnt note the time. She says> > > about 9 p but Im reluctant to trust her memory more than 40 yrs> after> > > the event.> > >> > > Yea I think we already established tht sjc theory is wrong and tht 1> > > combo doesnt deny/break a marriage. I hve another chart with ve in> 12> > > nav - female, v happily married. It would be difficult to find> > > marriages happier than those of these 2 with ve in 12 nav. If one> > > were to base rules on inadequate research one might even say tht ve> > > in 12 nav makes for a v happy marriage! :-))> > >> > > //...if the chart is authentic ( i must say so as i dont know> > > personaly this nativ and i am prooving some thing -actualy

nothing> > > against u su ,hope u understand )//> > >> > > Point understood and no offence taken - tho it wouldve been more> > > tactful to question the accuracy of birth data rather than the> > > authenticity of the chart :-)))> > >> > > rgds, Su> > >> > > ancient_indian_ astrology, "sunil nair"> > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> > >> > > > Hare rama krishna> > > >> > > > dear su> > > >> > > > Thanks for the chart ,pls tell me this is male or female and day> > > of> > > > marriage if possible ( or how long is they r married ) and if> > > possible> > > > the chart of the spouce etc .And if ny other details u can giv .> > > >> >

> > because i wanted to study how the excemptions are working .Also> > > how> > > > deep is the dosha .As this is var ( day ) and nakshtra dosha so> the> > > > factors can dilute or aggravate a problem .> > > >> > > > Any this is another example which again proves the sjc theory is> > > wrong> > > > -of venus in 12th house in navamsa does deny marriage (if the> chart> > > is> > > > authentic ( i must say so as i dont know personaly this nativ and> i> > > am> > > > prooving some thing -actualy nothing against u su ,hope u> > > understand )> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > regrds sunil nair> > > >> > > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah .> > > >>

> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, "illusive_2"> > > > <vreality_au@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Dear Sunilji> > > > >> > > > > Below is a chart with yr mentioned combo - native is v happily> > > > married.> > > > >> > > > > Natal Chart> > > > >> > > > > July 14, 1965> > > > > Time: 3:10:00 am> > > > > Time Zone: 10:00:00 (East of GMT)> > > > > Place: 151 E 45' 00", 32 S 55' 00"> > > > > Newcastle, Australia> > > > >> > > > > Vedic

Weekday: Tuesday (Ma)> > > > > Nakshatra: Uttarashadha (Su) (91.76% left)> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > rgds, Su> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, "sunil nair"> > > > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> > > > >> > > > > > Dear grp and learned scholars> > > > > >> > > > > > here is another list of visha kanaya yogas> > > > > >> > > > > > its day and nakshtra combinations> > > > > >> > > > > > 1)sun day coincide with Bharani.> > > > > >> > > > > > 2)Monday coincides with chitra> > > >

> >> > > > > > 3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus sign )> > > > > >> > > > > > 4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta)> > > > > >> > > > > > 5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta )> > > > > >> > > > > > 6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi )> > > > > >> > > > > > 7)saturday with revathi> > > > > >> > > > > > pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones who> is> > > > above> > > > > > marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post> > > exceptions to> > > > > this> > > > > > ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s> > > dont>

> > > know> > > > > > or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or> best> > > > > > gunamilan and approves the match .> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > regrds sunil nair> > > > > >> > > > > > om shrem mahalaxmai namah .> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >>

[Guest guest]

Hare ramakrishna

dear Karunakaram ji

 

why dont u take up this task ,as men is doing lacs of things in world it will not a problem to list it ,but only problem is, it shud tally with results arising and find what is limiting or promoting the results

all the best to u

 

regrds sunil nair

om shreem mahalaxmai namah

, KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM <munisevitham wrote:>> Namaste,> > > .....Lakhsam dosham guru hanti....> > It is my long felt desire to know the detailed list of one lac doshas which is being nullified by GURU.I hope some of the Astrologers may have this list of one lac doshas / some other web references where one can have knowledge about them.> Please advise.> > > --- On Wed, 8/6/08, sunil nair astro_tellerkerala wrote:> sunil nair astro_tellerkerala Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a diffrnt combinations> > Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 10:05 AM> > >> Hare ramakrishna> dear sreenadh ji> > sure ,also another shloka Lakhsam dosham guru hanti ( jup can cancell one lac doshas in charts ) .but here i use more wider analysis .> thanks for remindiing it> > regrds sunil nair> om shreem mahalaxmai namah .>

[Guest guest]

Dear Shri Sunil Nairji,

 

<<

 

this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions or Nakshtras (

decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor .

see the

day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day morning almost

now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day morning ) so

almost diluted . >>

 

I have read that some astrologers believe that during the night time the Vara

dosha is not there. Is there any truth in it?

 

Regards, Sunil Bhattacharjya

 

 

 

 

sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala

 

Wednesday, August 6, 2008 12:25:28 AM

Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a diffrnt

combinations

 

 

 

Hare rama krishna

dear su

 

Thanks .thanks for feed backs .i wanted the gender to declare the results ( as

its for my own reserch too )

this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions or Nakshtras (

decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor .

see the day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day morning almost

now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day morning ) so almost

diluted .

 

again if u see moon pournami finshed and prathama day( again if u see moon and

sun degrees or see percentage of thithi u can find that just strted only the

next thithti ) ,so moon is very power ful .also nite birth .

 

another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other trikonas and

7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so moon is strong varesh

is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties

next and most imp ,see the panchanga yoga of that day ,vaidrithi ruled by jup (

day yoga means combined power of sun and moon in a chart ) so u can see yoga

Lord is jup and in lagna ,so lagna ,sun and moon ( 3 power of lagnas ) become

more benefic to giv good results

 

hope u understnd

 

we shud use all panchnaga like this for complete chart results ,other wise what

is the use of panchanga in chart ,u can see every one write it and no one knows

how to use it and its real uses in dasa reading .

 

i am typing so many mails and reports and same time in many chats too,so in

hurry some times words need not reflect my intention as after mailed at times i

see i gone wrong in spelling or i miss one word which can make all communication

with a diffnrt meaning ,so ppl those who r familiar with me knows this ,so they

manages it .and pardons for this kind of flaws too

 

thank u

 

 

regrds sunil nair

om shreem mahalaxmai namah

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, " illusive_2 " <vreality_au@

....> wrote:

>

> Dear Sunilji

>

> She was married 21st November '87. Tog with the same man for more

> than 20 yrs now, and v happily so. 2 kids - boy and girl.

>

> I dont hve husbands birth time [tho I hve the date.] Apparently his

> mom was v ill during his birth and didnt note the time. She says

> about 9 p but Im reluctant to trust her memory more than 40 yrs after

> the event.

>

> Yea I think we already established tht sjc theory is wrong and tht 1

> combo doesnt deny/break a marriage. I hve another chart with ve in 12

> nav - female, v happily married. It would be difficult to find

> marriages happier than those of these 2 with ve in 12 nav. If one

> were to base rules on inadequate research one might even say tht ve

> in 12 nav makes for a v happy marriage! :-))

>

> //...if the chart is authentic ( i must say so as i dont know

> personaly this nativ and i am prooving some thing -actualy nothing

> against u su ,hope u understand )//

>

> Point understood and no offence taken - tho it wouldve been more

> tactful to question the accuracy of birth data rather than the

> authenticity of the chart :-)))

>

> rgds, Su

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, " sunil nair "

> astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:

>

> > Hare rama krishna

> >

> > dear su

> >

> > Thanks for the chart ,pls tell me this is male or female and day

> of

> > marriage if possible ( or how long is they r married ) and if

> possible

> > the chart of the spouce etc .And if ny other details u can giv .

> >

> > because i wanted to study how the excemptions are working .Also

> how

> > deep is the dosha .As this is var ( day ) and nakshtra dosha so the

> > factors can dilute or aggravate a problem .

> >

> > Any this is another example which again proves the sjc theory is

> wrong

> > -of venus in 12th house in navamsa does deny marriage (if the chart

> is

> > authentic ( i must say so as i dont know personaly this nativ and i

> am

> > prooving some thing -actualy nothing against u su ,hope u

> understand )

> >

> >

> >

> > regrds sunil nair

> >

> > om shreem mahalaxmai namah .

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ancient_indian_ astrology, " illusive_2 "

> > <vreality_au@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Sunilji

> > >

> > > Below is a chart with yr mentioned combo - native is v happily

> > married.

> > >

> > > Natal Chart

> > >

> > > July 14, 1965

> > > Time: 3:10:00 am

> > > Time Zone: 10:00:00 (East of GMT)

> > > Place: 151 E 45' 00 " , 32 S 55' 00 "

> > > Newcastle, Australia

> > >

> > > Vedic Weekday: Tuesday (Ma)

> > > Nakshatra: Uttarashadha (Su) (91.76% left)

> > >

> > >

> > > rgds, Su

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " sunil nair "

> > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:

> > >

> > > > Dear grp and learned scholars

> > > >

> > > > here is another list of visha kanaya yogas

> > > >

> > > > its day and nakshtra combinations

> > > >

> > > > 1)sun day coincide with Bharani.

> > > >

> > > > 2)Monday coincides with chitra

> > > >

> > > > 3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus sign )

> > > >

> > > > 4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta)

> > > >

> > > > 5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta )

> > > >

> > > > 6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi )

> > > >

> > > > 7)saturday with revathi

> > > >

> > > > pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones who is

> > above

> > > > marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post

> exceptions to

> > > this

> > > > ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s

> dont

> > know

> > > > or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or best

> > > > gunamilan and approves the match .

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > regrds sunil nair

> > > >

> > > > om shrem mahalaxmai namah .

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Hare ramakrishna

dear sunil bhattacharya ji

sure ,the begining hours are severe and then its getting diluted more ,but i am not aware of it is valid only in day time .May b other more knowledgeable ppl can illuminate us .But possible as sun is ruler of day only .so a worthy logical arguement too ,need to probe more .

 

thanks and regrds

sunil nair

om shreem mahalaxmai namah

, Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya wrote:>> Dear Shri Sunil Nairji,> > < > this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions or Nakshtras ( decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor .> see the> day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day morning almost> now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day morning ) so> almost diluted . >>> > I have read that some astrologers believe that during the night time the Vara dosha is not there. Is there any truth in it?> > Regards, Sunil Bhattacharjya> > > > > sunil nair astro_tellerkerala > Wednesday, August 6, 2008 12:25:28 AM> Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a diffrnt combinations> > > > Hare rama krishna > dear su > > Thanks .thanks for feed backs .i wanted the gender to declare the results ( as its for my own reserch too ) > this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions or Nakshtras ( decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor .> see the day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day morning almost now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day morning ) so almost diluted .> > again if u see moon pournami finshed and prathama day( again if u see moon and sun degrees or see percentage of thithi u can find that just strted only the next thithti ) ,so moon is very power ful .also nite birth .> > another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other trikonas and 7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so moon is strong varesh is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties > next and most imp ,see the panchanga yoga of that day ,vaidrithi ruled by jup ( day yoga means combined power of sun and moon in a chart ) so u can see yoga Lord is jup and in lagna ,so lagna ,sun and moon ( 3 power of lagnas ) become more benefic to giv good results > > hope u understnd > > we shud use all panchnaga like this for complete chart results ,other wise what is the use of panchanga in chart ,u can see every one write it and no one knows how to use it and its real uses in dasa reading .> > i am typing so many mails and reports and same time in many chats too,so in hurry some times words need not reflect my intention as after mailed at times i see i gone wrong in spelling or i miss one word which can make all communication with a diffnrt meaning ,so ppl those who r familiar with me knows this ,so they manages it .and pardons for this kind of flaws too > > thank u > > > regrds sunil nair > om shreem mahalaxmai namah >

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreenadhji,

 

I also heard about the effect of Brihaspati in neutralising the " Durbhaga " . Can

we find the sloka?

 

Regards, Sunil Bhattacharjya

 

 

 

 

Sreenadh <sreesog

 

Wednesday, August 6, 2008 4:37:00 AM

Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a diffrnt

combinations

 

 

Dear Sunil ji,

==>

another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other trikonas and

7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so moon is strong varesh

is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties

<==

There is a sloka which tells us that if Jupiter aspect is present, then

Vishakanya Yoga SHOULD NOT be considered and that it will not give its expected

bad results.

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, " sunil nair "

<astro_tellerkerala@ ...> wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Hare rama krishna

>

> dear su

>

>

>

> Thanks .thanks for feed backs .i wanted the gender to declare the

> results ( as its for my own reserch too )

>

> this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions or

> Nakshtras ( decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor .

>

> see the day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day morning

> almost now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day morning

> ) so almost diluted .

>

>

>

> again if u see moon pournami finshed and prathama day( again if u see

> moon and sun degrees or see percentage of thithi u can find that just

> strted only the next thithti ) ,so moon is very power ful .also nite

> birth .

>

>

>

> another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other

> trikonas and 7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so

> moon is strong varesh is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties

>

> next and most imp ,see the panchanga yoga of that day ,vaidrithi ruled

> by jup ( day yoga means combined power of sun and moon in a chart ) so u

> can see yoga Lord is jup and in lagna ,so lagna ,sun and moon ( 3 power

> of lagnas ) become more benefic to giv good results

>

>

>

> hope u understnd

>

>

>

> we shud use all panchnaga like this for complete chart results ,other

> wise what is the use of panchanga in chart ,u can see every one write it

> and no one knows how to use it and its real uses in dasa reading .

>

>

>

> i am typing so many mails and reports and same time in many chats too,so

> in hurry some times words need not reflect my intention as after mailed

> at times i see i gone wrong in spelling or i miss one word which can

> make all communication with a diffnrt meaning ,so ppl those who r

> familiar with me knows this ,so they manages it .and pardons for this

> kind of flaws too

>

>

>

> thank u

>

>

>

>

>

> regrds sunil nair

>

> om shreem mahalaxmai namah

>

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, " illusive_2 "

> vreality_au@ wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sunilji

> >

> > She was married 21st November '87. Tog with the same man for more

> > than 20 yrs now, and v happily so. 2 kids - boy and girl.

> >

> > I dont hve husbands birth time [tho I hve the date.] Apparently his

> > mom was v ill during his birth and didnt note the time. She says

> > about 9 p but Im reluctant to trust her memory more than 40 yrs after

> > the event.

> >

> > Yea I think we already established tht sjc theory is wrong and tht 1

> > combo doesnt deny/break a marriage. I hve another chart with ve in 12

> > nav - female, v happily married. It would be difficult to find

> > marriages happier than those of these 2 with ve in 12 nav. If one

> > were to base rules on inadequate research one might even say tht ve

> > in 12 nav makes for a v happy marriage! :-))

> >

> > //...if the chart is authentic ( i must say so as i dont know

> > personaly this nativ and i am prooving some thing -actualy nothing

> > against u su ,hope u understand )//

> >

> > Point understood and no offence taken - tho it wouldve been more

> > tactful to question the accuracy of birth data rather than the

> > authenticity of the chart :-)))

> >

> > rgds, Su

> >

> > ancient_indian_ astrology, " sunil nair "

> > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:

> >

> > > Hare rama krishna

> > >

> > > dear su

> > >

> > > Thanks for the chart ,pls tell me this is male or female and day

> > of

> > > marriage if possible ( or how long is they r married ) and if

> > possible

> > > the chart of the spouce etc .And if ny other details u can giv .

> > >

> > > because i wanted to study how the excemptions are working .Also

> > how

> > > deep is the dosha .As this is var ( day ) and nakshtra dosha so the

> > > factors can dilute or aggravate a problem .

> > >

> > > Any this is another example which again proves the sjc theory is

> > wrong

> > > -of venus in 12th house in navamsa does deny marriage (if the chart

> > is

> > > authentic ( i must say so as i dont know personaly this nativ and i

> > am

> > > prooving some thing -actualy nothing against u su ,hope u

> > understand )

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > regrds sunil nair

> > >

> > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah .

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " illusive_2 "

> > > <vreality_au@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Sunilji

> > > >

> > > > Below is a chart with yr mentioned combo - native is v happily

> > > married.

> > > >

> > > > Natal Chart

> > > >

> > > > July 14, 1965

> > > > Time: 3:10:00 am

> > > > Time Zone: 10:00:00 (East of GMT)

> > > > Place: 151 E 45' 00 " , 32 S 55' 00 "

> > > > Newcastle, Australia

> > > >

> > > > Vedic Weekday: Tuesday (Ma)

> > > > Nakshatra: Uttarashadha (Su) (91.76% left)

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > rgds, Su

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " sunil nair "

> > > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > Dear grp and learned scholars

> > > > >

> > > > > here is another list of visha kanaya yogas

> > > > >

> > > > > its day and nakshtra combinations

> > > > >

> > > > > 1)sun day coincide with Bharani.

> > > > >

> > > > > 2)Monday coincides with chitra

> > > > >

> > > > > 3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus sign )

> > > > >

> > > > > 4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta)

> > > > >

> > > > > 5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta )

> > > > >

> > > > > 6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi )

> > > > >

> > > > > 7)saturday with revathi

> > > > >

> > > > > pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones who is

> > > above

> > > > > marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post

> > exceptions to

> > > > this

> > > > > ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s

> > dont

> > > know

> > > > > or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or best

> > > > > gunamilan and approves the match .

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > regrds sunil nair

> > > > >

> > > > > om shrem mahalaxmai namah .

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sir ,

BPHS says' If Lord of  7H from Lagna or Moon or a banefic planet is placed in

7H,

 THE VISHKANAYA DOSA IS MITIGATED.THERE IS NO DOUBT ABOUT IT'

Regards,

 G.K.GOEL

 

 

 

Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya

 

Wednesday, 6 August, 2008 10:06:32 PM

Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a diffrnt

combinations

 

 

Dear Shri Sunil Nairji,

 

<<

 

this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions or Nakshtras (

decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor .

see the

day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day morning almost

now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day morning ) so

almost diluted . >>

 

I have read that some astrologers believe that during the night time the Vara

dosha is not there. Is there any truth in it?

 

Regards, Sunil Bhattacharjya

 

 

sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala@ .co. in>

ancient_indian_ astrology

Wednesday, August 6, 2008 12:25:28 AM

[ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a diffrnt

combinations

 

Hare rama krishna

dear su

 

Thanks .thanks for feed backs .i wanted the gender to declare the results ( as

its for my own reserch too )

this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions or Nakshtras (

decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor .

see the day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day morning almost

now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day morning ) so almost

diluted .

 

again if u see moon pournami finshed and prathama day( again if u see moon and

sun degrees or see percentage of thithi u can find that just strted only the

next thithti ) ,so moon is very power ful .also nite birth .

 

another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other trikonas and

7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so moon is strong varesh

is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties

next and most imp ,see the panchanga yoga of that day ,vaidrithi ruled by jup (

day yoga means combined power of sun and moon in a chart ) so u can see yoga

Lord is jup and in lagna ,so lagna ,sun and moon ( 3 power of lagnas ) become

more benefic to giv good results

 

hope u understnd

 

we shud use all panchnaga like this for complete chart results ,other wise what

is the use of panchanga in chart ,u can see every one write it and no one knows

how to use it and its real uses in dasa reading .

 

i am typing so many mails and reports and same time in many chats too,so in

hurry some times words need not reflect my intention as after mailed at times i

see i gone wrong in spelling or i miss one word which can make all communication

with a diffnrt meaning ,so ppl those who r familiar with me knows this ,so they

manages it .and pardons for this kind of flaws too

 

thank u

 

 

regrds sunil nair

om shreem mahalaxmai namah

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, " illusive_2 " <vreality_au@

....> wrote:

>

> Dear Sunilji

>

> She was married 21st November '87. Tog with the same man for more

> than 20 yrs now, and v happily so. 2 kids - boy and girl.

>

> I dont hve husbands birth time [tho I hve the date.] Apparently his

> mom was v ill during his birth and didnt note the time. She says

> about 9 p but Im reluctant to trust her memory more than 40 yrs after

> the event.

>

> Yea I think we already established tht sjc theory is wrong and tht 1

> combo doesnt deny/break a marriage. I hve another chart with ve in 12

> nav - female, v happily married. It would be difficult to find

> marriages happier than those of these 2 with ve in 12 nav. If one

> were to base rules on inadequate research one might even say tht ve

> in 12 nav makes for a v happy marriage! :-))

>

> //...if the chart is authentic ( i must say so as i dont know

> personaly this nativ and i am prooving some thing -actualy nothing

> against u su ,hope u understand )//

>

> Point understood and no offence taken - tho it wouldve been more

> tactful to question the accuracy of birth data rather than the

> authenticity of the chart :-)))

>

> rgds, Su

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, " sunil nair "

> astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:

>

> > Hare rama krishna

> >

> > dear su

> >

> > Thanks for the chart ,pls tell me this is male or female and day

> of

> > marriage if possible ( or how long is they r married ) and if

> possible

> > the chart of the spouce etc .And if ny other details u can giv .

> >

> > because i wanted to study how the excemptions are working .Also

> how

> > deep is the dosha .As this is var ( day ) and nakshtra dosha so the

> > factors can dilute or aggravate a problem .

> >

> > Any this is another example which again proves the sjc theory is

> wrong

> > -of venus in 12th house in navamsa does deny marriage (if the chart

> is

> > authentic ( i must say so as i dont know personaly this nativ and i

> am

> > prooving some thing -actualy nothing against u su ,hope u

> understand )

> >

> >

> >

> > regrds sunil nair

> >

> > om shreem mahalaxmai namah .

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ancient_indian_ astrology, " illusive_2 "

> > <vreality_au@ > wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Sunilji

> > >

> > > Below is a chart with yr mentioned combo - native is v happily

> > married.

> > >

> > > Natal Chart

> > >

> > > July 14, 1965

> > > Time: 3:10:00 am

> > > Time Zone: 10:00:00 (East of GMT)

> > > Place: 151 E 45' 00 " , 32 S 55' 00 "

> > > Newcastle, Australia

> > >

> > > Vedic Weekday: Tuesday (Ma)

> > > Nakshatra: Uttarashadha (Su) (91.76% left)

> > >

> > >

> > > rgds, Su

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " sunil nair "

> > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:

> > >

> > > > Dear grp and learned scholars

> > > >

> > > > here is another list of visha kanaya yogas

> > > >

> > > > its day and nakshtra combinations

> > > >

> > > > 1)sun day coincide with Bharani.

> > > >

> > > > 2)Monday coincides with chitra

> > > >

> > > > 3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus sign )

> > > >

> > > > 4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta)

> > > >

> > > > 5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta )

> > > >

> > > > 6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi )

> > > >

> > > > 7)saturday with revathi

> > > >

> > > > pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones who is

> > above

> > > > marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post

> exceptions to

> > > this

> > > > ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s

> dont

> > know

> > > > or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or best

> > > > gunamilan and approves the match .

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > regrds sunil nair

> > > >

> > > > om shrem mahalaxmai namah .

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

 

 

 

 

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to

http://in.messenger./invite/

[Guest guest]

Dear Friend,

 

 

BPHS ch81- Streejatak sloka46.

REGARDS,

G.K.GOEL

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya

 

Wednesday, 6 August, 2008 10:32:27 PM

Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a diffrnt

combinations

 

 

Dear Sreenadhji,

 

I also heard about the effect of Brihaspati in neutralising the " Durbhaga " . Can

we find the sloka?

 

Regards, Sunil Bhattacharjya

 

 

Sreenadh <sreesog >

ancient_indian_ astrology

Wednesday, August 6, 2008 4:37:00 AM

[ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a diffrnt

combinations

 

Dear Sunil ji,

==>

another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other trikonas and

7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so moon is strong varesh

is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties

<==

There is a sloka which tells us that if Jupiter aspect is present, then

Vishakanya Yoga SHOULD NOT be considered and that it will not give its expected

bad results.

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, " sunil nair "

<astro_tellerkerala @ ...> wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Hare rama krishna

>

> dear su

>

>

>

> Thanks .thanks for feed backs .i wanted the gender to declare the

> results ( as its for my own reserch too )

>

> this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions or

> Nakshtras ( decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor .

>

> see the day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day morning

> almost now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day morning

> ) so almost diluted .

>

>

>

> again if u see moon pournami finshed and prathama day( again if u see

> moon and sun degrees or see percentage of thithi u can find that just

> strted only the next thithti ) ,so moon is very power ful .also nite

> birth .

>

>

>

> another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other

> trikonas and 7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so

> moon is strong varesh is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties

>

> next and most imp ,see the panchanga yoga of that day ,vaidrithi ruled

> by jup ( day yoga means combined power of sun and moon in a chart ) so u

> can see yoga Lord is jup and in lagna ,so lagna ,sun and moon ( 3 power

> of lagnas ) become more benefic to giv good results

>

>

>

> hope u understnd

>

>

>

> we shud use all panchnaga like this for complete chart results ,other

> wise what is the use of panchanga in chart ,u can see every one write it

> and no one knows how to use it and its real uses in dasa reading .

>

>

>

> i am typing so many mails and reports and same time in many chats too,so

> in hurry some times words need not reflect my intention as after mailed

> at times i see i gone wrong in spelling or i miss one word which can

> make all communication with a diffnrt meaning ,so ppl those who r

> familiar with me knows this ,so they manages it .and pardons for this

> kind of flaws too

>

>

>

> thank u

>

>

>

>

>

> regrds sunil nair

>

> om shreem mahalaxmai namah

>

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, " illusive_2 "

> vreality_au@ wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sunilji

> >

> > She was married 21st November '87. Tog with the same man for more

> > than 20 yrs now, and v happily so. 2 kids - boy and girl.

> >

> > I dont hve husbands birth time [tho I hve the date.] Apparently his

> > mom was v ill during his birth and didnt note the time. She says

> > about 9 p but Im reluctant to trust her memory more than 40 yrs after

> > the event.

> >

> > Yea I think we already established tht sjc theory is wrong and tht 1

> > combo doesnt deny/break a marriage. I hve another chart with ve in 12

> > nav - female, v happily married. It would be difficult to find

> > marriages happier than those of these 2 with ve in 12 nav. If one

> > were to base rules on inadequate research one might even say tht ve

> > in 12 nav makes for a v happy marriage! :-))

> >

> > //...if the chart is authentic ( i must say so as i dont know

> > personaly this nativ and i am prooving some thing -actualy nothing

> > against u su ,hope u understand )//

> >

> > Point understood and no offence taken - tho it wouldve been more

> > tactful to question the accuracy of birth data rather than the

> > authenticity of the chart :-)))

> >

> > rgds, Su

> >

> > ancient_indian_ astrology, " sunil nair "

> > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:

> >

> > > Hare rama krishna

> > >

> > > dear su

> > >

> > > Thanks for the chart ,pls tell me this is male or female and day

> > of

> > > marriage if possible ( or how long is they r married ) and if

> > possible

> > > the chart of the spouce etc .And if ny other details u can giv .

> > >

> > > because i wanted to study how the excemptions are working .Also

> > how

> > > deep is the dosha .As this is var ( day ) and nakshtra dosha so the

> > > factors can dilute or aggravate a problem .

> > >

> > > Any this is another example which again proves the sjc theory is

> > wrong

> > > -of venus in 12th house in navamsa does deny marriage (if the chart

> > is

> > > authentic ( i must say so as i dont know personaly this nativ and i

> > am

> > > prooving some thing -actualy nothing against u su ,hope u

> > understand )

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > regrds sunil nair

> > >

> > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah .

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " illusive_2 "

> > > <vreality_au@ > wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Sunilji

> > > >

> > > > Below is a chart with yr mentioned combo - native is v happily

> > > married.

> > > >

> > > > Natal Chart

> > > >

> > > > July 14, 1965

> > > > Time: 3:10:00 am

> > > > Time Zone: 10:00:00 (East of GMT)

> > > > Place: 151 E 45' 00 " , 32 S 55' 00 "

> > > > Newcastle, Australia

> > > >

> > > > Vedic Weekday: Tuesday (Ma)

> > > > Nakshatra: Uttarashadha (Su) (91.76% left)

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > rgds, Su

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " sunil nair "

> > > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > Dear grp and learned scholars

> > > > >

> > > > > here is another list of visha kanaya yogas

> > > > >

> > > > > its day and nakshtra combinations

> > > > >

> > > > > 1)sun day coincide with Bharani.

> > > > >

> > > > > 2)Monday coincides with chitra

> > > > >

> > > > > 3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus sign )

> > > > >

> > > > > 4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta)

> > > > >

> > > > > 5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta )

> > > > >

> > > > > 6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi )

> > > > >

> > > > > 7)saturday with revathi

> > > > >

> > > > > pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones who is

> > > above

> > > > > marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post

> > exceptions to

> > > > this

> > > > > ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s

> > dont

> > > know

> > > > > or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or best

> > > > > gunamilan and approves the match .

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > regrds sunil nair

> > > > >

> > > > > om shrem mahalaxmai namah .

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

 

 

 

 

 

Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on

http://help./l/in//mail/mail/tools/tools-08.html/

[Guest guest]

Dear Sunilji

 

that was most interesting!! I do look at panchang quite often [for

other info] but confess I never quite understood what some of those

yogas meant. Thank you for taking the trouble to share your

knowledge with us.

 

//so ppl those who r familiar with me knows this ,so they manages

it .and pardons for this kind of flaws too//

 

Of course Im familiar with you and understood your intent. Hence

the 'long smiley' at the end of my post to indicate the good-

humoured, affectionate and friendly intent of my own post.

 

thanks and rdgs

Su

[Guest guest]

Hare rama krishna

dear su ,

 

Thanks ,pls b more activ in grp

 

thanks and regrds

sunil nair

om shreem mahalaxmai namah

, "illusive_2" <vreality_au wrote:>> Dear Sunilji> > that was most interesting!! I do look at panchang quite often [for> other info] but confess I never quite understood what some of those> yogas meant. Thank you for taking the trouble to share your> knowledge with us.> > //so ppl those who r familiar with me knows this ,so they manages> it .and pardons for this kind of flaws too//> > Of course Im familiar with you and understood your intent. Hence> the 'long smiley' at the end of my post to indicate the good-> humoured, affectionate and friendly intent of my own post.> > thanks and rdgs> Su>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sunil Bhattachrjya ji,

Yes, I have the quote. I will provide it tomarrow. (Because now i am

at office)

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

[Guest guest]

Namaste,

 

If the 7th lord or any subha graha (functional benefic) posited in the 7the

house cancels visha kanya yoga ( sloka 67 in sthri jathak phalam  chapter of

Jaathakaththuva).

 

--- On Wed, 8/6/08, Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya wrote:

Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya

Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a diffrnt

combinations

 

Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 1:02 PM

Dear Sreenadhji,

 

 

 

I also heard about the effect of Brihaspati in neutralising the " Durbhaga " . Can

we find the sloka?

 

 

 

Regards, Sunil Bhattacharjya

[Guest guest]

Dear friends,

 

First of let us split the phrase Vish- Kanya- Dosha

 

Kanya- womenhood- moon- venus and lagn and lagna lord of the girl

 

 

Dosha- afflictions, deviations

 

Visha- poison ruled by- Gulika and malefic plaents in house of

poision (8th house) and zodiac sign scorpio

 

 

So in all such cases we have to check whether the will power of the

native provide sufficient strength to - overcome the effects of the

poisions.

 

How the poision comes into life ?

viz; poisioning of body, mind or intellect ?

 

Accidentally ?

 

Due to own stupidity and ignorance ?

 

Injected by others ?

 

Hope this is food enough for further thought and helps in

streamlining our approach.

 

With best wishes,

 

Yours astrologically,

 

 

Mrutyunjay