Guest guest Posted August 15, 2008 Report Share Posted August 15, 2008 Dear Sreenadhji, Sreeramji and learned members, I am sorry to put a question related to 'primary level'. It is quiet often advised to check planetary combinations/ yogas from lagna as well as moon and derive the results from whichever is stronger - moon or lagna. How do we judge the strength here - between a house and planet. Do we judge from shadbala/ vimsopaka bala etc.? I tried to get the answer from books of B V Raman but could not get definite answer. I tried to search through archives but could not get any thread on this topic. I hope you will guide me. Regards, Rajendra , Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937 wrote: > > > Dear Sir , > BPHSÂ says' If Lord of 7H from Lagna or Moon or a banefic planet is placed in 7H, > THE VISHKANAYA DOSA IS MITIGATED.THERE IS NO DOUBT ABOUT IT' > Regards, > G.K.GOEL > > > > Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya > > Wednesday, 6 August, 2008 10:06:32 PM > Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a diffrnt combinations > > > Dear Shri Sunil Nairji, > > << > > this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions or Nakshtras ( decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor . > see the > day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day morning almost > now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day morning ) so > almost diluted . >> > > I have read that some astrologers believe that during the night time the Vara dosha is not there. Is there any truth in it? > > Regards, Sunil Bhattacharjya > > > sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala@ .co. in> > ancient_indian_ astrology > Wednesday, August 6, 2008 12:25:28 AM > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a diffrnt combinations > > Hare rama krishna > dear su > > Thanks .thanks for feed backs .i wanted the gender to declare the results ( as its for my own reserch too ) > this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions or Nakshtras ( decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor . > see the day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day morning almost now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day morning ) so almost diluted . > > again if u see moon pournami finshed and prathama day( again if u see moon and sun degrees or see percentage of thithi u can find that just strted only the next thithti ) ,so moon is very power ful .also nite birth . > > another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other trikonas and 7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so moon is strong varesh is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties > next and most imp ,see the panchanga yoga of that day ,vaidrithi ruled by jup ( day yoga means combined power of sun and moon in a chart ) so u can see yoga Lord is jup and in lagna ,so lagna ,sun and moon ( 3 power of lagnas ) become more benefic to giv good results > > hope u understnd > > we shud use all panchnaga like this for complete chart results ,other wise what is the use of panchanga in chart ,u can see every one write it and no one knows how to use it and its real uses in dasa reading . > > i am typing so many mails and reports and same time in many chats too,so in hurry some times words need not reflect my intention as after mailed at times i see i gone wrong in spelling or i miss one word which can make all communication with a diffnrt meaning ,so ppl those who r familiar with me knows this ,so they manages it .and pardons for this kind of flaws too > > thank u > > > regrds sunil nair > om shreem mahalaxmai namah > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " illusive_2 " <vreality_au@ ...> wrote: > > > > Dear Sunilji > > > > She was married 21st November '87. Tog with the same man for more > > than 20 yrs now, and v happily so. 2 kids - boy and girl. > > > > I dont hve husbands birth time [tho I hve the date.] Apparently his > > mom was v ill during his birth and didnt note the time. She says > > about 9 p but Im reluctant to trust her memory more than 40 yrs after > > the event. > > > > Yea I think we already established tht sjc theory is wrong and tht 1 > > combo doesnt deny/break a marriage. I hve another chart with ve in 12 > > nav - female, v happily married. It would be difficult to find > > marriages happier than those of these 2 with ve in 12 nav. If one > > were to base rules on inadequate research one might even say tht ve > > in 12 nav makes for a v happy marriage! :-)) > > > > //...if the chart is authentic ( i must say so as i dont know > > personaly this nativ and i am prooving some thing -actualy nothing > > against u su ,hope u understand )// > > > > Point understood and no offence taken - tho it wouldve been more > > tactful to question the accuracy of birth data rather than the > > authenticity of the chart :-))) > > > > rgds, Su > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " sunil nair " > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote: > > > > > Hare rama krishna > > > > > > dear su > > > > > > Thanks for the chart ,pls tell me this is male or female and day > > of > > > marriage if possible ( or how long is they r married ) and if > > possible > > > the chart of the spouce etc .And if ny other details u can giv . > > > > > > because i wanted to study how the excemptions are working .Also > > how > > > deep is the dosha .As this is var ( day ) and nakshtra dosha so the > > > factors can dilute or aggravate a problem . > > > > > > Any this is another example which again proves the sjc theory is > > wrong > > > -of venus in 12th house in navamsa does deny marriage (if the chart > > is > > > authentic ( i must say so as i dont know personaly this nativ and i > > am > > > prooving some thing -actualy nothing against u su ,hope u > > understand ) > > > > > > > > > > > > regrds sunil nair > > > > > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " illusive_2 " > > > <vreality_au@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sunilji > > > > > > > > Below is a chart with yr mentioned combo - native is v happily > > > married. > > > > > > > > Natal Chart > > > > > > > > July 14, 1965 > > > > Time: 3:10:00 am > > > > Time Zone: 10:00:00 (East of GMT) > > > > Place: 151 E 45' 00 " , 32 S 55' 00 " > > > > Newcastle, Australia > > > > > > > > Vedic Weekday: Tuesday (Ma) > > > > Nakshatra: Uttarashadha (Su) (91.76% left) > > > > > > > > > > > > rgds, Su > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " sunil nair " > > > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear grp and learned scholars > > > > > > > > > > here is another list of visha kanaya yogas > > > > > > > > > > its day and nakshtra combinations > > > > > > > > > > 1)sun day coincide with Bharani. > > > > > > > > > > 2)Monday coincides with chitra > > > > > > > > > > 3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus sign ) > > > > > > > > > > 4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta) > > > > > > > > > > 5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta ) > > > > > > > > > > 6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi ) > > > > > > > > > > 7)saturday with revathi > > > > > > > > > > pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones who is > > > above > > > > > marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post > > exceptions to > > > > this > > > > > ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s > > dont > > > know > > > > > or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or best > > > > > gunamilan and approves the match . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regrds sunil nair > > > > > > > > > > om shrem mahalaxmai namah . > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://in.messenger./invite/ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2008 Report Share Posted August 15, 2008 Dear Mr. Rajendra_Bhatt ji, " Doondtey Rah Jawoogey " { Lost in Search} goes the detergent Surf Excel popular advertisement. Same applies to Astrology also.....read little think more !! If the planet is well placed, the houses owned by that planet prosper and vice versa, akin to a Rich man having all things in his house, however a pauper.....you can use your imagination... Think you are a unrestricted guest in a rich man house....free to enjoy.....with access to his bank accounts...etc.. what you do....you reap .... same thing goes for a planet in a HOUSE, where the HL is well placed. Say Moon in Pisces conjunct Jupiter or Moon in Pisces, but Jupiter is exalted in Cancer. Else, you can imagine....your state. A planet in a nakshatra of a friend or benefic....good, in malefic nakshatra ....little negative. Think you are a rich man with unrestricted guest in a POOR man's house......same condition as above, but Jupiter is debilitated in Capricon. These are simplistic explanations..... without going complex or amsas...if above conditions are met, then all other things in shadbal .. are automatically taken care of . In between us- Irrespective of above, the astrologer should also be strong or well placed before he starts predicting.. !! We have many acclaimed Diamond Medalist Punditjis...who know less astrology but successful......few ....good knowledge....but .....conditions ....left to imagination again. {Writing a imaginative email }!! With regards, Sreeram_Srinivas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2008 Report Share Posted August 15, 2008 Dear Sreeramji, // These are simplistic explanations..... without going complex oramsas...if above conditions are met, then all other things in shadbal ...are automatically taken care of . // It gives me great pleasure to read the above lines. Simple astrology, simple explantions, basic principles applied , logical inferences made, these are enough to understand how a planet would behave. I wish there were more like us......... bst wishes, Bhaskaran. , "sreeram srinivas" <sreeram64 wrote:>> > Dear Mr. Rajendra_Bhatt ji,> > "Doondtey Rah Jawoogey" { Lost in Search} goes the detergent Surf Excel> popular advertisement. Same applies to Astrology also.....read little> think more !!> > If the planet is well placed, the houses owned by that planet prosper> and vice versa, akin to a Rich man having all things in his house,> however a pauper.....you can use your imagination...> > Think you are a unrestricted guest in a rich man house....free to> enjoy.....with access to his bank accounts...etc.. what you do....you> reap .... same thing goes for a planet in a HOUSE, where the HL is well> placed. Say Moon in Pisces conjunct Jupiter or Moon in Pisces, but> Jupiter is exalted in Cancer.> > Else, you can imagine....your state.> > A planet in a nakshatra of a friend or benefic....good, in malefic> nakshatra ....little negative.> > Think you are a rich man with unrestricted guest in a POOR man's> house......same condition as above, but Jupiter is debilitated in> Capricon.> > These are simplistic explanations..... without going complex or> amsas...if above conditions are met, then all other things in shadbal ..> are automatically taken care of .> > In between us- Irrespective of above, the astrologer should also be> strong or well placed before he starts predicting.. !! We have many> acclaimed Diamond Medalist Punditjis...who know less astrology but> successful......few ....good knowledge....but .....conditions ....left> to imagination again.> > {Writing a imaginative email }!!> > With regards,> > Sreeram_Srinivas> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2008 Report Share Posted August 15, 2008 Dear Rajendra ji, There was a detailed discussion on "Strength of Signs" in this group earlier. Just have a search in the group archives. To help locate or start it, here is a link: /message/845 A search and study in the group archives can save us re-doing a lot of explanation. ==>> How do we judge the strength here - between a house and planet. Do we > judge from shadbala/ vimsopaka bala etc.?<== No, it is NOT shadbala or vimsopakabala. The traditional answer is to use the quotes ("Hora swami...Lagnam lagna patau..." etc) provided in the above mentioned message to arrive at the correct judgement.Love and regards,Sreenadh , "rajendra_bhatt" <rajendra_bhatt wrote:>> Dear Sreenadhji, Sreeramji and learned members,> I am sorry to put a question related to 'primary level'. It is quiet > often advised to check planetary combinations/ yogas from lagna as > well as moon and derive the results from whichever is stronger - moon > or lagna.> How do we judge the strength here - between a house and planet. Do we > judge from shadbala/ vimsopaka bala etc.?> I tried to get the answer from books of B V Raman but could not get > definite answer. I tried to search through archives but could not get > any thread on this topic.> I hope you will guide me.> Regards,> Rajendra > > > > , Gopal Goel > gkgoel1937@ wrote:> >> > > > Dear Sir ,> > BPHSÂ says' If Lord of 7H from Lagna or Moon or a banefic planet > is placed in 7H,> > THE VISHKANAYA DOSA IS MITIGATED.THERE IS NO DOUBT ABOUT IT'> > Regards,> > G.K.GOEL> > > > > > > > Sunil Bhattacharjya sunil_bhattacharjya@> > > > Wednesday, 6 August, 2008 10:06:32 PM> > Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a > diffrnt combinations> > > > > > Dear Shri Sunil Nairji,> > > > <<> > > > this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions > or Nakshtras ( decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor .> > see the> > day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day morning > almost> > now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day morning ) > so> > almost diluted . >>> > > > I have read that some astrologers believe that during the night > time the Vara dosha is not there. Is there any truth in it?> > > > Regards, Sunil Bhattacharjya> > > > > > sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala@ .co. in>> > ancient_indian_ astrology> > Wednesday, August 6, 2008 12:25:28 AM> > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a > diffrnt combinations> > > > Hare rama krishna> > dear su> > > > Thanks .thanks for feed backs .i wanted the gender to declare the > results ( as its for my own reserch too )> > this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions > or Nakshtras ( decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor .> > see the day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day > morning almost now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next > day morning ) so almost diluted .> > > > again if u see moon pournami finshed and prathama day( again if u > see moon and sun degrees or see percentage of thithi u can find that > just strted only the next thithti ) ,so moon is very power ful .also > nite birth .> > > > another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other > trikonas and 7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so > moon is strong varesh is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties> > next and most imp ,see the panchanga yoga of that day ,vaidrithi > ruled by jup ( day yoga means combined power of sun and moon in a > chart ) so u can see yoga Lord is jup and in lagna ,so lagna ,sun and > moon ( 3 power of lagnas ) become more benefic to giv good results> > > > hope u understnd> > > > we shud use all panchnaga like this for complete chart > results ,other wise what is the use of panchanga in chart ,u can see > every one write it and no one knows how to use it and its real uses > in dasa reading .> > > > i am typing so many mails and reports and same time in many chats > too,so in hurry some times words need not reflect my intention as > after mailed at times i see i gone wrong in spelling or i miss one > word which can make all communication with a diffnrt meaning ,so ppl > those who r familiar with me knows this ,so they manages it .and > pardons for this kind of flaws too> > > > thank u> > > > > > regrds sunil nair> > om shreem mahalaxmai namah> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, "illusive_2" > <vreality_au@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sunilji> > >> > > She was married 21st November '87. Tog with the same man for more> > > than 20 yrs now, and v happily so. 2 kids - boy and girl.> > >> > > I dont hve husbands birth time [tho I hve the date.] Apparently > his> > > mom was v ill during his birth and didnt note the time. She says> > > about 9 p but Im reluctant to trust her memory more than 40 yrs > after> > > the event.> > >> > > Yea I think we already established tht sjc theory is wrong and > tht 1> > > combo doesnt deny/break a marriage. I hve another chart with ve > in 12> > > nav - female, v happily married. It would be difficult to find> > > marriages happier than those of these 2 with ve in 12 nav. If one> > > were to base rules on inadequate research one might even say tht > ve> > > in 12 nav makes for a v happy marriage! :-))> > >> > > //...if the chart is authentic ( i must say so as i dont know> > > personaly this nativ and i am prooving some thing -actualy nothing> > > against u su ,hope u understand )//> > >> > > Point understood and no offence taken - tho it wouldve been more> > > tactful to question the accuracy of birth data rather than the> > > authenticity of the chart :-)))> > >> > > rgds, Su> > >> > > ancient_indian_ astrology, "sunil nair"> > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> > >> > > > Hare rama krishna> > > >> > > > dear su> > > >> > > > Thanks for the chart ,pls tell me this is male or female and day> > > of> > > > marriage if possible ( or how long is they r married ) and if> > > possible> > > > the chart of the spouce etc .And if ny other details u can giv .> > > >> > > > because i wanted to study how the excemptions are working .Also> > > how> > > > deep is the dosha .As this is var ( day ) and nakshtra dosha so > the> > > > factors can dilute or aggravate a problem .> > > >> > > > Any this is another example which again proves the sjc theory is> > > wrong> > > > -of venus in 12th house in navamsa does deny marriage (if the > chart> > > is> > > > authentic ( i must say so as i dont know personaly this nativ > and i> > > am> > > > prooving some thing -actualy nothing against u su ,hope u> > > understand )> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > regrds sunil nair> > > >> > > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, "illusive_2"> > > > <vreality_au@ > wrote:> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Dear Sunilji> > > > >> > > > > Below is a chart with yr mentioned combo - native is v happily> > > > married.> > > > >> > > > > Natal Chart> > > > >> > > > > July 14, 1965> > > > > Time: 3:10:00 am> > > > > Time Zone: 10:00:00 (East of GMT)> > > > > Place: 151 E 45' 00", 32 S 55' 00"> > > > > Newcastle, Australia> > > > >> > > > > Vedic Weekday: Tuesday (Ma)> > > > > Nakshatra: Uttarashadha (Su) (91.76% left)> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > rgds, Su> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, "sunil > nair"> > > > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> > > > >> > > > > > Dear grp and learned scholars> > > > > >> > > > > > here is another list of visha kanaya yogas> > > > > >> > > > > > its day and nakshtra combinations> > > > > >> > > > > > 1)sun day coincide with Bharani.> > > > > >> > > > > > 2)Monday coincides with chitra> > > > > >> > > > > > 3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus > sign )> > > > > >> > > > > > 4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta)> > > > > >> > > > > > 5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta )> > > > > >> > > > > > 6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi )> > > > > >> > > > > > 7)saturday with revathi> > > > > >> > > > > > pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones > who is> > > > above> > > > > > marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post> > > exceptions to> > > > > this> > > > > > ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s> > > dont> > > > know> > > > > > or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or > best> > > > > > gunamilan and approves the match .> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > regrds sunil nair> > > > > >> > > > > > om shrem mahalaxmai namah .> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to > http://in.messenger./invite/> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Dear Sreenadhji. Thank you very much for leading me to a treasure. And I am sorry for search in archives I did not find right words. Dear Sreeramji, Thanks for your answer. Regards, Rajendra , " Sreenadh " <sreesog wrote: > > Dear Rajendra ji, > There was a detailed discussion on " Strength of Signs " in this group > earlier. Just have a search in the group archives. To help locate or > start it, here is a link: > /message/845 > </message/845> > A search and study in the group archives can save us re-doing a lot > of explanation. > ==> > > How do we judge the strength here - between a house and planet. Do we > > judge from shadbala/ vimsopaka bala etc.? > <== > No, it is NOT shadbala or vimsopakabala. The traditional answer is to > use the quotes ( " Hora swami... " " Lagnam lagna patau... " etc) provided in > the above mentioned message to arrive at the correct judgement. > Love and regards, > Sreenadh > > , " rajendra_bhatt " > <rajendra_bhatt@> wrote: > > > > Dear Sreenadhji, Sreeramji and learned members, > > I am sorry to put a question related to 'primary level'. It is quiet > > often advised to check planetary combinations/ yogas from lagna as > > well as moon and derive the results from whichever is stronger - moon > > or lagna. > > How do we judge the strength here - between a house and planet. Do we > > judge from shadbala/ vimsopaka bala etc.? > > I tried to get the answer from books of B V Raman but could not get > > definite answer. I tried to search through archives but could not get > > any thread on this topic. > > I hope you will guide me. > > Regards, > > Rajendra > > > > > > > > , Gopal Goel > > gkgoel1937@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Sir , > > > BPHSÂ says' If Lord of 7H from Lagna or Moon or a banefic planet > > is placed in 7H, > > > THE VISHKANAYA DOSA IS MITIGATED.THERE IS NO DOUBT ABOUT IT' > > > Regards, > > > G.K.GOEL > > > > > > > > > > > > Sunil Bhattacharjya sunil_bhattacharjya@ > > > > > > Wednesday, 6 August, 2008 10:06:32 PM > > > Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a > > diffrnt combinations > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri Sunil Nairji, > > > > > > << > > > > > > this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions > > or Nakshtras ( decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor . > > > see the > > > day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day morning > > almost > > > now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next day morning ) > > so > > > almost diluted . >> > > > > > > I have read that some astrologers believe that during the night > > time the Vara dosha is not there. Is there any truth in it? > > > > > > Regards, Sunil Bhattacharjya > > > > > > > > > sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala@ .co. in> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > > Wednesday, August 6, 2008 12:25:28 AM > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Visha kanyaka yogas --a > > diffrnt combinations > > > > > > Hare rama krishna > > > dear su > > > > > > Thanks .thanks for feed backs .i wanted the gender to declare the > > results ( as its for my own reserch too ) > > > this vishkanya yoga is vara ( decided by sun ) and lunar mansions > > or Nakshtras ( decided by moon ) ,so its strnght is deciding factor . > > > see the day was TUESADY but elapsed lot of time as its next day > > morning almost now ( vara day strtd frm morning( sun rise to ) next > > day morning ) so almost diluted . > > > > > > again if u see moon pournami finshed and prathama day( again if u > > see moon and sun degrees or see percentage of thithi u can find that > > just strted only the next thithti ) ,so moon is very power ful .also > > nite birth . > > > > > > another thing is jup aspecting her lagna ( stithi ) and all other > > trikonas and 7th H and 7TH Lord and protecting as natural benefic .so > > moon is strong varesh is weak and jupiter beneficial drishties > > > next and most imp ,see the panchanga yoga of that day ,vaidrithi > > ruled by jup ( day yoga means combined power of sun and moon in a > > chart ) so u can see yoga Lord is jup and in lagna ,so lagna ,sun and > > moon ( 3 power of lagnas ) become more benefic to giv good results > > > > > > hope u understnd > > > > > > we shud use all panchnaga like this for complete chart > > results ,other wise what is the use of panchanga in chart ,u can see > > every one write it and no one knows how to use it and its real uses > > in dasa reading . > > > > > > i am typing so many mails and reports and same time in many chats > > too,so in hurry some times words need not reflect my intention as > > after mailed at times i see i gone wrong in spelling or i miss one > > word which can make all communication with a diffnrt meaning ,so ppl > > those who r familiar with me knows this ,so they manages it .and > > pardons for this kind of flaws too > > > > > > thank u > > > > > > > > > regrds sunil nair > > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " illusive_2 " > > <vreality_au@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sunilji > > > > > > > > She was married 21st November '87. Tog with the same man for more > > > > than 20 yrs now, and v happily so. 2 kids - boy and girl. > > > > > > > > I dont hve husbands birth time [tho I hve the date.] Apparently > > his > > > > mom was v ill during his birth and didnt note the time. She says > > > > about 9 p but Im reluctant to trust her memory more than 40 yrs > > after > > > > the event. > > > > > > > > Yea I think we already established tht sjc theory is wrong and > > tht 1 > > > > combo doesnt deny/break a marriage. I hve another chart with ve > > in 12 > > > > nav - female, v happily married. It would be difficult to find > > > > marriages happier than those of these 2 with ve in 12 nav. If one > > > > were to base rules on inadequate research one might even say tht > > ve > > > > in 12 nav makes for a v happy marriage! :-)) > > > > > > > > //...if the chart is authentic ( i must say so as i dont know > > > > personaly this nativ and i am prooving some thing -actualy nothing > > > > against u su ,hope u understand )// > > > > > > > > Point understood and no offence taken - tho it wouldve been more > > > > tactful to question the accuracy of birth data rather than the > > > > authenticity of the chart :-))) > > > > > > > > rgds, Su > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " sunil nair " > > > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hare rama krishna > > > > > > > > > > dear su > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the chart ,pls tell me this is male or female and day > > > > of > > > > > marriage if possible ( or how long is they r married ) and if > > > > possible > > > > > the chart of the spouce etc .And if ny other details u can giv . > > > > > > > > > > because i wanted to study how the excemptions are working .Also > > > > how > > > > > deep is the dosha .As this is var ( day ) and nakshtra dosha so > > the > > > > > factors can dilute or aggravate a problem . > > > > > > > > > > Any this is another example which again proves the sjc theory is > > > > wrong > > > > > -of venus in 12th house in navamsa does deny marriage (if the > > chart > > > > is > > > > > authentic ( i must say so as i dont know personaly this nativ > > and i > > > > am > > > > > prooving some thing -actualy nothing against u su ,hope u > > > > understand ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regrds sunil nair > > > > > > > > > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology@ . com, " illusive_2 " > > > > > <vreality_au@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sunilji > > > > > > > > > > > > Below is a chart with yr mentioned combo - native is v happily > > > > > married. > > > > > > > > > > > > Natal Chart > > > > > > > > > > > > July 14, 1965 > > > > > > Time: 3:10:00 am > > > > > > Time Zone: 10:00:00 (East of GMT) > > > > > > Place: 151 E 45' 00 " , 32 S 55' 00 " > > > > > > Newcastle, Australia > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Weekday: Tuesday (Ma) > > > > > > Nakshatra: Uttarashadha (Su) (91.76% left) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rgds, Su > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " sunil > > nair " > > > > > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear grp and learned scholars > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here is another list of visha kanaya yogas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > its day and nakshtra combinations > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1)sun day coincide with Bharani. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)Monday coincides with chitra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3)tuesday coincides with uthradam ( utrashada in dhanus > > sign ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4)wednesday with avittam ( dhanishta) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5)Thurday with triketta ( jyeshta ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6)friday with pooradam ( poorvashada in dhanus rasi ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7)saturday with revathi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pls see in charts in ur possessions or near and dear ones > > who is > > > > > above > > > > > > > marriagebale age or already married .Then i will post > > > > exceptions to > > > > > > this > > > > > > > ,let us see in actual results .even i know many astrologer s > > > > dont > > > > > know > > > > > > > or never consider this in matchting and says good chart or > > best > > > > > > > gunamilan and approves the match . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regrds sunil nair > > > > > > > > > > > > > > om shrem mahalaxmai namah . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to > > http://in.messenger./invite/ > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.