Guest guest Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 hare rama krishna Dear shri Vinay ji and shri chandrahari ji vinay ji i think the basic problem in between u both is the basic yr in surya sindhantha computation ,vinay ji u hold the tradition view that it is early work ,chandra ji also has the same view but he says it is revised and re computed the calculation as the latest surya sidhantha is a revised work after pancha sidhantic a and even arya bhatiya and he presented a paper abt it Polar Longitudes of Suryasiddhanta and Hipparchus' Commentary, IJHS 41(1), 2006, pp.29-52. INSA, New Delhi-2 and he says the basic yr when some unknown scholar revised it he used the yr AD 522 as base yr . sure frm time immomorial the hindus use polar longitude know as druvankam and the story of druva become a star and that alligary in purana also support s it this has taken frm indians and hipparcus presented in greece as a theorey and later day ptolemy without saying the source he recomputed it without mentioning druvanga and used right ascertion and delianations method which is used in all modern panchangas i blv this has contributed for all controversy in recent time even saha lahiri calender committie also used all yrs frm AD 285 to AD 585 and finaly giv 3 base yrs now actualy what u and chandrahari says is almost correct but this is the fundamntal diffrnce chandrahari uses scientific knowledge and his abilities and decoding ancient sidhantantha s where as u r using ancient gurukula tradtional view and computing frm kali yugadi i think ,even i may b wrong i think u ppl shud do some correspondence and u can discuss ur beeja correction methods and chandra hari uses kerala driganita and beeja corections given by parameswara forget what happened in past and proceed . i think both of u can make a big diffrnce any mistake in abov post pls forgiv me as i am not a sidhantic scholar and i hope both of u take my suggestion in constructiv way . i cud not attent grp like b4 as i strted a business too because like what kaul and company says with all this fraud astrology i cannot make billions like a-satyam rajus ,so need some money to complete few tasks i think even reserch in astro needs money . so i hope u ppl will understand and conct each other and i think u can contribute more to astrology many memebrs has doubts why all this sidhantha talks in this astro grps ,but they dont know without it astro itself become sketlton soon .Even sri KN rao also said so recently .without a strong foundation then computing can go ashtray and also softwares and hence predictions in may b 50 yrs but i value every one's opinons regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Dear Sunil Nairji, Thank you for talking abot both the views. Can you kindli give the link to Chandrahariji's paper.In fact due to precession the Pole star changes and there was another star as Pole-star before the present Pole-star. They have the 25800 year cycle though the apparent movement is in relation to the earth. Regards,Sunil K. Bhattacharjya--- On Sun, 1/11/09, sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala wrote:sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala To Vinay ji and chandra hari ji Date: Sunday, January 11, 2009, 9:28 AM hare rama krishna Dear shri Vinay ji and shri chandrahari ji vinay ji i think the basic problem in between u both is the basic yr in surya sindhantha computation ,vinay ji u hold the tradition view that it is early work ,chandra ji also has the same view but he says it is revised and re computed the calculation as the latest surya sidhantha is a revised work after pancha sidhantic a and even arya bhatiya and he presented a paper abt it Polar Longitudes of Suryasiddhanta and Hipparchus ' Commentary, IJHS 41(1), 2006, pp.29-52. INSA, New Delhi-2 and he says the basic yr when some unknown scholar revised it he used the yr AD 522 as base yr . sure frm time immomorial the hindus use polar longitude know as druvankam and the story of druva become a star and that alligary in purana also support s it this has taken frm indians and hipparcus presented in greece as a theorey and later day ptolemy without saying the source he recomputed it without mentioning druvanga and used right ascertion and delianations method which is used in all modern panchangas i blv this has contributed for all controversy in recent time even saha lahiri calender committie also used all yrs frm AD 285 to AD 585 and finaly giv 3 base yrs now actualy what u and chandrahari says is almost correct but this is the fundamntal diffrnce chandrahari uses scientific knowledge and his abilities and decoding ancient sidhantantha s where as u r using ancient gurukula tradtional view and computing frm kali yugadi i think ,even i may b wrong i think u ppl shud do some correspondence and u can discuss ur beeja correction methods and chandra hari uses kerala driganita and beeja corections given by parameswara forget what happened in past and proceed . i think both of u can make a big diffrnce any mistake in abov post pls forgiv me as i am not a sidhantic scholar and i hope both of u take my suggestion in constructiv way . i cud not attent grp like b4 as i strted a business too because like what kaul and company says with all this fraud astrology i cannot make billions like a-satyam rajus ,so need some money to complete few tasks i think even reserch in astro needs money . so i hope u ppl will understand and conct each other and i think u can contribute more to astrology many memebrs has doubts why all this sidhantha talks in this astro grps ,but they dont know without it astro itself become sketlton soon .Even sri KN rao also said so recently .without a strong foundation then computing can go ashtray and also softwares and hence predictions in may b 50 yrs but i value every one's opinons regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 // In fact due to precession the Pole star changes and there was another star as Pole-star before the present Pole-star. They have the 25800 year cycle though the apparent movement is in relation to the earth. // Yes, and there will be another one too, in future. regards/Bhaskar. , Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya wrote: > > Dear Sunil Nairji, > > Thank you for talking abot both the views. Can you kindli give the link to Chandrahariji's paper. > > In fact due to precession the Pole star changes and there was another star as Pole-star before the present Pole-star. They have the 25800 year cycle though the apparent movement is in relation to the earth. > > Regards, > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > --- On Sun, 1/11/09, sunil nair astro_tellerkerala wrote: > sunil nair astro_tellerkerala > To Vinay ji and chandra hari ji > > Sunday, January 11, 2009, 9:28 AM > > > > > > hare rama krishna > Dear shri Vinay ji and shri chandrahari ji > > vinay ji i think the basic problem in between u both is the basic yr in surya sindhantha computation ,vinay ji u hold the tradition view that it is early work ,chandra ji also has the same view but he says it is revised and re computed the calculation as the latest surya sidhantha is a revised work after pancha sidhantic a and even arya bhatiya and he presented a paper abt it > Polar Longitudes of Suryasiddhanta and Hipparchus ' Commentary, IJHS 41(1), 2006, pp.29-52. INSA, New Delhi-2 > and he says the basic yr when some unknown scholar revised it he used the yr AD 522 as base yr . > > sure frm time immomorial the hindus use polar longitude know as druvankam and the story of druva become a star and that alligary in purana also support s it > > this has taken frm indians and hipparcus presented in greece as a theorey and later day ptolemy without saying the source he recomputed it without mentioning druvanga and used right ascertion and delianations method which is used in all modern panchangas i blv > > this has contributed for all controversy in recent time > > even saha lahiri calender committie also used all yrs frm AD 285 to AD 585 and finaly giv 3 base yrs > > now actualy what u and chandrahari says is almost correct but this is the fundamntal diffrnce > > chandrahari uses scientific knowledge and his abilities and decoding ancient sidhantantha s where as u r using ancient gurukula tradtional view and computing frm kali yugadi i think ,even i may b wrong i think u ppl shud do some correspondence and u can discuss ur beeja correction methods and chandra hari uses kerala driganita and beeja corections given by parameswara > > forget what happened in past and proceed . > > i think both of u can make a big diffrnce > > any mistake in abov post pls forgiv me as i am not a sidhantic scholar and i hope both of u take my suggestion in constructiv way . > > i cud not attent grp like b4 as i strted a business too because like what kaul and company says with all this fraud astrology i cannot make billions like a-satyam rajus ,so need some money to complete few tasks i think even reserch in astro needs money . > > so i hope u ppl will understand and conct each other and i think u can contribute more to astrology > > many memebrs has doubts why all this sidhantha talks in this astro grps ,but they dont know without it astro itself become sketlton soon ..Even sri KN rao also said so recently .without a strong foundation then computing can go ashtray and also softwares and hence predictions in may b 50 yrs > > but i value every one's opinons > > regrds sunil nair > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 hare rama krishna Dear sunil bhattacharjya ji here is links for Indian National Science Academy http://www.insa.ac.in/html/home.asp here is the link for indian journal of history of science http://www.insaindia.org/ijhs.htm hope this may help u sorry i just came frm office so delayed i n responding u regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah , Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya wrote:>> Dear Sunil Nairji, > > Thank you for talking abot both the views. Can you kindli give the link to Chandrahariji's paper.> > In fact due to precession the Pole star changes and there was another star as Pole-star before the present Pole-star. They have the 25800 year cycle though the apparent movement is in relation to the earth. > > Regards,> > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya> > --- On Sun, 1/11/09, sunil nair astro_tellerkerala wrote:> sunil nair astro_tellerkerala To Vinay ji and chandra hari ji> > Sunday, January 11, 2009, 9:28 AM> > > > > > > > > > > > > hare rama krishna> Dear shri Vinay ji and shri chandrahari ji > > vinay ji i think the basic problem in between u both is the basic yr in surya sindhantha computation ,vinay ji u hold the tradition view that it is early work ,chandra ji also has the same view but he says it is revised and re computed the calculation as the latest surya sidhantha is a revised work after pancha sidhantic a and even arya bhatiya and he presented a paper abt it > Polar Longitudes of Suryasiddhanta and Hipparchus ' Commentary, IJHS 41(1), 2006, pp.29-52. INSA, New Delhi-2> and he says the basic yr when some unknown scholar revised it he used the yr AD 522 as base yr .> > sure frm time immomorial the hindus use polar longitude know as druvankam and the story of druva become a star and that alligary in purana also support s it > > this has taken frm indians and hipparcus presented in greece as a theorey and later day ptolemy without saying the source he recomputed it without mentioning druvanga and used right ascertion and delianations method which is used in all modern panchangas i blv > > this has contributed for all controversy in recent time > > even saha lahiri calender committie also used all yrs frm AD 285 to AD 585 and finaly giv 3 base yrs > > now actualy what u and chandrahari says is almost correct but this is the fundamntal diffrnce > > chandrahari uses scientific knowledge and his abilities and decoding ancient sidhantantha s where as u r using ancient gurukula tradtional view and computing frm kali yugadi i think ,even i may b wrong i think u ppl shud do some correspondence and u can discuss ur beeja correction methods and chandra hari uses kerala driganita and beeja corections given by parameswara > > forget what happened in past and proceed .> > i think both of u can make a big diffrnce > > any mistake in abov post pls forgiv me as i am not a sidhantic scholar and i hope both of u take my suggestion in constructiv way .> > i cud not attent grp like b4 as i strted a business too because like what kaul and company says with all this fraud astrology i cannot make billions like a-satyam rajus ,so need some money to complete few tasks i think even reserch in astro needs money .> > so i hope u ppl will understand and conct each other and i think u can contribute more to astrology > > many memebrs has doubts why all this sidhantha talks in this astro grps ,but they dont know without it astro itself become sketlton soon .Even sri KN rao also said so recently .without a strong foundation then computing can go ashtray and also softwares and hence predictions in may b 50 yrs > > but i value every one's opinons > > regrds sunil nair > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.