Vasanta rtu’s beginning or the equinox (Ayanamsa)

[Guest guest]

Dear All, This mail and response happened between Kishore ji and Me in our private mail. But I think the group also can benefit from this mail. Therefore I am forwarding it to the group. Love and regards,Sreenadh--- On Fri, 1/16/09, sreenadh <sreesog wrote:sreenadh <sreesogRe: Vasanta rtu’s beginning or the equinox"kishore patnaik" <kishorepatnaik09Friday, January 16, 2009, 1:03 PM

Dear Kishore ji, As per True Ayanamsa (Surya Siddhanta/Chandra Hari): Ayanamsa for the year (Y) = (Y-238)/71.55 degrees. Where 238 is the Zero Ayanamsa

year and 71.55 is the heart beat speed (the connection ratio between the rhythm of the solar system and the human body). [Note that it is a very simple and straight formula and that therefore it is very easy to calculate ayanamsa for any year based on this formula]Therefore,Ayanamsa for the year 2009 (Y=2009) = (2009 - 238) / 71.55 Degrees = 24.751921733053808525506638714186 Degrees.That meas that, in the year AD 2009, Vernal Equinox was 24.7519 degrees away from the beginning of Meshadi/Aswinyadi. OR in other words Vernal Equinox is 95.248 Degrees away from Moola Star. Hope this clarifies. Love and regards,Sreenadh --- On Wed, 1/14/09,

kishore patnaik <kishorepatnaik09 wrote:kishore patnaik <kishorepatnaik09Vasanta rtu’s beginning or the equinox"sreenadh" <sreesogWednesday, January 14, 2009, 3:47 PMCan you please tell me where is the Vasanta rtu's beginning or the equinox in 2009

 

regards,

 

Kishore patnaik

[Guest guest]

I think it is actually slightly less than 72 years per degree. 72.5 is a bit inaccurate and might introduce an error of about 35 years in calculation of 5000-5200 years (in the back-calculation of MBH time). Am I missing something? Sreenadh <sreesog Sent: Saturday, January 17,

2009 3:28:38 PM Re: Vasanta rtu’s beginning or the equinox (Ayanamsa)

 

Dear Kishore ji, ==>> Average of the slip or technically the precision of equinox is 72.5° per

degree. <== What kind of calculation is that!!!!! Even the beginner students of astrology know that the annual precession is around 50 seconds per year. Ofcourse there occurs very slight variation the precision value every year. Even for 100 years this variation is very minute. Then how he is getting/assuming that the precision value is 72.5? That too "per degree" and not "per year"?!!! What kind of absurd maths he is using?! If his basic premise itself is wrong, how can his other statements or conclutions be correct? - I wonder. So what ever be the arguments of the said Prof Raja, it does not hold any value or water. It is better to just ignore it and move on - why waste our time after him?Love and regards,Sreenadh