QUERY for Mr. Mehta?-For UPDATE SOME ANSWERS .. BEWARE- VEDIC ASTROLOG

[Guest guest]

" Predictions if made accurately from whichever method may coincide. Accurately

is very important. "

 

Dear Sri Chiranjiv Ji,

I think waht you say makes sense.

 

Do you think any one could predict marraige for this incumbent(date atleast)

accurately?

 

The birth details are :

12-Dec-66

Kanpur

23:37

 

Thanks.

 

Regards,

Punkajj

 

, chiranjiv mehta

<vchiranjiv wrote:

>

> what you term as marriage is a mix of many things, they can happen togather to

give marriage or from time to time a few of them may manifest themselves

seperately to give rise to " near marraige like incidents " or false calls.

> Predictions if made accurately from whichever method may coincide. Accurately

is very important.

>

> Chiranjiv Mehta

>

> --- On Tue, 10/3/09, pom pom <pankajdhar wrote:

>

>

> pom pom <pankajdhar

> -For UPDATE Re: SOME ANSWERS .. BEWARE-

VEDIC ASTROLOG

>

> Tuesday, 10 March, 2009, 6:40 PM

" I don't understand this. If we are trying to predict the time of marriage for

a person, how can 3 different predictions be right. Hope you are not talking

about describing traits and behaviour which we do not call predictions. "

>

> 1) Predictions are alawys in terms of chances-say you use data d1,d2....dn to

make predictions. .(using different mdoels of astrology).

>

> the accuracy of marraige would depnd on the system used(a)KP,b) transits.

....c)Parashara) and also knowledge and parctsie of astrologer.

>

> 1)Some one suses the dahsa system...

>

> 2)some one else uses only transits

>

> 3)some one else uses navamsa and transits

>

> 4) some one uses KP system..

>

> say all are given 100 charts- the success rates of say 1) would be 60/10,

succes rate for 2) could be say 40/100.....so on and so forth( Go and check with

astrolgers you will understand what is being talked about)..

>

> The reason of this difference is the relevant data to make prediction used by

various systems is different and so is the expertize of the astrolger

>

> All these things need to be statistcially proven..to tell you what it means...

>

> Neelam - I think this might be pom pom. for you...and many..but without such

sceintfic backings...it would diffult to prove it as a sceince like economics..

>

> Once again without a proper background and attitdeu one cannot learn.( I had

trie dot give a common snese example whic possible you could not understand..

..may be we will sue the language of GOD/maths- the tool that has been used to

make matters explicit..

>

> If you have really studied and prcaticed astrology well, the wrtings would

have struck you at frist instance..The observations cannot escape you..

>

> Humility to learn from each other is some thing which need to have..

>

> Thanks..

>

> SOME FALLACIOU satements made:

> ============ ========= =========

> 1) Neelam wrote:

> " We have no compulsions also to

> > accept everything thrown at us. "

>

> 2) " Hope you are not

> > talking about describing traits and behaviour which we do not call

> > predictions. "

>

> You think an astrologer does nto knwo about " predictions "

>

> BTW just a contradiction, when you talk about a personality of a married

partner, that also is a prediction of one kind of parameter, though the time

part is missing

>

> OR you donot think it so.

>

> First let us be clear what prediction means and then doa debate on

predictions. ..

>

> 3) " We have expectations only from ourselves. We have no compulsions also to "

>

> I hope neelam is one person- why this word WE is coming in???

>

> [Moderator Message: Message Edited by moderators. Dear Pankaj, please be

specific and concentrate on astrological discussions]

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to

http://messenger./invite/

>