Samanta Chandrasekhar

[Guest guest]

Samanta

Chandrasekhar was born on the 13. 12. 1835,corresponding to Pausha

Krishna Astami of the Saka year 1957 at Khandapara state now in

Nayagarh district of Orissa.The states called Gadajat ruled by a dynastic

king, enjoying some degree of autonomy under the British rule. It was

a small state with an area of 244 square miles only, having its capital in

the small township of Khandapara, situated about 20 KM from Nayagarh

surrounded by hills and jungles. This kingdom was founded in 1599

and was being ruled at the time of Samanta, by his nephew, the eleventh

king named Natabar Singh Mardaraj. Samanta's father Shyamabandhu, and

mother Bishnumali, were a very pious couple. They had nine daughters and

one son before the birth of Chandra Sekhar. Since two daughters and the

only son they had died in infancy, they had named Chandra Sekhar as

Pathani Samanta His full name was Mahamahopadhaya Chandrasekhar Singh

Harichandan Mohapatra Samant, He wrote the `Sidhanta Darpana',

which was published in 1899, by Calcutta University. The original

manuscript of 2500 Sanskrit shlokas (In Sanskrita Language) was written in

Oriya script, on palm leaves, by Samanta Chandrasekhar

 

 

 

 

 

 

He received

primary education in Sanskrit from a Brahmin teacher. He studied Sanskrit

Grammer, Smritis, Puranas, Darshan and the original texts of many Kavyas.

When he was ten year old, one of his uncles taught him a little of

astrology and showed him some of the stars in the sky.Samanta

Chandrasekhar did not have any formal University education and his

interest and efforts in Astronomy were completely self

taught.Mahamahopadhyaya Chandra Sekhar Simha Samanta Harichandan Mohapatra,

popularly in Orissa as Pathani Samanta, is an astronomer of the rank

of Aryabhata, Varahamihira, Brahmagupta and Bhaskaracharya. He was born in

1835 A.D. in the princely state of Khandapara in Orissa. Away from the

English education, he taught himself Sanskrit and attained scholarship in

traditional Indian Astronomy. He fabricated ingenious instruments out of

wooden sticks and bamboo chips and attained great accuracy in measurement.

His scientific investigations are recorded in his astronomical treatise.

"The Siddhanta Darpana" composed in Sanskrit Verse. This work was

highly acclaimed even by the Western Press in 1899. Prof. Jogesh Chandra

Ray played a key role in the publication of Siddhanta

Darpana in Devanagiri script from a Calcutta press in 1899 with the

financial support from the kings of Athmalik and Mayurbhanja. It must be

noted that the scholarly introduction of fifty six pages in English

therein by Prof. Ray, formed the window through which the outside

world could get a glimpse of the valuable treasure contained in this

monumental work in Sanskrit verses, which was hardly accessible.

 

 

The title of Mahamahoadhyaya was convered upon him by the British Govt. in

1893 in recognition of his contribution to astronomy. Samata Chandra

Sekhar passed away in 1904. Even today most of the Oriya almanaces

attribute their calculations to Samanta's prescriptions.

 

 

"Chandrasekhar was a keen observer and made meticulous observations

of celestial objects with instruments that he had made himself. He was

deeply perturbed on finding that the ephemeral elements calculated from

classical siddhantic principles did not agree with his observations. The

same perplexity had also been faced by Swai Jaisingh, early in the 18th

century, and had given rise to the construction of his gigantic masonry

observatories for the correction of ephemeral elements. One underlying

factor that had been responsible for these perplexities was the freezing

of classical Indian astronomical calculations away from observational

verifications. The precession of equinoxes (Ayanamasa) had been noticed as

far back as the Vedic times, by Indian Astronomers and had been entering

the calculation of ephemeral elements as bija corrections – ad hoc

corrections that needed to be applied with the passage of time, to

incorporate the changes in ephemeral elements arising from precession. For

about a thousand years before the time of Swai Jai Singh or Pathani

Samanta – the emphasis had shifted away from observational verifications

and ephemeral elements had remained uncorrected. "

 

 

elements from these, and create predicted ephemeral elements in the

classical Siddhantic format for future observations. The resulting

ephemeral elements were amazingly accurate. Samanta's work was in the

classical mould – with the assumption of a geocentric Universe, although

his own model included the planets other than Earth, as revolving around

the Sun.( he has proposed a diffrnt model ,which i will b posting in future ) --sunil nair )

 

 

Equivalent mathematical formulations exist for calculation of ephemeral

elements in the two different world systems – Geocentric or Heliocentric

– and many observed phenomena require only the appropriate framework of

calculations in order to accurately predict possible celestial events.

Thus, Samanta's inability to envisage or accept the Copernican

revolution, did not prevent him from making many accurate calculations of

contemporary celestial events in his lifetime and observing them. The most

interesting of the celestial phenomena in his life time was the December 9

1874 Transit of Venus.

 

 

This rare and inspiring event was visible from India and many other parts

of the world. The Transit of Venus 8 years following that, in 1882, was

not visible from India. Such an event will again be visible on the 8th

of June 2004, from India and other parts of the world, and is creating a

lot of excitement amongst the amateur astronomers and educators. The

underlying excitement of this event, being the possibility of recreating

historical measurements of the Earth-Sun distance by students world

wide, through observations of the timings of this transit.

 

 

Going back to the year 1874 – there must have been considerable

excitement at that time too, with efforts from Astronomers worldwide,

making expeditions to India, as one of the locations from where, the event

was visible. There were also efforts by Observaotories under the then

British Government in India, to study this event. And then, there were

observatories built by private individuals and princely states where

activities were intense, for the observations of this event. Some

popularizations efforts also seem to have been in evidence. Chintaman

Raghunathachary, of Madras observatory, for instance, had made a

popular booklet on this event, that had been translated into many

languages, including Urdu. In all probability, none of this excitement

reached the remote Khandapara regions of Orissa, where Samanta could have

heard of this event.

 

 

Arun Kumar Upadhyaya, in his translation of the Siddhanta Darpana –

interprets this Shloka as –

 

 

"Solar eclipse due to Sukra (Venus) – To find the eclipse of the Sun

due to Sukra, their bimba (angular diameter) and size of other tara graha

(stars and planets nearby?) is stated. In Kali year 4975 (1874 AD) there

was a Solar Eclipse due to Sukra in Vrischika Rasi (Scorpio). Then Sukra

bimba was seen as 1/32 of solar bimba which is equal to 650 yojana. Thus

it is well proved that bimba of Sukra and planets is much smaller than the

Sun."

 

 

Did Samanta hear that there was going to be a transit and set out to

observe it – or did he find that there was to be such an occurrence from

his lifetime work of creating accurate ephemeral elements? Most probably,

the latter, as there seems no evidence that there was any European

Astronomical activity in the regions of Orissa, at that time. The Italian

expedition from the Palermo Observatory was to Muddapur in Bengal a

neighbouring state to Orissa and could there have been some information

that reached to Kandapara? It is not certain and there seems no evidence

of it. Even if the information did reach, Samanta would not have accepted

it without his own calculations agreeing with that.

 

 

All in all, it seems possible that not only did Samanta observe this

Transit, but, he predicted it from his own calculations, unaware, of the

excitement in the rest of the world arising from the Transits of Venus –

in the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries.

 

 

The mention of the ratio of the bimba or apparent angular diameters of

Venus and Sun as 1/32 is very interesting.

 

 

On the date of these observations – the 9th of December 1874,

the apparent angular diameters of Sun and Venus, respectively, were – 32

minutes, 29 seconds of arc and 1 minute, 3 seconds of arc. The ratio then

would have been discernable as 1: 30.93.

 

 

This ratio would have small variations from one transit to another due to

the ellipticity of orbits involved. In the year 2004, for instance, the

apparent diameters are – 31 minutes, 31 seconds for Sun and 58

seconds of arc, for Venus so that the ratio discernable, would be 1:32.6

for the coming Transit of Venus.

 

 

Pathani Samanta's observations were completely non telescopic, and made

with handmade instruments – and the accuracy achieved seems extra

ordinary. In theoretical calculations and observations of the Transit of

Venus, Samanta's achivement would be considered comparable to that of

Jeremiah Horrocks, though poignantly anachronistic

[Guest guest]

Respected Sunil Nair Ji,

Thanks for the new information.

regards