Rahu_Welcomes

[Guest guest]

Sreenadh ji,

 

Are you trying to correct my sentences what i told? Are you trying to change my openions? I have written that mail to neelamji. She didn't felt bad with my mail, she given me nice reply to that mail. I told my openions, your single mail can't change my mind i think. If someone do some more interpretations about my sentences in this mail, i'm not going to give any reply to those mails. Here i'm interested to talk about astrology only. My conclusions were general, i didn't told about any person in particular.I was talking about astrology rules in different context, you started talking about astrology rules in your own way. If you start interpretating evey single word the user write in group, then it will be difficult for the user to continue in the group.

 

Regards,

Swarna.

 

 

 

 

 

Sreenadh <sreesog Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 7:53:38 AM Re: Rahu_Welcomes

Dear Swarna ji, Our beginner understanding of astrology may not be accurate, may not be as guided by scriptures. Without a traditional guru, missing the gist of approach is easy. Let us try to learn and understand 'ancient indian astrology' here in this group together in a better way following the foot steps of the sages. //I always feel that rules doesn't decide a person as a successful astrologer, rather his accurate predictions gives him designation as successful astrologer./ / Without astrological rules there is no astrology; with out good understanding of astrological rules there is no good astrologer; without good astrology, astrological rules and a good astrologer there is no 'accurate astrological predication' . Forgetting the fundamental we cannot arrive at a conclusion; forgetting the foundation we cannot create a

sky scrapper; otherwise whatever we preach will remain baseless, what ever we try to make will remain castle made of playing cards that will wither away in a small wind. So let us correct our foundations, and start from the basics. //> No one is here expert in subject, everyone is equal i think, as astrology itself is a endless research. Giving respect to other astrologer's openion is good to have peaceful conversations in the group.// No - that is not so. There ARE experts in this group; whom other members identify based on the conversation that happen here. But ofcourse everyone is equal here; not in astrological knowledge; but as human beings. Yes, giving respect to other astrologer's (or member's) opinion is well appreciates PROVIDED the other opinion is logical or well supported by ancient astrological classics. If

illogical and without a scripture base, I won't appreciate appreciating opinions expressed in an astrological forum like this, which tries to keep its quality and direction - based on ancient indian astrology. We usually have very peaceful conversations and occasionally have an explosion and then a settling in the reasons for which you will understand as you become more and more familiar with the group. Actually we like peace better but still enjoys the occasional wars with fruitful results. Note: The group is for 'ancient indian astrology' - astrology as taught by the ancient indian astrological classics, as per the rishi horas. Instant neo rules and baseless imaginations (arguments without a base quote or logic to support) is not much appreciated here.Love and regards,Sreenadh ancient_indian_ astrology, swarna <swarna_gm@.. .>

wrote:>> Thank you for your kind welcome to the group neelam ji. Even i liked the way Manoj ji given hearty welcome through his mail. You made some comments about by explanation in the mail. 2nd house tells about budhdhi. Once again i repeat 2nd house is also seen for seeing a person thought processing. I aggree with you that 5th is seen for mind. I also know that moon is seen for mind.(i think this is first fundamental point we learn in astrology). 4th house is seen for character i can't show evidence for them, if you want to beleive them then you can beleive them. You asked me what kind of astrology i'm learning, i'm learning pure Indian astrology. I don't have any guru. I can say with god's blessings, i'm learning astrology and i feel god as my guru as he makes everyone to realise what the life is. By seeing our conversation anyone can understand why there is lots of ambiguity in astrology. No two astrologers agree with one

point easily. I always feel that> rules doesn't decide a person as a succesful astrologer, rather his accurate predictions gives him designation as successful astrologer.> > > If you didn't followed rahu topic mails then it's better not to discuss about them here, otherwise you can read them now so that you can get idea what i have written in my previous mail. Every astrologer learns some thing by reading different books and through different sources. It also depends on their analysis, experiences with horoscopes.> No one is here expert in subject, everyone is equal i think, as astrology itself is a endless research. Giving respect to other astrologer's openion is good to have peaceful conversations in the group.> > Regards,> Swarna.