Branch of Education

[Guest guest]

Friends,

 

Sri Mrutyunjay Tirupati is a knowledgeable astrologer and I respect his views.

Sri Yogesh Lajmi, is also a great astrologer, and I have no doubt on that.

 

On the subject, unless the person tell you, there is no possibility to venture the correct birth time, needs to be thought over. When a person approaches with certain problems, normally, astrologer takes that the chart out of data given to him is the correct one. But,

K. P a great and his authoritative ( I call him authoritative because, his method of analysis has been 'near correct' in many occasions for me to have arrived at) methods, process and fact finding routes, can help to reach whether we are 'pondering' over correct data. He elaborates this in his method "How to find out whether the man speaks truth or not?". Similarly method is adopted to find the chart before you, is correct or not. But the Astrologer must take pains to study that.

 

Now, in a given (hypothetical) analysis you understand that this girl should have started a 'married life' at a particular time of a Desa/Bukti/Anthara/ Sukshama period while father of that girl informs you that she is not married. Immediately, one will 'work' to find under KP method, is that data before you is accurate to the time of birth. Well! lot of practice is required. These cannot be discussed and come to point of 'firm' decision of approach over a dining table between two astrologers.

 

What I wish to confirm here is, an astrologer must understand all 'schools' and methods, its primary approaches, its magnifying sane 'qualities' which could contribute to the correct interpretations, before shunning the 'school' as 'irrelevant'. A one lane knowledge is not healthy for consummate traffic of 'results'.

Regards.

A.V.Pathi,

[Guest guest]

Dear Venkatachala pathi ji, //> What I wish to confirm here is, an astrologer must understand all

'schools' and methods, its primary approaches, its magnifying sane

'qualities' which could contribute to the correct interpretations,

before shunning the 'school' as 'irrelevant'. A one lane knowledge is

not healthy for consummate traffic of 'results'.// Well said! I agree with you.Love and regards,Sreenadh , venkatachala pathi <pathiav wrote:>> Friends,> > Sri Mrutyunjay Tirupati is a knowledgeable astrologer and I respect his views.> Sri Yogesh Lajmi, is�also a great astrologer, and I have no doubt on that.> > On the subject, unless the person tell you, there is no possibility to venture the correct birth time, needs to be thought over.� When a person approaches with certain problems, normally, astrologer takes that the chart out of data given to�him is the correct one.� But,> K. P a great and his authoritative ( I call him authoritative because, his method of analysis has been 'near correct' in many occasions for me to have arrived at) methods, process and fact finding routes, can help to reach whether we are 'pondering'�over correct data. He elaborates this in his method "How to find out whether the man speaks truth or not?".� Similarly method is adopted to find the chart before you, is correct or not.� But the Astrologer must take pains to study that.> > Now, in a given (hypothetical) analysis you understand that this�girl should have started a 'married life' at a particular time of a Desa/Bukti/Anthara/ Sukshama period while father of that girl informs you that she is not married.� Immediately,�one will �'work' to find under KP method, is that data before you is accurate to the time of birth.� Well! lot of practice is required.� These cannot be discussed and come to point of 'firm' decision of approach over a dining table between two astrologers.> > What I wish to confirm here is, an astrologer must understand all 'schools' and methods, its primary approaches, its magnifying sane 'qualities' which could contribute to the correct interpretations, before shunning the 'school' as 'irrelevant'.� A one lane knowledge is not healthy for consummate traffic of�'results'.> Regards.> �> A.V.Pathi,��>