Guest guest Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Please give the details of the parents of this would be child. regards, Mouji --- On Tue, 9/29/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Re: doubt regarding saadhe-saati Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 4:54 PM All interested members may please check this out - Date of birth, 16th December 2009 TOB 15.40 Place of Birth, jaipur. The child is yet to be born on above date. In the chart of this yet to be born Child. The Moon is in 29 degrees Scorpio The Sun is in 0.41 degrees Sagittarius Would we in our right senses deny the above Conjunction thereby denying amavasya Birth to the Child ? Would one not write Birth on Amavasya in his janma Kundli ? In my earlier mail I had mentioned about Yogas not working. Here too common sense has to be used, and I will not go in details. For ex. Budhi aditya may not work, but Guru Chandal Yoga may work. regards, Bhaskar. ancient_indian_ astrology, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@ ....> wrote: > > > They are considered to be conjunct because there are no cement or Steel > partitions in the sky between the 12 Raashis. Except that Yogas may not > work in conjunctions of two planets in two Raashis- for ex. Budhi aditya > Yoga. > > regards/Bhaskar. > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, Vandna Misra > vandana_mishra_ 91@ wrote: > > > > Respected maujiji, > > technically you cannot say conjunt,agree but dont they influence the > prospetive house where they are suppose to enter in little while.don't > they exert any impact over the next house..Isuppose that is what > manojji,keen to know. > > Regards. > > VANDNA MISHRA > > > > --- On Tue, 9/29/09, Manoj Kumar mouji99@ wrote: > > > > > > Manoj Kumar mouji99@ > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: doubt regarding saadhe-saati > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 6:13 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No it will not be. A planet would technically be called conjunct when > they are within one " bhava " irrespective of the distance between them. > If they are in different bhavas and close degree wise, then they cannot > be called 'conjunct'. > > > > regards, > > > > Mouji > > > > --- On Tue, 9/29/09, Anita R ash.rsh55 > wrote: > > > > Anita R ash.rsh55 > > > Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: doubt regarding > saadhe-saati > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 10:38 AM > > > > Hi, > > In this case, would it would be safe to consider any planets which are > within 30* of each other to be conjunct? > > Regs, Anita > > > > --- On Mon, 28/9/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> wrote: > > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: doubt regarding saadhe-saati > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > Monday, 28 September, 2009, 4:45 AM > > > > > > > > Dear Manoj ji, > > > > I agree with Vandana ji's dispersal of 45degrees orb to the Moons > natal > > degrees wrt Shani sadesathi. > > > > I also agree when you say two planets close to each other in adjacent > > signs are conjunct. > > > > regards/bhaskar. > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, Manoj Chandran > > <chandran_manoj@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Vandana Ji, > > > > > > Then in the same manner, why cannot we consider planets in adjacent > > signs, close to each other, as conjunct? For example, Planet A at 29 > deg > > Aries. Planet B at 1 degree Taurus. As per Rashi chart, they are not > > considered conjunct. But if we are going to use that theory in transit > > (that is if we are going to consider 180 degree Orb instead of 3 > signs), > > why cant we use the same in Natal astrology? > > > > > > Regards, > > > -Manoj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Vandna Misra vandana_mishra_ 91@ > > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > > Sunday, September 27, 2009 12:35:53 PM > > > Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: doubt regarding > > saadhe-saati > > > > > > > > > An astute astrologer,Shri Katwe suggested the longitude of the moon > be > > taken as the midpoint of the SADESAATI,and that the sadesaati should > > deem to have commenced when saturn, in transit arrives at a longitude > > that is 45 degree less than the longitude of the moon.it would then > end > > when saturn in transit would cross the longitude that is 45 degree > more > > than the longitude of the moon.Shri K.N. Rao SIR has mentioned this > > theory many times in his writings. > > > Vandana Mishra > > > > > > --- On Sun, 9/27/09, neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@ gmail.com> > > > >[ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: doubt regarding > saadhe-saati > > > >ancient_indian_ astrology > > > >Sunday, September 27, 2009, 5:25 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Very simply it is the transit of Saturn over natal moon and it is > > said to > > > >start when Saturn is in 12th from moon and ends when Saturn crosses > > the 2nd > > > >house from moon, the 7 and a half years in 3 signs for a nativity. > > > >Hope this helps. > > > > > > > >2009/9/27 cvs_45 cvs_45 (AT) (DOT) co.in> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> is the 7 1/2 period of saturn to be reckoned from the birth-sign > or > > > >> moon-sign or from both? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add whatever you love to the India homepage. Try now! > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Unknown parents. This is a hypothetical example obviously to show the relevance of Planets conjunct in certain orbs, irrespective of the irrelevance of their being in adjacent signs , in certain cases. regards/Bhaskar. , Manoj Kumar <mouji99 wrote: > > Please give the details of the parents of this would be child. > > regards, > > Mouji > > --- On Tue, 9/29/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish > Re: doubt regarding saadhe-saati > > Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 4:54 PM > All interested members may please check this out - > > Date of birth, 16th December 2009 TOB 15.40 > Place of Birth, jaipur. > > The child is yet to be born on above date. > > In the chart of this yet to be born Child. > > The Moon is in 29 degrees Scorpio > The Sun is in 0.41 degrees Sagittarius > > Would we in our right senses deny the above Conjunction > thereby denying amavasya Birth to the Child ? Would one > not write Birth on Amavasya in his janma Kundli ? > > In my earlier mail I had mentioned about Yogas not working. > Here too common sense has to be used, and I will not go > in details. For ex. Budhi aditya may not work, but Guru > Chandal Yoga may work. > > regards, > Bhaskar. > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > They are considered to be conjunct because there are no cement or Steel > > partitions in the sky between the 12 Raashis. Except that Yogas may not > > work in conjunctions of two planets in two Raashis- for ex. Budhi aditya > > Yoga. > > > > regards/Bhaskar. > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, Vandna Misra > > vandana_mishra_ 91@ wrote: > > > > > > Respected maujiji, > > > technically you cannot say conjunt,agree but dont they influence the > > prospetive house where they are suppose to enter in little while.don't > > they exert any impact over the next house..Isuppose that is what > > manojji,keen to know. > > > Regards. > > > VANDNA MISHRA > > > > > > --- On Tue, 9/29/09, Manoj Kumar mouji99@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > Manoj Kumar mouji99@ > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: doubt regarding saadhe-saati > > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > > Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 6:13 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No it will not be. A planet would technically be called conjunct when > > they are within one " bhava " irrespective of the distance between them. > > If they are in different bhavas and close degree wise, then they cannot > > be called 'conjunct'. > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Mouji > > > > > > --- On Tue, 9/29/09, Anita R ash.rsh55 > wrote: > > > > > > Anita R ash.rsh55 > > > > Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: doubt regarding > > saadhe-saati > > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > > Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 10:38 AM > > > > > > Hi, > > > In this case, would it would be safe to consider any planets which are > > within 30* of each other to be conjunct? > > > Regs, Anita > > > > > > --- On Mon, 28/9/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> wrote: > > > > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: doubt regarding saadhe-saati > > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > > Monday, 28 September, 2009, 4:45 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Manoj ji, > > > > > > I agree with Vandana ji's dispersal of 45degrees orb to the Moons > > natal > > > degrees wrt Shani sadesathi. > > > > > > I also agree when you say two planets close to each other in adjacent > > > signs are conjunct. > > > > > > regards/bhaskar. > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, Manoj Chandran > > > <chandran_manoj@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Vandana Ji, > > > > > > > > Then in the same manner, why cannot we consider planets in adjacent > > > signs, close to each other, as conjunct? For example, Planet A at 29 > > deg > > > Aries. Planet B at 1 degree Taurus. As per Rashi chart, they are not > > > considered conjunct. But if we are going to use that theory in transit > > > (that is if we are going to consider 180 degree Orb instead of 3 > > signs), > > > why cant we use the same in Natal astrology? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > -Manoj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > Vandna Misra vandana_mishra_ 91@ > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > > > Sunday, September 27, 2009 12:35:53 PM > > > > Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: doubt regarding > > > saadhe-saati > > > > > > > > > > > > An astute astrologer,Shri Katwe suggested the longitude of the moon > > be > > > taken as the midpoint of the SADESAATI,and that the sadesaati should > > > deem to have commenced when saturn, in transit arrives at a longitude > > > that is 45 degree less than the longitude of the moon.it would then > > end > > > when saturn in transit would cross the longitude that is 45 degree > > more > > > than the longitude of the moon.Shri K.N. Rao SIR has mentioned this > > > theory many times in his writings. > > > > Vandana Mishra > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 9/27/09, neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@ gmail.com> > > > > >[ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: doubt regarding > > saadhe-saati > > > > >ancient_indian_ astrology > > > > >Sunday, September 27, 2009, 5:25 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Very simply it is the transit of Saturn over natal moon and it is > > > said to > > > > >start when Saturn is in 12th from moon and ends when Saturn crosses > > > the 2nd > > > > >house from moon, the 7 and a half years in 3 signs for a nativity. > > > > >Hope this helps. > > > > > > > > > >2009/9/27 cvs_45 cvs_45 (AT) (DOT) co.in> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> is the 7 1/2 period of saturn to be reckoned from the birth-sign > > or > > > > >> moon-sign or from both? > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add whatever you love to the India homepage. Try now! > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.