Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Suitability of Mantra

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Suitability of MantraQuestion ---------There are methods to determine the suitability of Mantra for particular

person (Aa-Ka-Tha-Ha Chakra,Rni-Dhani Chakra etc). Please enlighten us

with following doubts

1. When is it necessary to check the mantra with above methods?

2. It is said the Mahamantra like Mritunjay Mantra,Shri Krishna Mantra, Gayatri Mantra are suitable for all.

3. What if the beejmantra of ones istadevta is not suitable for him ?

Does that means he has yet to arrive at his istadevta ? Please also

explain in what circumstances there is no need for checkin the mantras?

4. Does Mantra japa should esentialy be followed by homa?

There are lot of theories floating around on net. I request you to kindly enlighten us with your knowledg and experince.

RegradsAnswer -------------------As you have rightly noted, there are many stories floating around both

in book form and in internet. The fact is none of these stories may

have credibilty.

To explain all of your questions is not very easy and many will not

understand it. Yet I shall make an attempt as best as I can. I am not a

Mantra / Tantra expert. But being Bhramin and by nature was led into

understanding some of the concepts and practice whenever required. One

of the reason may be due to the fact that Astrology & Sashtras goes

hand in hand and Astrology is just a tool to understand Sashtras

including Mantras / Tantras.

I will start with

//Please also explain in what circumstances there is no need for checkin the mantras?

My answer to this is simple. Those mantras that are received as

tradition in ones family does not require any checking. Gayatri mantra

initiation of Bhramin boy is a perfect example. Does the scriptures

tell us to check whether the mantra is suitable for the boy? No. It is

because of the traditional concurrence. Similarly some families

traditional propitiate certain dieties at home or in their family

temple. The decendants of those families are not required to check the

mantras pertaining to those dieties. The scientific reasoning could be

that they have in them energy corresponding to those dieties.

However, for all others, it is always good to check whether the mantras are suitable for them.

Mantras are seen from the 5th house. It is called Mantras sthana. so if

the 5th house is well placed, reciting mantras shall help him. On the

contrary if it is associated with dusthans, he should not recite

mantras, but rather propitiate the diety in other ways.

For example if 5th lord is placed in th 6th, it is said that his

children will become his enemies. so we can assume that the mantra

shall turn againt him. This is only a basic concept.

If the 9th is strong, He can do Upasana of the dieties with pooja, sahasranama japa etc, but mostly without mantras.

Mantras sastra advocate to do 1/3 count of Tarpana and 1/3 count of Havana for the count of Japas done.

During Sandhya Vandha japa, Tarpana is also done. However if

the Gayatri Japa is specificaly done in large no's Both are done. This

is a requirement of Mantra sadhana.

from the above , it is easy to understand that if the beeja mantra is not suitable for a person, he / she should not recite it.

For specific reasons, women should recite only those mantras that are

allowed to them and in the way it is ordained. For example : It is

ordained that pranava or "Ohm" should eminate from the abdomen while

men are reciting and from throat while women are reciting.

In fact "amen" chanted by other religions is a lesser way of Ohm ordained to them.

However, today, in the pretence of discrimination and equality, there

is no control on what one does and those who knows are scared even to

open their mouth. So instead of gaining knowledge and corrections, the

unfortunately fall prey to their own doings.

Just like people of each country is adapted to the natural & living

conditions there, people of each sect / region etc are adapted to each

tantra or methods of rituals. They can follow their own without much

fear, but adopting others should be done carefully and with sound

advice.

A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Mantras are applied and practiced in various ways - japa, yoga, manana, tatva cintana etc. The "suitability" is applicable in case of japa/upasana. 2. There are different ways and modes in which japa/upasana is done - nitya, diksha, purascarana etc. Homa is required in some kinds of diksha and each diksha specifies its count for homa etc. In Purascarana there are five parts including japa, homa (1/10 of japa), tarpana (1/100 japa), abhisheka (1/1000 japa), samaradhana (1/10000 japa). Even here all the steps other than japa can be substituted with multiplied japa. Nitya japa does not need homa. 3. Typically mantra devata is known from 5th place and tapas in general from 9th place. However, there are many other factors - for instance -

whether 5th and lagna lords are enemies by nature - the grahas in and aspecting 5th place 4. It is true that for some mantras like Gayatri one does not need to check all this - however it still depends on his tapas and jataka whether he will ever attain siddhi of those. Hope this helps. Shankarastro_tellerkerala <astro_tellerkerala Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 7:01:52 PMSubject:

Suitability of Mantra

 

 

Suitability of Mantra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear sankar Bharadwaj JI Thanks for further additions on the post .pls contribute and illuminate us when ever u feel it is neccessary rgrds sunil nair , ShankaraBharadwaj Khandavalli <shankarabharadwaj wrote:>> 1. Mantras are applied and practiced in various ways - japa, yoga, manana, tatva cintana etc. The "suitability" is applicable in case of japa/upasana. > > 2. There are different ways and modes in which japa/upasana is done - nitya, diksha, purascarana etc. Homa is required in some kinds of diksha and each diksha specifies its count for homa etc. In Purascarana there are five parts including japa, homa (1/10 of japa), tarpana (1/100 japa), abhisheka (1/1000 japa), samaradhana (1/10000 japa). Even here all the steps other than japa can be substituted with multiplied japa. Nitya japa does not need homa. > > 3. Typically mantra devata is known from 5th place and tapas in general from 9th place. However, there are many other factors - for instance > - whether 5th and lagna lords are enemies by nature > - the grahas in and aspecting 5th place > > 4. It is true that for some mantras like Gayatri one does not need to check all this - however it still depends on his tapas and jataka whether he will ever attain siddhi of those. > > Hope this helps. > > Shankar> > > > > ________________________________> astro_tellerkerala astro_tellerkerala > Wednesday, September 30, 2009 7:01:52 PM> Suitability of Mantra> > > > > > Suitability of Mantra>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Classifications are many in mantras. Stri-Purusha is one of them. From 5th place and grahas in and aspecting 5th, this will be known. Kuja-Surya-Budha-Guru signify Purusha Devatas. Candra-Sukra-Rahu signify Stri Devatas and/or Mantras. Sani signifies napumsaka mantras. However their mere presence or aspect does not ensure one will attain siddhi of those mantras. Their relation with lagna and 5th lord, bhagya and other factors matter. 2. Besides, there are waking and sleeping times for each mantra. These are ascertained from various factors, including dasa but is a complex calculation. 3. It is an overkill to attempt estimating the length of a mantra one practices, for various reasons - mantras range

from single syllable to thousands of syllables. The author here seems to consider very short mantras for convenience. But that is not the case practically. Also, any seasoned sadhaka will be having upasana of multiple mantras. 4. There is nothing like whether one "can do it himself". The support from strong initiation can be known from guru sthana and one's own efforts from karma sthana in a general thumb rule, but initiation is nevertheless necessary. 5. The combination and placement of Sukra, Sani and Ketu also matters in these. Sunil Nair <astro_tellerkeralaTo:

Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2009 9:57:02 PM Re: Suitability of Mantra

 

 

Dear List some additional points on suitability of mantra s rgrds sunil nair ============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ====

 

In continuation to my last posting I am adding a little bit more which I feel shall be helpfull.

I shall more info on the subject.

Mantra Akshara Ganana.

The no of akshras in a mantra should be ascertained from Lagna & 5th house.

1) No of navamsa completed by the 5th lord from lagna rasi onwards

2) No of navamsa completed by the 5th lord from 5th sign onwards

This no shall be the total no of aksharas in the mantra. If jupiters sign's dhanu or meena falls among the counted signs, there will be pranava in the mantra. Otherwise it will not be present.

Another method.

A) The no of signs from the planet concerned upto its navamsa sign

B) the no of signs of the planet upto the navamsa of the 5th lord

C)The total of the above gives the no of aksharas in the mantra

As in the first case, if dhanu or meena are present among the counted signs, there will be pranava in the mantra.

Mantras are of three types.

Stree Mantras, Purusha mantras and napumsaka mantras.

Stree Mantras : Mantras that end with "Swaha"

Napumsaka Mantras : That end with "NamaH"

Purusha Mantras : That end with "VashaT" and all others.

Can I do mantra japa on my own?

There is way to quickly ascertain if he can do mantra japa on his own.

If the 10th house – karma sthana or its lord is strong, without malefic association, he shall benefit by doing mantra japa. Otherwise it is likely that defects shall creep in the process and he may not benefit. In such case, it is always better to do poojas at temples, recite sahasranamas etc or get the assistance of priests to do the remedial poojas.

This is only a quick method. However if lagna Chandra or Sun are very strong, he might be able to correct any mistakes or cross hurdles in doing the japa sadhana by sheer will power. Hence, this factor also should be considered. Similarly strength of 9th house of bhagya may enable him to complete it due to the grace of Guru or his ancestors or his own acquired virtues.

A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy

 

 

 

Try the new India Homepage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, some mistake -

 

Day before yesterday while coming from bikaner to Jaipur, it was a 5

hours drive and reached home ay midnight 00.15 hrs. My stomache had

started paining for the last 2 hours of the drive due to probably extra

ghee which was poured on my Rice (Which is normal for Bikaneris but not

for me), at lunch time and then in the evning Mithai, kachoris and other

stuff which I think reacted on my small stomache.

 

It was actually last night on Sharad Poornima (The night of Raasa by

Lord Krishna at Brindavan and Nathdwara) when we had darshan of

Chandramaji (The Moon)and later went to sleep that I had darshan of Lord

Shiva in my dreams.

 

regards/Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

, " Bhaskar "

<bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

>

> Dear Pranadas ji, Yes that is the truth actually. Some people dont

> know the essence of astrology, for which I am not even sure I should

> blame them or not, bcoz in todays astrology all they know is that

> Saturn,Rahu and Mars is bad, and Sun in 7th creates divorce and all

this

> bankas bakwaas. They treat the planets as bad, rather than

understanding

> the theory of Karma and the resultant Prarabdha which is Bhogya

through

> the instruments and nature of these planets. Mata Kakeyi was not evil,

> she was just an instrument in the play of the lords Avataar on earth.

> But mand buddhis will not understand this. Rahu is also seated in my

> lagna in degreecal conjunction with Mars. It aspects my 5th and 9th,

as

> well as 4th and 8th. I normally when sit for pooja, recite my mantras

> loudly(Average) and can sit for 3 hours at a stretch without rest on

the

> asana. I am normally reciting sanskrit stotras so love to make them

> audible. I also recite Durga saptashathi which I love very much

> alongwith the Nitya patha. My favourite Diety is Lord Krishna, but I

> treat all the major Gods as part of the family and recite mantras for

> all of them. In fact day before yesterday I met my mantra Guru and he

> asked me to increase my patha of Lord Shankara. I reminded him that my

> favourite mantra is what he gave me 25 years back was of (He completed

> this sentence for me )Lord Krishna. He counter questioned me , " what

do

> you say when doing Arti of Shankar Bhagwaan " ? I was perplexed at his

> question and muttered something incohensible. He replied to his own

> question " You sing - Brahma vishnu Sadashiv...... If You sing this

then

> why do you not mean it? If You also do Pooja of Shankar Bhagwaan and

> then do Mantra of lord Krishna you will get more benefits, as Lord

> Shankara loves Lord Krishna " . This replye and explanation from My

> Guruji closed my query. To top it, after meeting my guruji in Bikaner

> and reaching home(Jaipur) at midnight, when I went to sleep I dreamt

of

> a thousand snakes all around me, and felt no fear in my dream, and at

> the close of the dream got a Darshan of lord Shankar taking the Ganga

on

> His locks. This dream was as if to confirm what my Guruji mentioned. I

> am into Rahu mahadasha presently and my Guru antar has just started a

> fortnight ago. Since last 2 years I have been having many dreams of

> saints and Venerated personages appearing in my dreams and blessing

me.

> This is the power of Rahu. All above I did not wish to reveal but

> doing so just to affirm and break stupid modern misconceptions, by

> relaying and relating experiences in Rahu period, with Rahu aspecting

> 5th, through first person. I also have the Moon in my 5th house

> -Sagittarius aspected by the Sun and Mercury in Gemini from 11th . (I

> was born on Poornima). I also have the Kaivalya Yoga in my Kundli

(Ketu

> 12th from karakamsha in navamsha). As per KP I have already been

> predicted Moksha recently by Shri Yogesh Rao Lajmi ji and also another

> KP Senior. But I am not taking chances like a Karmaheena waiting for

> destiny to gift me, but instead working on my efforts and Karmas to

> achieve this. rest God knows. best wishes, Bhaskar.

>

>

>

> , s s freemorons@

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Bhaskarji and others,

> > I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone

> claiming

> > that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely

> personal

> > experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in

rapt

> > concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the

> inner

> > depths of our self. As such, one cannot " prove " that s/he has had

> mantra

> > sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.

> >

> > As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I

am

> not

> > sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution

(I

> am a

> > devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I

have

> of

> > Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not

> > otherwise)... Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well (i

> > think)...would anyone care to comment?

> >

> > Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually

> quoting

> > texts or explaining rationale...and please refrain from bogus

> statements

> > like " rahu in 5th will not give sadhana " ...we all know that it is

> impossible

> > to state anything without looking at relative placements of all

> planets.

> >

> > hari smaraNs,

> > prANadAsa.

> >

> >

> > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > > Now you are talking some sense. Dont waste my

> > > time in asking me to give abc of astrology. Learn this yourself

> please.

> > > This is what I wanted you to understand that Rahu in 5th will

> provide

> > > one the traits of how the native will do his mantra sadhana, but

> because

> > > Rahu is there in 5th does not mean that " Mantra Sadhana " is denied

> to

> > > him. This is bakwaas.

> > >

> > > I dont have to provide evidence in support of whatever I say.

> Believe it

> > > or not. Accept it or not. In this case for such a simple topic it

is

> > > understood that a person who dares to discuss should know by using

> some

> > > of his brains that when I Mentioned " Vocal " and " Loud " and " Nature

> of

> > > results " , it is pretty evident what I am talking about. Spoon

> feeding

> > > if one wants, then better go to a kindergarten class.

> > >

> > > Rahu additionally will make the native go for tamasik Mantras of

> Dieties

> > > of Rudra type . (Now dont ask me to give evidence, but use your

> brains

> > > please)

> > >

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> > > --- In

>

<%40yaho\

\

> ogroups.com>,

> > > " utkal.panigrahi "

> > >

> > > utkal.panigrahi@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > it's a common knowledge that rahu's link to shakti sadhana is

> figment

> > > of imagination done by jyotishis in 70's decade, kk pathak and

> others

> > > published no of articles in A.M.

> > > >

> > > > rahu in 5'th or in lagna is liable to failure of sadhana, such a

> rahu

> > > affects concentration required for doing sadhana, native becomes

> fancy

> > > and gets lost therein. need to understand difference in traits of

> rahu

> > > (attachment to materialism) and ketu (detachment to materialism).

> > > >

> > > > he is asking evidences whereas he himself has not given evidence

> in

> > > support of statement in hurry - " rahu in 5'th will give LOUD or

> VOCAL

> > > mantra sadhana " , a statement similar to rahu's trait.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > --- In

>

<%40yaho\

\

> ogroups.com>,

> > > ShankaraBharadwaj

> > > Khandavalli shankarabharadwaj@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > I agree for the most part. Material-Spiritual natures of

> Rahu-Ketu

> > > cannot be made to read that one would do matra sadhana or not. At

> most,

> > > that would only convey the kind of results of such sadhana -

whether

> the

> > > sadhana will confer material or inner benefits. But that too, is

> > > dependent not on the mantra devata as such but the dasa one is

going

> > > through. After all, any serious sadhana will result in every kind

of

> > > improvement in one's life and the whole being.

> > > > >

> > > > > In general it is the Mantra devata that is known from 5th. The

> > > Adhisthana devata of planet owning or falling in the 5th will be

the

> > > Mantra devata. Thus Rahu's influence will make one take to

> Jatavedasi

> > > Durga specifically or Durga in general. Ganapati would be fruitful

> if

> > > there is Ketu in the 5th. Also, since they are always aspecting

each

> > > other, both would be fruitful in many cases. However whether one

> does

> > > patha or antarjapa or something, whether one would attain siddi is

> > > dependent on many other factors.

> > > > >

> > > > > Shankar

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ________________________________

> > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

> > > > > To:

>

<%40yaho\

\

> ogroups.com>

> > > > > Sunday, October 4, 2009 11:10:38 AM

> > > > > Re: Suitability of Mantra

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Nonsense Jyotish

> > > > >

> > > > > Rahu in 5th will not give mantra Sadhana.

> > > > > Ketu in 5th will give mantra Sadhana.

> > > > >

> > > > > Actual Jyotish

> > > > >

> > > > > 1)Any planet in 5th will actually be a significator for

> > > > > Mantra Sadhana. In fact will give addittion to what

> > > > > native would have ordinarily done in absence of

> > > > > any planet in the 5th.

> > > > >

> > > > > 2) The planet in 5th will show the nature of Mantra

> > > > > Sadhana.

> > > > >

> > > > > 3) Rahu in 5th will make the native take up Vocal

> > > > > or loud Mantra Sadhana which he will enjoy.

> > > > > Ketu in 5th instead would make the native enjoy

> > > > > silent japa.

> > > > >

> > > > > 4) Planets are instruments to show the nature of

> > > > > results, native will face due to his Prarabdha, Dridha

> > > > > or Adridha, and also Kriyaman karmas. Planets are

> > > > > not the cause but just the source and imply the way

> > > > > or nature results would manifest.

> > > > >

> > > > > etc.

> > > > >

> > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Neelam ji,This is better commented by someone who knows jyotisha than me, as it is not my subject. However, since you have asked here is my take - There is no answer that I know of, to the question "who would be the mantra devata", it is only whether "does upasana of so and so devata would succeed or not" or "what would you recommend for this horoscope". Typically, worship of Adhisthana devata of strong lagna lord, 5th lord, grahas in 5th house, grahas aspecting 5th house, dasadhipati all have chances of success under the conditions of their enemity or friendship with lagna lord and 5th lord. In the example you gave, Mars and Moon are in 5th, Jupiter is aspecting 5th - their Adhisthana devatas being Kumaraswamy (Skanda), Parvati and Siva respectively, any of these

should be fruitful in their dasas. However Ju being the lagnadhipati, that should be fruitful even if Ju does not aspect 5th (but for the fact that Ju is weak in satru sthana). However Ju-Ma yoga should makes things really good. I know of a person whose lagnadhipati (sagi) Ju is in exalted state in 8th house, with Moon and Rahu in 10th, Ma in 12th and Me, Su, Ve in 11th aspecting 5th house. He has successful upasana of Siva and Devi. He actually initiated his worship with Hanuman and Rama and was a Vishnu worshiper for a while, then started more serious upasana in mantra marga. All these have succeeded while he went through his Rahu maha dasa. He had seen brief testing times but the real longlasting and result giving was Siva upasana. However, Ju neither aspects 5th nor is in 5th nor aspects janma rasi (kanya). The only thing one might observe is that Ju is aspecting Mars in 12th. I read that Ju being the strong lagnadhipati such upasana would

always be fruitful. And after Rahu as his Ju maha dasa starts he should only be seeing better times in upasana. On a general note, from astrological perspective what might make more sense is that owing to enmity with lagnadhipati some specific upasanas might result in negative results in material terms. One would either brush it off or reason out as a "divine testing", but such things are typically not advised when one sees a horoscope. What is friendly to lagnadhipati or dasadhipati is advised. Shankarneelam gupta <neelamgupta07 Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2009 3:07:29 PMRe: Re: Suitability of Mantra

 

 

Dear Shankar ji,What is the best way to assess a conjunction? Or strong influences?E.g. who would be the mantra devata for a sagitarius native who has 5L Mars in fifth in degree conjunction with Moon (the 8L)

and who is aspected by Jupiter, also the lagna lord from 11th house. I was totally confused when the native asked me.Would appreciate your comments.RegardsNeelam

2009/10/4 ShankaraBharadwaj Khandavalli <shankarabharadwaj@ >

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Bhaskar ji,I agree for the most part. Material-Spiritual natures of Rahu-Ketu cannot be made to read that one would do matra sadhana or not. At most, that would only convey the kind of results of such sadhana - whether the sadhana will confer material or inner benefits. But that too, is dependent not on the mantra devata as such but the dasa one is going through. After all, any serious sadhana will result in every kind of improvement in one's life and the whole being.

In general it is the Mantra devata that is known from 5th. The Adhisthana devata of planet owning or falling in the 5th will be the Mantra devata. Thus Rahu's influence will make one take to Jatavedasi Durga specifically or Durga in general. Ganapati would be fruitful if there is Ketu in the 5th. Also, since they

are always aspecting each other, both would be fruitful in many cases. However whether one does patha or antarjapa or something, whether one would attain siddi is dependent on many other factors. Shankar

 

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in>ancient_indian_ astrology

Sunday, October 4, 2009 11:10:38 AM[ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra

 

 

 

 

Nonsense Jyotish

 

Rahu in 5th will not give mantra Sadhana.

Ketu in 5th will give mantra Sadhana.

 

Actual Jyotish

 

1)Any planet in 5th will actually be a significator for

Mantra Sadhana. In fact will give addittion to what

native would have ordinarily done in absence of

any planet in the 5th.

 

2) The planet in 5th will show the nature of Mantra

Sadhana.

 

3) Rahu in 5th will make the native take up Vocal

or loud Mantra Sadhana which he will enjoy.

Ketu in 5th instead would make the native enjoy

silent japa.

 

4) Planets are instruments to show the nature of

results, native will face due to his Prarabdha, Dridha

or Adridha, and also Kriyaman karmas. Planets are

not the cause but just the source and imply the way

or nature results would manifest.

 

etc.

 

Bhaskar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Pranadasa ji,Sakti sadhana being Rahu's contribution is something I mentioned too, but my reading is that in your case it should more be the lagna lord's contribution - Ve. Also, Ve and Me being mitra, both Devi and Vishnu worship should be fruitful. Of course, quick grace would be of whoever is stronger :) Shankars s <freemoronsTo:

Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2009 8:57:12 PMRe: Re: Suitability of Mantra

 

 

Dear Bhaskarji and others,I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone claiming that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely personal experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in rapt concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the inner depths of our self. As such, one cannot "prove" that s/he has had mantra sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.

As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I am not sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution (I am a devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I have of Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well (i think)...would anyone care to comment?

Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually quoting texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus statements like "rahu in 5th will not give sadhana"...we all know that it is impossible to state anything without looking at relative placements of all planets.

hari smaraNs,prANadAsa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Shankarji,My pranams to your feet for any guidance you can provide to me will be received with as much reverence as rAma pAduka...Please let me know if you and others would be willing to look at my chart to help me understand my spiritual side...a humble and sincere request by me.

hari smaraNs,prAnadAsa.On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 2:36 PM, ShankaraBharadwaj Khandavalli <shankarabharadwaj wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Pranadasa ji,Sakti sadhana being Rahu's contribution is something I mentioned too, but my reading is that in your case it should more be the lagna lord's contribution - Ve. Also, Ve and Me being mitra, both Devi and Vishnu worship should be fruitful. Of course, quick grace would be of whoever is stronger :)

Shankar

s s <freemoronsTo:

Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2009 8:57:12 PMRe: Re: Suitability of Mantra

 

 

 

Dear Bhaskarji and others,I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone claiming that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely personal experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in rapt concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the inner depths of our self. As such, one cannot " prove " that s/he has had mantra sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.

As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I am not sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution (I am a devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I have of Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well (i think)...would anyone care to comment?

Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually quoting texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus statements like " rahu in 5th will not give sadhana " ...we all know that it is impossible to state anything without looking at relative placements of all planets.

hari smaraNs,prANadAsa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Bhaskar jiIn Sharad poornima , moon showers Amrit and if you prepare Kheer in cow milk and keep whole night on open place , that kheer ahve a vital power and that gives body resistance power.But you enjoyed lot of heavy stuff , inspite of keer.Ok enjoy , RegardsDr Mishra--- On Sun, 10/4/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Re: Suitability of Mantra Received:

Sunday, October 4, 2009, 7:02 PM

 

 

 

Sorry, some mistake -

 

Day before yesterday while coming from bikaner to Jaipur, it was a 5

hours drive and reached home ay midnight 00.15 hrs. My stomache had

started paining for the last 2 hours of the drive due to probably extra

ghee which was poured on my Rice (Which is normal for Bikaneris but not

for me), at lunch time and then in the evning Mithai, kachoris and other

stuff which I think reacted on my small stomache.

 

It was actually last night on Sharad Poornima (The night of Raasa by

Lord Krishna at Brindavan and Nathdwara) when we had darshan of

Chandramaji (The Moon)and later went to sleep that I had darshan of Lord

Shiva in my dreams.

 

regards/Bhaskar.

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, "Bhaskar"

<bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:

>

> Dear Pranadas ji, Yes that is the truth actually. Some people dont

> know the essence of astrology, for which I am not even sure I should

> blame them or not, bcoz in todays astrology all they know is that

> Saturn,Rahu and Mars is bad, and Sun in 7th creates divorce and all

this

> bankas bakwaas. They treat the planets as bad, rather than

understanding

> the theory of Karma and the resultant Prarabdha which is Bhogya

through

> the instruments and nature of these planets. Mata Kakeyi was not evil,

> she was just an instrument in the play of the lords Avataar on earth.

> But mand buddhis will not understand this. Rahu is also seated in my

> lagna in degreecal conjunction with Mars. It aspects my 5th and 9th,

as

> well as 4th and 8th. I normally when sit for pooja, recite my mantras

> loudly(Average) and can sit for 3 hours at a stretch without rest on

the

> asana. I am normally reciting sanskrit stotras so love to make them

> audible. I also recite Durga saptashathi which I love very much

> alongwith the Nitya patha. My favourite Diety is Lord Krishna, but I

> treat all the major Gods as part of the family and recite mantras for

> all of them. In fact day before yesterday I met my mantra Guru and he

> asked me to increase my patha of Lord Shankara. I reminded him that my

> favourite mantra is what he gave me 25 years back was of (He completed

> this sentence for me )Lord Krishna. He counter questioned me , " what

do

> you say when doing Arti of Shankar Bhagwaan " ? I was perplexed at his

> question and muttered something incohensible. He replied to his own

> question " You sing - Brahma vishnu Sadashiv.... .. If You sing this

then

> why do you not mean it? If You also do Pooja of Shankar Bhagwaan and

> then do Mantra of lord Krishna you will get more benefits, as Lord

> Shankara loves Lord Krishna" . This replye and explanation from My

> Guruji closed my query. To top it, after meeting my guruji in Bikaner

> and reaching home(Jaipur) at midnight, when I went to sleep I dreamt

of

> a thousand snakes all around me, and felt no fear in my dream, and at

> the close of the dream got a Darshan of lord Shankar taking the Ganga

on

> His locks. This dream was as if to confirm what my Guruji mentioned. I

> am into Rahu mahadasha presently and my Guru antar has just started a

> fortnight ago. Since last 2 years I have been having many dreams of

> saints and Venerated personages appearing in my dreams and blessing

me.

> This is the power of Rahu. All above I did not wish to reveal but

> doing so just to affirm and break stupid modern misconceptions, by

> relaying and relating experiences in Rahu period, with Rahu aspecting

> 5th, through first person. I also have the Moon in my 5th house

> -Sagittarius aspected by the Sun and Mercury in Gemini from 11th . (I

> was born on Poornima). I also have the Kaivalya Yoga in my Kundli

(Ketu

> 12th from karakamsha in navamsha). As per KP I have already been

> predicted Moksha recently by Shri Yogesh Rao Lajmi ji and also another

> KP Senior. But I am not taking chances like a Karmaheena waiting for

> destiny to gift me, but instead working on my efforts and Karmas to

> achieve this. rest God knows. best wishes, Bhaskar.

>

>

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, s s freemorons@

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Bhaskarji and others,

> > I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone

> claiming

> > that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely

> personal

> > experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in

rapt

> > concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the

> inner

> > depths of our self. As such, one cannot "prove" that s/he has had

> mantra

> > sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.

> >

> > As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I

am

> not

> > sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution

(I

> am a

> > devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I

have

> of

> > Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not

> > otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well (i

> > think)...would anyone care to comment?

> >

> > Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually

> quoting

> > texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus

> statements

> > like "rahu in 5th will not give sadhana"...we all know that it is

> impossible

> > to state anything without looking at relative placements of all

> planets.

> >

> > hari smaraNs,

> > prANadAsa.

> >

> >

> > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > > Now you are talking some sense. Dont waste my

> > > time in asking me to give abc of astrology. Learn this yourself

> please.

> > > This is what I wanted you to understand that Rahu in 5th will

> provide

> > > one the traits of how the native will do his mantra sadhana, but

> because

> > > Rahu is there in 5th does not mean that "Mantra Sadhana" is denied

> to

> > > him. This is bakwaas.

> > >

> > > I dont have to provide evidence in support of whatever I say.

> Believe it

> > > or not. Accept it or not. In this case for such a simple topic it

is

> > > understood that a person who dares to discuss should know by using

> some

> > > of his brains that when I Mentioned "Vocal" and "Loud" and "Nature

> of

> > > results ", it is pretty evident what I am talking about. Spoon

> feeding

> > > if one wants, then better go to a kindergarten class.

> > >

> > > Rahu additionally will make the native go for tamasik Mantras of

> Dieties

> > > of Rudra type . (Now dont ask me to give evidence, but use your

> brains

> > > please)

> > >

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> > > --- In

>

ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40yaho\

\

> ogroups.com> ,

> > > "utkal.panigrahi"

> > >

> > > utkal.panigrahi@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > it's a common knowledge that rahu's link to shakti sadhana is

> figment

> > > of imagination done by jyotishis in 70's decade, kk pathak and

> others

> > > published no of articles in A.M.

> > > >

> > > > rahu in 5'th or in lagna is liable to failure of sadhana, such a

> rahu

> > > affects concentration required for doing sadhana, native becomes

> fancy

> > > and gets lost therein. need to understand difference in traits of

> rahu

> > > (attachment to materialism) and ketu (detachment to materialism) .

> > > >

> > > > he is asking evidences whereas he himself has not given evidence

> in

> > > support of statement in hurry - "rahu in 5'th will give LOUD or

> VOCAL

> > > mantra sadhana", a statement similar to rahu's trait.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > --- In

>

ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40yaho\

\

> ogroups.com> ,

> > > ShankaraBharadwaj

> > > Khandavalli shankarabharadwaj@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > I agree for the most part. Material-Spiritual natures of

> Rahu-Ketu

> > > cannot be made to read that one would do matra sadhana or not. At

> most,

> > > that would only convey the kind of results of such sadhana -

whether

> the

> > > sadhana will confer material or inner benefits. But that too, is

> > > dependent not on the mantra devata as such but the dasa one is

going

> > > through. After all, any serious sadhana will result in every kind

of

> > > improvement in one's life and the whole being.

> > > > >

> > > > > In general it is the Mantra devata that is known from 5th. The

> > > Adhisthana devata of planet owning or falling in the 5th will be

the

> > > Mantra devata. Thus Rahu's influence will make one take to

> Jatavedasi

> > > Durga specifically or Durga in general. Ganapati would be fruitful

> if

> > > there is Ketu in the 5th. Also, since they are always aspecting

each

> > > other, both would be fruitful in many cases. However whether one

> does

> > > patha or antarjapa or something, whether one would attain siddi is

> > > dependent on many other factors.

> > > > >

> > > > > Shankar

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

> > > > > To:

>

ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40yaho\

\

> ogroups.com>

> > > > > Sunday, October 4, 2009 11:10:38 AM

> > > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Nonsense Jyotish

> > > > >

> > > > > Rahu in 5th will not give mantra Sadhana.

> > > > > Ketu in 5th will give mantra Sadhana.

> > > > >

> > > > > Actual Jyotish

> > > > >

> > > > > 1)Any planet in 5th will actually be a significator for

> > > > > Mantra Sadhana. In fact will give addittion to what

> > > > > native would have ordinarily done in absence of

> > > > > any planet in the 5th.

> > > > >

> > > > > 2) The planet in 5th will show the nature of Mantra

> > > > > Sadhana.

> > > > >

> > > > > 3) Rahu in 5th will make the native take up Vocal

> > > > > or loud Mantra Sadhana which he will enjoy.

> > > > > Ketu in 5th instead would make the native enjoy

> > > > > silent japa.

> > > > >

> > > > > 4) Planets are instruments to show the nature of

> > > > > results, native will face due to his Prarabdha, Dridha

> > > > > or Adridha, and also Kriyaman karmas. Planets are

> > > > > not the cause but just the source and imply the way

> > > > > or nature results would manifest.

> > > > >

> > > > > etc.

> > > > >

> > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

>

 

 

 

All new Mail - Get a sneak peak at messages with a handy reading pane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Mishra ji,

 

You are right, and you will be glad to note that my wife did this on the

beautiful night and next morning at breakfast/lunch, we all had one

katori each of this kheer by gods grace.

 

regards/Bhaskar.

 

 

, Akhil Mishra

<astro6301 wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskar ji

> In Sharad poornima , moon showers Amrit and if you prepare Kheer in

cow milk and keep whole night on open place , that kheer ahve a

vital power and that gives body resistance power.

> But you enjoyed lot of heavy stuff , inspite of keer.

> Ok enjoy ,

>

> Regards

> Dr Mishra

>

> --- On Sun, 10/4/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

>

> Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish

> Re: Suitability of Mantra

>

> Received: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 7:02 PM

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Sorry, some mistake -

>

>

>

> Day before yesterday while coming from bikaner to Jaipur, it was a 5

>

> hours drive and reached home ay midnight 00.15 hrs. My stomache had

>

> started paining for the last 2 hours of the drive due to probably

extra

>

> ghee which was poured on my Rice (Which is normal for Bikaneris but

not

>

> for me), at lunch time and then in the evning Mithai, kachoris and

other

>

> stuff which I think reacted on my small stomache.

>

>

>

> It was actually last night on Sharad Poornima (The night of Raasa by

>

> Lord Krishna at Brindavan and Nathdwara) when we had darshan of

>

> Chandramaji (The Moon)and later went to sleep that I had darshan of

Lord

>

> Shiva in my dreams.

>

>

>

> regards/Bhaskar.

>

>

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, " Bhaskar "

>

> <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:

>

> >

>

> > Dear Pranadas ji, Yes that is the truth actually. Some people dont

>

> > know the essence of astrology, for which I am not even sure I should

>

> > blame them or not, bcoz in todays astrology all they know is that

>

> > Saturn,Rahu and Mars is bad, and Sun in 7th creates divorce and all

>

> this

>

> > bankas bakwaas. They treat the planets as bad, rather than

>

> understanding

>

> > the theory of Karma and the resultant Prarabdha which is Bhogya

>

> through

>

> > the instruments and nature of these planets. Mata Kakeyi was not

evil,

>

> > she was just an instrument in the play of the lords Avataar on

earth.

>

> > But mand buddhis will not understand this. Rahu is also seated in my

>

> > lagna in degreecal conjunction with Mars. It aspects my 5th and 9th,

>

> as

>

> > well as 4th and 8th. I normally when sit for pooja, recite my

mantras

>

> > loudly(Average) and can sit for 3 hours at a stretch without rest on

>

> the

>

> > asana. I am normally reciting sanskrit stotras so love to make them

>

> > audible. I also recite Durga saptashathi which I love very much

>

> > alongwith the Nitya patha. My favourite Diety is Lord Krishna, but I

>

> > treat all the major Gods as part of the family and recite mantras

for

>

> > all of them. In fact day before yesterday I met my mantra Guru and

he

>

> > asked me to increase my patha of Lord Shankara. I reminded him that

my

>

> > favourite mantra is what he gave me 25 years back was of (He

completed

>

> > this sentence for me )Lord Krishna. He counter questioned me , "

what

>

> do

>

> > you say when doing Arti of Shankar Bhagwaan " ? I was perplexed at

his

>

> > question and muttered something incohensible. He replied to his own

>

> > question " You sing - Brahma vishnu Sadashiv.... .. If You sing this

>

> then

>

> > why do you not mean it? If You also do Pooja of Shankar Bhagwaan and

>

> > then do Mantra of lord Krishna you will get more benefits, as Lord

>

> > Shankara loves Lord Krishna " . This replye and explanation from My

>

> > Guruji closed my query. To top it, after meeting my guruji in

Bikaner

>

> > and reaching home(Jaipur) at midnight, when I went to sleep I dreamt

>

> of

>

> > a thousand snakes all around me, and felt no fear in my dream, and

at

>

> > the close of the dream got a Darshan of lord Shankar taking the

Ganga

>

> on

>

> > His locks. This dream was as if to confirm what my Guruji mentioned.

I

>

> > am into Rahu mahadasha presently and my Guru antar has just started

a

>

> > fortnight ago. Since last 2 years I have been having many dreams of

>

> > saints and Venerated personages appearing in my dreams and blessing

>

> me.

>

> > This is the power of Rahu. All above I did not wish to reveal but

>

> > doing so just to affirm and break stupid modern misconceptions, by

>

> > relaying and relating experiences in Rahu period, with Rahu

aspecting

>

> > 5th, through first person. I also have the Moon in my 5th house

>

> > -Sagittarius aspected by the Sun and Mercury in Gemini from 11th .

(I

>

> > was born on Poornima). I also have the Kaivalya Yoga in my Kundli

>

> (Ketu

>

> > 12th from karakamsha in navamsha). As per KP I have already been

>

> > predicted Moksha recently by Shri Yogesh Rao Lajmi ji and also

another

>

> > KP Senior. But I am not taking chances like a Karmaheena waiting for

>

> > destiny to gift me, but instead working on my efforts and Karmas to

>

> > achieve this. rest God knows. best wishes, Bhaskar.

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > ancient_indian_ astrology, s s freemorons@

>

> > wrote:

>

> > >

>

> > > Dear Bhaskarji and others,

>

> > > I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read

someone

>

> > claiming

>

> > > that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely

>

> > personal

>

> > > experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in

>

> rapt

>

> > > concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into

the

>

> > inner

>

> > > depths of our self. As such, one cannot " prove " that s/he has had

>

> > mantra

>

> > > sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.

>

> > >

>

> > > As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I

>

> am

>

> > not

>

> > > sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s

contribution

>

> (I

>

> > am a

>

> > > devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I

>

> have

>

> > of

>

> > > Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not

>

> > > otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well

(i

>

> > > think)...would anyone care to comment?

>

> > >

>

> > > Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually

>

> > quoting

>

> > > texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus

>

> > statements

>

> > > like " rahu in 5th will not give sadhana " ...we all know that it is

>

> > impossible

>

> > > to state anything without looking at relative placements of all

>

> > planets.

>

> > >

>

> > > hari smaraNs,

>

> > > prANadAsa.

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

>

> > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Now you are talking some sense. Dont waste my

>

> > > > time in asking me to give abc of astrology. Learn this yourself

>

> > please.

>

> > > > This is what I wanted you to understand that Rahu in 5th will

>

> > provide

>

> > > > one the traits of how the native will do his mantra sadhana, but

>

> > because

>

> > > > Rahu is there in 5th does not mean that " Mantra Sadhana " is

denied

>

> > to

>

> > > > him. This is bakwaas.

>

> > > >

>

> > > > I dont have to provide evidence in support of whatever I say.

>

> > Believe it

>

> > > > or not. Accept it or not. In this case for such a simple topic

it

>

> is

>

> > > > understood that a person who dares to discuss should know by

using

>

> > some

>

> > > > of his brains that when I Mentioned " Vocal " and " Loud " and

" Nature

>

> > of

>

> > > > results " , it is pretty evident what I am talking about. Spoon

>

> > feeding

>

> > > > if one wants, then better go to a kindergarten class.

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Rahu additionally will make the native go for tamasik Mantras of

>

> > Dieties

>

> > > > of Rudra type . (Now dont ask me to give evidence, but use your

>

> > brains

>

> > > > please)

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Bhaskar.

>

> > > >

>

> > > > --- In

>

> >

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology%

40yaho\

>

> \

>

> > ogroups.com> ,

>

> > > > " utkal.panigrahi "

>

> > > >

>

> > > > utkal.panigrahi@ wrote:

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > it's a common knowledge that rahu's link to shakti sadhana is

>

> > figment

>

> > > > of imagination done by jyotishis in 70's decade, kk pathak and

>

> > others

>

> > > > published no of articles in A.M.

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > rahu in 5'th or in lagna is liable to failure of sadhana, such

a

>

> > rahu

>

> > > > affects concentration required for doing sadhana, native becomes

>

> > fancy

>

> > > > and gets lost therein. need to understand difference in traits

of

>

> > rahu

>

> > > > (attachment to materialism) and ketu (detachment to materialism)

..

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > he is asking evidences whereas he himself has not given

evidence

>

> > in

>

> > > > support of statement in hurry - " rahu in 5'th will give LOUD or

>

> > VOCAL

>

> > > > mantra sadhana " , a statement similar to rahu's trait.

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > --- In

>

> >

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology%

40yaho\

>

> \

>

> > ogroups.com> ,

>

> > > > ShankaraBharadwaj

>

> > > > Khandavalli shankarabharadwaj@ wrote:

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > I agree for the most part. Material-Spiritual natures of

>

> > Rahu-Ketu

>

> > > > cannot be made to read that one would do matra sadhana or not.

At

>

> > most,

>

> > > > that would only convey the kind of results of such sadhana -

>

> whether

>

> > the

>

> > > > sadhana will confer material or inner benefits. But that too, is

>

> > > > dependent not on the mantra devata as such but the dasa one is

>

> going

>

> > > > through. After all, any serious sadhana will result in every

kind

>

> of

>

> > > > improvement in one's life and the whole being.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > In general it is the Mantra devata that is known from 5th.

The

>

> > > > Adhisthana devata of planet owning or falling in the 5th will be

>

> the

>

> > > > Mantra devata. Thus Rahu's influence will make one take to

>

> > Jatavedasi

>

> > > > Durga specifically or Durga in general. Ganapati would be

fruitful

>

> > if

>

> > > > there is Ketu in the 5th. Also, since they are always aspecting

>

> each

>

> > > > other, both would be fruitful in many cases. However whether one

>

> > does

>

> > > > patha or antarjapa or something, whether one would attain siddi

is

>

> > > > dependent on many other factors.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Shankar

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

>

> > > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

>

> > > > > > To:

>

> >

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology%

40yaho\

>

> \

>

> > ogroups.com>

>

> > > > > > Sunday, October 4, 2009 11:10:38 AM

>

> > > > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of

Mantra

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Nonsense Jyotish

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Rahu in 5th will not give mantra Sadhana.

>

> > > > > > Ketu in 5th will give mantra Sadhana.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Actual Jyotish

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > 1)Any planet in 5th will actually be a significator for

>

> > > > > > Mantra Sadhana. In fact will give addittion to what

>

> > > > > > native would have ordinarily done in absence of

>

> > > > > > any planet in the 5th.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > 2) The planet in 5th will show the nature of Mantra

>

> > > > > > Sadhana.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > 3) Rahu in 5th will make the native take up Vocal

>

> > > > > > or loud Mantra Sadhana which he will enjoy.

>

> > > > > > Ketu in 5th instead would make the native enjoy

>

> > > > > > silent japa.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > 4) Planets are instruments to show the nature of

>

> > > > > > results, native will face due to his Prarabdha, Dridha

>

> > > > > > or Adridha, and also Kriyaman karmas. Planets are

>

> > > > > > not the cause but just the source and imply the way

>

> > > > > > or nature results would manifest.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > etc.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Bhaskar.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > >

>

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

________________

> Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark

your favourite sites. Download it now

> http://ca.toolbar..

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Bhaskar jiNmaskar,Really I appreciate your words , that My lagan is Vrashik and in my 9th house Mars and Rahu exist, and my profession is a Medicinal chemist and P.hD in Organic chemistry, but since 1981 , I firts pray Ganapati , and becuase I have no Guru so read Hanuman stututi and Hanuman chalisa and at last Bhagwati Durgra and I also do strota loudly and I am enjoying my time in Canada.Could you exactly tell me what are basics behind it.AKHILESHDOB# 13-01-1963 , TIME : 04:10 am, PLACE CHITRAKUT ( up) OR TAKE MANIKPUR.REGARDDR MISHRA--- On Sun, 10/4/09, Bhaskar

<bhaskar_jyotish wrote:Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Re: Suitability of Mantra Received: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 6:35 PM

 

 

Dear Pranadas ji,

 

Yes that is the truth actually.

 

Some people dont know the essence of astrology, for which I am not even sure I should blame them or not, bcoz in todays astrology all they know is that Saturn,Rahu and Mars is bad, and Sun in 7th creates divorce and all this bankas bakwaas. They treat the planets as bad, rather than understanding the theory of Karma and the resultant Prarabdha which is Bhogya through the instruments and nature of these planets. Mata Kakeyi was not evil, she was just an instrument in the play of the lords Avataar on earth. But mand buddhis will not understand this.

 

Rahu is also seated in my lagna in degreecal conjunction with Mars. It aspects my 5th and 9th, as well as 4th and 8th.

I normally when sit for pooja, recite my mantras loudly(Average) and can sit for 3 hours at a stretch without rest on the asana. I am normally reciting sanskrit stotras so love to make them audible. I also recite Durga saptashathi which I love very much alongwith the Nitya patha. My favourite Diety is Lord Krishna, but I treat all the major Gods as part of the family and recite mantras for all of them. In fact day before yesterday I met my mantra Guru and he asked me to increase my patha of Lord Shankara. I reminded him that my favourite mantra is what he gave me 25 years back was of (He completed this sentence for me )Lord Krishna. He counter questioned me , " what do you say when doing Arti of Shankar Bhagwaan " ? I was perplexed at his question and muttered something incohensible. He replied to his own question " You sing - Brahma vishnu Sadashiv.... .. If You sing this then why do you not mean it? If You

also do Pooja of Shankar Bhagwaan and then do Mantra of lord Krishna you will get more benefits, as Lord Shankara loves Lord Krishna" . This replye and explanation from My Guruji closed my query.

 

To top it, after meeting my guruji in Bikaner and reaching home(Jaipur) at midnight, when I went to sleep I dreamt of a thousand snakes all around me, and felt no fear in my dream, and at the close of the dream got a Darshan of lord Shankar taking the Ganga on His locks. This dream was as if to confirm what my Guruji mentioned.

 

I am into Rahu mahadasha presently and my Guru antar has just started a fortnight ago. Since last 2 years I have been having many dreams of saints and Venerated personages appearing in my dreams and blessing me. This is the power of Rahu.

 

All above I did not wish to reveal but doing so just to affirm and break stupid modern misconceptions, by relaying and relating experiences in Rahu period, with Rahu aspecting 5th, through first person. I also have the Moon in my 5th house -Sagittarius aspected by the Sun and Mercury in Gemini from 11th . (I was born on Poornima). I also have the Kaivalya Yoga in my Kundli (Ketu 12th from karakamsha in navamsha). As per KP I have already been predicted Moksha recently by Shri Yogesh Rao Lajmi ji and also another KP Senior. But I am not taking chances like a Karmaheena waiting for destiny to gift me, but instead working on my efforts and Karmas to achieve this. rest God knows.

best wishes,

Bhaskar.

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, s s <freemorons@. ..> wrote:>> Dear Bhaskarji and others,> I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone claiming> that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely personal> experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in rapt> concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the inner> depths of our self. As such, one cannot "prove" that s/he has had mantra> sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.> > As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I am not> sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution (I am a> devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I have of> Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not> otherwise).. . Mercury is not

very strong in my horoscope as well (i> think)...would anyone care to comment?> > Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually quoting> texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus statements> like "rahu in 5th will not give sadhana"...we all know that it is impossible> to state anything without looking at relative placements of all planets.> > hari smaraNs,> prANadAsa.> > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... wrote:> > >> >> > Now you are talking some sense. Dont waste my> > time in asking me to give abc of astrology. Learn this yourself please.> > This is what I wanted you to understand that Rahu in 5th will provide> > one the traits of how the native will do his mantra sadhana, but because> > Rahu is there in 5th does not mean

that "Mantra Sadhana" is denied to> > him. This is bakwaas.> >> > I dont have to provide evidence in support of whatever I say. Believe it> > or not. Accept it or not. In this case for such a simple topic it is> > understood that a person who dares to discuss should know by using some> > of his brains that when I Mentioned "Vocal" and "Loud" and "Nature of> > results ", it is pretty evident what I am talking about. Spoon feeding> > if one wants, then better go to a kindergarten class.> >> > Rahu additionally will make the native go for tamasik Mantras of Dieties> > of Rudra type . (Now dont ask me to give evidence, but use your brains> > please)> >> > Bhaskar.> >> > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40. com>,> >

"utkal.panigrahi"> >> > utkal.panigrahi@ wrote:> > >> > > it's a common knowledge that rahu's link to shakti sadhana is figment> > of imagination done by jyotishis in 70's decade, kk pathak and others> > published no of articles in A.M.> > >> > > rahu in 5'th or in lagna is liable to failure of sadhana, such a rahu> > affects concentration required for doing sadhana, native becomes fancy> > and gets lost therein. need to understand difference in traits of rahu> > (attachment to materialism) and ketu (detachment to materialism) .> > >> > > he is asking evidences whereas he himself has not given evidence in> > support of statement in hurry - "rahu in 5'th will give LOUD or VOCAL> > mantra sadhana", a statement similar to rahu's trait.> > >> > >> > >

ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40. com>,> > ShankaraBharadwaj> > Khandavalli shankarabharadwaj@ wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > >> > > > I agree for the most part. Material-Spiritual natures of Rahu-Ketu> > cannot be made to read that one would do matra sadhana or not. At most,> > that would only convey the kind of results of such sadhana - whether the> > sadhana will confer material or inner benefits. But that too, is> > dependent not on the mantra devata as such but the dasa one is going> > through. After all, any serious sadhana will result in every kind of> > improvement in one's life and the whole being.> > > >> > > > In general it is the Mantra devata that is known from 5th. The> >

Adhisthana devata of planet owning or falling in the 5th will be the> > Mantra devata. Thus Rahu's influence will make one take to Jatavedasi> > Durga specifically or Durga in general. Ganapati would be fruitful if> > there is Ketu in the 5th. Also, since they are always aspecting each> > other, both would be fruitful in many cases. However whether one does> > patha or antarjapa or something, whether one would attain siddi is> > dependent on many other factors.> > > >> > > > Shankar> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40. com>> > > > Sunday, October 4, 2009

11:10:38 AM> > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Nonsense Jyotish> > > >> > > > Rahu in 5th will not give mantra Sadhana.> > > > Ketu in 5th will give mantra Sadhana.> > > >> > > > Actual Jyotish> > > >> > > > 1)Any planet in 5th will actually be a significator for> > > > Mantra Sadhana. In fact will give addittion to what> > > > native would have ordinarily done in absence of> > > > any planet in the 5th.> > > >> > > > 2) The planet in 5th will show the nature of Mantra> > > > Sadhana.> > > >> > > > 3) Rahu in 5th will make the native take up Vocal> > > > or loud

Mantra Sadhana which he will enjoy.> > > > Ketu in 5th instead would make the native enjoy> > > > silent japa.> > > >> > > > 4) Planets are instruments to show the nature of> > > > results, native will face due to his Prarabdha, Dridha> > > > or Adridha, and also Kriyaman karmas. Planets are> > > > not the cause but just the source and imply the way> > > > or nature results would manifest.> > > >> > > > etc.> > > >> > > > Bhaskar.> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bhaskar jiPranamI think you are on line reagrds--- On Mon, 10/5/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Re: Suitability of Mantra Received: Monday, October 5, 2009, 3:40 AM

 

 

 

Dear Mishra ji,

 

You are right, and you will be glad to note that my wife did this on the

beautiful night and next morning at breakfast/lunch, we all had one

katori each of this kheer by gods grace.

 

regards/Bhaskar.

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, Akhil Mishra

<astro6301@. ..> wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskar ji

> In Sharad poornima , moon showers Amrit and if you prepare Kheer in

cow milk and keep whole night on open place , that kheer ahve a

vital power and that gives body resistance power.

> But you enjoyed lot of heavy stuff , inspite of keer.

> Ok enjoy ,

>

> Regards

> Dr Mishra

>

> --- On Sun, 10/4/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... wrote:

>

> Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...

> [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra

> ancient_indian_ astrology

> Received: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 7:02 PM

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Sorry, some mistake -

>

>

>

> Day before yesterday while coming from bikaner to Jaipur, it was a 5

>

> hours drive and reached home ay midnight 00.15 hrs. My stomache had

>

> started paining for the last 2 hours of the drive due to probably

extra

>

> ghee which was poured on my Rice (Which is normal for Bikaneris but

not

>

> for me), at lunch time and then in the evning Mithai, kachoris and

other

>

> stuff which I think reacted on my small stomache.

>

>

>

> It was actually last night on Sharad Poornima (The night of Raasa by

>

> Lord Krishna at Brindavan and Nathdwara) when we had darshan of

>

> Chandramaji (The Moon)and later went to sleep that I had darshan of

Lord

>

> Shiva in my dreams.

>

>

>

> regards/Bhaskar.

>

>

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, "Bhaskar"

>

> <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:

>

> >

>

> > Dear Pranadas ji, Yes that is the truth actually. Some people dont

>

> > know the essence of astrology, for which I am not even sure I should

>

> > blame them or not, bcoz in todays astrology all they know is that

>

> > Saturn,Rahu and Mars is bad, and Sun in 7th creates divorce and all

>

> this

>

> > bankas bakwaas. They treat the planets as bad, rather than

>

> understanding

>

> > the theory of Karma and the resultant Prarabdha which is Bhogya

>

> through

>

> > the instruments and nature of these planets. Mata Kakeyi was not

evil,

>

> > she was just an instrument in the play of the lords Avataar on

earth.

>

> > But mand buddhis will not understand this. Rahu is also seated in my

>

> > lagna in degreecal conjunction with Mars. It aspects my 5th and 9th,

>

> as

>

> > well as 4th and 8th. I normally when sit for pooja, recite my

mantras

>

> > loudly(Average) and can sit for 3 hours at a stretch without rest on

>

> the

>

> > asana. I am normally reciting sanskrit stotras so love to make them

>

> > audible. I also recite Durga saptashathi which I love very much

>

> > alongwith the Nitya patha. My favourite Diety is Lord Krishna, but I

>

> > treat all the major Gods as part of the family and recite mantras

for

>

> > all of them. In fact day before yesterday I met my mantra Guru and

he

>

> > asked me to increase my patha of Lord Shankara. I reminded him that

my

>

> > favourite mantra is what he gave me 25 years back was of (He

completed

>

> > this sentence for me )Lord Krishna. He counter questioned me , "

what

>

> do

>

> > you say when doing Arti of Shankar Bhagwaan " ? I was perplexed at

his

>

> > question and muttered something incohensible. He replied to his own

>

> > question " You sing - Brahma vishnu Sadashiv.... .. If You sing this

>

> then

>

> > why do you not mean it? If You also do Pooja of Shankar Bhagwaan and

>

> > then do Mantra of lord Krishna you will get more benefits, as Lord

>

> > Shankara loves Lord Krishna" . This replye and explanation from My

>

> > Guruji closed my query. To top it, after meeting my guruji in

Bikaner

>

> > and reaching home(Jaipur) at midnight, when I went to sleep I dreamt

>

> of

>

> > a thousand snakes all around me, and felt no fear in my dream, and

at

>

> > the close of the dream got a Darshan of lord Shankar taking the

Ganga

>

> on

>

> > His locks. This dream was as if to confirm what my Guruji mentioned.

I

>

> > am into Rahu mahadasha presently and my Guru antar has just started

a

>

> > fortnight ago. Since last 2 years I have been having many dreams of

>

> > saints and Venerated personages appearing in my dreams and blessing

>

> me.

>

> > This is the power of Rahu. All above I did not wish to reveal but

>

> > doing so just to affirm and break stupid modern misconceptions, by

>

> > relaying and relating experiences in Rahu period, with Rahu

aspecting

>

> > 5th, through first person. I also have the Moon in my 5th house

>

> > -Sagittarius aspected by the Sun and Mercury in Gemini from 11th .

(I

>

> > was born on Poornima). I also have the Kaivalya Yoga in my Kundli

>

> (Ketu

>

> > 12th from karakamsha in navamsha). As per KP I have already been

>

> > predicted Moksha recently by Shri Yogesh Rao Lajmi ji and also

another

>

> > KP Senior. But I am not taking chances like a Karmaheena waiting for

>

> > destiny to gift me, but instead working on my efforts and Karmas to

>

> > achieve this. rest God knows. best wishes, Bhaskar.

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > ancient_indian_ astrology, s s freemorons@

>

> > wrote:

>

> > >

>

> > > Dear Bhaskarji and others,

>

> > > I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read

someone

>

> > claiming

>

> > > that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely

>

> > personal

>

> > > experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in

>

> rapt

>

> > > concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into

the

>

> > inner

>

> > > depths of our self. As such, one cannot "prove" that s/he has had

>

> > mantra

>

> > > sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.

>

> > >

>

> > > As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I

>

> am

>

> > not

>

> > > sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s

contribution

>

> (I

>

> > am a

>

> > > devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I

>

> have

>

> > of

>

> > > Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not

>

> > > otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well

(i

>

> > > think)...would anyone care to comment?

>

> > >

>

> > > Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually

>

> > quoting

>

> > > texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus

>

> > statements

>

> > > like "rahu in 5th will not give sadhana"...we all know that it is

>

> > impossible

>

> > > to state anything without looking at relative placements of all

>

> > planets.

>

> > >

>

> > > hari smaraNs,

>

> > > prANadAsa.

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

>

> > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Now you are talking some sense. Dont waste my

>

> > > > time in asking me to give abc of astrology. Learn this yourself

>

> > please.

>

> > > > This is what I wanted you to understand that Rahu in 5th will

>

> > provide

>

> > > > one the traits of how the native will do his mantra sadhana, but

>

> > because

>

> > > > Rahu is there in 5th does not mean that "Mantra Sadhana" is

denied

>

> > to

>

> > > > him. This is bakwaas.

>

> > > >

>

> > > > I dont have to provide evidence in support of whatever I say.

>

> > Believe it

>

> > > > or not. Accept it or not. In this case for such a simple topic

it

>

> is

>

> > > > understood that a person who dares to discuss should know by

using

>

> > some

>

> > > > of his brains that when I Mentioned "Vocal" and "Loud" and

"Nature

>

> > of

>

> > > > results ", it is pretty evident what I am talking about. Spoon

>

> > feeding

>

> > > > if one wants, then better go to a kindergarten class.

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Rahu additionally will make the native go for tamasik Mantras of

>

> > Dieties

>

> > > > of Rudra type . (Now dont ask me to give evidence, but use your

>

> > brains

>

> > > > please)

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Bhaskar.

>

> > > >

>

> > > > --- In

>

> >

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_ indian_ astrology%

40yaho\

>

> \

>

> > ogroups.com> ,

>

> > > > "utkal.panigrahi"

>

> > > >

>

> > > > utkal.panigrahi@ wrote:

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > it's a common knowledge that rahu's link to shakti sadhana is

>

> > figment

>

> > > > of imagination done by jyotishis in 70's decade, kk pathak and

>

> > others

>

> > > > published no of articles in A.M.

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > rahu in 5'th or in lagna is liable to failure of sadhana, such

a

>

> > rahu

>

> > > > affects concentration required for doing sadhana, native becomes

>

> > fancy

>

> > > > and gets lost therein. need to understand difference in traits

of

>

> > rahu

>

> > > > (attachment to materialism) and ketu (detachment to materialism)

..

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > he is asking evidences whereas he himself has not given

evidence

>

> > in

>

> > > > support of statement in hurry - "rahu in 5'th will give LOUD or

>

> > VOCAL

>

> > > > mantra sadhana", a statement similar to rahu's trait.

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > --- In

>

> >

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_ indian_ astrology%

40yaho\

>

> \

>

> > ogroups.com> ,

>

> > > > ShankaraBharadwaj

>

> > > > Khandavalli shankarabharadwaj@ wrote:

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > I agree for the most part. Material-Spiritual natures of

>

> > Rahu-Ketu

>

> > > > cannot be made to read that one would do matra sadhana or not.

At

>

> > most,

>

> > > > that would only convey the kind of results of such sadhana -

>

> whether

>

> > the

>

> > > > sadhana will confer material or inner benefits. But that too, is

>

> > > > dependent not on the mantra devata as such but the dasa one is

>

> going

>

> > > > through. After all, any serious sadhana will result in every

kind

>

> of

>

> > > > improvement in one's life and the whole being.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > In general it is the Mantra devata that is known from 5th.

The

>

> > > > Adhisthana devata of planet owning or falling in the 5th will be

>

> the

>

> > > > Mantra devata. Thus Rahu's influence will make one take to

>

> > Jatavedasi

>

> > > > Durga specifically or Durga in general. Ganapati would be

fruitful

>

> > if

>

> > > > there is Ketu in the 5th. Also, since they are always aspecting

>

> each

>

> > > > other, both would be fruitful in many cases. However whether one

>

> > does

>

> > > > patha or antarjapa or something, whether one would attain siddi

is

>

> > > > dependent on many other factors.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Shankar

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

>

> > > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

>

> > > > > > To:

>

> >

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_ indian_ astrology%

40yaho\

>

> \

>

> > ogroups.com>

>

> > > > > > Sunday, October 4, 2009 11:10:38 AM

>

> > > > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of

Mantra

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Nonsense Jyotish

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Rahu in 5th will not give mantra Sadhana.

>

> > > > > > Ketu in 5th will give mantra Sadhana.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Actual Jyotish

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > 1)Any planet in 5th will actually be a significator for

>

> > > > > > Mantra Sadhana. In fact will give addittion to what

>

> > > > > > native would have ordinarily done in absence of

>

> > > > > > any planet in the 5th.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > 2) The planet in 5th will show the nature of Mantra

>

> > > > > > Sadhana.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > 3) Rahu in 5th will make the native take up Vocal

>

> > > > > > or loud Mantra Sadhana which he will enjoy.

>

> > > > > > Ketu in 5th instead would make the native enjoy

>

> > > > > > silent japa.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > 4) Planets are instruments to show the nature of

>

> > > > > > results, native will face due to his Prarabdha, Dridha

>

> > > > > > or Adridha, and also Kriyaman karmas. Planets are

>

> > > > > > not the cause but just the source and imply the way

>

> > > > > > or nature results would manifest.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > etc.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Bhaskar.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > >

>

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _

> Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark

your favourite sites. Download it now

> http://ca.toolbar. .

>

 

 

 

 

Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Pranadasa ji,Please do not humble me with such words. While I certainly do not mind taking a look, I have not learned Jyotisha. It is over to the learned members for that, I might just add a point from my limited understanding of the basics. Shankars s <freemorons Sent:

Monday, October 5, 2009 5:27:33 AMRe: Re: Suitability of Mantra

 

 

Dear Shankarji,My pranams to your feet for any guidance you can provide to me will be received with as much reverence as rAma pAduka...Please let me know if you and others would be willing to look at my chart to help me understand my spiritual side...a humble and sincere request by me.

hari smaraNs,prAnadAsa.On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 2:36 PM, ShankaraBharadwaj Khandavalli <shankarabharadwaj@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Pranadasa ji,Sakti sadhana being Rahu's contribution is something I mentioned too, but my reading is that in your case it should more be the lagna lord's contribution - Ve. Also, Ve and Me being mitra, both Devi and Vishnu worship should be fruitful. Of course, quick grace would be of whoever is stronger :)

Shankar

s s <freemorons (AT) gmail (DOT) com>To:

ancient_indian_ astrologySunday, October 4, 2009 8:57:12 PMRe: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra

 

 

 

Dear Bhaskarji and others,I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone claiming that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely personal experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in rapt concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the inner depths of our self. As such, one cannot "prove" that s/he has had mantra sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.

As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I am not sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution (I am a devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I have of Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well (i think)...would anyone care to comment?

Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually quoting texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus statements like "rahu in 5th will not give sadhana"...we all know that it is impossible to state anything without looking at relative placements of all planets.

hari smaraNs,prANadAsa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Akhil,

 

Any body who get's his lagna lord in 9th, wd hve faith in dharma, rahu in 9th is

different from rahu in 5th, if u recall, i mentioned that in hanuman ji's chart

(believed) rahu is in 9th, lokmanya tilak has rahu in 9th wth guru. rahu in 9th

is siddhidata, makes one chase it's goal, bt, on the contrary, rahu in 5th

diverts the focus.

 

Loud chanting is not an attribute of rahu, everybody begins with loud chanting,

even people with ketu begins with loud chanting, (saturn - moon conjunction is a

rider to some extent), as one's sadhana advances, he goes inwards and reaches at

silence. it's common to all.

 

It's good to know that you are from chitrakut, I visited chitrakut last year.

Gupt Godavari, Anusuia Ashram etc.

 

A personal query - do you have some obesity in your physic.

 

Rest is fine.

- utkal.

 

, Akhil Mishra <astro6301

wrote:

>

> Dear  Bhaskar ji

> Nmaskar,

> Really I appreciate  your words , that  My lagan is Vrashik and  in my 9th

house Mars  and Rahu exist, and my profession is  a Medicinal chemist and P.hD

in Organic chemistry, but  since 1981 , I  firts  pray  Ganapati , and becuase I

have no Guru  so  read Hanuman stututi and Hanuman chalisa and at last Bhagwati

Durgra  and I also do  strota  loudly and I am enjoying my time  in Canada.

> Could you exactly  tell me  what are basics behind it.

> AKHILESHDOB# 13-01-1963 , TIME : 04:10 am, PLACE  CHITRAKUT ( up) OR TAKE

 MANIKPUR.

> REGARDDR MISHRA

>

> --- On Sun, 10/4/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

>

> Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

> Re: Suitability of Mantra

>

> Received: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 6:35 PM

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

>

>

>

>

>

> Dear Pranadas ji,

>  

> Yes that is the truth actually.

>  

> Some people dont know the essence of astrology, for which I am not even sure I

should blame them or not, bcoz in todays astrology all they know is that

Saturn,Rahu and Mars is bad, and Sun in 7th creates divorce and all this bankas

bakwaas. They treat the planets as bad, rather than understanding the theory of

Karma and the resultant Prarabdha which is Bhogya through the instruments and

nature of these planets. Mata Kakeyi was not evil, she was just an instrument in

the play of the lords Avataar on earth. But mand buddhis will not understand

this.

>  

> Rahu is also seated in my lagna in degreecal conjunction with Mars. It aspects

my 5th and 9th, as well as 4th and 8th.

> I normally when sit for pooja, recite my mantras loudly(Average) and can sit

for 3 hours at a stretch without rest on the asana.  I am normally reciting

sanskrit stotras so love to make them audible. I also recite Durga saptashathi

which I love very much alongwith the Nitya patha. My favourite Diety is Lord

Krishna, but I treat all the major Gods as part of the family and recite mantras

for all of them. In fact day before yesterday I met my mantra Guru and he asked

me to increase my patha of Lord Shankara. I reminded him that my favourite

mantra is what he gave me 25 years back was of (He completed this sentence for

me )Lord Krishna. He counter questioned me , " what do you say when doing Arti

of Shankar Bhagwaan " ? I was perplexed at his question and muttered something

incohensible. He replied to his own question " You sing - Brahma vishnu

Sadashiv.... .. If You sing this then why do you not mean it? If You also do

Pooja of Shankar Bhagwaan and then

> do Mantra of lord Krishna you will get more benefits, as Lord Shankara loves

Lord Krishna " . This replye and explanation from My Guruji closed my query.

>  

> To top it, after meeting my guruji in Bikaner and reaching home(Jaipur) at

midnight, when I went to sleep I dreamt of a thousand snakes all around me, and

felt no fear in my dream, and at the close of the dream got a Darshan of lord

Shankar taking the Ganga on His locks. This dream was as if to confirm what my

Guruji mentioned.

>  

> I am into Rahu mahadasha presently and my Guru antar has just started a

fortnight ago. Since last 2 years I have been having many dreams of saints and

Venerated personages appearing in my dreams and blessing me. This is the power

of Rahu.

>  

> All above I did not wish to reveal but doing so just to affirm and break

stupid modern misconceptions, by relaying and relating experiences in Rahu

period, with Rahu aspecting 5th, through first person. I also have the Moon in

my 5th house -Sagittarius aspected by the Sun and Mercury in Gemini from 11th .

(I was born on Poornima). I also have the Kaivalya Yoga in my Kundli (Ketu 12th

from karakamsha in navamsha). As per KP I have already been predicted Moksha

recently by Shri Yogesh Rao Lajmi ji and also another KP Senior. But I am not

taking chances like a Karmaheena waiting for destiny to gift me, but instead

working on my efforts and Karmas  to achieve this. rest God knows.

>   

> best wishes,

> Bhaskar. 

>  

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, s s <freemorons@ ..>

wrote:

> >

> > Dear Bhaskarji and others,

> > I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone claiming

> > that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely personal

> > experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in rapt

> > concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the inner

> > depths of our self. As such, one cannot " prove " that s/he has had mantra

> > sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.

> >

> > As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I am not

> > sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution (I am a

> > devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I have of

> > Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not

> > otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well (i

> > think)...would anyone care to comment?

> >

> > Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually quoting

> > texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus statements

> > like " rahu in 5th will not give sadhana " ...we all know that it is impossible

> > to state anything without looking at relative placements of all planets.

> >

> > hari smaraNs,

> > prANadAsa.

> >

> >

> > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > > Now you are talking some sense. Dont waste my

> > > time in asking me to give abc of astrology. Learn this yourself please.

> > > This is what I wanted you to understand that Rahu in 5th will provide

> > > one the traits of how the native will do his mantra sadhana, but because

> > > Rahu is there in 5th does not mean that " Mantra Sadhana " is denied to

> > > him. This is bakwaas.

> > >

> > > I dont have to provide evidence in support of whatever I say. Believe it

> > > or not. Accept it or not. In this case for such a simple topic it is

> > > understood that a person who dares to discuss should know by using some

> > > of his brains that when I Mentioned " Vocal " and " Loud " and " Nature of

> > > results " , it is pretty evident what I am talking about. Spoon feeding

> > > if one wants, then better go to a kindergarten class.

> > >

> > > Rahu additionally will make the native go for tamasik Mantras of Dieties

> > > of Rudra type . (Now dont ask me to give evidence, but use your brains

> > > please)

> > >

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_

astrology% 40. com>,

> > > " utkal.panigrahi "

> > >

> > > utkal.panigrahi@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > it's a common knowledge that rahu's link to shakti sadhana is figment

> > > of imagination done by jyotishis in 70's decade, kk pathak and others

> > > published no of articles in A.M.

> > > >

> > > > rahu in 5'th or in lagna is liable to failure of sadhana, such a rahu

> > > affects concentration required for doing sadhana, native becomes fancy

> > > and gets lost therein. need to understand difference in traits of rahu

> > > (attachment to materialism) and ketu (detachment to materialism) .

> > > >

> > > > he is asking evidences whereas he himself has not given evidence in

> > > support of statement in hurry - " rahu in 5'th will give LOUD or VOCAL

> > > mantra sadhana " , a statement similar to rahu's trait.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_

astrology% 40. com>,

> > > ShankaraBharadwaj

> > > Khandavalli shankarabharadwaj@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > I agree for the most part. Material-Spiritual natures of Rahu-Ketu

> > > cannot be made to read that one would do matra sadhana or not. At most,

> > > that would only convey the kind of results of such sadhana - whether the

> > > sadhana will confer material or inner benefits. But that too, is

> > > dependent not on the mantra devata as such but the dasa one is going

> > > through. After all, any serious sadhana will result in every kind of

> > > improvement in one's life and the whole being.

> > > > >

> > > > > In general it is the Mantra devata that is known from 5th. The

> > > Adhisthana devata of planet owning or falling in the 5th will be the

> > > Mantra devata. Thus Rahu's influence will make one take to Jatavedasi

> > > Durga specifically or Durga in general. Ganapati would be fruitful if

> > > there is Ketu in the 5th. Also, since they are always aspecting each

> > > other, both would be fruitful in many cases. However whether one does

> > > patha or antarjapa or something, whether one would attain siddi is

> > > dependent on many other factors.

> > > > >

> > > > > Shankar

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

> > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_

astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > Sunday, October 4, 2009 11:10:38 AM

> > > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Nonsense Jyotish

> > > > >

> > > > > Rahu in 5th will not give mantra Sadhana.

> > > > > Ketu in 5th will give mantra Sadhana.

> > > > >

> > > > > Actual Jyotish

> > > > >

> > > > > 1)Any planet in 5th will actually be a significator for

> > > > > Mantra Sadhana. In fact will give addittion to what

> > > > > native would have ordinarily done in absence of

> > > > > any planet in the 5th.

> > > > >

> > > > > 2) The planet in 5th will show the nature of Mantra

> > > > > Sadhana.

> > > > >

> > > > > 3) Rahu in 5th will make the native take up Vocal

> > > > > or loud Mantra Sadhana which he will enjoy.

> > > > > Ketu in 5th instead would make the native enjoy

> > > > > silent japa.

> > > > >

> > > > > 4) Planets are instruments to show the nature of

> > > > > results, native will face due to his Prarabdha, Dridha

> > > > > or Adridha, and also Kriyaman karmas. Planets are

> > > > > not the cause but just the source and imply the way

> > > > > or nature results would manifest.

> > > > >

> > > > > etc.

> > > > >

> > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

________________

> Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet Explorer®

8. Optimized for Get it Now for Free! at

http://downloads./ca/internetexplorer/

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems most of us with rahu-mars combo follow the same pattern of pooja to a good extent. I also worship Ganeshji , do arti of Hanumanji , Hanuman stuti, and Durga mantras in my morning pooja.

 

Rahu also represents Durga seated on a Lion.

For those who may not be aware, Lal Kitab prescribes Durga Chalisa, Durga Stuti for the planet Rahu.

 

In Your case, Vrischik lagna itself represents Mars and Hanumanji as the consequent diety. Mars alongwith Rahu from the 9th house of Dharma, is aspecting the Lagna, and also the 5th house (5th and 9th aspect of Rahu) of Pooja.Your lagna is again influenced by a female Diety as Venus is placed in it in the Natal Chart. (The Moon in Navamsha goes to Taurus sign owned by Venus representing a female Diety.)

 

Ketu, Budh and Shani are all 3 aspecting your 5th house, since Saturn is doing so, and since the rest of the other two planets are spaced within 6 degrees each forming a particular yoga (There is a word for this connected to Light, which I cannot remember presently). Saturn incidentally also owns the Vimsamsa Lagna.

 

Your 12th house bears a joint aspect both of Jupiter and Saturn, while saturn is influencing both the 5th as well as the 9th house.

 

Mars as the atmakaraka has the planet Ketu behind it in the Karakamsha which is a good sign for spiritual upliftment in this Life. A potential promise of elevations.

 

Though as Hindus we know that one must worship Ganeshji first before we move onto doing other recitations, but with Your Moon in Magha, owned by Ketu, you will have a natural affinity for Ganeshji. Magha is a great Planet connected to the Pitrus and dead ancestors and if one can pacify them and gain their blessings, then his progress is assured. In Your case there is a clear indications of Rina to ancestors and own father. (Your Paternal association shows some upheavals ,trial and tribulations and association not completed in full - I may be wrong, you know better).

 

Do not worry about the Lagna Lord Mars debilitation, because it is Retro and also at the fag end of the sign Karka and will instead give you good benefits rather than results of debilitation (Except trouble in leg portions which would come).

 

Though you did not ask for this input but I must say that near about February 2010 you will have change of place, residence and would shift, if you are planning to do so.Your chart has very good promises for wealth creations.

 

I also notice that there has been many challenges in Your Life (Though you have mentioned that you are enjoying in Canada), and things have not been achieved easily by you. There have certainly been struggle in your Life, some very unpleasant phases in both personal and professional Life . You have also been struggling with Your inner self to attain your set goals in Life (Now I am talking about spiritual and not material) and there have been occasions when you have pushed yourself to change many characteristsics of Your ownself in order to achieve these goals.

 

Your chart has very good promises for spiritual growth. Get prepared for the Rahu Mahadasha next year. It will create effect great changes in your Life, apparently difficult initially for first 3 months, but subsequently will set you on a grand scale of progress both materially and spiritually.

 

best wishes,

Bhaskar. , Akhil Mishra <astro6301 wrote:>> Dear Bhaskar ji> Nmaskar,> Really I appreciate your words , that My lagan is Vrashik and in my 9th house Mars and Rahu exist, and my profession is a Medicinal chemist and P.hD in Organic chemistry, but since 1981 , I firts pray Ganapati , and becuase I have no Guru so read Hanuman stututi and Hanuman chalisa and at last Bhagwati Durgra and I also do strota loudly and I am enjoying my time in Canada.> Could you exactly tell me what are basics behind it.> AKHILESHDOB# 13-01-1963 , TIME : 04:10 am, PLACE CHITRAKUT ( up) OR TAKE MANIKPUR.> REGARDDR MISHRA> > --- On Sun, 10/4/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish wrote:> > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish Re: Suitability of Mantra> > Received: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 6:35 PM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Pranadas ji,> > Yes that is the truth actually.> > Some people dont know the essence of astrology, for which I am not even sure I should blame them or not, bcoz in todays astrology all they know is that Saturn,Rahu and Mars is bad, and Sun in 7th creates divorce and all this bankas bakwaas. They treat the planets as bad, rather than understanding the theory of Karma and the resultant Prarabdha which is Bhogya through the instruments and nature of these planets. Mata Kakeyi was not evil, she was just an instrument in the play of the lords Avataar on earth. But mand buddhis will not understand this.> > Rahu is also seated in my lagna in degreecal conjunction with Mars. It aspects my 5th and 9th, as well as 4th and 8th.> I normally when sit for pooja, recite my mantras loudly(Average) and can sit for 3 hours at a stretch without rest on the asana. I am normally reciting sanskrit stotras so love to make them audible. I also recite Durga saptashathi which I love very much alongwith the Nitya patha. My favourite Diety is Lord Krishna, but I treat all the major Gods as part of the family and recite mantras for all of them. In fact day before yesterday I met my mantra Guru and he asked me to increase my patha of Lord Shankara. I reminded him that my favourite mantra is what he gave me 25 years back was of (He completed this sentence for me )Lord Krishna. He counter questioned me , " what do you say when doing Arti of Shankar Bhagwaan " ? I was perplexed at his question and muttered something incohensible. He replied to his own question " You sing - Brahma vishnu Sadashiv.... .. If You sing this then why do you not mean it? If You also do Pooja of Shankar Bhagwaan and then> do Mantra of lord Krishna you will get more benefits, as Lord Shankara loves Lord Krishna" . This replye and explanation from My Guruji closed my query.> > To top it, after meeting my guruji in Bikaner and reaching home(Jaipur) at midnight, when I went to sleep I dreamt of a thousand snakes all around me, and felt no fear in my dream, and at the close of the dream got a Darshan of lord Shankar taking the Ganga on His locks. This dream was as if to confirm what my Guruji mentioned.> > I am into Rahu mahadasha presently and my Guru antar has just started a fortnight ago. Since last 2 years I have been having many dreams of saints and Venerated personages appearing in my dreams and blessing me. This is the power of Rahu.> > All above I did not wish to reveal but doing so just to affirm and break stupid modern misconceptions, by relaying and relating experiences in Rahu period, with Rahu aspecting 5th, through first person. I also have the Moon in my 5th house -Sagittarius aspected by the Sun and Mercury in Gemini from 11th . (I was born on Poornima). I also have the Kaivalya Yoga in my Kundli (Ketu 12th from karakamsha in navamsha). As per KP I have already been predicted Moksha recently by Shri Yogesh Rao Lajmi ji and also another KP Senior. But I am not taking chances like a Karmaheena waiting for destiny to gift me, but instead working on my efforts and Karmas to achieve this. rest God knows.> > best wishes,> Bhaskar. > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, s s freemorons@ ..> wrote:> >> > Dear Bhaskarji and others,> > I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone claiming> > that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely personal> > experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in rapt> > concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the inner> > depths of our self. As such, one cannot "prove" that s/he has had mantra> > sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.> > > > As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I am not> > sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution (I am a> > devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I have of> > Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not> > otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well (i> > think)...would anyone care to comment?> > > > Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually quoting> > texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus statements> > like "rahu in 5th will not give sadhana"...we all know that it is impossible> > to state anything without looking at relative placements of all planets.> > > > hari smaraNs,> > prANadAsa.> > > > > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... wrote:> > > > >> > >> > > Now you are talking some sense. Dont waste my> > > time in asking me to give abc of astrology. Learn this yourself please.> > > This is what I wanted you to understand that Rahu in 5th will provide> > > one the traits of how the native will do his mantra sadhana, but because> > > Rahu is there in 5th does not mean that "Mantra Sadhana" is denied to> > > him. This is bakwaas.> > >> > > I dont have to provide evidence in support of whatever I say. Believe it> > > or not. Accept it or not. In this case for such a simple topic it is> > > understood that a person who dares to discuss should know by using some> > > of his brains that when I Mentioned "Vocal" and "Loud" and "Nature of> > > results ", it is pretty evident what I am talking about. Spoon feeding> > > if one wants, then better go to a kindergarten class.> > >> > > Rahu additionally will make the native go for tamasik Mantras of Dieties> > > of Rudra type . (Now dont ask me to give evidence, but use your brains> > > please)> > >> > > Bhaskar.> > >> > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40. com>,> > > "utkal.panigrahi"> > >> > > utkal.panigrahi@ wrote:> > > >> > > > it's a common knowledge that rahu's link to shakti sadhana is figment> > > of imagination done by jyotishis in 70's decade, kk pathak and others> > > published no of articles in A.M.> > > >> > > > rahu in 5'th or in lagna is liable to failure of sadhana, such a rahu> > > affects concentration required for doing sadhana, native becomes fancy> > > and gets lost therein. need to understand difference in traits of rahu> > > (attachment to materialism) and ketu (detachment to materialism) .> > > >> > > > he is asking evidences whereas he himself has not given evidence in> > > support of statement in hurry - "rahu in 5'th will give LOUD or VOCAL> > > mantra sadhana", a statement similar to rahu's trait.> > > >> > > >> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40. com>,> > > ShankaraBharadwaj> > > Khandavalli shankarabharadwaj@ wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > > >> > > > > I agree for the most part. Material-Spiritual natures of Rahu-Ketu> > > cannot be made to read that one would do matra sadhana or not. At most,> > > that would only convey the kind of results of such sadhana - whether the> > > sadhana will confer material or inner benefits. But that too, is> > > dependent not on the mantra devata as such but the dasa one is going> > > through. After all, any serious sadhana will result in every kind of> > > improvement in one's life and the whole being.> > > > >> > > > > In general it is the Mantra devata that is known from 5th. The> > > Adhisthana devata of planet owning or falling in the 5th will be the> > > Mantra devata. Thus Rahu's influence will make one take to Jatavedasi> > > Durga specifically or Durga in general. Ganapati would be fruitful if> > > there is Ketu in the 5th. Also, since they are always aspecting each> > > other, both would be fruitful in many cases. However whether one does> > > patha or antarjapa or something, whether one would attain siddi is> > > dependent on many other factors.> > > > >> > > > > Shankar> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@> > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40. com>> > > > > Sunday, October 4, 2009 11:10:38 AM> > > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Nonsense Jyotish> > > > >> > > > > Rahu in 5th will not give mantra Sadhana.> > > > > Ketu in 5th will give mantra Sadhana.> > > > >> > > > > Actual Jyotish> > > > >> > > > > 1)Any planet in 5th will actually be a significator for> > > > > Mantra Sadhana. In fact will give addittion to what> > > > > native would have ordinarily done in absence of> > > > > any planet in the 5th.> > > > >> > > > > 2) The planet in 5th will show the nature of Mantra> > > > > Sadhana.> > > > >> > > > > 3) Rahu in 5th will make the native take up Vocal> > > > > or loud Mantra Sadhana which he will enjoy.> > > > > Ketu in 5th instead would make the native enjoy> > > > > silent japa.> > > > >> > > > > 4) Planets are instruments to show the nature of> > > > > results, native will face due to his Prarabdha, Dridha> > > > > or Adridha, and also Kriyaman karmas. Planets are> > > > > not the cause but just the source and imply the way> > > > > or nature results would manifest.> > > > >> > > > > etc.> > > > >> > > > > Bhaskar.> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________> Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet Explorer® 8. Optimized for Get it Now for Free! at http://downloads./ca/internetexplorer/>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Respected Bhaskarji,

kindly accept my heartiest thanks for heart to heart talk.

now,if native's lives were long enough to find the ultimate theory of existence,every thing would have been solved in his previous births.But it does not happen so again he has to indulge in unfolding the truths that can happen only in 5h as this house is house of womb

signifying the capacity to absorve, preserve and produce in a new form.that is what rahu does in 5h.

it is wrritten in many classic if rahu is with mandi,or aspected by mars or together in 5h,it is the combination of sarp dosha.the curses of previous lives.but then we all know astrology is

directly related to the past,the present and the future birth.It is being referred to in every hindu sripture and repeatedly in Gita.that reincarnation reinforces belief in three inter connected observation and traditional beliefs,the first is what is known as karmaphala,or result of our karma of the past life.secondly is karmasanskara or psychomental emotional tendencies of the previous life.third is birth mark.

what planetary combination you have mentioned in your [i dont know your exact birth details]chart,yours is leo lagna with mars and rahu in lagna in degree conjunction.in various

classic rahu -mars combination again termed as something the result of ones bad karmas

in ones past life.what has been suggested that this combination blemishes the jeev of the concerned house.one gets or not gets is due to his past karma.[you can comment on this theory!]

In your chart mars rahu together in leo fiery sign.rahu a serpent and mars Kartikeya or hanumanji,but in your case it is more a Rudra [destroyer/fiery sign]there can be no other than Mahadev whose worship is need of the hour.you are Blessed ,may be because of your past karmas that you saw him in your dreams.Aise hi hai M ahadev!! i dont know the placement of rahu in navamsha but rahu mars combination running dasha of rahu ,one often sees snakes in ones dream. I wish to share my personal experience my Rahu is with exalted mars in 12h,mars is also the dispositor of jupiter placed in 10h.this rahu is with exalted jupiter and vargottam sun placed in 9h of navamsha.when my jupiter rahu dasha was running i took the toughest pilgrimages of my life starting from kedarnath,amarnath,mani mahesh and then the latest Kailash Mansarovar.the p lacement of rahu sun in 9h destroys the jeev [i lost my father in my teenage]but otherwise

what best one can ask for from this combination.I am shiv bhakta share the finest compatibilty and proximity with him.So no complaints.

Regards.

Vandana Mishra

..--- On Sun, 10/4/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Re: Suitability of Mantra Date: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 6:35 PM

 

Dear Pranadas ji,

 

Yes that is the truth actually.

 

Some people dont know the essence of astrology, for which I am not even sure I should blame them or not, bcoz in todays astrology all they know is that Saturn,Rahu and Mars is bad, and Sun in 7th creates divorce and all this bankas bakwaas. They treat the planets as bad, rather than understanding the theory of Karma and the resultant Prarabdha which is Bhogya through the instruments and nature of these planets. Mata Kakeyi was not evil, she was just an instrument in the play of the lords Avataar on earth. But mand buddhis will not understand this.

 

Rahu is also seated in my lagna in degreecal conjunction with Mars. It aspects my 5th and 9th, as well as 4th and 8th..

I normally when sit for pooja, recite my mantras loudly(Average) and can sit for 3 hours at a stretch without rest on the asana. I am normally reciting sanskrit stotras so love to make them audible. I also recite Durga saptashathi which I love very much alongwith the Nitya patha. My favourite Diety is Lord Krishna, but I treat all the major Gods as part of the family and recite mantras for all of them. In fact day before yesterday I met my mantra Guru and he asked me to increase my patha of Lord Shankara. I reminded him that my favourite mantra is what he gave me 25 years back was of (He completed this sentence for me )Lord Krishna. He counter questioned me , " what do you say when doing Arti of Shankar Bhagwaan " ? I was perplexed at his question and muttered something incohensible. He replied to his own question " You sing - Brahma vishnu Sadashiv.... .. If You sing this then why do you not mean it? If You also

do Pooja of Shankar Bhagwaan and then do Mantra of lord Krishna you will get more benefits, as Lord Shankara loves Lord Krishna" . This replye and explanation from My Guruji closed my query.

 

To top it, after meeting my guruji in Bikaner and reaching home(Jaipur) at midnight, when I went to sleep I dreamt of a thousand snakes all around me, and felt no fear in my dream, and at the close of the dream got a Darshan of lord Shankar taking the Ganga on His locks. This dream was as if to confirm what my Guruji mentioned.

 

I am into Rahu mahadasha presently and my Guru antar has just started a fortnight ago. Since last 2 years I have been having many dreams of saints and Venerated personages appearing in my dreams and blessing me. This is the power of Rahu.

 

All above I did not wish to reveal but doing so just to affirm and break stupid modern misconceptions, by relaying and relating experiences in Rahu period, with Rahu aspecting 5th, through first person. I also have the Moon in my 5th house -Sagittarius aspected by the Sun and Mercury in Gemini from 11th . (I was born on Poornima). I also have the Kaivalya Yoga in my Kundli (Ketu 12th from karakamsha in navamsha). As per KP I have already been predicted Moksha recently by Shri Yogesh Rao Lajmi ji and also another KP Senior. But I am not taking chances like a Karmaheena waiting for destiny to gift me, but instead working on my efforts and Karmas to achieve this. rest God knows.

best wishes,

Bhaskar.

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, s s <freemorons@. ..> wrote:>> Dear Bhaskarji and others,> I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone claiming> that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely personal> experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in rapt> concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the inner> depths of our self. As such, one cannot "prove" that s/he has had mantra> sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru..> > As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I am not> sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution (I am a> devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I have of> Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not> otherwise).. . Mercury is

not very strong in my horoscope as well (i> think)...would anyone care to comment?> > Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually quoting> texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus statements> like "rahu in 5th will not give sadhana"...we all know that it is impossible> to state anything without looking at relative placements of all planets.> > hari smaraNs,> prANadAsa.> > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... wrote:> > >> >> > Now you are talking some sense. Dont waste my> > time in asking me to give abc of astrology. Learn this yourself please..> > This is what I wanted you to understand that Rahu in 5th will provide> > one the traits of how the native will do his mantra sadhana, but because> > Rahu is there in 5th does not mean

that "Mantra Sadhana" is denied to> > him. This is bakwaas.> >> > I dont have to provide evidence in support of whatever I say. Believe it> > or not. Accept it or not. In this case for such a simple topic it is> > understood that a person who dares to discuss should know by using some> > of his brains that when I Mentioned "Vocal" and "Loud" and "Nature of> > results ", it is pretty evident what I am talking about. Spoon feeding> > if one wants, then better go to a kindergarten class.> >> > Rahu additionally will make the native go for tamasik Mantras of Dieties> > of Rudra type . (Now dont ask me to give evidence, but use your brains> > please)> >> > Bhaskar.> >> > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40. com>,> >

"utkal.panigrahi"> >> > utkal.panigrahi@ wrote:> > >> > > it's a common knowledge that rahu's link to shakti sadhana is figment> > of imagination done by jyotishis in 70's decade, kk pathak and others> > published no of articles in A..M.> > >> > > rahu in 5'th or in lagna is liable to failure of sadhana, such a rahu> > affects concentration required for doing sadhana, native becomes fancy> > and gets lost therein. need to understand difference in traits of rahu> > (attachment to materialism) and ketu (detachment to materialism) .> > >> > > he is asking evidences whereas he himself has not given evidence in> > support of statement in hurry - "rahu in 5'th will give LOUD or VOCAL> > mantra sadhana", a statement similar to rahu's trait.> > >> > >> > >

ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40. com>,> > ShankaraBharadwaj> > Khandavalli shankarabharadwaj@ wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > >> > > > I agree for the most part. Material-Spiritual natures of Rahu-Ketu> > cannot be made to read that one would do matra sadhana or not. At most,> > that would only convey the kind of results of such sadhana - whether the> > sadhana will confer material or inner benefits. But that too, is> > dependent not on the mantra devata as such but the dasa one is going> > through. After all, any serious sadhana will result in every kind of> > improvement in one's life and the whole being.> > > >> > > > In general it is the Mantra devata that is known from 5th. The> >

Adhisthana devata of planet owning or falling in the 5th will be the> > Mantra devata. Thus Rahu's influence will make one take to Jatavedasi> > Durga specifically or Durga in general. Ganapati would be fruitful if> > there is Ketu in the 5th. Also, since they are always aspecting each> > other, both would be fruitful in many cases. However whether one does> > patha or antarjapa or something, whether one would attain siddi is> > dependent on many other factors..> > > >> > > > Shankar> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40.. com>> > > > Sunday, October 4, 2009

11:10:38 AM> > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Nonsense Jyotish> > > >> > > > Rahu in 5th will not give mantra Sadhana.> > > > Ketu in 5th will give mantra Sadhana.> > > >> > > > Actual Jyotish> > > >> > > > 1)Any planet in 5th will actually be a significator for> > > > Mantra Sadhana. In fact will give addittion to what> > > > native would have ordinarily done in absence of> > > > any planet in the 5th.> > > >> > > > 2) The planet in 5th will show the nature of Mantra> > > > Sadhana.> > > >> > > > 3) Rahu in 5th will make the native take up Vocal> > > > or loud

Mantra Sadhana which he will enjoy.> > > > Ketu in 5th instead would make the native enjoy> > > > silent japa.> > > >> > > > 4) Planets are instruments to show the nature of> > > > results, native will face due to his Prarabdha, Dridha> > > > or Adridha, and also Kriyaman karmas. Planets are> > > > not the cause but just the source and imply the way> > > > or nature results would manifest.> > > >> > > > etc.> > > >> > > > Bhaskar.> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Friends,

 

As far as my knowledge goes, no one except a siddha or a mantra drishta can suggest a mantra for an individual. Mantra Drishta means one who can see what mantra is suitable for whom and this is what Shri K.N. Rao has written on the subject in his book, Yogis Destiny and Wheel of Time.

 

Rest all methods have failed when tried, including the jaimini ones.

 

regards,

 

Mouji--- On Mon, 10/5/09, Akhil Mishra <astro6301 wrote:

Akhil Mishra <astro6301Re: Re: Suitability of Mantra Date: Monday, October 5, 2009, 9:15 AM

 

 

 

 

Dear Bhaskar ji

 

Nmaskar,

 

Really I appreciate your words , that My lagan is Vrashik and in my 9th house Mars and Rahu exist, and my profession is a Medicinal chemist and P.hD in Organic chemistry, but since 1981 , I firts pray Ganapati , and becuase I have no Guru so read Hanuman stututi and Hanuman chalisa and at last Bhagwati Durgra and I also do strota loudly and I am enjoying my time in Canada.

 

Could you exactly tell me what are basics behind it.

 

AKHILESH

DOB# 13-01-1963 , TIME : 04:10 am, PLACE CHITRAKUT ( up) OR TAKE MANIKPUR.

 

REGARD

DR MISHRA

--- On Sun, 10/4/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> wrote:

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in>[ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantraancient_indian_ astrologyReceived: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 6:35 PM

 

Dear Pranadas ji,

 

Yes that is the truth actually.

 

Some people dont know the essence of astrology, for which I am not even sure I should blame them or not, bcoz in todays astrology all they know is that Saturn,Rahu and Mars is bad, and Sun in 7th creates divorce and all this bankas bakwaas. They treat the planets as bad, rather than understanding the theory of Karma and the resultant Prarabdha which is Bhogya through the instruments and nature of these planets. Mata Kakeyi was not evil, she was just an instrument in the play of the lords Avataar on earth. But mand buddhis will not understand this.

 

Rahu is also seated in my lagna in degreecal conjunction with Mars. It aspects my 5th and 9th, as well as 4th and 8th.

I normally when sit for pooja, recite my mantras loudly(Average) and can sit for 3 hours at a stretch without rest on the asana. I am normally reciting sanskrit stotras so love to make them audible. I also recite Durga saptashathi which I love very much alongwith the Nitya patha. My favourite Diety is Lord Krishna, but I treat all the major Gods as part of the family and recite mantras for all of them. In fact day before yesterday I met my mantra Guru and he asked me to increase my patha of Lord Shankara. I reminded him that my favourite mantra is what he gave me 25 years back was of (He completed this sentence for me )Lord Krishna. He counter questioned me , " what do you say when doing Arti of Shankar Bhagwaan " ? I was perplexed at his question and muttered something incohensible. He replied to his own question " You sing - Brahma vishnu Sadashiv.... .. If You sing this then why do you not mean it? If You also

do Pooja of Shankar Bhagwaan and then do Mantra of lord Krishna you will get more benefits, as Lord Shankara loves Lord Krishna" . This replye and explanation from My Guruji closed my query.

 

To top it, after meeting my guruji in Bikaner and reaching home(Jaipur) at midnight, when I went to sleep I dreamt of a thousand snakes all around me, and felt no fear in my dream, and at the close of the dream got a Darshan of lord Shankar taking the Ganga on His locks. This dream was as if to confirm what my Guruji mentioned.

 

I am into Rahu mahadasha presently and my Guru antar has just started a fortnight ago. Since last 2 years I have been having many dreams of saints and Venerated personages appearing in my dreams and blessing me. This is the power of Rahu.

 

All above I did not wish to reveal but doing so just to affirm and break stupid modern misconceptions, by relaying and relating experiences in Rahu period, with Rahu aspecting 5th, through first person. I also have the Moon in my 5th house -Sagittarius aspected by the Sun and Mercury in Gemini from 11th . (I was born on Poornima). I also have the Kaivalya Yoga in my Kundli (Ketu 12th from karakamsha in navamsha). As per KP I have already been predicted Moksha recently by Shri Yogesh Rao Lajmi ji and also another KP Senior. But I am not taking chances like a Karmaheena waiting for destiny to gift me, but instead working on my efforts and Karmas to achieve this. rest God knows.

best wishes,

Bhaskar.

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, s s <freemorons@. ..> wrote:>> Dear Bhaskarji and others,> I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone claiming> that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely personal> experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in rapt> concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the inner> depths of our self. As such, one cannot "prove" that s/he has had mantra> sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.> > As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I am not> sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution (I am a> devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I have of> Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not> otherwise).. . Mercury is

not very strong in my horoscope as well (i> think)...would anyone care to comment?> > Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually quoting> texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus statements> like "rahu in 5th will not give sadhana"...we all know that it is impossible> to state anything without looking at relative placements of all planets.> > hari smaraNs,> prANadAsa.> > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... wrote:> > >> >> > Now you are talking some sense. Dont waste my> > time in asking me to give abc of astrology. Learn this yourself please.> > This is what I wanted you to understand that Rahu in 5th will provide> > one the traits of how the native will do his mantra sadhana, but because> > Rahu is there in 5th does not mean

that "Mantra Sadhana" is denied to> > him. This is bakwaas.> >> > I dont have to provide evidence in support of whatever I say. Believe it> > or not. Accept it or not. In this case for such a simple topic it is> > understood that a person who dares to discuss should know by using some> > of his brains that when I Mentioned "Vocal" and "Loud" and "Nature of> > results ", it is pretty evident what I am talking about. Spoon feeding> > if one wants, then better go to a kindergarten class.> >> > Rahu additionally will make the native go for tamasik Mantras of Dieties> > of Rudra type . (Now dont ask me to give evidence, but use your brains> > please)> >> > Bhaskar.> >> > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40. com>,> >

"utkal.panigrahi"> >> > utkal.panigrahi@ wrote:> > >> > > it's a common knowledge that rahu's link to shakti sadhana is figment> > of imagination done by jyotishis in 70's decade, kk pathak and others> > published no of articles in A.M.> > >> > > rahu in 5'th or in lagna is liable to failure of sadhana, such a rahu> > affects concentration required for doing sadhana, native becomes fancy> > and gets lost therein. need to understand difference in traits of rahu> > (attachment to materialism) and ketu (detachment to materialism) .> > >> > > he is asking evidences whereas he himself has not given evidence in> > support of statement in hurry - "rahu in 5'th will give LOUD or VOCAL> > mantra sadhana", a statement similar to rahu's trait.> > >> > >> > >

ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40. com>,> > ShankaraBharadwaj> > Khandavalli shankarabharadwaj@ wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > >> > > > I agree for the most part. Material-Spiritual natures of Rahu-Ketu> > cannot be made to read that one would do matra sadhana or not. At most,> > that would only convey the kind of results of such sadhana - whether the> > sadhana will confer material or inner benefits. But that too, is> > dependent not on the mantra devata as such but the dasa one is going> > through. After all, any serious sadhana will result in every kind of> > improvement in one's life and the whole being.> > > >> > > > In general it is the Mantra devata that is known from 5th. The> >

Adhisthana devata of planet owning or falling in the 5th will be the> > Mantra devata. Thus Rahu's influence will make one take to Jatavedasi> > Durga specifically or Durga in general. Ganapati would be fruitful if> > there is Ketu in the 5th. Also, since they are always aspecting each> > other, both would be fruitful in many cases. However whether one does> > patha or antarjapa or something, whether one would attain siddi is> > dependent on many other factors.> > > >> > > > Shankar> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40. com>> > > > Sunday, October 4, 2009

11:10:38 AM> > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Nonsense Jyotish> > > >> > > > Rahu in 5th will not give mantra Sadhana.> > > > Ketu in 5th will give mantra Sadhana.> > > >> > > > Actual Jyotish> > > >> > > > 1)Any planet in 5th will actually be a significator for> > > > Mantra Sadhana. In fact will give addittion to what> > > > native would have ordinarily done in absence of> > > > any planet in the 5th.> > > >> > > > 2) The planet in 5th will show the nature of Mantra> > > > Sadhana.> > > >> > > > 3) Rahu in 5th will make the native take up Vocal> > > > or loud

Mantra Sadhana which he will enjoy.> > > > Ketu in 5th instead would make the native enjoy> > > > silent japa.> > > >> > > > 4) Planets are instruments to show the nature of> > > > results, native will face due to his Prarabdha, Dridha> > > > or Adridha, and also Kriyaman karmas. Planets are> > > > not the cause but just the source and imply the way> > > > or nature results would manifest.> > > >> > > > etc.> > > >> > > > Bhaskar.> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Mouji Sahab,

 

I thought you had bid us good bye. Nice to see you back. Aapke rahne se

yahan par mouj rahti hai.

 

I do not think that at this age Mishraji is asking anybody for a proper

mantra. One Indian Hindu normally does not change his wife or favourite

Diety at this age. He is talking something else.

 

What you mention is right. Just anybody cannot " pradaan " a mantra to

another anybody .

 

But from where does one find a Siddha or a Mantra Drista. Its not

commonly accessible to all. Therefore whatever one feels homely with, he

can choose his Diety and pray. It all goes to the same Superpower. In

the Bhagavad Gita Lord Krishna has clearly mentioned so. " Whomever you

pray, it finally reaches me. "

 

I personally do not think this or that Diety matters. Ultimately Shiva

would not accept those who do not accept Vishnu and vice versa, as

written in the Ramayana, again clearly. No diety is going to create

miracles for anybody unless the native is running a proper Life as per

laws of Nature-Prakriti.

 

regards/Bhaskar.

 

 

, Manoj Kumar

<mouji99 wrote:

>

> Dear Friends,

>

> As far as my knowledge goes, no one except a siddha or a mantra

drishta can suggest a mantra for an individual. Mantra Drishta means one

who can see what mantra is suitable for whom and this is what Shri K.N.

Rao has written on the subject in his book, Yogis Destiny and Wheel of

Time.

>

> Rest all methods have failed when tried, including the jaimini ones.

>

> regards,

>

> Mouji

>

> --- On Mon, 10/5/09, Akhil Mishra astro6301 wrote:

>

>

> Akhil Mishra astro6301

> Re: Re: Suitability of Mantra

>

> Monday, October 5, 2009, 9:15 AM

>

>

>

>

Dear Bhaskar ji

>

>

> Nmaskar,

>

>

> Really I appreciate your words , that My lagan is Vrashik and in my

9th house Mars and Rahu exist, and my profession is a Medicinal

chemist and P.hD in Organic chemistry, but since 1981 , I firts pray

Ganapati , and becuase I have no Guru so read Hanuman stututi and

Hanuman chalisa and at last Bhagwati Durgra and I also do strota

loudly and I am enjoying my time in Canada.

>

>

> Could you exactly tell me what are basics behind it.

>

>

> AKHILESH

> DOB# 13-01-1963 , TIME : 04:10 am, PLACE CHITRAKUT ( up) OR TAKE

MANIKPUR.

>

>

> REGARD

> DR MISHRA

>

>

> --- On Sun, 10/4/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> wrote:

>

>

> Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in>

> [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra

> ancient_indian_ astrology

> Received: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 6:35 PM

>

>

>

>

>

> Dear Pranadas ji,

>

> Yes that is the truth actually.

>

> Some people dont know the essence of astrology, for which I am not

even sure I should blame them or not, bcoz in todays astrology all they

know is that Saturn,Rahu and Mars is bad, and Sun in 7th creates divorce

and all this bankas bakwaas. They treat the planets as bad, rather than

understanding the theory of Karma and the resultant Prarabdha which is

Bhogya through the instruments and nature of these planets. Mata Kakeyi

was not evil, she was just an instrument in the play of the lords

Avataar on earth. But mand buddhis will not understand this.

>

> Rahu is also seated in my lagna in degreecal conjunction with Mars. It

aspects my 5th and 9th, as well as 4th and 8th.

> I normally when sit for pooja, recite my mantras loudly(Average) and

can sit for 3 hours at a stretch without rest on the asana. I am

normally reciting sanskrit stotras so love to make them audible. I also

recite Durga saptashathi which I love very much alongwith the Nitya

patha. My favourite Diety is Lord Krishna, but I treat all the major

Gods as part of the family and recite mantras for all of them. In fact

day before yesterday I met my mantra Guru and he asked me to increase my

patha of Lord Shankara. I reminded him that my favourite mantra is what

he gave me 25 years back was of (He completed this sentence for me )Lord

Krishna. He counter questioned me , " what do you say when doing Arti of

Shankar Bhagwaan " ? I was perplexed at his question and muttered

something incohensible. He replied to his own question " You sing -

Brahma vishnu Sadashiv.... .. If You sing this then why do you not mean

it? If You also do Pooja of Shankar Bhagwaan and then

> do Mantra of lord Krishna you will get more benefits, as Lord Shankara

loves Lord Krishna " . This replye and explanation from My Guruji closed

my query.

>

> To top it, after meeting my guruji in Bikaner and reaching

home(Jaipur) at midnight, when I went to sleep I dreamt of a thousand

snakes all around me, and felt no fear in my dream, and at the close of

the dream got a Darshan of lord Shankar taking the Ganga on His locks.

This dream was as if to confirm what my Guruji mentioned.

>

> I am into Rahu mahadasha presently and my Guru antar has just started

a fortnight ago. Since last 2 years I have been having many dreams of

saints and Venerated personages appearing in my dreams and blessing me.

This is the power of Rahu.

>

> All above I did not wish to reveal but doing so just to affirm and

break stupid modern misconceptions, by relaying and relating experiences

in Rahu period, with Rahu aspecting 5th, through first person. I also

have the Moon in my 5th house -Sagittarius aspected by the Sun and

Mercury in Gemini from 11th . (I was born on Poornima). I also have the

Kaivalya Yoga in my Kundli (Ketu 12th from karakamsha in navamsha). As

per KP I have already been predicted Moksha recently by Shri Yogesh Rao

Lajmi ji and also another KP Senior. But I am not taking chances like a

Karmaheena waiting for destiny to gift me, but instead working on my

efforts and Karmas to achieve this. rest God knows.

>

> best wishes,

> Bhaskar.

>

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, s s freemorons@

...> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Bhaskarji and others,

> > I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone

claiming

> > that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely

personal

> > experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in

rapt

> > concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the

inner

> > depths of our self. As such, one cannot " prove " that s/he has had

mantra

> > sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.

> >

> > As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I

am not

> > sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution

(I am a

> > devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I

have of

> > Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not

> > otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well (i

> > think)...would anyone care to comment?

> >

> > Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually

quoting

> > texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus

statements

> > like " rahu in 5th will not give sadhana " ...we all know that it is

impossible

> > to state anything without looking at relative placements of all

planets.

> >

> > hari smaraNs,

> > prANadAsa.

> >

> >

> > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > > Now you are talking some sense. Dont waste my

> > > time in asking me to give abc of astrology. Learn this yourself

please.

> > > This is what I wanted you to understand that Rahu in 5th will

provide

> > > one the traits of how the native will do his mantra sadhana, but

because

> > > Rahu is there in 5th does not mean that " Mantra Sadhana " is denied

to

> > > him. This is bakwaas.

> > >

> > > I dont have to provide evidence in support of whatever I say.

Believe it

> > > or not. Accept it or not. In this case for such a simple topic it

is

> > > understood that a person who dares to discuss should know by using

some

> > > of his brains that when I Mentioned " Vocal " and " Loud " and " Nature

of

> > > results " , it is pretty evident what I am talking about. Spoon

feeding

> > > if one wants, then better go to a kindergarten class.

> > >

> > > Rahu additionally will make the native go for tamasik Mantras of

Dieties

> > > of Rudra type . (Now dont ask me to give evidence, but use your

brains

> > > please)

> > >

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_

astrology% 40. com>,

> > > " utkal.panigrahi "

> > >

> > > utkal.panigrahi@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > it's a common knowledge that rahu's link to shakti sadhana is

figment

> > > of imagination done by jyotishis in 70's decade, kk pathak and

others

> > > published no of articles in A.M.

> > > >

> > > > rahu in 5'th or in lagna is liable to failure of sadhana, such a

rahu

> > > affects concentration required for doing sadhana, native becomes

fancy

> > > and gets lost therein. need to understand difference in traits of

rahu

> > > (attachment to materialism) and ketu (detachment to materialism) .

> > > >

> > > > he is asking evidences whereas he himself has not given evidence

in

> > > support of statement in hurry - " rahu in 5'th will give LOUD or

VOCAL

> > > mantra sadhana " , a statement similar to rahu's trait.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology@ .

com<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40. com>,

> > > ShankaraBharadwaj

> > > Khandavalli shankarabharadwaj@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > I agree for the most part. Material-Spiritual natures of

Rahu-Ketu

> > > cannot be made to read that one would do matra sadhana or not. At

most,

> > > that would only convey the kind of results of such sadhana -

whether the

> > > sadhana will confer material or inner benefits. But that too, is

> > > dependent not on the mantra devata as such but the dasa one is

going

> > > through. After all, any serious sadhana will result in every kind

of

> > > improvement in one's life and the whole being.

> > > > >

> > > > > In general it is the Mantra devata that is known from 5th. The

> > > Adhisthana devata of planet owning or falling in the 5th will be

the

> > > Mantra devata. Thus Rahu's influence will make one take to

Jatavedasi

> > > Durga specifically or Durga in general. Ganapati would be fruitful

if

> > > there is Ketu in the 5th. Also, since they are always aspecting

each

> > > other, both would be fruitful in many cases. However whether one

does

> > > patha or antarjapa or something, whether one would attain siddi is

> > > dependent on many other factors.

> > > > >

> > > > > Shankar

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

> > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology@ .

com<ancient_indian_ astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > Sunday, October 4, 2009 11:10:38 AM

> > > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Nonsense Jyotish

> > > > >

> > > > > Rahu in 5th will not give mantra Sadhana.

> > > > > Ketu in 5th will give mantra Sadhana.

> > > > >

> > > > > Actual Jyotish

> > > > >

> > > > > 1)Any planet in 5th will actually be a significator for

> > > > > Mantra Sadhana. In fact will give addittion to what

> > > > > native would have ordinarily done in absence of

> > > > > any planet in the 5th.

> > > > >

> > > > > 2) The planet in 5th will show the nature of Mantra

> > > > > Sadhana.

> > > > >

> > > > > 3) Rahu in 5th will make the native take up Vocal

> > > > > or loud Mantra Sadhana which he will enjoy.

> > > > > Ketu in 5th instead would make the native enjoy

> > > > > silent japa.

> > > > >

> > > > > 4) Planets are instruments to show the nature of

> > > > > results, native will face due to his Prarabdha, Dridha

> > > > > or Adridha, and also Kriyaman karmas. Planets are

> > > > > not the cause but just the source and imply the way

> > > > > or nature results would manifest.

> > > > >

> > > > > etc.

> > > > >

> > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

>

>

>

> Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Pranadasa ji,Please do not humble me with such words. While I certainly do not mind taking a look, I have not learned Jyotisha. It is over to the learned members for that, I might just add a point from my limited understanding of the basics. Shankars s <freemorons Sent:

Monday, October 5, 2009 5:27:33 AMRe: Re: Suitability of Mantra

 

 

Dear Shankarji,My pranams to your feet for any guidance you can provide to me will be received with as much reverence as rAma pAduka...Please let me know if you and others would be willing to look at my chart to help me understand my spiritual side...a humble and sincere request by me.

hari smaraNs,prAnadAsa.On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 2:36 PM, ShankaraBharadwaj Khandavalli <shankarabharadwaj@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Pranadasa ji,Sakti sadhana being Rahu's contribution is something I mentioned too, but my reading is that in your case it should more be the lagna lord's contribution - Ve. Also, Ve and Me being mitra, both Devi and Vishnu worship should be fruitful. Of course, quick grace would be of whoever is stronger :)

Shankar

s s <freemorons (AT) gmail (DOT) com>To:

ancient_indian_ astrologySunday, October 4, 2009 8:57:12 PMRe: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra

 

 

 

Dear Bhaskarji and others,I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone claiming that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely personal experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in rapt concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the inner depths of our self. As such, one cannot "prove" that s/he has had mantra sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.

As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I am not sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution (I am a devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I have of Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well (i think)...would anyone care to comment?

Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually quoting texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus statements like "rahu in 5th will not give sadhana"...we all know that it is impossible to state anything without looking at relative placements of all planets.

hari smaraNs,prANadAsa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Vandana ji,

 

This combo does cause a blemish no doubt about that.Especially in the area where

it is manifested in the chart. But since we were talking about negating some

members comment about " Rahu does not allow sadhana " , I did not delve upon those

points. 2 days back a person who just settled in Jaipur after 2 years stay in

Japan, came to me with his kundli and had Rahu in his 5th. After checking other

influences I asked him " Did you have an abortion which the family members are

not aware of " ? He got shocked and said that his first child is actually the 3rd

child as the other two did not seethe sunlight. Rahu can do this in the 5th

house. Ketu can do similiar in the 4th house. There are so many matters which we

are yet to understand fully, and may never do so with a limited supply of years

to our LIfe and brains.

 

Rahu with Mars combo is a matter where inputs in Lal Kitab too asre

avilable.They have demarcated a postive combo and a negative combo with presence

of other combination in the chart.

 

You have a Fixed Lagna both in natal chart as well in Navamsha making the 9th a

badhaka in any case. A strange movement I noticed in Your chart. Jupiter

aspecting the Ketu and the Sun and the sign Cancer in Your Natal chart, and in

navamsha, Jupiter is thrown in the 9th alongwith Sun and the same sign Cancer.It

was denied providing help to your Father's longevity it seems by Divine

Proclamations.

 

Just like you mentioned that you undertook pilgrimages to teertha sthals related

to Shiva, in same manner I got a Darshan of Shiva and order from my Guru to

increase my pooja path related to Shiva. All pieces of the puzzles fall in place

when one contemplates.

 

I have seen snakes after 30 years this time in my dreams. The last I saw was my

mothers hair flowing long below the knees and flinging a big snake and chanting

Jai Ambe, in my dream. I asked my mother the next morning who is Ambe , and then

she explained me. I have also seen Ramdev Baba in my dreams holding me in his

arms,on his horse, and Lord Krishna has instructed me personally once in his

dream, and in another dream he just appeared some time before my son was born to

me 20 years ago though just smiled and said nothing.

 

My Birth details if you are interested - 28th June 1961. 10.15am.

Eluru. 16.45N 81.09E (Near Vijaywada).

 

I have Vargottama Lagna. The Sun.Moon,and Lagna in odd sign causing mahabhagya

Yoga as daytime birth.Many planets in fiery and odd signs.Rahu and mars in

Taurus in navamsha. If you may wish you may also check my vimsamsa chart and

please give your valued comments which would be much appreciated.

 

regards/Bhaskar.

 

 

 

, Vandna Misra

<vandana_mishra_91 wrote:

>

> Respected Bhaskarji,

> kindly accept my heartiest thanks for heart to heart talk.

> now,if native's lives were long enough to find the ultimate theory of

existence,every thing would have been solved in his previous births.But it does

not happen so again he has to indulge in unfolding the truths that can happen

only in 5h as this house is house of womb

> signifying the capacity to absorve, preserve and produce in a new form.that is

what rahu does in 5h.

> it is wrritten in many classic if rahu is with mandi,or aspected by mars or

together in 5h,it is the combination of sarp dosha.the curses of previous

lives.but then we all know astrology is

> directly related to the past,the present and the future birth.It is being

referred to in every hindu sripture and repeatedly in Gita.that reincarnation

reinforces belief in three inter connected observation and traditional

beliefs,the first is what is known as karmaphala,or result of our karma of the

past life.secondly is karmasanskara or psychomental emotional tendencies of the

previous life.third is birth mark.

> what planetary combination you have mentioned in your [i dont know your exact

birth details]chart,yours is leo lagna with mars and rahu in lagna in degree

conjunction.in various

> classic rahu -mars combination again termed as something the result of ones

bad karmas

> in ones past life.what has been suggested that this combination blemishes the

jeev of the concerned house.one gets or not gets is due to his past karma.[you

can comment on this theory!]

> In your chart mars rahu together in leo fiery sign.rahu a serpent and mars

Kartikeya or hanumanji,but in your case it is more a Rudra [destroyer/fiery

sign]there can be no other than Mahadev whose worship is need of the hour.you

are Blessed ,may be because of your past karmas that you saw him in your

dreams.Aise hi hai M ahadev!! i dont know the placement of rahu in navamsha but

rahu mars combination running dasha of rahu ,one often sees snakes in ones

dream. 

> I wish to share my personal experience my Rahu is with exalted mars in

12h,mars is also the dispositor of jupiter placed in 10h.this rahu is with

exalted jupiter and vargottam sun placed in 9h of navamsha.when my jupiter rahu

dasha was running i took the toughest pilgrimages of my life starting from

kedarnath,amarnath,mani mahesh and then the latest Kailash Mansarovar.the

p lacement of rahu sun  in 9h destroys the jeev [i lost my father in my

teenage]but otherwise what best one can ask  for from this combination.I am shiv

bhakta share the finest compatibilty and proximity with him.So no complaints.

> Regards.

> Vandana Mishra

> ..

> --- On Sun, 10/4/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

>

>

> Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

> Re: Suitability of Mantra

>

> Sunday, October 4, 2009, 6:35 PM

>

>

>  

>

>

>

>

> Dear Pranadas ji,

>  

> Yes that is the truth actually.

>  

> Some people dont know the essence of astrology, for which I am not even sure I

should blame them or not, bcoz in todays astrology all they know is that

Saturn,Rahu and Mars is bad, and Sun in 7th creates divorce and all this bankas

bakwaas. They treat the planets as bad, rather than understanding the theory of

Karma and the resultant Prarabdha which is Bhogya through the instruments and

nature of these planets. Mata Kakeyi was not evil, she was just an instrument in

the play of the lords Avataar on earth. But mand buddhis will not understand

this.

>  

> Rahu is also seated in my lagna in degreecal conjunction with Mars. It aspects

my 5th and 9th, as well as 4th and 8th.

> I normally when sit for pooja, recite my mantras loudly(Average) and can sit

for 3 hours at a stretch without rest on the asana.  I am normally reciting

sanskrit stotras so love to make them audible. I also recite Durga saptashathi

which I love very much alongwith the Nitya patha. My favourite Diety is Lord

Krishna, but I treat all the major Gods as part of the family and recite mantras

for all of them. In fact day before yesterday I met my mantra Guru and he asked

me to increase my patha of Lord Shankara. I reminded him that my favourite

mantra is what he gave me 25 years back was of (He completed this sentence for

me )Lord Krishna. He counter questioned me , " what do you say when doing Arti

of Shankar Bhagwaan " ? I was perplexed at his question and muttered something

incohensible. He replied to his own question " You sing - Brahma vishnu

Sadashiv.... .. If You sing this then why do you not mean it? If You also do

Pooja of Shankar Bhagwaan and then

> do Mantra of lord Krishna you will get more benefits, as Lord Shankara loves

Lord Krishna " . This replye and explanation from My Guruji closed my query.

>  

> To top it, after meeting my guruji in Bikaner and reaching home(Jaipur) at

midnight, when I went to sleep I dreamt of a thousand snakes all around me, and

felt no fear in my dream, and at the close of the dream got a Darshan of lord

Shankar taking the Ganga on His locks. This dream was as if to confirm what my

Guruji mentioned.

>  

> I am into Rahu mahadasha presently and my Guru antar has just started a

fortnight ago. Since last 2 years I have been having many dreams of saints and

Venerated personages appearing in my dreams and blessing me. This is the power

of Rahu.

>  

> All above I did not wish to reveal but doing so just to affirm and break

stupid modern misconceptions, by relaying and relating experiences in Rahu

period, with Rahu aspecting 5th, through first person. I also have the Moon in

my 5th house -Sagittarius aspected by the Sun and Mercury in Gemini from 11th .

(I was born on Poornima). I also have the Kaivalya Yoga in my Kundli (Ketu 12th

from karakamsha in navamsha). As per KP I have already been predicted Moksha

recently by Shri Yogesh Rao Lajmi ji and also another KP Senior. But I am not

taking chances like a Karmaheena waiting for destiny to gift me, but instead

working on my efforts and Karmas  to achieve this. rest God knows.

>   

> best wishes,

> Bhaskar. 

>  

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, s s <freemorons@ ..>

wrote:

> >

> > Dear Bhaskarji and others,

> > I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone claiming

> > that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely personal

> > experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in rapt

> > concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the inner

> > depths of our self. As such, one cannot " prove " that s/he has had mantra

> > sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.

> >

> > As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I am not

> > sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution (I am a

> > devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I have of

> > Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not

> > otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well (i

> > think)...would anyone care to comment?

> >

> > Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually quoting

> > texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus statements

> > like " rahu in 5th will not give sadhana " ...we all know that it is impossible

> > to state anything without looking at relative placements of all planets.

> >

> > hari smaraNs,

> > prANadAsa.

> >

> >

> > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > > Now you are talking some sense. Dont waste my

> > > time in asking me to give abc of astrology. Learn this yourself please.

> > > This is what I wanted you to understand that Rahu in 5th will provide

> > > one the traits of how the native will do his mantra sadhana, but because

> > > Rahu is there in 5th does not mean that " Mantra Sadhana " is denied to

> > > him. This is bakwaas.

> > >

> > > I dont have to provide evidence in support of whatever I say. Believe it

> > > or not. Accept it or not. In this case for such a simple topic it is

> > > understood that a person who dares to discuss should know by using some

> > > of his brains that when I Mentioned " Vocal " and " Loud " and " Nature of

> > > results " , it is pretty evident what I am talking about. Spoon feeding

> > > if one wants, then better go to a kindergarten class.

> > >

> > > Rahu additionally will make the native go for tamasik Mantras of Dieties

> > > of Rudra type . (Now dont ask me to give evidence, but use your brains

> > > please)

> > >

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_

astrology% 40. com>,

> > > " utkal.panigrahi "

> > >

> > > utkal.panigrahi@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > it's a common knowledge that rahu's link to shakti sadhana is figment

> > > of imagination done by jyotishis in 70's decade, kk pathak and others

> > > published no of articles in A.M.

> > > >

> > > > rahu in 5'th or in lagna is liable to failure of sadhana, such a rahu

> > > affects concentration required for doing sadhana, native becomes fancy

> > > and gets lost therein. need to understand difference in traits of rahu

> > > (attachment to materialism) and ketu (detachment to materialism) .

> > > >

> > > > he is asking evidences whereas he himself has not given evidence in

> > > support of statement in hurry - " rahu in 5'th will give LOUD or VOCAL

> > > mantra sadhana " , a statement similar to rahu's trait.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_

astrology% 40. com>,

> > > ShankaraBharadwaj

> > > Khandavalli shankarabharadwaj@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > I agree for the most part. Material-Spiritual natures of Rahu-Ketu

> > > cannot be made to read that one would do matra sadhana or not. At most,

> > > that would only convey the kind of results of such sadhana - whether the

> > > sadhana will confer material or inner benefits. But that too, is

> > > dependent not on the mantra devata as such but the dasa one is going

> > > through. After all, any serious sadhana will result in every kind of

> > > improvement in one's life and the whole being.

> > > > >

> > > > > In general it is the Mantra devata that is known from 5th. The

> > > Adhisthana devata of planet owning or falling in the 5th will be the

> > > Mantra devata. Thus Rahu's influence will make one take to Jatavedasi

> > > Durga specifically or Durga in general. Ganapati would be fruitful if

> > > there is Ketu in the 5th. Also, since they are always aspecting each

> > > other, both would be fruitful in many cases. However whether one does

> > > patha or antarjapa or something, whether one would attain siddi is

> > > dependent on many other factors.

> > > > >

> > > > > Shankar

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

> > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_indian_

astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > Sunday, October 4, 2009 11:10:38 AM

> > > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Nonsense Jyotish

> > > > >

> > > > > Rahu in 5th will not give mantra Sadhana.

> > > > > Ketu in 5th will give mantra Sadhana.

> > > > >

> > > > > Actual Jyotish

> > > > >

> > > > > 1)Any planet in 5th will actually be a significator for

> > > > > Mantra Sadhana. In fact will give addittion to what

> > > > > native would have ordinarily done in absence of

> > > > > any planet in the 5th.

> > > > >

> > > > > 2) The planet in 5th will show the nature of Mantra

> > > > > Sadhana.

> > > > >

> > > > > 3) Rahu in 5th will make the native take up Vocal

> > > > > or loud Mantra Sadhana which he will enjoy.

> > > > > Ketu in 5th instead would make the native enjoy

> > > > > silent japa.

> > > > >

> > > > > 4) Planets are instruments to show the nature of

> > > > > results, native will face due to his Prarabdha, Dridha

> > > > > or Adridha, and also Kriyaman karmas. Planets are

> > > > > not the cause but just the source and imply the way

> > > > > or nature results would manifest.

> > > > >

> > > > > etc.

> > > > >

> > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the opportune moment comes, he walks in your life.

 

regards,

 

Mouji--- On Mon, 10/5/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Re: Suitability of Mantra Date: Monday, October 5, 2009, 1:51 PM

Dear Mouji Sahab,I thought you had bid us good bye. Nice to see you back. Aapke rahne seyahan par mouj rahti hai.I do not think that at this age Mishraji is asking anybody for a propermantra. One Indian Hindu normally does not change his wife or favouriteDiety at this age. He is talking something else.What you mention is right. Just anybody cannot "pradaan" a mantra toanother anybody .But from where does one find a Siddha or a Mantra Drista. Its notcommonly accessible to all. Therefore whatever one feels homely with, hecan choose his Diety and pray. It all goes to the same Superpower. Inthe Bhagavad Gita Lord Krishna has clearly mentioned so. "Whomever youpray, it finally reaches me."I personally do not think this or that Diety matters. Ultimately Shivawould not accept those who do not accept Vishnu and vice versa, aswritten in the Ramayana, again clearly. No diety

is going to createmiracles for anybody unless the native is running a proper Life as perlaws of Nature-Prakriti.regards/Bhaskar.ancient_indian_ astrology, Manoj Kumar<mouji99 > wrote:>> Dear Friends,>> As far as my knowledge goes, no one except a siddha or a mantradrishta can suggest a mantra for an individual. Mantra Drishta means onewho can see what mantra is suitable for whom and this is what Shri K.N.Rao has written on the subject in his book, Yogis Destiny and Wheel ofTime.>> Rest all methods have failed when tried, including the jaimini ones.>> regards,>> Mouji>> --- On Mon, 10/5/09, Akhil Mishra

astro6301@.. . wrote:>>> Akhil Mishra astro6301@.. .> Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra> ancient_indian_ astrology> Monday, October 5, 2009, 9:15 AM>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Bhaskar ji>>> Nmaskar,>>> Really I appreciate your words , that My lagan is Vrashik and in my9th house Mars and Rahu exist, and my profession is a Medicinalchemist and P.hD in Organic chemistry, but since 1981 , I firts pray Ganapati , and becuase I have no Guru so read Hanuman stututi andHanuman chalisa and at last Bhagwati Durgra and I also do strota loudly and

I am enjoying my time in Canada.>>> Could you exactly tell me what are basics behind it.>>> AKHILESH> DOB# 13-01-1963 , TIME : 04:10 am, PLACE CHITRAKUT ( up) OR TAKE MANIKPUR.>>> REGARD> DR MISHRA>>> --- On Sun, 10/4/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> wrote:>>> Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in>> [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra> ancient_indian_ astrology> Received: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 6:35 PM>>>>>> Dear Pranadas ji,>> Yes that is the truth actually.>> Some people dont know the essence of astrology, for which I am noteven sure I should blame them or not, bcoz in todays astrology all theyknow is that Saturn,Rahu and Mars is bad, and Sun in 7th

creates divorceand all this bankas bakwaas. They treat the planets as bad, rather thanunderstanding the theory of Karma and the resultant Prarabdha which isBhogya through the instruments and nature of these planets. Mata Kakeyiwas not evil, she was just an instrument in the play of the lordsAvataar on earth. But mand buddhis will not understand this.>> Rahu is also seated in my lagna in degreecal conjunction with Mars. Itaspects my 5th and 9th, as well as 4th and 8th.> I normally when sit for pooja, recite my mantras loudly(Average) andcan sit for 3 hours at a stretch without rest on the asana. I amnormally reciting sanskrit stotras so love to make them audible. I alsorecite Durga saptashathi which I love very much alongwith the Nityapatha. My favourite Diety is Lord Krishna, but I treat all the majorGods as part of the family and recite mantras for all of them. In factday before

yesterday I met my mantra Guru and he asked me to increase mypatha of Lord Shankara. I reminded him that my favourite mantra is whathe gave me 25 years back was of (He completed this sentence for me )LordKrishna. He counter questioned me , " what do you say when doing Arti ofShankar Bhagwaan " ? I was perplexed at his question and mutteredsomething incohensible. He replied to his own question " You sing -Brahma vishnu Sadashiv.... .. If You sing this then why do you not meanit? If You also do Pooja of Shankar Bhagwaan and then> do Mantra of lord Krishna you will get more benefits, as Lord Shankaraloves Lord Krishna" . This replye and explanation from My Guruji closedmy query.>> To top it, after meeting my guruji in Bikaner and reachinghome(Jaipur) at midnight, when I went to sleep I dreamt of a thousandsnakes all around me, and felt no fear in my dream, and at the close ofthe dream got

a Darshan of lord Shankar taking the Ganga on His locks.This dream was as if to confirm what my Guruji mentioned.>> I am into Rahu mahadasha presently and my Guru antar has just starteda fortnight ago. Since last 2 years I have been having many dreams ofsaints and Venerated personages appearing in my dreams and blessing me.This is the power of Rahu.>> All above I did not wish to reveal but doing so just to affirm andbreak stupid modern misconceptions, by relaying and relating experiencesin Rahu period, with Rahu aspecting 5th, through first person. I alsohave the Moon in my 5th house -Sagittarius aspected by the Sun andMercury in Gemini from 11th . (I was born on Poornima). I also have theKaivalya Yoga in my Kundli (Ketu 12th from karakamsha in navamsha). Asper KP I have already been predicted Moksha recently by Shri Yogesh RaoLajmi ji and also another KP Senior. But I am not taking

chances like aKarmaheena waiting for destiny to gift me, but instead working on myefforts and Karmas to achieve this. rest God knows.>> best wishes,> Bhaskar.>>> ancient_indian_ astrology, s s freemorons@..> wrote:> >> > Dear Bhaskarji and others,> > I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someoneclaiming> > that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intenselypersonal> > experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are inrapt> > concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into theinner> > depths of our self. As such, one cannot "prove" that s/he has hadmantra> > sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.> >> > As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although Iam

not> > sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution(I am a> > devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana Ihave of> > Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not> > otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well (i> > think)...would anyone care to comment?> >> > Sincere request to people - do not state things without actuallyquoting> > texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogusstatements> > like "rahu in 5th will not give sadhana"...we all know that it isimpossible> > to state anything without looking at relative placements of allplanets.> >> > hari smaraNs,> > prANadAsa.> >> >> > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... wrote:> >>

> >> > >> > > Now you are talking some sense. Dont waste my> > > time in asking me to give abc of astrology. Learn this yourselfplease.> > > This is what I wanted you to understand that Rahu in 5th willprovide> > > one the traits of how the native will do his mantra sadhana, butbecause> > > Rahu is there in 5th does not mean that "Mantra Sadhana" is deniedto> > > him. This is bakwaas.> > >> > > I dont have to provide evidence in support of whatever I say.Believe it> > > or not. Accept it or not. In this case for such a simple topic itis> > > understood that a person who dares to discuss should know by usingsome> > > of his brains that when I Mentioned "Vocal" and "Loud" and "Natureof> > > results ", it is pretty evident what I am talking about.

Spoonfeeding> > > if one wants, then better go to a kindergarten class.> > >> > > Rahu additionally will make the native go for tamasik Mantras ofDieties> > > of Rudra type . (Now dont ask me to give evidence, but use yourbrains> > > please)> > >> > > Bhaskar.> > >> > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_ indian_astrology% 40. com>,> > > "utkal.panigrahi"> > >> > > utkal.panigrahi@ wrote:> > > >> > > > it's a common knowledge that rahu's link to shakti sadhana isfigment> > > of imagination done by jyotishis in 70's decade, kk pathak andothers> > > published no of articles in A.M.> > > >> > > > rahu in 5'th or in lagna is liable to failure of

sadhana, such arahu> > > affects concentration required for doing sadhana, native becomesfancy> > > and gets lost therein. need to understand difference in traits ofrahu> > > (attachment to materialism) and ketu (detachment to materialism) .> > > >> > > > he is asking evidences whereas he himself has not given evidencein> > > support of statement in hurry - "rahu in 5'th will give LOUD orVOCAL> > > mantra sadhana", a statement similar to rahu's trait.> > > >> > > >> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology@ <ancient_ indian_ astrology% 40. com>,> > > ShankaraBharadwaj> > > Khandavalli shankarabharadwaj@ wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > > >> > > >

> I agree for the most part. Material-Spiritual natures ofRahu-Ketu> > > cannot be made to read that one would do matra sadhana or not. Atmost,> > > that would only convey the kind of results of such sadhana -whether the> > > sadhana will confer material or inner benefits. But that too, is> > > dependent not on the mantra devata as such but the dasa one isgoing> > > through. After all, any serious sadhana will result in every kindof> > > improvement in one's life and the whole being.> > > > >> > > > > In general it is the Mantra devata that is known from 5th. The> > > Adhisthana devata of planet owning or falling in the 5th will bethe> > > Mantra devata. Thus Rahu's influence will make one take toJatavedasi> > > Durga specifically or Durga in general. Ganapati would be

fruitfulif> > > there is Ketu in the 5th. Also, since they are always aspectingeach> > > other, both would be fruitful in many cases. However whether onedoes> > > patha or antarjapa or something, whether one would attain siddi is> > > dependent on many other factors.> > > > >> > > > > Shankar> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@> > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology@ <ancient_ indian_ astrology% 40. com>> > > > > Sunday, October 4, 2009 11:10:38 AM> > > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra> > > > >> >

> > >> > > > >> > > > > Nonsense Jyotish> > > > >> > > > > Rahu in 5th will not give mantra Sadhana.> > > > > Ketu in 5th will give mantra Sadhana.> > > > >> > > > > Actual Jyotish> > > > >> > > > > 1)Any planet in 5th will actually be a significator for> > > > > Mantra Sadhana. In fact will give addittion to what> > > > > native would have ordinarily done in absence of> > > > > any planet in the 5th.> > > > >> > > > > 2) The planet in 5th will show the nature of Mantra> > > > > Sadhana.> > > > >> > > > > 3) Rahu in 5th will make the native take up Vocal> > > > > or loud Mantra Sadhana which he will

enjoy.> > > > > Ketu in 5th instead would make the native enjoy> > > > > silent japa.> > > > >> > > > > 4) Planets are instruments to show the nature of> > > > > results, native will face due to his Prarabdha, Dridha> > > > > or Adridha, and also Kriyaman karmas. Planets are> > > > > not the cause but just the source and imply the way> > > > > or nature results would manifest.> > > > >> > > > > etc.> > > > >> > > > > Bhaskar.> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >>>>> Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is Vandanaji 1971 born ?

Anyway, trust Bhaskarji to ride thru some dogmas on a bulldozer.

Could not help but add :

I have 3 malefics in Kendras with no benefics. Sun , Moon and mercury in 12th and Sun debilitated in Navmasa.

My journey in formal religion started a few years back.

Ist Hanumanji , then Lord Shiva and Lord Ram. I was not sure if I was doing right when a BHU educated astrologer told me that Sukra's aspect on 5th will help me pick up quickly.

Then Mataji. It took me a few years of these to be amenable to bhakti and Lord Krishna.

This is firmly believe is the result of Bholanaths blessing.

My Ketu MD starting. Ketu in 4th house and Meena ( 12 th ) Navmasa. Some astrologer told me it will take on many pilgrimages.

Just decided today around 12 am to go for an impromptu pilgrimage. I had to travel to Delhi for a few hours on coming Saturday and the trains are getting full. Since i do not have powerfull Laxmi Yoga, cannot afford flights at short notice.

I have decided to go a day earlier and get off at Mathura to have Darshan. I know it is not enough , but it is a start.

So i hope to go with Mahadev's blessings to meet the dark one. Very excited.

Frankly, i cannot make out much difference between the two.

 

Thanks & Regards Chiranjiv Mehta--- On Mon, 5/10/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Re: Suitability of Mantra Date: Monday, 5 October, 2009, 2:00 PM

 

 

Dear Vandana ji,This combo does cause a blemish no doubt about that.Especially in the area where it is manifested in the chart. But since we were talking about negating some members comment about "Rahu does not allow sadhana", I did not delve upon those points. 2 days back a person who just settled in Jaipur after 2 years stay in Japan, came to me with his kundli and had Rahu in his 5th. After checking other influences I asked him "Did you have an abortion which the family members are not aware of" ? He got shocked and said that his first child is actually the 3rd child as the other two did not seethe sunlight. Rahu can do this in the 5th house. Ketu can do similiar in the 4th house. There are so many matters which we are yet to understand fully, and may never do so with a limited supply of years to our LIfe and brains.Rahu with Mars combo is a matter where inputs in Lal Kitab too asre avilable.They have demarcated a postive combo

and a negative combo with presence of other combination in the chart.You have a Fixed Lagna both in natal chart as well in Navamsha making the 9th a badhaka in any case. A strange movement I noticed in Your chart. Jupiter aspecting the Ketu and the Sun and the sign Cancer in Your Natal chart, and in navamsha, Jupiter is thrown in the 9th alongwith Sun and the same sign Cancer.It was denied providing help to your Father's longevity it seems by Divine Proclamations. Just like you mentioned that you undertook pilgrimages to teertha sthals related to Shiva, in same manner I got a Darshan of Shiva and order from my Guru to increase my pooja path related to Shiva. All pieces of the puzzles fall in place when one contemplates.I have seen snakes after 30 years this time in my dreams. The last I saw was my mothers hair flowing long below the knees and flinging a big snake and chanting Jai Ambe, in my dream. I asked my mother the next

morning who is Ambe , and then she explained me. I have also seen Ramdev Baba in my dreams holding me in his arms,on his horse, and Lord Krishna has instructed me personally once in his dream, and in another dream he just appeared some time before my son was born to me 20 years ago though just smiled and said nothing. My Birth details if you are interested - 28th June 1961. 10.15am.Eluru. 16.45N 81.09E (Near Vijaywada).I have Vargottama Lagna. The Sun.Moon,and Lagna in odd sign causing mahabhagya Yoga as daytime birth.Many planets in fiery and odd signs.Rahu and mars in Taurus in navamsha. If you may wish you may also check my vimsamsa chart and please give your valued comments which would be much appreciated. regards/Bhaskar.ancient_indian_ astrology, Vandna Misra

<vandana_mishra_ 91 wrote:>> Respected Bhaskarji,> kindly accept my heartiest thanks for heart to heart talk.> now,if native's lives were long enough to find the ultimate theory of existence,every thing would have been solved in his previous births.But it does not happen so again he has to indulge in unfolding the truths that can happen only in 5h as this house is house of womb> signifying the capacity to absorve, preserve and produce in a new form.that is what rahu does in 5h.> it is wrritten in many classic if rahu is with mandi,or aspected by mars or together in 5h,it is the combination of sarp dosha.the curses of previous lives.but then we all know astrology is > directly related to the past,the present and the future birth.It is being referred to in every hindu sripture and repeatedly in Gita.that reincarnation reinforces belief in three inter connected observation and

traditional beliefs,the first is what is known as karmaphala,or result of our karma of the past life.secondly is karmasanskara or psychomental emotional tendencies of the previous life.third is birth mark.> what planetary combination you have mentioned in your [i dont know your exact birth details]chart, yours is leo lagna with mars and rahu in lagna in degree conjunction. in various> classic rahu -mars combination again termed as something the result of ones bad karmas> in ones past life.what has been suggested that this combination blemishes the jeev of the concerned house.one gets or not gets is due to his past karma.[you can comment on this theory!]> In your chart mars rahu together in leo fiery sign.rahu a serpent and mars Kartikeya or hanumanji,but in your case it is more a Rudra [destroyer/fiery sign]there can be no other than Mahadev whose worship is need of the hour.you are Blessed ,may be because of your past

karmas that you saw him in your dreams.Aise hi hai M ahadev!! i dont know the placement of rahu in navamsha but rahu mars combination running dasha of rahu ,one often sees snakes in ones dream. > I wish to share my personal experience my Rahu is with exalted mars in 12h,mars is also the dispositor of jupiter placed in 10h.this rahu is with exalted jupiter and vargottam sun placed in 9h of navamsha.when my jupiter rahu dasha was running i took the toughest pilgrimages of my life starting from kedarnath,amarnath, mani mahesh and then the latest Kailash Mansarovar.the p lacement of rahu sun in 9h destroys the jeev [i lost my father in my teenage]but otherwise what best one can ask for from this combination. I am shiv bhakta share the finest compatibilty and proximity with him.So no complaints.> Regards.> Vandana Mishra> ..> --- On Sun, 10/4/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>

wrote:> > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>> [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra> ancient_indian_ astrology> Sunday, October 4, 2009, 6:35 PM> > > > > > > > Dear Pranadas ji,> > Yes that is the truth actually.> > Some people dont know the essence of astrology, for which I am not even sure I should blame them or not, bcoz in todays astrology all they know is that Saturn,Rahu and Mars is bad, and Sun in 7th creates divorce and all this bankas bakwaas. They treat the planets as bad, rather than understanding the theory of Karma and the resultant Prarabdha which is Bhogya through the instruments and nature of these planets.

Mata Kakeyi was not evil, she was just an instrument in the play of the lords Avataar on earth. But mand buddhis will not understand this.> > Rahu is also seated in my lagna in degreecal conjunction with Mars. It aspects my 5th and 9th, as well as 4th and 8th.> I normally when sit for pooja, recite my mantras loudly(Average) and can sit for 3 hours at a stretch without rest on the asana. I am normally reciting sanskrit stotras so love to make them audible. I also recite Durga saptashathi which I love very much alongwith the Nitya patha. My favourite Diety is Lord Krishna, but I treat all the major Gods as part of the family and recite mantras for all of them. In fact day before yesterday I met my mantra Guru and he asked me to increase my patha of Lord Shankara. I reminded him that my favourite mantra is what he gave me 25 years back was of (He completed this sentence for me )Lord Krishna. He counter questioned me ,

" what do you say when doing Arti of Shankar Bhagwaan " ? I was perplexed at his question and muttered something incohensible. He replied to his own question " You sing - Brahma vishnu Sadashiv.... .. If You sing this then why do you not mean it? If You also do Pooja of Shankar Bhagwaan and then> do Mantra of lord Krishna you will get more benefits, as Lord Shankara loves Lord Krishna" . This replye and explanation from My Guruji closed my query.> > To top it, after meeting my guruji in Bikaner and reaching home(Jaipur) at midnight, when I went to sleep I dreamt of a thousand snakes all around me, and felt no fear in my dream, and at the close of the dream got a Darshan of lord Shankar taking the Ganga on His locks. This dream was as if to confirm what my Guruji mentioned.> > I am into Rahu mahadasha presently and my Guru antar has just started a fortnight ago. Since last 2 years I have been having

many dreams of saints and Venerated personages appearing in my dreams and blessing me. This is the power of Rahu.> > All above I did not wish to reveal but doing so just to affirm and break stupid modern misconceptions, by relaying and relating experiences in Rahu period, with Rahu aspecting 5th, through first person. I also have the Moon in my 5th house -Sagittarius aspected by the Sun and Mercury in Gemini from 11th . (I was born on Poornima). I also have the Kaivalya Yoga in my Kundli (Ketu 12th from karakamsha in navamsha). As per KP I have already been predicted Moksha recently by Shri Yogesh Rao Lajmi ji and also another KP Senior. But I am not taking chances like a Karmaheena waiting for destiny to gift me, but instead working on my efforts and Karmas to achieve this. rest God knows.> > best wishes,> Bhaskar. > > > ancient_indian_ astrology@

. com, s s <freemorons@ ..> wrote:> >> > Dear Bhaskarji and others,> > I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone claiming> > that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely personal> > experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in rapt> > concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the inner> > depths of our self. As such, one cannot "prove" that s/he has had mantra> > sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.> > > > As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I am not> > sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution (I am a> > devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I have of> > Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not> >

otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well (i> > think)...would anyone care to comment?> > > > Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually quoting> > texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus statements> > like "rahu in 5th will not give sadhana"...we all know that it is impossible> > to state anything without looking at relative placements of all planets.> > > > hari smaraNs,> > prANadAsa.> > > > > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... wrote:> > > > >> > >> > > Now you are talking some sense. Dont waste my> > > time in asking me to give abc of astrology. Learn this yourself please.> > > This is what I wanted you to understand that Rahu in 5th will provide> > >

one the traits of how the native will do his mantra sadhana, but because> > > Rahu is there in 5th does not mean that "Mantra Sadhana" is denied to> > > him. This is bakwaas.> > >> > > I dont have to provide evidence in support of whatever I say. Believe it> > > or not. Accept it or not. In this case for such a simple topic it is> > > understood that a person who dares to discuss should know by using some> > > of his brains that when I Mentioned "Vocal" and "Loud" and "Nature of> > > results ", it is pretty evident what I am talking about. Spoon feeding> > > if one wants, then better go to a kindergarten class.> > >> > > Rahu additionally will make the native go for tamasik Mantras of Dieties> > > of Rudra type . (Now dont ask me to give evidence, but use your brains> > > please)>

> >> > > Bhaskar.> > >> > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_ indian_ astrology% 40. com>,> > > "utkal.panigrahi"> > >> > > utkal.panigrahi@ wrote:> > > >> > > > it's a common knowledge that rahu's link to shakti sadhana is figment> > > of imagination done by jyotishis in 70's decade, kk pathak and others> > > published no of articles in A.M.> > > >> > > > rahu in 5'th or in lagna is liable to failure of sadhana, such a rahu> > > affects concentration required for doing sadhana, native becomes fancy> > > and gets lost therein. need to understand difference in traits of rahu> > > (attachment to materialism) and ketu (detachment to materialism) .> > > >> > > > he is asking

evidences whereas he himself has not given evidence in> > > support of statement in hurry - "rahu in 5'th will give LOUD or VOCAL> > > mantra sadhana", a statement similar to rahu's trait.> > > >> > > >> > > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_ indian_ astrology% 40. com>,> > > ShankaraBharadwaj> > > Khandavalli shankarabharadwaj@ wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > > >> > > > > I agree for the most part. Material-Spiritual natures of Rahu-Ketu> > > cannot be made to read that one would do matra sadhana or not. At most,> > > that would only convey the kind of results of such sadhana - whether the> > > sadhana will confer material or inner benefits. But that too, is> > >

dependent not on the mantra devata as such but the dasa one is going> > > through. After all, any serious sadhana will result in every kind of> > > improvement in one's life and the whole being.> > > > >> > > > > In general it is the Mantra devata that is known from 5th. The> > > Adhisthana devata of planet owning or falling in the 5th will be the> > > Mantra devata. Thus Rahu's influence will make one take to Jatavedasi> > > Durga specifically or Durga in general. Ganapati would be fruitful if> > > there is Ketu in the 5th. Also, since they are always aspecting each> > > other, both would be fruitful in many cases. However whether one does> > > patha or antarjapa or something, whether one would attain siddi is> > > dependent on many other factors.> > > > >> > > >

> Shankar> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@> > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology<ancient_ indian_ astrology% 40. com>> > > > > Sunday, October 4, 2009 11:10:38 AM> > > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Nonsense Jyotish> > > > >> > > > > Rahu in 5th will not give mantra Sadhana.> > > > > Ketu in 5th will give mantra Sadhana.> > > > >> > > > > Actual Jyotish> > > > >> > > > > 1)Any

planet in 5th will actually be a significator for> > > > > Mantra Sadhana. In fact will give addittion to what> > > > > native would have ordinarily done in absence of> > > > > any planet in the 5th.> > > > >> > > > > 2) The planet in 5th will show the nature of Mantra> > > > > Sadhana.> > > > >> > > > > 3) Rahu in 5th will make the native take up Vocal> > > > > or loud Mantra Sadhana which he will enjoy.> > > > > Ketu in 5th instead would make the native enjoy> > > > > silent japa.> > > > >> > > > > 4) Planets are instruments to show the nature of> > > > > results, native will face due to his Prarabdha, Dridha> > > > > or Adridha, and also Kriyaman karmas. Planets

are> > > > > not the cause but just the source and imply the way> > > > > or nature results would manifest.> > > > >> > > > > etc.> > > > >> > > > > Bhaskar.> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> >>

Try the new India Homepage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Shankarji,Once again, I am very grateful for your guidance - here are my birth details: 24 Oct 1978, 19:40Hrs, Bangalore, India.Swasti astu sataam. thank you again!

hari smaraNs,prANadAsaOn Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:39 AM, ShankaraBharadwaj Khandavalli <shankarabharadwaj wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Pranadasa ji,Please do not humble me with such words. While I certainly do not mind taking a look, I have not learned Jyotisha. It is over to the learned members for that, I might just add a point from my limited understanding of the basics.

Shankar

s s <freemorons

Sent:

Monday, October 5, 2009 5:27:33 AMRe: Re: Suitability of Mantra

 

 

Dear Shankarji,My pranams to your feet for any guidance you can provide to me will be received with as much reverence as rAma pAduka...Please let me know if you and others would be willing to look at my chart to help me understand my spiritual side...a humble and sincere request by me.

hari smaraNs,prAnadAsa.On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 2:36 PM, ShankaraBharadwaj Khandavalli <shankarabharadwaj@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Pranadasa ji,Sakti sadhana being Rahu's contribution is something I mentioned too, but my reading is that in your case it should more be the lagna lord's contribution - Ve. Also, Ve and Me being mitra, both Devi and Vishnu worship should be fruitful. Of course, quick grace would be of whoever is stronger :)

Shankar

s s <freemorons (AT) gmail (DOT) com>To:

ancient_indian_ astrologySunday, October 4, 2009 8:57:12 PM

Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra

 

 

 

Dear Bhaskarji and others,I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone claiming that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely personal experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in rapt concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the inner depths of our self. As such, one cannot " prove " that s/he has had mantra sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.

As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I am not sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution (I am a devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I have of Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well (i think)...would anyone care to comment?

Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually quoting texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus statements like " rahu in 5th will not give sadhana " ...we all know that it is impossible to state anything without looking at relative placements of all planets.

hari smaraNs,prANadAsa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Pranadasa ji,While guidance is possible only from a learned man, let me share what I see. If I were you, this is how I go about it - 1. 5th is owned by Me and Me-Ve are mitra, so Vishnu and Devi worship suits me well. 2. I am running Ve maha dasa for a decade and half to come, so Devi worship is going to be very fruitful. This is going to be the longest and used properly, one of the best dasas. 3. Since neither Me nor Su are very strong, I might not worship Vishnu/Narayana directly. However, since Ve rules kama and Krishna is Kama/Madana Manohara (Krishna is Kama in Mantra Sastra), I would worship Krishna or Devi Kamakala. It is worth noting that similarity is sibling relation (which is why Vishnu and Devi are siblings) and complementarity is consort relation

(which is why Sakti is the consort of Siva). Thus owing to the similarity, Devi worship is going to be similar to pleasing Narayana. In fact if one looks at the idols of Chenna Kesava or Venkateswara, one would wonder if it is Him or His sister :) Devi Maha maya is called Nanda Devi because She is the sister of Nanda Nandana. 4. The strongest graha is Ju, however since Ju is enemy of lagnadhipati Ve, I would not go with Siva worship. Ju dasa would only come very late so that should not even concern me.

5. The upasana suited for me is not vairagya driven but driven by desire for devata. This does not mean you are materialistic but this is the difference between vedanta and upasana marga. Rama of sankhyas is the existential object while Krishna of yogis and bhaktas is their desired object. This is the difference I am indicating. Feel free to tell me I am wrong :) Dear learned members, please correct me. Shankars s <freemorons Sent:

Monday, October 5, 2009 6:29:40 PMRe: Re: Suitability of Mantra

 

 

Dear Shankarji,Once again, I am very grateful for your guidance - here are my birth details: 24 Oct 1978, 19:40Hrs, Bangalore, India.Swasti astu sataam. thank you again!

hari smaraNs,prANadAsaOn Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:39 AM, ShankaraBharadwaj Khandavalli <shankarabharadwaj@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Pranadasa ji,Please do not humble me with such words. While I certainly do not mind taking a look, I have not learned Jyotisha. It is over to the learned members for that, I might just add a point from my limited understanding of the basics.

Shankar

s s <freemorons (AT) gmail (DOT) com>ancient_indian_ astrology

Sent:

Monday, October 5, 2009 5:27:33 AMRe: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra

 

 

Dear Shankarji,My pranams to your feet for any guidance you can provide to me will be received with as much reverence as rAma pAduka...Please let me know if you and others would be willing to look at my chart to help me understand my spiritual side...a humble and sincere request by me.

hari smaraNs,prAnadAsa.On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 2:36 PM, ShankaraBharadwaj Khandavalli <shankarabharadwaj@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Pranadasa ji,Sakti sadhana being Rahu's contribution is something I mentioned too, but my reading is that in your case it should more be the lagna lord's contribution - Ve. Also, Ve and Me being mitra, both Devi and Vishnu worship should be fruitful. Of course, quick grace would be of whoever is stronger :)

Shankar

s s <freemorons (AT) gmail (DOT) com>To:

ancient_indian_ astrologySunday, October 4, 2009 8:57:12 PM

Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suitability of Mantra

 

 

 

Dear Bhaskarji and others,I have rahu in 5th (in kanya), and it is surprising to read someone claiming that mantra sadhana is not possible. Mantra-sadhana is a intensely personal experience, with the devata revealing him/herself when we are in rapt concentration chanting the mantra again and again, looking into the inner depths of our self. As such, one cannot "prove" that s/he has had mantra sadhana to anyone other than one's own guru.

As such, Bhaskarji appears to be right in this matter - although I am not sure I completely agree to shakti-sadhana being Rahu;s contribution (I am a devotee of Narayana (mercury house, afterall), and any upasana I have of Durga is only to get more access to Narayana's divine grace...not otherwise).. . Mercury is not very strong in my horoscope as well (i think)...would anyone care to comment?

Sincere request to people - do not state things without actually quoting texts or explaining rationale... and please refrain from bogus statements like "rahu in 5th will not give sadhana"...we all know that it is impossible to state anything without looking at relative placements of all planets.

hari smaraNs,prANadAsa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bhaskar ji

 

It is absolutly right

 

Regards

Dr Mishra--- On Mon, 10/5/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Re: Suitability of Mantra Received: Monday, October 5, 2009, 8:21 AM

Dear Mouji Sahab,I thought you had bid us good bye. Nice to see you back. Aapke rahne seyahan par mouj rahti hai.I do not think that at this age Mishraji is asking anybody for a propermantra. One Indian Hindu normally does not change his wife or favouriteDiety at this age. He is talking something else.What you mention is right. Just anybody cannot "pradaan" a mantra toanother anybody .But from where does one find a Siddha or a Mantra Drista. Its notcommonly accessible to all. Therefore whatever one feels homely with, hecan choose his Diety and pray. It all goes to the same Superpower. Inthe Bhagavad Gita Lord Krishna has clearly mentioned so. "Whomever youpray, it finally reaches me."I personally do not think this or that Diety matters. Ultimately Shivawould not accept those who do not accept Vishnu and vice versa, aswritten in the Ramayana, again clearly. No diety

is going to createmiracles for anybody unless the native is running a proper Life as perlaws of Nature-Prakriti.regards/Bhaskar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...