Guest guest Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 Dear Bhattachajyaji, Comparing of the planets with the deities is Ok, in my view.It is wise to do so. I have also done that and found that the deities exist in reallity in our mind as written in our scriptures. I have also found that the physical planets connected with the deities do not really have this effects on us. Thus astrology is not a reliable science at all. Only some mathematically minded people seem to have associated the physical planets, without effect on us, to the dieties, who have real effects on us, so that they can do some calculations. For example, sarawati has real effect on us.She virutally controls our everyday life through our thoughts and words.But the physical planet linked to her, Budha, has virtually no effect on us. Thus the word 'Budha' related to our buddhi or intellect is inadvertantly or meaninglessly associated with the physical planet. Thus our scriptures are fully correct.Astrology is partly correct. The effects of physical planets other than the sun-earth- moon system, are only imaginary. All our deities can be linked to only the sun, earth and the moon system. None other planets have any appreciable effects on us. Please you need not reply.thank you. Hari Malla , Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya wrote: > > Shri Kaul, > > Come and let us see who is making fool of himself- you or me: > 1) > You are mistaken. I am not enigmatic and I judge issues on their own merit merit while considering the views of all others. I did say that I am myself convinced that Yama is Shani. There are other cases like this too. The Rudra of the Veda is the Shiva in the Purana and the Swarbhanu of Veda is the Rahu / Ketu in astrology. I need not mention who are all the people who believe like me. Will you please let us know why you try to use the names of Meghnad Saha, Dixit and other personalities to give weight to your views instead of discussing the issues on their own merit?. Please reply. > 2) > Agreed that the heading of the thread is " “Vaivarta > Puran & Prakriti Khand.†but if you would have opened your eyes you would have seen that one of the topics discussed was who is Shani in the purana (fifth Veda) and I added who represents Shani in the Rig Veda. Do you consider it to be a crime? Please reply. > 3) > You said that Kathopanishad says that even gods succumb to Yama ultimately. You have misunderstood the Upanishad. The message of all the Upanishads is that evrybody ultimately realises the oneness with the Brahman. " Sarvam Khalvidam Brahma " . Even Yama has a limited life. Will you refrain from misinterpreting the Shastras? Please reply. > 4) > Do you know that Saraswati has two vahanas ie. the Swan as well as the Peacock.  Moreover you do not understand astrology as I have shown earlier. You do not know that there are 12 Lagnas in a day of 24 hours and that is why you could not understand how Bharata could take birth after 14 hours in Mina Lagna. In the Original Sanskrit verse it is clearly given " Mina Lagne " .  In astrology the vahana of Shani is buffalo and one of the daanas for propitiation of Shani if buffalo. May be Shani Maharaj may not be able to fly with buffalo like he will able to do with the Vulture (some say it is crow). Will you stop dabbling at astrology? Please reply. > > I hope you will not evade replying to the five points above. If you call my points as foolish can I not call your comments as utterly idiotic in the light of the above? > > You also said : > > Quote > > > > > > In > the posts attached with SKB’s mail, some “Vedic astrologer†> has made the following comments > > <Mahatma > goswami tulsi Das ji was trikal darshi and if you > read Ram charit Manas…..> > > As > already clarified in an earlier post, Goswami Tulsidas has not said anywhere > that Bhagwan Ram had five planets exalted or He was born in Karkata lagna etc. > or Bharata was born with the sun or lagna in Mina or Shaturgna and Lakshmana > with the sun in Karkata and so on! That means that Goswami Tulsidas did > not agree with the good for nothing jyotishi’s interpolations in the VR > or AR! > > That > is why all that Tulsidasji has said in Doha No. 190 in Balakanda is: > â€All the planets, tithi etc. at the time of birth of Bhagwan Ram > were favourableâ€. > > Tulsidas > has not even said that Bhagwan Ram was born in Punarvasu nakshatra! That > again means that Goswami Tulsidas could understand, unlike jyotish samrat SKB, >  that it was impossible for anyone to be born in Madhumasa with the sun in > Mesha and then Shukla paksha navmi and Punnarvasu nakshatra!  > Tulsidasji has simply said, " navmi tithi madhumas puneeta, sukalpachha > abhijit hari preeta " > > That > itself should have paid put to " Vedic astrologers " foolish attempts > to subjugate Bhagwan Ram to planetary suzerainty! But > then " Vedic astrologers " being actually Kaliyugi astrologers, > they will interpret everything according to their sinister motives! > > If > you peruse the contents of the complete post of SKB further, you can see the > following “quotable quotes†> > “ > 1)Durga : Planet is Mars > > 2)Laxmi > : Planet is Venus. > > 3)Saraswati > : Planet is Mercury. > > > > 4)Savitri : Planet is > Jupiter. > > 5)Radha. > : Planet is Saturn.†> > Since > Radha was a contemporary of Shri Krishen, which according to > Bhata-jyotish- acharjya was in about 3200 BCE, that means there was no Saturn > before then! > Now why are you afraid of taking the names of Shri Bhaskarli and Shri Goyelji, who made the above statements. Where did I say Radha is the daughter of Sun? Whom are you asking to prepare the vedic horoscope of Radha and Saturn / the Yama? Only a lunatic will say so. With your zero knowledge please stop ridiculing the Parokshya and Pratyaksha knowledge. You are having bad days and i suggest that you show your horoscope to some good astrologer and / or go to a good psychiatrist. > > Sincerely, > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > > > --- On Mon, 10/5/09, jyotirved <jyotirved wrote: > > jyotirved <jyotirved > [VRI] Re: Vaivarta Puran & Prakriti Khand. > vedic_research_institute > Cc: hinducalendar , indian_astrology_group_daily_digest > Monday, October 5, 2009, 7:59 AM  > > > > > > > Dear friends, > > Jai > Shri Ram! > > SKB > is again making a fool of himself by putting his knowledge (actually ignorance) > on public display! He has said, “According to some scholars Yama in > Veda is the Saturn in Jyotisha and I agree with that. Yama is the son of the > Sun and so also is the Saturn the son of the Sun. They have the same type of > vahanaâ€. > > Why > is he enigmatic? Why does he not name the scholars according to whom Yama > in Veda is the Saturn in Jyotisha? Again, the heading of the post is > “Vaivarta > Puran & Prakriti Khand.â€. Is that a Veda? > > SKB > says Yama is the son of the sun! That is news to me! Kathopanishad > tells us that even gods succumb to Yama ultimately! In other words, Yama > will kill his own father one day! If Yama was born after the sun, how > could it become Yama? Just through the efforts of “Vedic astrologersâ€? > > > Further, > is SKB sure that the vahanas of Yama and Saturn are the same? Will he pl. > quote the exact authorities with their meanings?  IMHO, the vahana > of Saturn is a vulture whereas that of Yama a buffalo! > > But > maybe according to the omniscient SKB there is no difference between a vulture > and a buffalo--just as a Scorpion is equal to a Crocodile in their " equal > division rashichakra " ! > > And > to crown all such foolish statements with the “wisdom†of further > non-sense, jyotish-samrat SKB and company will calculate the longitude, > latitude etc. of Yama-raja through heliocentric orbital elements from JPL/NASA > and call that the longitude of “Yamarajaâ€! Can there be any > more foolish statement than the same? My God! Is there no limit to the > stupidities of “Vedic astrologersâ€? > > In > the posts attached with SKB’s mail, some “Vedic astrologer†> has made the following comments > > <Mahatma > goswami tulsi Das ji was trikal darshi and if you > read Ram charit Manas…..> > > As > already clarified in an earlier post, Goswami Tulsidas has not said anywhere > that Bhagwan Ram had five planets exalted or He was born in Karkata lagna etc. > or Bharata was born with the sun or lagna in Mina or Shaturgna and Lakshmana > with the sun in Karkata and so on! That means that Goswami Tulsidas did > not agree with the good for nothing jyotishi’s interpolations in the VR > or AR! > > That > is why all that Tulsidasji has said in Doha No. 190 in Balakanda is: > â€All the planets, tithi etc. at the time of birth of Bhagwan Ram > were favourableâ€. > > Tulsidas > has not even said that Bhagwan Ram was born in Punarvasu nakshatra! That > again means that Goswami Tulsidas could understand, unlike jyotish samrat SKB, >  that it was impossible for anyone to be born in Madhumasa with the sun in > Mesha and then Shukla paksha navmi and Punnarvasu nakshatra!  > Tulsidasji has simply said, " navmi tithi madhumas puneeta, sukalpachha > abhijit hari preeta " > > That > itself should have paid put to " Vedic astrologers " foolish attempts > to subjugate Bhagwan Ram to planetary suzerainty! But > then " Vedic astrologers " being actually Kaliyugi astrologers, > they will interpret everything according to their sinister motives! > > If > you peruse the contents of the complete post of SKB further, you can see the > following “quotable quotes†> > “ > 1)Durga : Planet is Mars > > 2)Laxmi > : Planet is Venus. > > 3)Saraswati > : Planet is Mercury. > > > > 4)Savitri : Planet is > Jupiter. > > 5)Radha. > : Planet is Saturn.†> > Since > Radha was a contemporary of Shri Krishen, which according to > Bhata-jyotish- acharjya was in about 3200 BCE, that means there was no Saturn > before then! > > SKB > being “know it allâ€, will he please clarify whether it is Yama that > is Saturn or it is Radha that is Saturn? Was Radha the daughter of > Sun? If yes, then she should be the sister of Yama and not Yama > himself/herself! > > BTW, > what is the date of birth of Radha a.k.a Saturn the Yama? Why not > erect a “Vedic horoscope†for her/him? > > SKB > appears to be in his real “paroskhya†mode and by now we know what > that means---HALLUCINATI ON. > > Jai > Shri Ram! > > A > K Kaul > > --- > In vedic_research_ institute, > Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya > wrote:Dear friends, > > > > According to some scholars Yama in Veda is the Saturn in Jyotisha and I agree with > that.. Yama is the son of the Sun and so also is the Saturn the son of the Sun. > They have the same type of vahana. > > > > Regards, > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > > > --- On Sun, 10/4/09, utkal.panigrahi <utkal.panigrahi@ ...> > wrote: > > > > utkal.panigrahi <utkal.panigrahi@ ...> > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Vaivarta Puran & Prakriti Khand. > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > Sunday, October 4, 2009, 9:30 PM > >  Radha is Saturn ..... looks good, great discovery !! > > > > ~utkal. > > > > ancient_indian_ > astrology, Akhil Mishra > > <astro6301@ ..> wrote: > > > > > > Bhaskar ji > > > Mahatma goswami tulsi Das ji was trikal darshi and if you read > > Ram charit Manas and Geetwali you will get lot of quotes related > > with Jyotish. > > > Regards > > > Dr Mishra > > > > > > --- On Mon, 10/5/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... wrote: > > > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Vaivarta Puran & Prakriti > > Khand. > > > ancient_indian_ > astrology > > > Received: Monday, October 5, 2009, 3:52 AM > > >> > > > Dear Goel ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu is mentioned in the Tulsidasa Ramayana in the initial Chapters, > > in some shloka (If someone wishes to know which one, I can locate this > > after reaching Bombay) though I did not mention this, because people > > will say that Tulsidasji is of recent origin...etc, so I kept quiet. > > > > > > > > > > > > About the rest of your mail, I am not eligible enough or competent to > > answer or comment on the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards/Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " vijay.goel " > > goyalvj@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In Bhrama Vaivatra Puran, (Pg 85 Gita press Gorakhpur) in Prakriti > > Khanda, Bhagwan Narayan says to Narada that on five Devi is called > > Prakriti in which this Universe is dependent. > > > > > > > These five Devi are : > > > > > > > 1)Durga (who is mother of Ganesh) > > > > > > > 2)Laxmi > > > > > > > 3)Saraswati > > > > > > > 4)Savitri > > > > > > > 5)Radha. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think these are referred as Five Tattwas and just a though came to > > my mind to relate these with five planets as following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1)Durga : Planet is Mars. > > > > > > > 2)Laxmi : Planet is Venus. > > > > > > > 3)Saraswati : Planet is Mercury. > > > > > > > 4)Savitri : Planet is Jupiter. > > > > > > > 5)Radha. : Planet is Saturn. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Though Rahu\ketu and sun\moon are excluded in basic scheme of > > tattwas still we can classify by putting Rahu and ketu with Durga, Sun > > with Saraswati & Moon with Savitri. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is just my thought and shared with all, if you find appropriate > > than discuss it else leave it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thankyou, > > > > > > > Best Wishes, > > > > > > > Vijay Goel > > > > > > > Jaipur. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, > " Bhaskar " > > <bhaskar_jyotish@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sreenadh ji and all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Those who wish to learn about the real source of astrology and > the > > > > > > > > timings etc. must make an independent reading and study into the > > ancient > > > > > > > > puranas and must not allow themselves to be influenced by any > > modern > > > > > > > > texts or, websites on such subjects. 3 years of study of the > > following > > > > > > > > would give one an indepth knowledge and original knowledge of > > actual > > > > > > > > astrology on Nakshatras , Vedic astrology and allied subjects. > > Just > > > > > > > > Forget the commonly known astrological texts we are accustomed > to. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Read these and one has read all - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Narada Purana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Padma Purana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Brahmavaarvat Purana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Recently I posted some lines on Nishedha food for certain Masas > > and > > > > > > > > tithis. These come from " BrahmaVaarvat Puraana " Page > 78 (Gita > > Press). > > > > > > > > The above will teach one real astrology and not the " Bankas > > bakwaas " > > > > > > > > astrology we notice all around us. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The above advice comes from a real Yogi and not from me. I have > > seen > > > > > > > > this Yogi perform real miracles in day times, a man who can call > > at will > > > > > > > > anyone from the atmosphere, a man who can predict the time of > > death to > > > > > > > > the minute, a man who can tell you what planets are placed where > > in Your > > > > > > > > horoscope without even opening or closing his eyes. He is my > > Spiritual > > > > > > > > , mantra and Jyotish Guru who can just see a person and tell him > > what > > > > > > > > planets in his Horoscope indicate the source of his ills. He is > > the best > > > > > > > > jyotishi I have seen till date, and about 25 years ago I have > seen > > him > > > > > > > > explaining Horoscopes like nobody else and giving sureshot > > remedies. He > > > > > > > > can exorcise the most evil Pisachini gripping a person with his > > powers . > > > > > > > > He has completed the Dus Mahavidyas in his early youth and > > attained > > > > > > > > Siddhis which very few can claim in times of today. When he > > conducts > > > > > > > > Yagnas the animals like Owls and snakes connected to the Diety > > (Whose > > > > > > > > pooja is conducted) come and sit across near him till the Yagna > is > > > > > > > > completed and he receives thus the blessings of the Diety. My > > nephew was > > > > > > > > in the last stage of his Cancer and he just with his power of > Yoga > > and > > > > > > > > in one sentence commanded all the blood cells to rejunevate and > > removed > > > > > > > > the Cancer in a minute. Whereas the foremost Cancer Surgeon of > > Asia , > > > > > > > > Dr.Advani at jaslok hospital, Bombay had finally after giving > the > > > > > > > > maximum number of chemotherapies which can be given to any human > > being, > > > > > > > > had lost hope and asked us to call all relatives for the final > > journey > > > > > > > > of the boy. Such a great person is he. I have witnessed many > such > > of his > > > > > > > > miracles in the last 25 years of my existence. He just has to > > > > > > > > think(Concentrate) for a moment (Few seconds) about You and all > > > > > > > > knowledge about you becomes accessible to him. He stopped > > predicting > > > > > > > > from actual Horoscopes in the early 90's after having attained > > Siddhis > > > > > > > > from his own Guru Pahadi Baba. Anyways I do not wish to speak > much > > > > > > > > about him, but just send this above message across to all > > Jyotishis who > > > > > > > > are really sincere and wish to actually help people and make > this > > world > > > > > > > > a better place to live in. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bhaskar. > > > > >  > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 Shri Harimalla,If you think astrology is not reliable why are you wasting your time in astrology forum? Sincerely,SKB--- On Mon, 10/5/09, hari <harimalla wrote:hari <harimalla[VRI] Re: Vaivarta Puran & Prakriti Khand. Date: Monday, October 5, 2009, 7:14 PM Dear Bhattachajyaji, Comparing of the planets with the deities is Ok, in my view.It is wise to do so. I have also done that and found that the deities exist in reallity in our mind as written in our scriptures. I have also found that the physical planets connected with the deities do not really have this effects on us. Thus astrology is not a reliable science at all. Only some mathematically minded people seem to have associated the physical planets, without effect on us, to the dieties, who have real effects on us, so that they can do some calculations. For example, sarawati has real effect on us.She virutally controls our everyday life through our thoughts and words.But the physical planet linked to her, Budha, has virtually no effect on us. Thus the word 'Budha' related to our buddhi or intellect is inadvertantly or meaninglessly associated with the physical planet. Thus our scriptures are fully correct.Astrology is partly correct. The effects of physical planets other than the sun-earth- moon system, are only imaginary. All our deities can be linked to only the sun, earth and the moon system. None other planets have any appreciable effects on us. Please you need not reply.thank you. Hari Malla ancient_indian_ astrology, Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjy a wrote: > > Shri Kaul, > > Come and let us see who is making fool of himself- you or me: > 1) > You are mistaken. I am not enigmatic and I judge issues on their own merit merit while considering the views of all others. I did say that I am myself convinced that Yama is Shani. There are other cases like this too. The Rudra of the Veda is the Shiva in the Purana and the Swarbhanu of Veda is the Rahu / Ketu in astrology. I need not mention who are all the people who believe like me. Will you please let us know why you try to use the names of Meghnad Saha, Dixit and other personalities to give weight to your views instead of discussing the issues on their own merit?. Please reply. > 2) > Agreed that the heading of the thread is "“Vaivarta > Puran & Prakriti Khand.†but if you would have opened your eyes you would have seen that one of the topics discussed was who is Shani in the purana (fifth Veda) and I added who represents Shani in the Rig Veda. Do you consider it to be a crime? Please reply. > 3) > You said that Kathopanishad says that even gods succumb to Yama ultimately. You have misunderstood the Upanishad. The message of all the Upanishads is that evrybody ultimately realises the oneness with the Brahman. "Sarvam Khalvidam Brahma". Even Yama has a limited life. Will you refrain from misinterpreting the Shastras? Please reply. > 4) > Do you know that Saraswati has two vahanas ie. the Swan as well as the Peacock. Moreover you do not understand astrology as I have shown earlier. You do not know that there are 12 Lagnas in a day of 24 hours and that is why you could not understand how Bharata could take birth after 14 hours in Mina Lagna. In the Original Sanskrit verse it is clearly given "Mina Lagne". In astrology the vahana of Shani is buffalo and one of the daanas for propitiation of Shani if buffalo. May be Shani Maharaj may not be able to fly with buffalo like he will able to do with the Vulture (some say it is crow). Will you stop dabbling at astrology? Please reply. > > I hope you will not evade replying to the five points above. If you call my points as foolish can I not call your comments as utterly idiotic in the light of the above? > > You also said : > > Quote > > > > > > In > the posts attached with SKB’s mail, some “Vedic astrologer†> has made the following comments > > <Mahatma > goswami tulsi Das ji was trikal darshi and if you > read Ram charit Manas…..> > > As > already clarified in an earlier post, Goswami Tulsidas has not said anywhere > that Bhagwan Ram had five planets exalted or He was born in Karkata lagna etc. > or Bharata was born with the sun or lagna in Mina or Shaturgna and Lakshmana > with the sun in Karkata and so on! That means that Goswami Tulsidas did > not agree with the good for nothing jyotishi’s interpolations in the VR > or AR! > > That > is why all that Tulsidasji has said in Doha No. 190 in Balakanda is: > â€All the planets, tithi etc. at the time of birth of Bhagwan Ram > were favourableâ€. > > Tulsidas > has not even said that Bhagwan Ram was born in Punarvasu nakshatra! That > again means that Goswami Tulsidas could understand, unlike jyotish samrat SKB, > that it was impossible for anyone to be born in Madhumasa with the sun in > Mesha and then Shukla paksha navmi and Punnarvasu nakshatra! > Tulsidasji has simply said, "navmi tithi madhumas puneeta, sukalpachha > abhijit hari preeta" > > That > itself should have paid put to "Vedic astrologers" foolish attempts > to subjugate Bhagwan Ram to planetary suzerainty! But > then "Vedic astrologers" being actually Kaliyugi astrologers, > they will interpret everything according to their sinister motives! > > If > you peruse the contents of the complete post of SKB further, you can see the > following “quotable quotes†> > “ > 1)Durga : Planet is Mars > > 2)Laxmi > : Planet is Venus. > > 3)Saraswati > : Planet is Mercury. > > > > 4)Savitri : Planet is > Jupiter. > > 5)Radha. > : Planet is Saturn.†> > Since > Radha was a contemporary of Shri Krishen, which according to > Bhata-jyotish- acharjya was in about 3200 BCE, that means there was no Saturn > before then! > Now why are you afraid of taking the names of Shri Bhaskarli and Shri Goyelji, who made the above statements. Where did I say Radha is the daughter of Sun? Whom are you asking to prepare the vedic horoscope of Radha and Saturn / the Yama? Only a lunatic will say so. With your zero knowledge please stop ridiculing the Parokshya and Pratyaksha knowledge. You are having bad days and i suggest that you show your horoscope to some good astrologer and / or go to a good psychiatrist. > > Sincerely, > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > > > --- On Mon, 10/5/09, jyotirved <jyotirved@. ..> wrote: > > jyotirved <jyotirved@. ..> > [VRI] [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Vaivarta Puran & Prakriti Khand. > vedic_research_ institute > Cc: hinducalendar, indian_astrology_ group_daily_ digest@grou ps.com > Monday, October 5, 2009, 7:59 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear friends, > > Jai > Shri Ram! > > SKB > is again making a fool of himself by putting his knowledge (actually ignorance) > on public display! He has said, “According to some scholars Yama in > Veda is the Saturn in Jyotisha and I agree with that. Yama is the son of the > Sun and so also is the Saturn the son of the Sun. They have the same type of > vahanaâ€. > > Why > is he enigmatic? Why does he not name the scholars according to whom Yama > in Veda is the Saturn in Jyotisha? Again, the heading of the post is > “Vaivarta > Puran & Prakriti Khand.â€. Is that a Veda? > > SKB > says Yama is the son of the sun! That is news to me! Kathopanishad > tells us that even gods succumb to Yama ultimately! In other words, Yama > will kill his own father one day! If Yama was born after the sun, how > could it become Yama? Just through the efforts of “Vedic astrologersâ€? > > > Further, > is SKB sure that the vahanas of Yama and Saturn are the same? Will he pl. > quote the exact authorities with their meanings? IMHO, the vahana > of Saturn is a vulture whereas that of Yama a buffalo! > > But > maybe according to the omniscient SKB there is no difference between a vulture > and a buffalo--just as a Scorpion is equal to a Crocodile in their "equal > division rashichakra" ! > > And > to crown all such foolish statements with the “wisdom†of further > non-sense, jyotish-samrat SKB and company will calculate the longitude, > latitude etc. of Yama-raja through heliocentric orbital elements from JPL/NASA > and call that the longitude of “Yamarajaâ€! Can there be any > more foolish statement than the same? My God! Is there no limit to the > stupidities of “Vedic astrologersâ€? > > In > the posts attached with SKB’s mail, some “Vedic astrologer†> has made the following comments > > <Mahatma > goswami tulsi Das ji was trikal darshi and if you > read Ram charit Manas…..> > > As > already clarified in an earlier post, Goswami Tulsidas has not said anywhere > that Bhagwan Ram had five planets exalted or He was born in Karkata lagna etc. > or Bharata was born with the sun or lagna in Mina or Shaturgna and Lakshmana > with the sun in Karkata and so on! That means that Goswami Tulsidas did > not agree with the good for nothing jyotishi’s interpolations in the VR > or AR! > > That > is why all that Tulsidasji has said in Doha No. 190 in Balakanda is: > â€All the planets, tithi etc. at the time of birth of Bhagwan Ram > were favourableâ€. > > Tulsidas > has not even said that Bhagwan Ram was born in Punarvasu nakshatra! That > again means that Goswami Tulsidas could understand, unlike jyotish samrat SKB, > that it was impossible for anyone to be born in Madhumasa with the sun in > Mesha and then Shukla paksha navmi and Punnarvasu nakshatra! > Tulsidasji has simply said, "navmi tithi madhumas puneeta, sukalpachha > abhijit hari preeta" > > That > itself should have paid put to "Vedic astrologers" foolish attempts > to subjugate Bhagwan Ram to planetary suzerainty! But > then "Vedic astrologers" being actually Kaliyugi astrologers, > they will interpret everything according to their sinister motives! > > If > you peruse the contents of the complete post of SKB further, you can see the > following “quotable quotes†> > “ > 1)Durga : Planet is Mars > > 2)Laxmi > : Planet is Venus. > > 3)Saraswati > : Planet is Mercury. > > > > 4)Savitri : Planet is > Jupiter. > > 5)Radha. > : Planet is Saturn.†> > Since > Radha was a contemporary of Shri Krishen, which according to > Bhata-jyotish- acharjya was in about 3200 BCE, that means there was no Saturn > before then! > > SKB > being “know it allâ€, will he please clarify whether it is Yama that > is Saturn or it is Radha that is Saturn? Was Radha the daughter of > Sun? If yes, then she should be the sister of Yama and not Yama > himself/herself! > > BTW, > what is the date of birth of Radha a.k.a Saturn the Yama? Why not > erect a “Vedic horoscope†for her/him? > > SKB > appears to be in his real “paroskhya†mode and by now we know what > that means---HALLUCINATI ON. > > Jai > Shri Ram! > > A > K Kaul > > --- > In vedic_research_ institute, > Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjy a > wrote:Dear friends, > > > > According to some scholars Yama in Veda is the Saturn in Jyotisha and I agree with > that.. Yama is the son of the Sun and so also is the Saturn the son of the Sun. > They have the same type of vahana. > > > > Regards, > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > > > --- On Sun, 10/4/09, utkal.panigrahi <utkal.panigrahi@ ...> > wrote: > > > > utkal.panigrahi <utkal.panigrahi@ ...> > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Vaivarta Puran & Prakriti Khand. > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > Sunday, October 4, 2009, 9:30 PM > > > > > > > > > Radha is Saturn ..... looks good, great discovery !! > > > > ~utkal. > > > > ancient_indian_ > astrology, Akhil Mishra > > <astro6301@ ..> wrote: > > > > > > Bhaskar ji > > > Mahatma goswami tulsi Das ji was trikal darshi and if you read > > Ram charit Manas and Geetwali you will get lot of quotes related > > with Jyotish. > > > Regards > > > Dr Mishra > > > > > > --- On Mon, 10/5/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... wrote: > > > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... > > > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Vaivarta Puran & Prakriti > > Khand. > > > ancient_indian_ > astrology > > > Received: Monday, October 5, 2009, 3:52 AM > > >> > > > Dear Goel ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu is mentioned in the Tulsidasa Ramayana in the initial Chapters, > > in some shloka (If someone wishes to know which one, I can locate this > > after reaching Bombay) though I did not mention this, because people > > will say that Tulsidasji is of recent origin...etc, so I kept quiet. > > > > > > > > > > > > About the rest of your mail, I am not eligible enough or competent to > > answer or comment on the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards/Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, "vijay.goel" > > goyalvj@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In Bhrama Vaivatra Puran, (Pg 85 Gita press Gorakhpur) in Prakriti > > Khanda, Bhagwan Narayan says to Narada that on five Devi is called > > Prakriti in which this Universe is dependent. > > > > > > > These five Devi are : > > > > > > > 1)Durga (who is mother of Ganesh) > > > > > > > 2)Laxmi > > > > > > > 3)Saraswati > > > > > > > 4)Savitri > > > > > > > 5)Radha. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think these are referred as Five Tattwas and just a though came to > > my mind to relate these with five planets as following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1)Durga : Planet is Mars. > > > > > > > 2)Laxmi : Planet is Venus. > > > > > > > 3)Saraswati : Planet is Mercury. > > > > > > > 4)Savitri : Planet is Jupiter. > > > > > > > 5)Radha. : Planet is Saturn. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Though Rahu\ketu and sun\moon are excluded in basic scheme of > > tattwas still we can classify by putting Rahu and ketu with Durga, Sun > > with Saraswati & Moon with Savitri. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is just my thought and shared with all, if you find appropriate > > than discuss it else leave it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thankyou, > > > > > > > Best Wishes, > > > > > > > Vijay Goel > > > > > > > Jaipur. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, > "Bhaskar" > > <bhaskar_jyotish@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sreenadh ji and all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Those who wish to learn about the real source of astrology and > the > > > > > > > > timings etc. must make an independent reading and study into the > > ancient > > > > > > > > puranas and must not allow themselves to be influenced by any > > modern > > > > > > > > texts or, websites on such subjects. 3 years of study of the > > following > > > > > > > > would give one an indepth knowledge and original knowledge of > > actual > > > > > > > > astrology on Nakshatras , Vedic astrology and allied subjects. > > Just > > > > > > > > Forget the commonly known astrological texts we are accustomed > to. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Read these and one has read all - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Narada Purana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Padma Purana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Brahmavaarvat Purana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Recently I posted some lines on Nishedha food for certain Masas > > and > > > > > > > > tithis. These come from "BrahmaVaarvat Puraana" Page > 78 (Gita > > Press). > > > > > > > > The above will teach one real astrology and not the "Bankas > > bakwaas" > > > > > > > > astrology we notice all around us. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The above advice comes from a real Yogi and not from me. I have > > seen > > > > > > > > this Yogi perform real miracles in day times, a man who can call > > at will > > > > > > > > anyone from the atmosphere, a man who can predict the time of > > death to > > > > > > > > the minute, a man who can tell you what planets are placed where > > in Your > > > > > > > > horoscope without even opening or closing his eyes. He is my > > Spiritual > > > > > > > > , mantra and Jyotish Guru who can just see a person and tell him > > what > > > > > > > > planets in his Horoscope indicate the source of his ills. He is > > the best > > > > > > > > jyotishi I have seen till date, and about 25 years ago I have > seen > > him > > > > > > > > explaining Horoscopes like nobody else and giving sureshot > > remedies. He > > > > > > > > can exorcise the most evil Pisachini gripping a person with his > > powers . > > > > > > > > He has completed the Dus Mahavidyas in his early youth and > > attained > > > > > > > > Siddhis which very few can claim in times of today. When he > > conducts > > > > > > > > Yagnas the animals like Owls and snakes connected to the Diety > > (Whose > > > > > > > > pooja is conducted) come and sit across near him till the Yagna > is > > > > > > > > completed and he receives thus the blessings of the Diety. My > > nephew was > > > > > > > > in the last stage of his Cancer and he just with his power of > Yoga > > and > > > > > > > > in one sentence commanded all the blood cells to rejunevate and > > removed > > > > > > > > the Cancer in a minute. Whereas the foremost Cancer Surgeon of > > Asia , > > > > > > > > Dr.Advani at jaslok hospital, Bombay had finally after giving > the > > > > > > > > maximum number of chemotherapies which can be given to any human > > being, > > > > > > > > had lost hope and asked us to call all relatives for the final > > journey > > > > > > > > of the boy. Such a great person is he. I have witnessed many > such > > of his > > > > > > > > miracles in the last 25 years of my existence. He just has to > > > > > > > > think(Concentrate) for a moment (Few seconds) about You and all > > > > > > > > knowledge about you becomes accessible to him. He stopped > > predicting > > > > > > > > from actual Horoscopes in the early 90's after having attained > > Siddhis > > > > > > > > from his own Guru Pahadi Baba. Anyways I do not wish to speak > much > > > > > > > > about him, but just send this above message across to all > > Jyotishis who > > > > > > > > are really sincere and wish to actually help people and make > this > > world > > > > > > > > a better place to live in. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bhaskar. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.