Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 sri ganeshaya namah dear narasimha, jhora 7.33 is not calculating HL position accurately.please refer below.. date - 8 aug 1985 place - ludhiana ,punjab , india time - 12:40 am jamna ghatis at birth - 47.2080 hora lagna advancement from sunrise - 47.2080 X 24 / 2 = 566.496 sunrise at birth (7 aug) - 21deg cancer 10min 54 sec adding hora lagna advancement + sunrise @ birth = 566.496 + 111.10 = 677.596 - 360 = 317.596 = 17 deg capricorn approx... jhora shows HL at 17 Aq 40m which seems to be incorrect.... please let me know if i have made any calculation error on my part. similar error i found when working with princess diana chart. humbly, chandan s sabarwal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Namaste, > = 677.596 - 360 = 317.596 = 17 deg capricorn approx... > jhora shows HL at 17 Aq 40m which seems to be incorrect.... Nope, 317.596 deg is NOT " 17 deg capricorn approx " . It is " 17 deg aquarius approx " . Capricorn is 270-300 deg, Aquarius is 300-330 deg and Pisces is 330-360 deg. You made an error at the end. There is no error in JHora. Best regards, Narasimha Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpana Spirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org ---- chandan486 <wavelogix wrote: > sri ganeshaya namah > > dear narasimha, > > jhora 7.33 is not calculating HL position accurately.please refer below.. > > date - 8 aug 1985 > place - ludhiana ,punjab , india > time - 12:40 am > > jamna ghatis at birth - 47.2080 > > hora lagna advancement from sunrise - 47.2080 X 24 / 2 = 566.496 > > sunrise at birth (7 aug) - 21deg cancer 10min 54 sec > > adding hora lagna advancement + sunrise @ birth = 566.496 + 111.10 > > = 677.596 - 360 = 317.596 = 17 deg capricorn approx... > > jhora shows HL at 17 Aq 40m which seems to be incorrect.... > > please let me know if i have made any calculation error on my part. > > similar error i found when working with princess diana chart. > > humbly, > chandan s sabarwal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 oh yes ... silly calculation error on my part ... sorry for the trouble.... btw , did you get my mail on shadbala and ishta kashta calculations? humble regards, chandan s sabarwal. ps - i have some spiritual questions , can i ask you in private?? On 9/10/09, Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote: Namaste,> = 677.596 - 360 = 317.596 = 17 deg capricorn approx...> jhora shows HL at 17 Aq 40m which seems to be incorrect.... Nope, 317.596 deg is NOT " 17 deg capricorn approx " . It is " 17 deg aquarius approx " . Capricorn is 270-300 deg, Aquarius is 300-330 deg and Pisces is 330-360 deg. You made an error at the end. There is no error in JHora.Best regards,NarasimhaDo a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpanaSpirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.netFree Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org---- chandan486 <wavelogix wrote: > sri ganeshaya namah>> dear narasimha,>> jhora 7.33 is not calculating HL position accurately.please refer below..>> date - 8 aug 1985> place - ludhiana ,punjab , india > time - 12:40 am>> jamna ghatis at birth - 47.2080>> hora lagna advancement from sunrise - 47.2080 X 24 / 2 = 566.496>> sunrise at birth (7 aug) - 21deg cancer 10min 54 sec >> adding hora lagna advancement + sunrise @ birth = 566.496 + 111.10>> = 677.596 - 360 = 317.596 = 17 deg capricorn approx...>> jhora shows HL at 17 Aq 40m which seems to be incorrect.... >> please let me know if i have made any calculation error on my part.>> similar error i found when working with princess diana chart.>> humbly,> chandan s sabarwal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.