Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

May be A Bug in JHORA

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Namaste Shanumukha,

 

Yes, this is a bug. If city name is blank, Jagannatha Hora is going to the next

line and taking the text there as the city name, the line next as country etc.

So the fields saved in the file after city name are mis-read. Thus,

Julian/Gregorian calendar used can be misread and chart can be wrong.

 

If you never leave the city name blank, you will never see this issue.

 

I will fix it in the next release. Thanks for pointing this out!

 

Thanks,

Narasimha

 

---- " IMS(ZF & T)QA " <imsqazf wrote:

>

> Om Namah Sivaya

>

> Dear Sri Narasimha,

>

> I recently found a small bug / discrepancy in JHora. Let me explain what I

did.

>

> I had to generate a chart with the following data where the long/Latt were

known but not the name of the birth place. Hence I manually entered the

following deatails with the City name field left blank.

>

> DOB : July 24th, 1064 at 10:30 Hrs IST

> Place : 84E55, 19N25

>

> And, then saved the file Ex01.jhd. The following is the resultant file.

> /********************************

> 7

> 24

> 1964

> 10.300000

> -5.300000

> -84.550000

> 19.250000

> 0.000000

> -5.500000

> -5.500000

> 0

> 105

>

> India

> 1

> 1013.250000

> 20.000000

> 0

> ********* End of File **********************/

>

> Then, I restarted the JHora and opened the saved Ex01.jhd file. I got a very

wrong chart as follows.

> +--------------+

> | | |Ju |Mo Ma |

> | | | |Ve Ra |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> |-----------+-----------------------+-----------|

> |SaR | |Su AL |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> |-----------| Rasi |-----------|

> | | |Me GL |

> | | |Md Gk |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> |-----------+-----------------------+-----------|

> |Ke HL | | |As |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> +--------------+

>

>

> The program Key Info tab displays the following.

> C:\Documents and Settings\IPC610\Desktop\Ex01

>

> Natal Chart

>

> July 24, 1964

> Time: 10:30:00

> Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)

> Place: 84 E 55' 00 " , 19 N 25' 00 "

> India, 1

> Altitude: 0.00 meters

>

> Lunar Yr-Mo: Krodhi - Ashadha

> Tithi: Krishna Chaturdasi (Ve) (81.94% left)

> Vedic Weekday: Friday (Ve)

> Nakshatra: Punarvasu (Ju) (35.76% left)

> Yoga: Vajra (Mo) (7.77% left)

> Karana: Vishti (Sa) (63.88% left)

> Hora Lord: Jupiter (5 min sign: Aq)

> Mahakala Hora: Jupiter (5 min sign: Li)

> Kaala Lord: Rahu (Mahakala: Rahu)

>

> Sunrise: 5:31:49

> Sunset: 18:20:15

> Janma Ghatis: 12.4244

>

> Ayanamsa: 23-21-45.32

> Sidereal Time: 7:38:43

>

>

> I agian generated a new chart, but keeping the City Name field as Hyderabad

and manually entered Lat/Lon. The correct chart for the above data shall be as

follows.

>

> +--------------+

> | |Ju |Ve |Ma Ra |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> |-----------+-----------------------+-----------|

> |SaR | |Su GL |

> | | |Gk AL |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> |-----------| Rasi |-----------|

> |Mo | |Me Md |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> | | | |

> |-----------+-----------------------+-----------|

> |Ke HL | | |As |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> | | | | |

> +--------------+

>

>

> And the corresponding Ex02.jhd file

> 7

> 24

> 1964

> 10.300000

> -5.300000

> -84.550000

> 19.250000

> 0.000000

> -5.500000

> -5.500000

> 0

> 105

> Hyderabad

> India

> 1

> 1013.250000

> 20.000000

> 0

>

>

> If we compare the both jhd file contents above, the only field that differes

is City name Hyderabad. In the first file it was kept intentionally blank for

the reason I knew the lat/lon.

>

> Upon probing, I found that the Calander Used field is defaulted to Julian and

not displayed on the Enter Birthdata dilaog Box. Once I changed it to Gregorian,

then everything was fine. So, it looks to me that there is a bug in this. Or is

it intentional? Since, as explained in the procedure above, I didn't change the

Calander field, why should it default to Julian year? The atmospheric pressure

field also changed to 0.25 instead of the default 1013.25.

>

> I think it can be reproduced at your end as well.

>

> Regards,

> Shanmukha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...