Guest guest Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 I haven't used this technique before today so I can't say if it happened in the other versions. I tried to get the nakshatra moon for the Navamsa chart. It seems to always say the same one regardless that the longitude in d9 is different. I just go to the menus and switch from the Nativity Longitudes (Rasi) to the Navamsa D9 and you would expect that to switch but no matter how many charts I try the Nakshatra in D9 stays the same. As this is a new thing to me I may have not set it up right. But I thought you might like to know just in case its a real bug <grin>. By the way I am doing this because of the excellent material on Nakshatras on Barbara Pijan Lama's Jyotish website. Majid Buell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 Namaste, I tested with JHora 1.4 beta. In the longitudes window, I switched the D-chart to navamsa. I do see divisional longitudes and nakshatra displayed based on them. If you can give the birthdata and the exact steps you did, I can try to reproduce it. Thanks, Narasimha ---- majidbuell <majidb wrote: > I haven't used this technique before today so I can't say if it happened in the other versions. I tried to get the nakshatra moon for the Navamsa chart. It seems to always say the same one regardless that the longitude in d9 is different. I just go to the menus and switch from the Nativity Longitudes (Rasi) to the Navamsa D9 and you would expect that to switch but no matter how many charts I try the Nakshatra in D9 stays the same. As this is a new thing to me I may have not set it up right. But I thought you might like to know just in case its a real bug <grin>. By the way I am doing this because of the excellent material on Nakshatras on Barbara Pijan Lama's Jyotish website. > Majid Buell > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 Namaste, Thank you. Now I get it. The nakshatras are being re-calculated in divisional charts only when a chart is opened or TP/Tajaka/Natal modes are being entered/exited. If you keep the same chart open and edit birthdata, divisional nakshatras are not being calculated. Only nakshatra in rasi chart is being re-calculated. Divisional longitudes are being re-calculated, but nakshatra based on them is not being re-calculated. I can reproduce this issue and I will fix it. BTW, thanks a lot to all the people who reported bugs during this 7.4 testing. Your help enables us to make JHora more solid. Thanks, Narasimha ---- majid <majidb wrote: > Namaste Narasimhaji > Its not that they do not display, just that the same Nakshatra displays > for different birthtimes. If you say take one birthtime then change that > to longitudes for Navamsa. Then you bring up say the present time and > change that to longitudes for Navamsa and then bring up another birth > time after a while it seems to get the same nakshatra. Its like the > Nakshatra column gets stuck on one Nakashatra whilst the Longitude > column changes each time. > > Now maybe I am missing a re-set button. I started with Prince Charles > Nov 14, 1948 21:14 London the just switched to the Now chart (first > icon) and then added a chart from my set say Gen Franco Dec 4: 1892 4:09 > 0:32 TZ 8W00 42N30. After a bit the Nakshatra Column does not change it > seems to get stuck. My intent was to look up as many Lunar Navamsa > Nakshatras as were in my check list for research purposes and you had > the system set up, but for now I will just look up the Moon's Longitude > in the Navamsa and find it on a list. > Maybe I am pushing the software too far or something. > Thanks for all the work and the attention you pay to detail. > Majid Buell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.