Guest guest Posted November 25, 2003 Report Share Posted November 25, 2003 Dear Punit ji , I am afraid I can't agree with what shri VarinderJoshi ji has said. He suggests that an Upaya for a Grah-phal planet in the Janma Kundali can , not only be done it must be done every year if it is a malefic. My understanding is entirely different and based on the Lal Kitab. Here I quote from the 1952 Urdu edition [ page 38 ] , the most exhaustive and updated version of the Lal Kitab. The book goes on to explain which is a Rasi-phal planet and says, " Jis ke bure asar se bachne ke liye shaq ka fayada uthaya ja sakta hai " next the book explains which planet would be considered as a Grah- phal planet and says, " Is ke vipreet ya upar kahi hui halat ke ulat haal par jab ki woh uchcha-neech ghar ka, ya apane ghar ka , pakke ghar ka sabit ho to woh grah grah-phal ya pakki halat ka hoga , jis ka asar hamesha ke liye qayam ho chuka hai / uske asar ko tabdeel karne ki koshish karna bemaani balki insani taaqat se bahar hogi / sirf khas-khas khuda raseedi aur mahdood hastiyan hi rekh mein mekh [ surya mesha rashi mein khana no 1 ] mein qaida laga sakti hain./ magar woh bhi akhir tabadala hi hogi / and then talking about ` tabadala ` it gives the example of Babar and Humayun and finally says : " yah haalat bhi unki khudai shareeq hone ki hogi / koi na koi tabadala diya gaya , magar grah-phal phir bhi na tala / " I have quoted these sentences from the book to suggest that we , not enlightened godmen, can not do any upaya for a grah-phal planet , nor like Babar do a` tabadala ` either , ` tabadala `meaning take someone else's misfortune on ourselves. Therefore I believe that there is no Upaya for a Grah-phal planet in the Janma kundali . Only an enlightened sadhu or faqeer can do some thing about it. The example shri Varinder Joshi ji has given of Rahu in the 11th house may not be for a grah-phal because only Saturn and Jupiter have been mentioned as grah-phal planets if in the 11th house. With regards, upadhyay lalkitab , Punit Pandey <pandeypunit> wrote: > With thanks to Mr. Varinder Joshi, I am posting his reply here. I think that would be useful. > > Punit Pandey > > For this, you have to decide and know about the planets in Grah Phal and Rashi Phal in detail. For the Janam Kundali, the planets that are malefic and in Grah Phal, the upaya should be done every year. The Varash Phal planets are considered to be in Rashi phal. After deciding drishti and other placements, you can do the upaya for varshaphal if needed. At the same time, if a planet is in Grah Phal in the janam kundali, then that upaya is also needed. Just one upaya of a malefic planet in the Janam Kundali, generally does not solve the problems for life particularly if it is of Grah Phal. For example, if Rahu is in the eleventh house, it requires a remedial measure every year - Four dry coconuts and four pieces of lead in running water, every year. And in Varash phal, if the same Rahu comes to the first house then upaya for this will also be needed. Varinder Joshi > > > Rajinder Bhatia <rajinderbhatia2002> wrote: > Friends, > > This question about when to perform a remedial measure for the natal chart and when to perform the measure for the annual progressed horoscope is not really very easy but an excellent question, nevertheless. Upadhyay Jee has also noted below that " it is not as simple as it may sound. " I tend to agree with his (Upadhyay Jee's) answer. Someone has asked somewhat similar question in the Discussion Forum at www.OriginalLalKitab.com and Varinder Joshi has answered that question there. His explanation takes us into the right direction. Basically, it boils down to " LalKitab grammar " - a good understanding of GrahaPhal and RashiPhal certainly helps in unfolding the mystery. All of a suddent this is begining to make sense. > > Respectfully, > > Rajinder Bhatia > > > upadhyay_iitd <upadhyay_iitd> wrote: > dear friends , > > I am speaking for myself alone. In brief while prescribing upaya I > follow this routine [ a ] draw the Varsh Phal chart [ b ] determine > the planet/planets which are responsible for the problem , it is not > as simple as it may sound ,the planet/planets that are suspect have > to be seen in relation to the other planet placements [ c ] if there > is any ambiguity regarding the rogue planet/planets confirm from the > querrist through qustions regarding his other family members , the > orientation of the house he lives in or the surroundings of his house > etc.[ d ]once the planet/planets have been identified , their > placement context understood ,then comes the most difficult part of > the whole exercise namely - prescribing the upaya. I have to then > decide which of the SIX forms of upaya has to be prescribed for that > paricular planet.This is done keeping in mind the entire grammar of > Lal Kitab , e.g. rashi phal-grah phal factor , aspect factor ,friend- > enemy factor etc..its a long list. > > Now coming to the querries shri Vinod Kumar ji has raised ; > > [ a ]Have the upaya to be repeated ? No . > The upaya are Varsh Phal specific for a particular problem and > hold good for that year. If the planet is placed in the same house > again , in the Varsh Phal , a few years later , and the querrist gets > the same problem again even then the upaya may not be the same > because the placement of the other planets is not likely to be the > same that year too. > > [ b ] There are at least 12 upaya mentioned for the Mars in the 4th > house depending on the problems arising out of Mars in that house. > The formulations of these 12 upaya might run into a couple of > dozens . The upaya shri Vinod ji has mentioned , in his example ,is > advised only for the 'progeny problem' depending on whether the other > planetary placement demands it . Therefore it is extremely dangerous > to pick up stock-upaya from a book and prescribe it without > understanding the grammar of the Lal Kitab. > > [ c ] The planetary time scale is a rough guide to expect the results > of the planet , good or bad ,in our life. Yes it does help us > appreciate the intensity of the problem when prescribing the upaya. > > with regards, > > upadhyay > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2003 Report Share Posted November 25, 2003 Upadhyay Ji, I agree with you. It is what I understood from Lal Kitab. I didn't find the things told by Varinder ji in Lal Kitab. I think Varinder ji (I guess he is the member of this group) or Rajinder ji can explain it. I request Varinder ji to quote the source of this information or explain why this discripency is there. Regards, Punit Pandey lalkitab , " Suresh Upadhyay " <upadhyay_iitd> wrote: > > Dear Punit ji , > > I am afraid I can't agree with what shri VarinderJoshi ji has said. > He suggests that an Upaya for a Grah-phal planet in the Janma Kundali > can , not only be done it must be done every year if it is a malefic. > My understanding is entirely different and based on the Lal Kitab. > Here I quote from the 1952 Urdu edition [ page 38 ] , the most > exhaustive and updated version of the Lal Kitab. > > The book goes on to explain which is a Rasi-phal planet and says, > > " Jis ke bure asar se bachne ke liye shaq ka fayada uthaya ja sakta > hai " > > next the book explains which planet would be considered as a Grah- > phal planet and says, > > " Is ke vipreet ya upar kahi hui halat ke ulat haal par jab ki woh > uchcha-neech ghar ka, ya apane ghar ka , pakke ghar ka sabit ho to > woh grah grah-phal ya pakki halat ka hoga , jis ka asar hamesha ke > liye qayam ho chuka hai / uske asar ko tabdeel karne ki koshish > karna bemaani balki insani taaqat se bahar hogi / sirf khas-khas > khuda raseedi aur mahdood hastiyan hi rekh mein mekh [ surya mesha > rashi mein khana no 1 ] mein qaida laga sakti hain./ magar woh bhi > akhir tabadala hi hogi / > > and then talking about ` tabadala ` it gives the example of Babar and > Humayun and finally says : > " yah haalat bhi unki khudai shareeq hone ki hogi / koi na koi > tabadala diya gaya , magar grah-phal phir bhi na tala / " > > I have quoted these sentences from the book to suggest that we , not > enlightened godmen, can not do any upaya for a grah-phal planet , nor > like Babar do a` tabadala ` either , ` tabadala `meaning take someone > else's misfortune on ourselves. Therefore I believe that there is no > Upaya for a Grah-phal planet in the Janma kundali . Only an > enlightened sadhu or faqeer can do some thing about it. > > The example shri Varinder Joshi ji has given of Rahu in the 11th > house may not be for a grah-phal because only Saturn and Jupiter have > been mentioned as grah-phal planets if in the 11th house. > > With regards, > > upadhyay > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , Punit Pandey <pandeypunit> > wrote: > > With thanks to Mr. Varinder Joshi, I am posting his reply here. I > think that would be useful. > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > For this, you have to decide and know about the planets in Grah > Phal and Rashi Phal in detail. For the Janam Kundali, the planets > that are malefic and in Grah Phal, the upaya should be done every > year. The Varash Phal planets are considered to be in Rashi phal. > After deciding drishti and other placements, you can do the upaya for > varshaphal if needed. At the same time, if a planet is in Grah Phal > in the janam kundali, then that upaya is also needed. Just one upaya > of a malefic planet in the Janam Kundali, generally does not solve > the problems for life particularly if it is of Grah Phal. For > example, if Rahu is in the eleventh house, it requires a remedial > measure every year - Four dry coconuts and four pieces of lead in > running water, every year. And in Varash phal, if the same Rahu comes > to the first house then upaya for this will also be needed. Varinder > Joshi > > > > > > Rajinder Bhatia <rajinderbhatia2002> wrote: > > Friends, > > > > This question about when to perform a remedial measure for the > natal chart and when to perform the measure for the annual progressed > horoscope is not really very easy but an excellent question, > nevertheless. Upadhyay Jee has also noted below that " it is not as > simple as it may sound. " I tend to agree with his (Upadhyay Jee's) > answer. Someone has asked somewhat similar question in the Discussion > Forum at www.OriginalLalKitab.com and Varinder Joshi has answered > that question there. His explanation takes us into the right > direction. Basically, it boils down to " LalKitab grammar " - a good > understanding of GrahaPhal and RashiPhal certainly helps in unfolding > the mystery. All of a suddent this is begining to make sense. > > > > Respectfully, > > > > Rajinder Bhatia > > > > > > upadhyay_iitd <upadhyay_iitd> wrote: > > dear friends , > > > > I am speaking for myself alone. In brief while prescribing upaya I > > follow this routine [ a ] draw the Varsh Phal chart [ b ] determine > > the planet/planets which are responsible for the problem , it is > not > > as simple as it may sound ,the planet/planets that are suspect have > > to be seen in relation to the other planet placements [ c ] if > there > > is any ambiguity regarding the rogue planet/planets confirm from > the > > querrist through qustions regarding his other family members , the > > orientation of the house he lives in or the surroundings of his > house > > etc.[ d ]once the planet/planets have been identified , their > > placement context understood ,then comes the most difficult part of > > the whole exercise namely - prescribing the upaya. I have to then > > decide which of the SIX forms of upaya has to be prescribed for > that > > paricular planet.This is done keeping in mind the entire grammar of > > Lal Kitab , e.g. rashi phal-grah phal factor , aspect > factor ,friend- > > enemy factor etc..its a long list. > > > > Now coming to the querries shri Vinod Kumar ji has raised ; > > > > [ a ]Have the upaya to be repeated ? No . > > The upaya are Varsh Phal specific for a particular problem and > > hold good for that year. If the planet is placed in the same house > > again , in the Varsh Phal , a few years later , and the querrist > gets > > the same problem again even then the upaya may not be the same > > because the placement of the other planets is not likely to be the > > same that year too. > > > > [ b ] There are at least 12 upaya mentioned for the Mars in the 4th > > house depending on the problems arising out of Mars in that house. > > The formulations of these 12 upaya might run into a couple of > > dozens . The upaya shri Vinod ji has mentioned , in his example ,is > > advised only for the 'progeny problem' depending on whether the > other > > planetary placement demands it . Therefore it is extremely > dangerous > > to pick up stock-upaya from a book and prescribe it without > > understanding the grammar of the Lal Kitab. > > > > [ c ] The planetary time scale is a rough guide to expect the > results > > of the planet , good or bad ,in our life. Yes it does help us > > appreciate the intensity of the problem when prescribing the upaya. > > > > with regards, > > > > upadhyay > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2003 Report Share Posted November 26, 2003 Respected Fellow LalKitabists, There is no denying the fact and Upadhyay Jee has quoted from LalKitab about GrahPhal. However, remember that we are quoting from a book published over fifty years ago. Pandit Roop Chand Jee, Varinder's grandfather, continued to practice and modify LalKitab methodology right till his last day on this earth. Varinder has quoted based on the written material from Pt Roop Chand Jee. I am sure that all of you have noticed that despite some planets being in Graha Phal, yet LalKitab specifies remedial measures for them. Based on my personal experience, Pandit jee had advised my younger brother back in 1970 to perform those remedial measures every year to minimize the effects of a couple of GrahPhal planets. However, it is up to you to take it or leave it; please use your judgement. Respectfully, Rajinder Bhatia Upadhyay Ji,I agree with you. It is what I understood from Lal Kitab. I didn't find the things told by Varinder ji in Lal Kitab. I think Varinder ji (I guess he is the member of this group) or Rajinder ji can explain it. I request Varinder ji to quote the source of this information or explain why this discripency is there.Regards,Punit Pandey Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2003 Report Share Posted November 26, 2003 I am little confused here, correct me if i am wrong. If the LalKitab followers are practicing the teachings of the LalKitab (1952 edition) and the material written later by Roop Chand Ji contradicts it, then how can a LalKitab practitioner can prescribe the right Upayays,especially when the modified material is not available for anyone to refer to. I think the Joshi family should make an effort to publish the Lal Kitab with the updated material written By Roop Chand Ji, so that people could benefit from the powerfull Upayays of Lak Kitab. I think that is the reason so many crooks are claiming to be the Lal Kitab originaors, because for an ordinary young person who wants to learn lalkitab its very hard to distinguish who is the real Lal Kitab author. Again I am amazed at the time, effort and pain that Upadhyay Ji is putting to help the mankind. Upadhyay Ji is the true follower of Lal Kitab as he is not expecting anything in return. Regards Gullu lalkitab , Rajinder Bhatia <rajinderbhatia2002> wrote: > Respected Fellow LalKitabists, > There is no denying the fact and Upadhyay Jee has quoted from LalKitab about GrahPhal. However, remember that we are quoting from a book published over fifty years ago. Pandit Roop Chand Jee, Varinder's grandfather, continued to practice and modify LalKitab methodology right till his last day on this earth. Varinder has quoted based on the written material from Pt Roop Chand Jee. > I am sure that all of you have noticed that despite some planets being in Graha Phal, yet LalKitab specifies remedial measures for them. Based on my personal experience, Pandit jee had advised my younger brother back in 1970 to perform those remedial measures every year to minimize the effects of a couple of GrahPhal planets. > > However, it is up to you to take it or leave it; please use your judgement. > > Respectfully, > Rajinder Bhatia > > Upadhyay Ji, > > I agree with you. It is what I understood from Lal Kitab. I didn't find the things told by Varinder ji in Lal Kitab. I think Varinder ji (I guess he is the member of this group) or Rajinder ji can explain it. I request Varinder ji to quote the source of this information or > explain why this discripency is there. > > Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.