Guest guest Posted June 13, 2004 Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 Ever since I have started reading about it(the e-book here and the translation by Goswamni & Vashisth) and corrrelating what the book says with my life, there is a remarkable level of coincidence between what the book says and what I have lived over the past 40 odd yrs - clear, unambiguous coincidence. So why delve into needless controversies? Just see if you can benefit from the text. However if you like controversies/arguements be my guest and go ahead. R S lalkitab , " vivek784 " <vivek784> wrote: > Dear all the Lal Kitabees ji > > The is lot of confusion about who is the author of l;al kitab > General view is that its author is unknown > But there is website http://www.originallalkitab.com > which says that it is written by Pandit Roop chand Joshi > > " Lal Kitab is the name of five books, published between 1939 and > 1952, which expound an absolutely unique system of Indian astrology > now known as the Lal Kitab system of astrology. These books, each > carrying the title Lal Kitab, were authored by the originator of this > system, Pandit Roop Chand Joshi " > It further states that " In a dream, he(Pandit roop chand joshi) saw > an unseen person who told Pt Roop Chand that he had been " picked " to > modify and bring to the world, a revolutionary system of astrology. > His entire knowledge of physiognomy, palmistry and the prevalent > surroundings was to be amalgamated into one discipline " . > > Please go thru the site and lets discusses the what is the truth > vivek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2004 Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 The confusion has been created by a combination of ignorant (who did not know who the author was) and, by some selfish people on purpose ("let me create confusion and sell my own books.") If you are reading the translation by M/s Goswami and Vashisth, they acknowledge Pt Roop Chand jee as the author of this system. To quote you "Just see if you can benefit from the text. However if you like controversies/arguements be my guest and go ahead." I very strongly feel that we should know who should we be thankful for the benefit that we all are deriving. There are numerous people on this forum who either personally met or their parents met Pt Roop Chand Jee. I'd hope that at least on this forum, there should not be a confusion or contraversary about the origin of LalKitab or its author. Respectfully, Rajinder Bhatiarakeshsahgal <rakeshsahgal wrote: Ever since I have started reading about it(the e-book here and thetranslation by Goswamni & Vashisth) and corrrelating what the booksays with my life, there is a remarkable level of coincidence betweenwhat the book says and what I have lived over the past 40 odd yrs -clear, unambiguous coincidence. So why delve into needless controversies? Just see if you can benefitfrom the text. However if you like controversies/arguements be myguest and go ahead.R S Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Messenger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2004 Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 Yes they have exhibited the grace of giving credit where it is apparently due. And yes I agree with you, when one comes aross such a beneficial piece of work one needs to remember with gratitude the person(s) who have made it possible for us to so benefit. My only submission was needless controversies serve no purpose whatsoever. They only detract such fora from their stated purpose i.e. the dissemination of this body of knowledge for expanding the base of people who benefit from this school of thought. Allow me to assure you NO discrespect of any kind was intended towards towards Pt Roop Chand Joshi ji. Regards R S lalkitab , Rajinder Bhatia <rajinderbhatia2002> wrote: > The confusion has been created by a combination of ignorant (who did not know who the author was) and, by some selfish people on purpose ( " let me create confusion and sell my own books. " ) If you are reading the translation by M/s Goswami and Vashisth, they acknowledge Pt Roop Chand jee as the author of this system. To quote you " Just see if you can benefit from the text. However if you like controversies/arguements be my guest and go ahead. " I very strongly feel that we should know who should we be thankful for the benefit that we all are deriving. There are numerous people on this forum who either personally met or their parents met Pt Roop Chand Jee. I'd hope that at least on this forum, there should not be a confusion or contraversary about the origin of LalKitab or its author. > Respectfully, > Rajinder Bhatia > > rakeshsahgal <rakeshsahgal> wrote: > Ever since I have started reading about it(the e-book here and the > translation by Goswamni & Vashisth) and corrrelating what the book > says with my life, there is a remarkable level of coincidence between > what the book says and what I have lived over the past 40 odd yrs - > clear, unambiguous coincidence. > > So why delve into needless controversies? Just see if you can benefit > from the text. However if you like controversies/arguements be my > guest and go ahead. > > > > R S > > > > Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Messenger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.