Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Sorry state of affairs for the group

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I don't consider to be an expert in Lal Kitab but I am also not ignorant about this subject. My family has been very blessedas far as Lal Kitab goes. My grandfather and Pt Rup Chand were good friends. My grandfather also had a chance to learn basics of Lal Kitab from Pt ji. Someof this was passed on to me. I understand some concepts quite well.

I have very carefully read all the old postings of this . I have developed a good sense of the level of understanding of Lal Kitab knowledge of the members in this group. I am sad at the very rude correspondence that is taking place in last few days.Someone who has no knowledge of this mazmoon himselfbut he has not spared those who have proved themselves again and again atthe group. His Guru is refusing to give him the knowledge so he is directinghis anger and frustration at others. He should kindly learn to deal withfrustrations as a mature person by himself and not giving a bad taste to all others. We wants us that we must agree to his demands. ABHEE JUMMA JUMMA DO DIN HUVAY HAIN AUR US NE SAB KO CONDEMN KAR DIYA HAI. MERE BHAI - PAHLAY HAMEIN BHEE PATAA CHALAY KI AAP KITNE PAANEE MEIN HO. KOYEE HOROSCOPE ANALYZE KARO TO PATAA CHALAY KI AAP DUSRON KO BAHUTJALDEE CONDEMN KAR DEATAY HO LEKIN AAP KEE

APNEE KNOWLEDGE KEE KYAA AUKAAT HAI. Aur iss socalled discussions mein saahib hee judge aur jury dono hain.Agar saahib ko jawaab naheen pasand aaya to jawaab dene wala sab se badaa moorkh sabit hoga. Also, I couldn't keep from laughing after reading such an intellectual explanation of Holi. Dosto, kyaa yeh example kisee kee samajh mein aayee ya aapko ek bhee katraa sense ka nazar aaya? and the connection of LalKitab with the characters from Ramayan. wHAT A BUNK! Come, do you really believe this? Does not LalKitab and mythology say that Hanuman as representing Mars and our new Guru is talking about Laxman and Vibhishana as representing Mangal nek and bad. Jyotish is devine knowledge but it is the human beings who interpret it. Pt Rup Chand was one such extraordinary human being. But there are errors in Lal Kitab not done by purpose and not in the devine knowledge but here and there inspite of Pt Rup Chand's best effort.

He himself wrote in the book that the best friend is the one who points out shortcomings in this subject. So he knew that there were errors.

I am sorry. I can not write good English. But I see the aggressive style as very very harmful. The person who gave the original answer in some other reference for the 35-sala chakkar should have been given a chance to explain. Maybe Bhatiya ji knows the answer. hamara naya dost disappoint ho gayaa aur rone lag gayaa. phir wo spade ko spade kahane lag gayaa. yaa to mujhe bataao ki is ka jawab kya hai aur jawab bhee wo jo mujhe khud maloom nahee par wo mujhe pasand aaye par aap ki main khatiya khadee kar doonga. kam se kam Bhatiya ji ko explain karne ka moka to dena chahiye tha. Lalkitabee ji ne bahut politely jawaab diyaa to jis phooharta ke saath unhecondemn kar diyaa wo ek sabhya logon ka tareeqa nahee hai. aap doosronse knowledge kee demand kar rahe hain - hamesha gyan sharaaft kee had mein aur namratapoorvak liya jaata hai, naaki kisikee gardan pakad kar. Shayad aap ke guru bhee yahee demonstrate karna chahte hain. zara sochiye.

main samajhti hoon ke ye group ko todne kee ya gumraah karne kee scheme hai.Is tarah se to group band ho jayega, mujhe aisa lag raha hai. Sorry butI can not hide my disappointment at the immaturity and rudeness which wasalmost not there in this group before. Sorry if I have crossed the limit of Mr Pandey's guidelines. But I see bigtrouble in this group. I joined as I was very excited about sharing the knowledge but no civilized person will share on such impolite conditions.

 

Mrs MKASangeet Visharad

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Respected madam,

 

more or less meine bhi yahi kaha hai apne message mein. ram charit

manas ke patra aur holi ke sandarbha mein bhi meri yahi raya hai.

 

i also think that the group would be closed soon unless respected

Punit jee takes an action.

 

with respect for all the gurus.

 

bhuwan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

lalkitab , Model Model <model_1965_june>

wrote:

>

> I don't consider to be an expert in Lal Kitab but I am also not

> ignorant about this subject. My family has been very blessed

> as far as Lal Kitab goes. My grandfather and Pt Rup Chand were good

friends.

> My grandfather also had a chance to learn basics of Lal Kitab from

Pt ji. Some

> of this was passed on to me. I understand some concepts quite well.

> I have very carefully read all the old postings of this

> . I have developed a good sense of the level of

understanding of

> Lal Kitab knowledge of the members in this group.

>

> I am sad at the very rude correspondence that is taking place in

last few days.

> Someone who has no knowledge of this mazmoon himself

> but he has not spared those who have proved themselves again and

again at

> the group. His Guru is refusing to give him the knowledge so he is

directing

> his anger and frustration at others. He should kindly learn to deal

with

> frustrations as a mature person by himself and not giving a bad

taste to all

> others.

> We wants us that we must agree to his demands. ABHEE JUMMA JUMMA DO

DIN

> HUVAY HAIN AUR US NE SAB KO CONDEMN KAR DIYA HAI. MERE BHAI -

PAHLAY HAMEIN BHEE PATAA CHALAY KI AAP KITNE PAANEE MEIN HO. KOYEE

HOROSCOPE ANALYZE KARO TO PATAA CHALAY KI AAP DUSRON KO BAHUT

> JALDEE CONDEMN KAR DEATAY HO LEKIN AAP KEE APNEE KNOWLEDGE KEE KYAA

AUKAAT HAI. Aur iss socalled discussions mein saahib hee judge aur

jury dono hain.

> Agar saahib ko jawaab naheen pasand aaya to jawaab dene wala sab se

badaa

> moorkh sabit hoga. Also, I couldn't keep from laughing after

reading such an intellectual

> explanation of Holi. Dosto, kyaa yeh example kisee kee samajh mein

aayee ya aap

> ko ek bhee katraa sense ka nazar aaya? and the connection of

LalKitab with

> the characters from Ramayan. wHAT A BUNK! Come, do you really

> believe this? Does not LalKitab and mythology say that Hanuman as

> representing Mars and our new Guru is talking about Laxman and

Vibhishana as

> representing Mangal nek and bad. Jyotish is devine knowledge but

it is the human beings who interpret it.

> Pt Rup Chand was one such extraordinary human being. But there are

errors in

> Lal Kitab not done by purpose and not in the devine knowledge but

here and there inspite of Pt Rup Chand's best effort. He himself

wrote in the book that the best friend is the one who points out

shortcomings in this subject. So he knew that there were errors.

> I am sorry. I can not write good English. But I see the aggressive

style as very very harmful. The person who gave the original answer

in some other reference for the 35-sala chakkar should have been

given a chance to explain. Maybe Bhatiya ji knows the answer. hamara

naya dost disappoint ho gayaa aur rone lag gayaa. phir wo spade ko

spade kahane lag gayaa. yaa to mujhe bataao ki is ka jawab kya hai

aur jawab bhee wo jo mujhe khud maloom nahee par wo mujhe pasand aaye

par aap ki main khatiya khadee kar doonga. kam se kam Bhatiya ji ko

explain karne ka moka to dena chahiye tha. Lalkitabee ji ne bahut

politely jawaab diyaa to jis phooharta ke saath unhe

> condemn kar diyaa wo ek sabhya logon ka tareeqa nahee hai. aap

doosron

> se knowledge kee demand kar rahe hain - hamesha gyan sharaaft kee

had

> mein aur namratapoorvak liya jaata hai, naaki kisikee gardan pakad

kar.

> Shayad aap ke guru bhee yahee demonstrate karna chahte hain. zara

sochiye.

> main samajhti hoon ke ye group ko todne kee ya gumraah karne kee

scheme hai.

> Is tarah se to group band ho jayega, mujhe aisa lag raha hai. Sorry

but

> I can not hide my disappointment at the immaturity and rudeness

which was

> almost not there in this group before.

>

> Sorry if I have crossed the limit of Mr Pandey's guidelines. But I

see big

> trouble in this group. I joined as I was very excited about sharing

the

> knowledge but no civilized person will share on such impolite

conditions.

>

> Mrs MKA

> Sangeet Visharad

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...