Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Taviz/talisman..

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Prabhakar Ji and Bhuwan Ji

I am not at all offended. and i m not that senior & experienced

astrologer...just a student of astrology.

Regarding taveez , i am not acting as per any baazaari book, this has been

told to me by a senior lalkitab practitioner ......same views has been

shared by Bhatia Saheb also ( mail sent by him on 8th Aug ) .

this forum is meant to discuss lalkitab,the more we discuss...the more we

will gain.

 

a request, kindly share with us ...how to analyse a chart step by step , you

can take Harry's sister's case for example.

 

Regards

Rajeev K Khattar

 

 

 

 

 

-

" Yograj Prabhakar " <yr_prabhakar

<lalkitab >

Tuesday, August 03, 2004 12:36 PM

Re: [lalkitab] Re: taviz/talisman...kindly comment

 

 

> Dear Bhuwan Ji

>

>

> That is what I wanted to hear. You explained the

> situation in its true soul.And that is what LAL KITAB

> says exactly regarding not accepting/keeping a

> Taveez/Tamisman etc.

>

> These sort of lapses are the visible result of study

> the subject from Bazaari Books.

>

> I hope Mr. Khattar will not feel offended from my

> side.

> Because my intentions are not at all malefide. He is

> one of our seniors, and being the senior most junior

> of the subject,I was surprised to hear this sort of

> precaution from him.

>

> Innovations are good upto some extent. But

> fabrications are not. I request the practitioners of

> LK to study the original book thoroughly before

> recommending remedial measures to innocent peoples.

>

> Regards

>

> Yograj Prabhakar.

>

>

> --- bhuwanvashishtha <bhuwanvashishtha

> wrote:

>

> > Respected Khattar jee,

> >

> > Taking a tabeez from a faqir is prohibited only when

> > the mercury of

> > the 9th house in the janma kundali goes to the 11th

> > house of the

> > varsh phal. Here I quote from the book 1952 ed page

> > 576 , mercury in

> > the 11th house , mandee haalat sec# 3

> >

> > " Varsh Pahl ke mutabiq khana # 9 ka budh khana # 11

> > mein aaya huwa

> > howe aur teve wala kisi faqir , sadhu wagerah se koi

> > taabeez lewe to

> > budh poora jaroon se ukhaar dega , yaani had se

> > jyadaa manda asar

> > dega / "

> >

> > Lines , not identical , but similar in meaning occur

> > in Arun sanhita

> > [ chandigarh ed ] on page 198 top.

> >

> > Therefore there is no ban on keeping a tabeez if one

> > already has it.

> > The prohibition is in regard to accepting a tabeez

> > from a faqeer or a

> > sadhu in that year when the mercury of 9th in the

> > janma kundali goes

> > to the 11th in the varsh phal

> >

> > But most of the books available as notes on Lal

> > Kitab donot carry the

> > condition of prohibition , instead carry a blanket

> > ban on keeping a

> > tabeez, for example the Lal Kitab on our own groups

> > file section

 

> > page 23 , remedies # 4 }.

> >

> > We have to take extreme care about what to consult

> > and what not to

> > consult.

> >

> > sabhee gurujan ko naman,

> >

> > bhuwan

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > lalkitab , Rajeev KKhattar

> > <lalkitab@v...>

> > wrote:

> > > When mercury is affilicted,one should not keep

> > talisman/tabeez ,in

> > lalkitab

> > > it is written for mercury in 11th.

> > > mercury is affilicted in 3rd and 9th also. so i

> > suggested this.He

> > has

> > > mercury in 3rd in varshphal.

> > > Regards

> > > Rajeev K Khattar

> > >

> > > -

> > > " Yograj Prabhakar " <yr_prabhakar>

> > > <lalkitab >

> > > Monday, August 02, 2004 11:29 PM

> > > Re: [lalkitab] case of Himanshu

> > Porwal,Gurujans kindly

> > > comment..another case of moon + sat

> > >

> > >

> > > > Respected Khattar Sahib

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Can you elaborate why Mr.Himanshu Should not

> > keep

> > > > Taveez or Talisman in his office/house etc ?

> > What is

> > > > the logic behing your recommendations ? Is it

> > > > mentioned anywhere in the legendary Lal Kitab ?

> > Or s

> > > > it your good self's own innovation ? I would

> > love to

> > > > hear from your side.

> > > >

> > > > Please dont take it otherwise. I am writing a

> > research

> > > > paper on this subject, so it is very important

> > for me

> > > > to have the complete knowledge behind the

> > remedial

> > > > measures of LK.

> > > >

> > > > Regards

> > > >

> > > > Yograj Prabhakar.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > --- Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > Dear Khattar Sahib

> > > > >

> > > > > I think you forget to mention the remedy for

> > Rahu in

> > > > > 11th; the most malefic planet in the

> > Varshphal.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Yograj Prabhakar.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > --- Rajeev KKhattar <lalkitab@v...> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > > Himasnhu Porwal> Place of birth Udaipur>

> > Time

> > > > > 8.05

> > > > > > PM IST> Date 18th april

> > > > > > 1975

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Chart--

> > > > > > Rahu in 2

> > > > > > Mar in 5

> > > > > > Jup in 6

> > > > > > Sun & Mer in 7

> > > > > > Ven + Ketu in 8

> > > > > > Moon + Sat in 9

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Varshphal

> > > > > > Mer & Sun in 3.........Rahu in 11

> > > > > > sat & moon in 2-------Ven & Ketu in 12

> > > > > > Mar in 4

> > > > > > Jup in 1

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > suggestions ;

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 1. Pour a cupful of unboiled milk ,

> > sweetened with

> > > > > > sugar , onto the roots of

> > > > > > a banyan (BARGAD in hindi , VAT VRIKSH in

> > Sanskrit

> > > > > ,

> > > > > > this tree has long

> > > > > > beard ) tree and put that wet soil on your

> > navel

> > > > > > and forehead . OR bring

> > > > > > the wet soil home and dry in shade . Apply

> > dry

> > > > > soil

> > > > > > on your forehead as

> > > > > > tilakam daily.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2. This birth year you may face depression /

> > > > > > isolation / separation /

> > > > > > hospitalisation / litigation. To minimise

> > the

> > > > > > effects , make 100 small

> > > > > > balls of clay , dry them in shade . Keep one

> > ball

> > > > > > in any temple for 100

> > > > > > days , daily

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Clean your teeth with alum everyday. not to

> > take

> > > > > > pan-masalas/pan .

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Soak a handful of whole green ( unbroken )

> > MOONG

> > > > > > pulse at bedtime , feed it

> > > > > > to the birds next morning. To be done for 43

> > days

> > > > > .

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Not to keep any yantra / tabiz ( talisman )

> > in

> > > > > your

> > > > > > house / office .

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Good Luck

> > > > > > Rajeev K Khattar

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > New and Improved Mail - Send 10MB

> > messages!

> >

> === message truncated ===

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Read only the mail you want - Mail SpamGuard.

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Khattar Sahib

 

I am really sorry if your good self thought that my

comments regarding Bazzari Kitab were anyway directed

towards you.

 

This is the general perception I am having regarding

the modern LK Quacks who are presenting themselves as

the civil surgeons of the subject. I hope your good

self will understand the souls behind my message.

 

In my personal opinion you are a civil surgeon.Because

a Quack never gives weight to a junoirs suggestion.

 

Regards.

 

Yograj Prabhakar.

 

 

 

 

 

 

--- Rajeev KKhattar <lalkitab wrote:

 

> Dear Prabhakar Ji and Bhuwan Ji

> I am not at all offended. and i m not that senior &

> experienced

> astrologer...just a student of astrology.

> Regarding taveez , i am not acting as per any

> baazaari book, this has been

> told to me by a senior lalkitab practitioner

> ......same views has been

> shared by Bhatia Saheb also ( mail sent by him on

> 8th Aug ) .

> this forum is meant to discuss lalkitab,the more we

> discuss...the more we

> will gain.

>

> a request, kindly share with us ...how to analyse a

> chart step by step , you

> can take Harry's sister's case for example.

>

> Regards

> Rajeev K Khattar

>

>

>

>

>

> -

> " Yograj Prabhakar " <yr_prabhakar

> <lalkitab >

> Tuesday, August 03, 2004 12:36 PM

> Re: [lalkitab] Re: taviz/talisman...kindly

> comment

>

>

> > Dear Bhuwan Ji

> >

> >

> > That is what I wanted to hear. You explained the

> > situation in its true soul.And that is what LAL

> KITAB

> > says exactly regarding not accepting/keeping a

> > Taveez/Tamisman etc.

> >

> > These sort of lapses are the visible result of

> study

> > the subject from Bazaari Books.

> >

> > I hope Mr. Khattar will not feel offended from my

> > side.

> > Because my intentions are not at all malefide. He

> is

> > one of our seniors, and being the senior most

> junior

> > of the subject,I was surprised to hear this sort

> of

> > precaution from him.

> >

> > Innovations are good upto some extent. But

> > fabrications are not. I request the practitioners

> of

> > LK to study the original book thoroughly before

> > recommending remedial measures to innocent

> peoples.

> >

> > Regards

> >

> > Yograj Prabhakar.

> >

> >

> > --- bhuwanvashishtha <bhuwanvashishtha

> > wrote:

> >

> > > Respected Khattar jee,

> > >

> > > Taking a tabeez from a faqir is prohibited only

> when

> > > the mercury of

> > > the 9th house in the janma kundali goes to the

> 11th

> > > house of the

> > > varsh phal. Here I quote from the book 1952 ed

> page

> > > 576 , mercury in

> > > the 11th house , mandee haalat sec# 3

> > >

> > > " Varsh Pahl ke mutabiq khana # 9 ka budh khana

> # 11

> > > mein aaya huwa

> > > howe aur teve wala kisi faqir , sadhu wagerah se

> koi

> > > taabeez lewe to

> > > budh poora jaroon se ukhaar dega , yaani had se

> > > jyadaa manda asar

> > > dega / "

> > >

> > > Lines , not identical , but similar in meaning

> occur

> > > in Arun sanhita

> > > [ chandigarh ed ] on page 198 top.

> > >

> > > Therefore there is no ban on keeping a tabeez if

> one

> > > already has it.

> > > The prohibition is in regard to accepting a

> tabeez

> > > from a faqeer or a

> > > sadhu in that year when the mercury of 9th in

> the

> > > janma kundali goes

> > > to the 11th in the varsh phal

> > >

> > > But most of the books available as notes on Lal

> > > Kitab donot carry the

> > > condition of prohibition , instead carry a

> blanket

> > > ban on keeping a

> > > tabeez, for example the Lal Kitab on our own

> groups

> > > file section

>

> > > page 23 , remedies # 4 }.

> > >

> > > We have to take extreme care about what to

> consult

> > > and what not to

> > > consult.

> > >

> > > sabhee gurujan ko naman,

> > >

> > > bhuwan

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > lalkitab , Rajeev KKhattar

> > > <lalkitab@v...>

> > > wrote:

> > > > When mercury is affilicted,one should not keep

> > > talisman/tabeez ,in

> > > lalkitab

> > > > it is written for mercury in 11th.

> > > > mercury is affilicted in 3rd and 9th also. so

> i

> > > suggested this.He

> > > has

> > > > mercury in 3rd in varshphal.

> > > > Regards

> > > > Rajeev K Khattar

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > " Yograj Prabhakar " <yr_prabhakar>

> > > > <lalkitab >

> > > > Monday, August 02, 2004 11:29 PM

> > > > Re: [lalkitab] case of Himanshu

> > > Porwal,Gurujans kindly

> > > > comment..another case of moon + sat

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > > Respected Khattar Sahib

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Can you elaborate why Mr.Himanshu Should not

> > > keep

> > > > > Taveez or Talisman in his office/house etc ?

> > > What is

> > > > > the logic behing your recommendations ? Is

> it

> > > > > mentioned anywhere in the legendary Lal

> Kitab ?

> > > Or s

> > > > > it your good self's own innovation ? I would

> > > love to

> > > > > hear from your side.

> > > > >

> > > > > Please dont take it otherwise. I am writing

> a

> > > research

> > > > > paper on this subject, so it is very

> important

> > > for me

> > > > > to have the complete knowledge behind the

> > > remedial

> > > > > measures of LK.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards

> > > > >

> > > > > Yograj Prabhakar.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > --- Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar>

> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Khattar Sahib

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I think you forget to mention the remedy

> for

> > > Rahu in

> > > > > > 11th; the most malefic planet in the

>

=== message truncated ===

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...