Sorry....: No DOB, no birth details ... so what?-

September 13, 2004

dear sirs;

am a old memeber of group didnot want to get in controversy but it

appears that geevak has been removed from groupas his name donot

figure in list. who ever is taking shots now at the post is either

late to respond either by intention or chance.as for trying to analyse

horoscope in absense of details it is almost wasting time as one

gullu sir is mentioned and got a rude reply.

similarly some one shishi or sidharth is no more on list member name

that person also made some critical remarks.responses were made late

by chance or intention

similarly one emealid -critic is no more a member also a criticiser.

is this all a chance or intentional.

one can always analyse horoscopes with details insteaD other things

i dont mind if am removed for mentoning such view.

lalkitab , ceeta bains <ceetabains> wrote:

> bhatia ji, please don't mind mr. gullu is a very nice and pure

hearted man, may be he just wanted to focus ur kind attention towards

nawal's problem, i am working on his chart, i also pray to u kindly

look into it, this person surely deserves ur attention, iknow u

arevery busy but kindly do it as a personal favour to me. about

geevak i think ur analysis was absolutely right i just put in my

observations so that the person can be coaxed to come forward but as

gullu says let him go to hell. aap to chand ki tarah hai, thookne

wala apna hi mooh ganda karega.

> kulbir

> Rajinder Bhatia <rajinderbhatia2002> wrote:Sorry, didn't

realize that Kulbir and I were on YOUR payroll. Apologies. Is baar

muaaf kar do...

> Gullu Badshaw <acura_2004> wrote:

> Bhatia ji and Kulbir ji,

> If you can please stop wasting your

time,

> efforts and energy to find a solution to some problem that doesn't

> even exist. No one asked you to analyse this person's

problems ........

>

September 14, 2004

Ganpati ji,

Both of the ids i.e. geevak and shishi has been removed intentionally.

critic has not been removed, probably he would himself opted for

removal. Do you think that these two ids should not be removed? Being

an old member of this forum, please let me know your opinion. Also it

would be great if other members can give their opinion too on this

matter.

Regards,

Punit Pandey

On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:35:12 -0000, ganpati_1 <ganpati_1 wrote:

> dear sirs;

> am a old memeber of group didnot want to get in controversy but it

> appears that geevak has been removed from groupas his name donot

> figure in list. who ever is taking shots now at the post is either

> late to respond either by intention or chance.as for trying to analyse

> horoscope in absense of details it is almost wasting time as one

> gullu sir is mentioned and got a rude reply.

> similarly some one shishi or sidharth is no more on list member name

> that person also made some critical remarks.responses were made late

> by chance or intention

> similarly one emealid -critic is no more a member also a criticiser.

> is this all a chance or intentional.

> one can always analyse horoscopes with details insteaD other things

> i dont mind if am removed for mentoning such view.

>

> lalkitab , ceeta bains <ceetabains> wrote:

> > bhatia ji, please don't mind mr. gullu is a very nice and pure

> hearted man, may be he just wanted to focus ur kind attention towards

> nawal's problem, i am working on his chart, i also pray to u kindly

> look into it, this person surely deserves ur attention, iknow u

> arevery busy but kindly do it as a personal favour to me. about

> geevak i think ur analysis was absolutely right i just put in my

> observations so that the person can be coaxed to come forward but as

> gullu says let him go to hell. aap to chand ki tarah hai, thookne

> wala apna hi mooh ganda karega.

> > kulbir

> > Rajinder Bhatia <rajinderbhatia2002> wrote:Sorry, didn't

> realize that Kulbir and I were on YOUR payroll. Apologies. Is baar

> muaaf kar do...

> > Gullu Badshaw <acura_2004> wrote:

> > Bhatia ji and Kulbir ji,

> > If you can please stop wasting your

> time,

> > efforts and energy to find a solution to some problem that doesn't

> > even exist. No one asked you to analyse this person's

> problems ........

> >

September 14, 2004

Puneetji namskar

Shri rajinderjike liye kisine agar apana nam chupakar hi likha hai to koi kuch nahi kar sakata .yahan sare aadarniya aur jane-mane hue astrologers her kisiki madad apana samay nikalkar kar rahe hai to meri samaz me nahi aata ke voh adami ya aurat apana gussa yahan kyon nikalna chahate hai.Muze bhi kisine bhala-bura kaha tha, aur gusseme aakar maine meri manki shanti khokar usi reader ke bareme likha tha, lekin ab lagata hai ke kisi ke kahanepar hume utana dhyan dena nahi chatiye kyonki bhala-bura to kahanevala bhag gaya-usaki/ki nam tak pata nahi chala to usaki kundli banakar bhi kya fayada.Shri Rajinderji sabake liye aadarniya hai to uss aadami/auratpar dhyan kyon diya jaye.

vaise Rajinderjine isake bareme jankari dekar thik kiya kyonki hum ummid karenge ki aage koi aisi behuda harkat na kare ab sabhi ko pata chala bhi hoga ke kuch log kis tarah se pesh aate hai.

regards

vasumati

vote. - Register online to vote today!

September 15, 2004

Respected Puneet Ji

there is a old saying that "Nindak Niyare Rakhiye Aangan Kuti Chhavay"

and u must be aware of that.If some body is pin pointing at our wekness or cricising our act we should take it sportingly.any way every body has his own thinking.This is an humble sugession only.

Regards.

RavindrapancholiPunit Pandey <punitp wrote:

Ganpati ji,Both of the ids i.e. geevak and shishi has been removed intentionally.critic has not been removed, probably he would himself opted forremoval. Do you think that these two ids should not be removed? Beingan old member of this forum, please let me know your opinion. Also itwould be great if other members can give their opinion too on thismatter.Regards,Punit PandeyOn Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:35:12 -0000, ganpati_1 <ganpati_1 wrote:> dear sirs;> am a old memeber of group didnot want to get in controversy but it> appears that geevak has been removed from groupas his name donot> figure in list. who ever is taking shots now at the post is either> late to respond either by intention or chance.as for trying to analyse> horoscope in absense of details it is

almost wasting time as one> gullu sir is mentioned and got a rude reply.> similarly some one shishi or sidharth is no more on list member name> that person also made some critical remarks.responses were made late> by chance or intention> similarly one emealid -critic is no more a member also a criticiser.> is this all a chance or intentional.> one can always analyse horoscopes with details insteaD other things> i dont mind if am removed for mentoning such view.> > lalkitab , ceeta bains <ceetabains> wrote:> > bhatia ji, please don't mind mr. gullu is a very nice and pure> hearted man, may be he just wanted to focus ur kind attention towards> nawal's problem, i am working on his chart, i also pray to u kindly> look into it, this person surely deserves ur attention, iknow u> arevery busy but kindly do it as a personal favour to me.

about> geevak i think ur analysis was absolutely right i just put in my> observations so that the person can be coaxed to come forward but as> gullu says let him go to hell. aap to chand ki tarah hai, thookne> wala apna hi mooh ganda karega.> > kulbir> > Rajinder Bhatia <rajinderbhatia2002> wrote:Sorry, didn't> realize that Kulbir and I were on YOUR payroll. Apologies. Is baar> muaaf kar do...> > Gullu Badshaw <acura_2004> wrote:> > Bhatia ji and Kulbir ji,> > If you can please stop wasting your> time,> > efforts and energy to find a solution to some problem that doesn't> > even exist. No one asked you to analyse this person's> problems ........> >>

>> > > > > > > >