Sorry....: No DOB, no birth details ... so what?-[attn -punitji]

[Guest guest]

resp sir

thanks for kind response and clearing confusion

if those persons are not able to read the various responses

and rebuttals why to waste time just move ahead.

if as owner you feel that there was something to look in to all

these messages than those points kindly be kept in sight and addressed

as it is a forum for lalkitab which is still mystery to most and

quacks are calling the shots in field.no offence is intended to ANY

ONE.i personally feel knowledgeble sincere persons must come to front

to share and demystify the subject so that it can be practised by

many.

as one can discuss safe remedies which have effectand can be

explained with basics;i am sure such remedies must be many in books

and many developed by honrable practioners.

as you all are coming out with a seminar;

1] why not share them at place where lovers of this art are going to

come from far and close.

2]why not give a certificte of participation to make it an occassion

3]if some hand out or study matireal is needed for better help of

many newcomers likely to be there a token registration amount

if all at top feell right can be charged.

and if any matireal is for sale kindly mention the costs if possible

for list;so attending ones can come prepared .

i hope above are taken as mere thoughts coming to a sincre mind

and action may be taken if found worth it.thanking you

 

 

 

 

lalkitab , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote:

> Ganpati ji,

>

> Both of the ids i.e. geevak and shishi has been removed

intentionally.

> critic has not been removed, probably he would himself opted for

> removal. Do you think that these two ids should not be removed?

Being

> an old member of this forum, please let me know your opinion. Also

it

> would be great if other members can give their opinion too on this

> matter.

>

> Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

>

>

> On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:35:12 -0000, ganpati_1 <ganpati_1>

wrote:

> > dear sirs;

> > am a old memeber of group didnot want to get in controversy but it

> > appears that geevak has been removed from groupas his name donot

> > figure in list. who ever is taking shots now at the post is

either

> > late to respond either by intention or chance.as for trying to

analyse

> > horoscope in absense of details it is almost wasting time as one

> > gullu sir is mentioned and got a rude reply.

> > similarly some one shishi or sidharth is no more on list member

name

> > that person also made some critical remarks.responses were made

late

> > by chance or intention

> > similarly one emealid -critic is no more a member also a

criticiser.

> > is this all a chance or intentional.

> > one can always analyse horoscopes with details insteaD other

things

> > i dont mind if am removed for mentoning such view.

> >

> > lalkitab , ceeta bains <ceetabains>

wrote:

> > > bhatia ji, please don't mind mr. gullu is a very nice and pure

> > hearted man, may be he just wanted to focus ur kind attention

towards

> > nawal's problem, i am working on his chart, i also pray to u

kindly

> > look into it, this person surely deserves ur attention, iknow u

> > arevery busy but kindly do it as a personal favour to me. about

> > geevak i think ur analysis was absolutely right i just put in my

> > observations so that the person can be coaxed to come forward but

as

> > gullu says let him go to hell. aap to chand ki tarah hai, thookne

> > wala apna hi mooh ganda karega.

> > > kulbir

> > > Rajinder Bhatia <rajinderbhatia2002> wrote:Sorry, didn't

> > realize that Kulbir and I were on YOUR payroll. Apologies. Is baar

> > muaaf kar do...

> > > Gullu Badshaw <acura_2004> wrote:

> > > Bhatia ji and Kulbir ji,

> > > If you can please stop wasting your

> > time,

> > > efforts and energy to find a solution to some problem that

doesn't

> > > even exist. No one asked you to analyse this person's

> > problems ........

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >