R.Bhatia--Rubin,s case-Sir, i beg to differ

[Guest guest]

Bhatia sahib i vehemently beg to differ, kindly view the extract from

the message as follows, i had deliberately written in bold alphabets

that when chandra and budh are established in khana no. 2 in such a

situation lalkitab says that BALKI BUDH AB MADAD DEGA i again stress

that this condition is exclusively for chandra-budh in 2. i think your

goodself mistook this for chandra alone in khana no.2. As i have said

i am still a learner kindly rectify if i am wrong. I DON'T AGREE THAT

IN THIS CONDITION BUDH IS MALEFIC IN KHAANA NO.2. as suggested by u

fixing moon alone in 2 will invite disstrous results of budh in 8 as

deliberated by Umesh ji. kindly read his message thoroughly. Umesh is

not the kind of a person who would agree with me for courtesy sake and

play with someone's life. Moreover with me Umesh and Prabhakar in the

capacity of ustaad would have given me a sound thrashing. but still if

we are wrong we aould be indebted for rectificatin.

jaansheen

 

" khaana no 2 khali hone ke karan pichle janamo ki nek

> kamai bhi madad par nahin.

> mangal khana no.4 mein nahin hai in halaaton mein

> agar khana no2. mein chandra aur budh ko stapith kar

> diya jaye to sabhi taraf se khushgwaar hoga. chandra

> mein jaan aa jayegi, surya mangal aur guru bhi

> taklif se muqt ho jayenge aur khana no. 9 aur 4 ki 2

> wali sharat bhi poori ho jayegi.

> Chandra budh khaana no.2 mein sthapit karne se baaki

> alamton se to chutkara milega hi aur " pitta (guru)

> ki umar ab kabhi shakki na hogi aur na hi dhan aur

> pitta ka bachya hua dhan barbaad hoga, BALKI BUDH AB

> MADAD DEGA "

> aapne akele budh ka upaya bataya hai par usse kuch

> zyada hasil nahin hoga yahan par budh kamai ko aadha

> kar raha par asal maine mein kamai shuru to ho.

>lalkitab , Rajinder Bhatia

<rajinderbhatia2002> wrote:

> Umesh Jee, Jaansheen sahib and all those who participated in this

analysis:

>

> May I poke my nose in to this also? I have started reading the mails

today. My suggestion is that you should also consider " 2nd ghar ko

jagaana " rather than establishing Mercury there. Mercury in the second

is basically a malefic and on top of that, it is in the native's

eighth so I'd be a bit hasitant to establish Mercury there. Via a

Moon based remedial measure, it may be fixed.. Since you folks are

meeting in Delhi, I'd be interested in learning what decision you

reach. Please let me know.

> Best regards.

> Respectfully,

> Rajinder Bhatia

> jaanasheen jaanasneen <jaansheen_e_lk> wrote:

> Thanks for the clarification. What you have said in

> just one line is gagar mein sagar. are bhai hum yuon

> hi to aapko ustaad nahin mante.

> jaansheen

> --- Mudit982001 <mudit982001> wrote:

>

> > jee sahab

> > Mere hisaab sey janamkundlee ke grhon ko lal-kitab

> > ki sharton ko pura

> > kartey hue bhala karey phir varshaphal ke mutabik

> > kareyn. es tarah se

> > jatak ko jyada fayda hoga esa mera manna hey.

> >

> > mudit982001

> >

> > lalkitab , jaanasheen

> > jaanasneen

> > <jaansheen_e_lk> wrote:

> > >

> > > Is group mein yeh baat pehle bhi ho chuki hai aur

> > > mujhe pata hai aap controversial bate forum mein

> > > karana pasand nahin karte is liye aapse guzarish

> > hai

> > > ki khuda ke liye IS BAR rah ko apne tazurbe aur

> > > daanishmandi se roshan kare . aapne darusat

> > pharmaya

> > > ki grah ki tasir jo janam kundali mein tay ho gayi

> > woh

> > > hi umar bhar (varshphal mein) chalti hai. AB

> > SAWAAL

> > > YEH PAIDA HOTA HAI KI JO GRAH TEWE MEIN PAKKE GHAR

> > KA

> > > HAI KYA USKA VARSHPHAL MEIN UPAYA HOTA HAI YA

> > KARNA

> > > MUNASIB HOGA.

> > > JAANSHEEN

>

>

>

>

> Read only the mail you want - Mail SpamGuard.