Guest guest Posted October 16, 2005 Report Share Posted October 16, 2005 Hi Ryan, I had a look at your chart again last night, but only this morning I could write some words... You are now running your Ketu/SUN planetary period, two malefics for Capricorn, so things are not great, but by the end of this month things should generally improve when you start your Ketu/MOON period. Your Moon is not weak, so you should enjoy your Moon bukthi. I also would like to point out that you are very young now. When I was your age, being myself a Capricorn too, I would worry a lot about life, but please have patience, things will improve. I read somewhere 36 is the best age for Capricorns. Your life should improve a lot when you're 28, that is when you start your Venus dasha, and Venus is your yogakaraka. Yes, it is combust in Rasi, but unafflicted and conjunct all functional benefics in Navamsa. Oh, and your Saturn is not in infancy, it is exalted in degree 6 of Libra. I understand that from age 4 to 18 you must have had it tough because you were running your Mercury dasha and your Mercury is indeed weak, I experienced same thing with my weak Moon dasha, it is like we are trained or brain washed to believe there is no way out and that we will never be happy but that is not true as you will see for yourself as you get older. Talk later, Rui. --- Ryan Rocheleau <eleblanc1982 wrote: > Case in point, I don't have a single unafflicted > planet in my own chart: Sun is weak in navamsa, moon > is also, Mercury is combust, so is venus, Mars is in > old age, jupiter is combust, saturn is in infancy, > rahu and ketu are in malefic houses... what's left? > > Ryan > > --- Ryan Rocheleau <eleblanc1982 wrote: > > > Thank you so much for clarifying. I find something > > else a bit confusing though. I have 9 charts of > > friends and family members, and all of them have > > mostly weak planets, and while each of them is > > struggling with 2 or 3 things in their lives, their > > lives are mostly normal. How can this be? Do > > afflictions only manifest during dasha periods? > > > > Ryan > > > > --- RPM <rupamede wrote: > > > > > Hi Ryan, it is always weak. > > > I was also confused at first by similar things. I > > > have already queried the professor regarding my > > > Moon that is exalted and in the benefic 5th house > > > but in the very early degrees of Taurus and the > > > professor said it was weak. > > > On a personal note, I would suggest we should not > > > measure the strenght of planets by looking at > > > the Rasi chart only. I believe the Navamsa chart > > was > > > created, among many other reasons, for double > > > checking strenght. > > > Regards, Rui. > > > > > > --- Ryan Rocheleau <eleblanc1982 wrote: > > > > > > > So planets can't really be understood in black > > and > > > > white terms of weak or strong, I guess. Each > > > > individual planet then may be a mixture of > > > strength > > > > and weakness? > > > > > > > > --- Jean Bianchi <jeanbianchi > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello Ryan, > > > > > > > > > > I think the Sun is considered weak because of > > > being > > > > > in old age, > > > > > but retains some strenght because of its > > > placement > > > > > in its own house. > > > > > The Sun is thus able to promote to some extent > > > the > > > > > significations of this > > > > > moolatrikona house and as per its nature. > > > > > > > > > > With kind regards, > > > > > > > > > > Jean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > " Ryan Rocheleau " > > <eleblanc1982 > > > > > > > > > > Saturday, October 15, 2005 5:03 PM > > > > > Weaknesses vs. Strengths > > in > > > Rasi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Something is confusing me terribly. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the Self Learning Course in Astrology a > > > whole > > > > > bunch > > > > > > of factors are listed that make a planet > > weak, > > > ie > > > > > > combustion, being in a malefic house, > > debility > > > in > > > > > > navamsa, being under 5 degrees and over 25 > > > degrees > > > > > > etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > On the following page there are a list of > > > factors > > > > > that > > > > > > can make a planet stronger: being between > > > 10-20 > > > > > > degrees, being in a sign of dignity etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > What I would like to know, is which would > > take > > > > > > precedence, strengths or weaknesses, if both > > > > > > conditions are present in a planet... eg > > would > > > the > > > > > sun > > > > > > be weak if it were 28 degrees Leo? > > > > > > > > > > > > Ryan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice > > 2005 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.