Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Mystery of Rahu??

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Sir,

I am little struck in this kindly forgive my ignorance and clarify

the doubt .Rahu is one of the most mysterious planet. It is generally

malefic but can give benefic result if its dispositor is benefic and

Rahu itself is placed in a benefic house.

 

1 In this case , i.e Dispositor a benefic and rahu itself placed in a

benefic house, WILL AFFLICTION TO DISPOSITOR make RAHU a " COMPLETE "

MALEFIC giving malefic results similar to the situation if it is

placed in a malefic house with malefic dispositor OR will RAHU STILL

be capable of giving " MIXED results " ( not too good not too bad)??

 

2 In the above case is it advisable to strengthened rahu by wearing a

gem , gomed .

 

Regards

 

Dev

 

 

 

Sincestrengthing of dispositoriI am STRUC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Dev,

 

I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message appended below.

 

Best wishes,

 

 

 

-

" kdsips " <kdsips

 

Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:37 PM

Mystery of Rahu??

 

 

> Dear Sir,

> I am little struck in this kindly forgive my ignorance and clarify

> the doubt .Rahu is one of the most mysterious planet. It is generally

> malefic but can give benefic result if its dispositor is benefic and

> Rahu itself is placed in a benefic house.

>

> 1 In this case , i.e Dispositor a benefic and rahu itself placed in a

> benefic house, WILL AFFLICTION TO DISPOSITOR make RAHU a " COMPLETE "

> MALEFIC giving malefic results similar to the situation if it is

> placed in a malefic house with malefic dispositor

 

YES.

 

OR will RAHU STILL

> be capable of giving " MIXED results " ( not too good not too bad)??

>

LITTLE CHANCE.

 

> 2 In the above case is it advisable to strengthened rahu by wearing a

> gem , gomed .

 

NO.

 

> Regards

>

> Dev

>

>

>

> Sincestrengthing of dispositoriI am STRUC

>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Respected Sir,

Thanks for the reply.

From the discussion once we see that Rahu is malefic (even though it

was placed in a good house , but because of affliction of its

dispositor, the malefic nature is highlighted) in this case which is

better, Rahu with less strength due to old age or infancy or rahu with

more strenghth.??

 

Can we universally say that Rahu being malefic generally will give

good results(in a sense that it will give less malefic results)with

less srength(even if the dispositor is not afflicted and Rahu is

placed in good house) ,if it is weak in strength ?? .

 

 

Regards

 

Dev

 

 

 

 

 

 

Once we say that Rahu is malefic and ,

<siha> wrote:

>

>

> Hello Dev,

>

> I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message appended

below.

>

> Best wishes,

>

>

>

> -

> " kdsips " <kdsips>

>

> Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:37 PM

> Mystery of Rahu??

>

>

> > Dear Sir,

> > I am little struck in this kindly forgive my ignorance and clarify

> > the doubt .Rahu is one of the most mysterious planet. It is generally

> > malefic but can give benefic result if its dispositor is benefic and

> > Rahu itself is placed in a benefic house.

> >

> > 1 In this case , i.e Dispositor a benefic and rahu itself placed in a

> > benefic house, WILL AFFLICTION TO DISPOSITOR make RAHU a " COMPLETE "

> > MALEFIC giving malefic results similar to the situation if it is

> > placed in a malefic house with malefic dispositor

>

> YES.

>

> OR will RAHU STILL

> > be capable of giving " MIXED results " ( not too good not too bad)??

> >

> LITTLE CHANCE.

>

> > 2 In the above case is it advisable to strengthened rahu by wearing a

> > gem , gomed .

>

> NO.

>

> > Regards

> >

> > Dev

> >

> >

> >

> > Sincestrengthing of dispositoriI am STRUC

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Dev,

 

You will have to wait to find the results of Rahu.

 

Best wishes,

 

 

 

 

-

" kdsips " <kdsips

 

Tuesday, December 13, 2005 9:13 PM

Re: Mystery of Rahu??

 

 

>

> Respected Sir,

> Thanks for the reply.

> From the discussion once we see that Rahu is malefic (even though it

> was placed in a good house , but because of affliction of its

> dispositor, the malefic nature is highlighted) in this case which is

> better, Rahu with less strength due to old age or infancy or rahu with

> more strenghth.??

>

> Can we universally say that Rahu being malefic generally will give

> good results(in a sense that it will give less malefic results)with

> less srength(even if the dispositor is not afflicted and Rahu is

> placed in good house) ,if it is weak in strength ?? .

>

>

> Regards

>

> Dev

Once we say that Rahu is malefic and ,

> <siha> wrote:

>>

>>

>> Hello Dev,

>>

>> I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message appended

> below.

>>

>> Best wishes,

>>

>>

>>

>> -

>> " kdsips " <kdsips>

>>

>> Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:37 PM

>> Mystery of Rahu??

>>

>>

>> > Dear Sir,

>> > I am little struck in this kindly forgive my ignorance and clarify

>> > the doubt .Rahu is one of the most mysterious planet. It is generally

>> > malefic but can give benefic result if its dispositor is benefic and

>> > Rahu itself is placed in a benefic house.

>> >

>> > 1 In this case , i.e Dispositor a benefic and rahu itself placed in a

>> > benefic house, WILL AFFLICTION TO DISPOSITOR make RAHU a " COMPLETE "

>> > MALEFIC giving malefic results similar to the situation if it is

>> > placed in a malefic house with malefic dispositor

>>

>> YES.

>>

>> OR will RAHU STILL

>> > be capable of giving " MIXED results " ( not too good not too bad)??

>> >

>> LITTLE CHANCE.

>>

>> > 2 In the above case is it advisable to strengthened rahu by wearing a

>> > gem , gomed .

>>

>> NO.

>>

>> > Regards

>> >

>> > Dev

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > Sincestrengthing of dispositoriI am STRUC

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Dev,

Rahu gives good results during its sub-periods only if:

i)Its not in the dusthana houses

ii)Its mare than 5degs away from the MEP

iii)Its not afflicting other planets and is not afflicted.

iv)Its depositor is strong.

 

Regarding your question, about strength.

Rahu is strong on counts mentioned above.

Infancy and old age should not matter at all, I think.....

We invite 's comment.

Regards,

Fraser.

 

 

 

 

, " kdsips " <kdsips> wrote:

>

>

> Respected Sir,

> Thanks for the reply.

> From the discussion once we see that Rahu is malefic (even though

it

> was placed in a good house , but because of affliction of its

> dispositor, the malefic nature is highlighted) in this case which is

> better, Rahu with less strength due to old age or infancy or rahu

with

> more strenghth.??

>

> Can we universally say that Rahu being malefic generally will give

> good results(in a sense that it will give less malefic results)with

> less srength(even if the dispositor is not afflicted and Rahu is

> placed in good house) ,if it is weak in strength ?? .

>

>

> Regards

>

> Dev

Once we say that Rahu is malefic and --- In

,

> <siha> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Hello Dev,

> >

> > I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message

appended

> below.

> >

> > Best wishes,

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > " kdsips " <kdsips>

> >

> > Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:37 PM

> > Mystery of Rahu??

> >

> >

> > > Dear Sir,

> > > I am little struck in this kindly forgive my ignorance and

clarify

> > > the doubt .Rahu is one of the most mysterious planet. It is

generally

> > > malefic but can give benefic result if its dispositor is

benefic and

> > > Rahu itself is placed in a benefic house.

> > >

> > > 1 In this case , i.e Dispositor a benefic and rahu itself

placed in a

> > > benefic house, WILL AFFLICTION TO DISPOSITOR make RAHU

a " COMPLETE "

> > > MALEFIC giving malefic results similar to the situation if

it is

> > > placed in a malefic house with malefic dispositor

> >

> > YES.

> >

> > OR will RAHU STILL

> > > be capable of giving " MIXED results " ( not too good not too

bad)??

> > >

> > LITTLE CHANCE.

> >

> > > 2 In the above case is it advisable to strengthened rahu by

wearing a

> > > gem , gomed .

> >

> > NO.

> >

> > > Regards

> > >

> > > Dev

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Sincestrengthing of dispositoriI am STRUC

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Professor,

 

Does it really matter what the nature/strength of Rahu/Ketu's

despositor is?

 

Rahu and Ketu are phantoms, not planets. In my experience they seem to

be immune to planetary influences. Am I on the right track here?

 

Lew Jones

 

 

On Dec 13, 2005, at 10:57 AM, fraser wrote:

 

> Hello Dev,

> Rahu gives good results during its sub-periods only if:

> i)Its not in the dusthana houses

> ii)Its mare than 5degs away from the MEP

> iii)Its not afflicting other planets and is not afflicted.

> iv)Its depositor is strong.

>

> Regarding your question, about strength.

> Rahu is strong on counts mentioned above.

> Infancy and old age should not matter at all, I think.....

> We invite 's comment.

> Regards,

> Fraser.

>

>

>

>

> , " kdsips " <kdsips> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Respected Sir,

> >  Thanks for the reply.

> >  From the  discussion once we see that Rahu is malefic (even though

> it

> > was placed in a good house , but because of affliction of its

> > dispositor, the malefic nature is highlighted) in this case which is

> > better, Rahu with less strength due to old age or infancy or rahu

> with

> > more strenghth.??

> >

> > Can we universally say that Rahu being malefic generally will give

> > good results(in a sense that it will give less malefic results)with

> > less srength(even if the dispositor is not afflicted and Rahu is

> > placed in good house) ,if it is weak in strength ?? .

> >

> >

> > Regards

> >

> > Dev

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Once we say that Rahu is malefic and --- In

> ,

> > <siha> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Hello Dev,

> > >

> > > I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message

> appended

> > below.

> > >

> > > Best wishes,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > " kdsips " <kdsips>

> > >

> > > Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:37 PM

> > > Mystery of Rahu??

> > >

> > >

> > > > Dear Sir,

> > > > I am little struck in this kindly forgive my ignorance and

> clarify

> > > > the doubt .Rahu is one of the most mysterious planet. It is

> generally

> > > > malefic but can give benefic result if its dispositor is

> benefic and

> > > > Rahu itself is placed in a benefic house.

> > > >

> > > > 1 In this case , i.e Dispositor a benefic and rahu itself

> placed in a

> > > > benefic house, WILL AFFLICTION TO DISPOSITOR  make RAHU 

> a " COMPLETE "

> > > > MALEFIC giving   malefic results   similar to the situation if

> it is

> > > > placed in a malefic house with malefic dispositor

> > >

> > > YES.

> > >

> > > OR  will  RAHU STILL

> > > > be capable of giving " MIXED results " ( not too good not too

> bad)??

> > > >

> > > LITTLE CHANCE.

> > >

> > > > 2 In the above case is it advisable to strengthened rahu by

> wearing a

> > > > gem , gomed  .

> > >

> > > NO.

> > >

> > > > Regards

> > > >

> > > > Dev

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sincestrengthing of dispositoriI  am  STRUC

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Lew Jones,

The strength of the depositor is seen to estimate how much of the

house it can salvage, I think....

It's nothing to do with an influence on the 'phantom'itself.

Regards,

Fraser

 

, LEWIS JONES <lewjon@e...> wrote:

>

> Professor,

>

> Does it really matter what the nature/strength of Rahu/Ketu's

> despositor is?

>

> Rahu and Ketu are phantoms, not planets. In my experience they

seem to

> be immune to planetary influences. Am I on the right track here?

>

> Lew Jones

>

>

> On Dec 13, 2005, at 10:57 AM, fraser wrote:

>

> > Hello Dev,

> > Rahu gives good results during its sub-periods only if:

> > i)Its not in the dusthana houses

> > ii)Its mare than 5degs away from the MEP

> > iii)Its not afflicting other planets and is not afflicted.

> > iv)Its depositor is strong.

> >

> > Regarding your question, about strength.

> > Rahu is strong on counts mentioned above.

> > Infancy and old age should not matter at all, I think.....

> > We invite 's comment.

> > Regards,

> > Fraser.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , " kdsips " <kdsips> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Respected Sir,

> > >  Thanks for the reply.

> > >  From the  discussion once we see that Rahu is malefic (even

though

> > it

> > > was placed in a good house , but because of affliction of its

> > > dispositor, the malefic nature is highlighted) in this case

which is

> > > better, Rahu with less strength due to old age or infancy or

rahu

> > with

> > > more strenghth.??

> > >

> > > Can we universally say that Rahu being malefic generally will

give

> > > good results(in a sense that it will give less malefic results)

with

> > > less srength(even if the dispositor is not afflicted and Rahu is

> > > placed in good house) ,if it is weak in strength ?? .

> > >

> > >

> > > Regards

> > >

> > > Dev

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Once we say that Rahu is malefic and --- In

> > ,

> > > <siha> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Hello Dev,

> > > >

> > > > I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message

> > appended

> > > below.

> > > >

> > > > Best wishes,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > " kdsips " <kdsips>

> > > >

> > > > Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:37 PM

> > > > Mystery of Rahu??

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > > Dear Sir,

> > > > > I am little struck in this kindly forgive my ignorance and

> > clarify

> > > > > the doubt .Rahu is one of the most mysterious planet. It is

> > generally

> > > > > malefic but can give benefic result if its dispositor is

> > benefic and

> > > > > Rahu itself is placed in a benefic house.

> > > > >

> > > > > 1 In this case , i.e Dispositor a benefic and rahu itself

> > placed in a

> > > > > benefic house, WILL AFFLICTION TO DISPOSITOR  make RAHU 

> > a " COMPLETE "

> > > > > MALEFIC giving   malefic results   similar to the

situation if

> > it is

> > > > > placed in a malefic house with malefic dispositor

> > > >

> > > > YES.

> > > >

> > > > OR  will  RAHU STILL

> > > > > be capable of giving " MIXED results " ( not too good not too

> > bad)??

> > > > >

> > > > LITTLE CHANCE.

> > > >

> > > > > 2 In the above case is it advisable to strengthened rahu by

> > wearing a

> > > > > gem , gomed  .

> > > >

> > > > NO.

> > > >

> > > > > Regards

> > > > >

> > > > > Dev

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Sincestrengthing of dispositoriI  am  STRUC

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your understanding is right, Mr. Fraser.

Best wishes,

 

 

www.YourNetAstrologer.com

A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122101 (India)

Phones: 91 124 - 2219240

Mobile 98110 16333

 

 

-

" fraser " <fraser

 

Tuesday, December 13, 2005 10:27 PM

Re: Mystery of Rahu??

 

 

> Hello Dev,

> Rahu gives good results during its sub-periods only if:

> i)Its not in the dusthana houses

> ii)Its mare than 5degs away from the MEP

> iii)Its not afflicting other planets and is not afflicted.

> iv)Its depositor is strong.

>

> Regarding your question, about strength.

> Rahu is strong on counts mentioned above.

> Infancy and old age should not matter at all, I think.....

> We invite 's comment.

> Regards,

> Fraser.

>

>

>

>

> , " kdsips " <kdsips> wrote:

>>

>>

>> Respected Sir,

>> Thanks for the reply.

>> From the discussion once we see that Rahu is malefic (even though

> it

>> was placed in a good house , but because of affliction of its

>> dispositor, the malefic nature is highlighted) in this case which is

>> better, Rahu with less strength due to old age or infancy or rahu

> with

>> more strenghth.??

>>

>> Can we universally say that Rahu being malefic generally will give

>> good results(in a sense that it will give less malefic results)with

>> less srength(even if the dispositor is not afflicted and Rahu is

>> placed in good house) ,if it is weak in strength ?? .

>>

>>

>> Regards

>>

>> Dev

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Once we say that Rahu is malefic and --- In

> ,

>> <siha> wrote:

>> >

>> >

>> > Hello Dev,

>> >

>> > I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message

> appended

>> below.

>> >

>> > Best wishes,

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > -

>> > " kdsips " <kdsips>

>> >

>> > Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:37 PM

>> > Mystery of Rahu??

>> >

>> >

>> > > Dear Sir,

>> > > I am little struck in this kindly forgive my ignorance and

> clarify

>> > > the doubt .Rahu is one of the most mysterious planet. It is

> generally

>> > > malefic but can give benefic result if its dispositor is

> benefic and

>> > > Rahu itself is placed in a benefic house.

>> > >

>> > > 1 In this case , i.e Dispositor a benefic and rahu itself

> placed in a

>> > > benefic house, WILL AFFLICTION TO DISPOSITOR make RAHU

> a " COMPLETE "

>> > > MALEFIC giving malefic results similar to the situation if

> it is

>> > > placed in a malefic house with malefic dispositor

>> >

>> > YES.

>> >

>> > OR will RAHU STILL

>> > > be capable of giving " MIXED results " ( not too good not too

> bad)??

>> > >

>> > LITTLE CHANCE.

>> >

>> > > 2 In the above case is it advisable to strengthened rahu by

> wearing a

>> > > gem , gomed .

>> >

>> > NO.

>> >

>> > > Regards

>> > >

>> > > Dev

>> > >

>> > >

>> > >

>> > > Sincestrengthing of dispositoriI am STRUC

>> > >

>> > >

>> > >

>> > >

>> > >

>> > >

>> > >

>> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Mr. Jones,

 

I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message appended below.

 

Best wishes,

 

 

 

 

-

" LEWIS JONES " <lewjon

 

Tuesday, December 13, 2005 10:59 PM

Re: Re: Mystery of Rahu??

 

 

Professor,

 

Does it really matter what the nature/strength of Rahu/Ketu's

despositor is?

STRENGTH MATTERS.

Rahu and Ketu are phantoms, not planets. In my experience they seem to

be immune to planetary influences. Am I on the right track here?

I DO NOT THINK SO.

Lew Jones

 

 

On Dec 13, 2005, at 10:57 AM, fraser wrote:

 

> Hello Dev,

> Rahu gives good results during its sub-periods only if:

> i)Its not in the dusthana houses

> ii)Its mare than 5degs away from the MEP

> iii)Its not afflicting other planets and is not afflicted.

> iv)Its depositor is strong.

>

> Regarding your question, about strength.

> Rahu is strong on counts mentioned above.

> Infancy and old age should not matter at all, I think.....

> We invite 's comment.

> Regards,

> Fraser.

>

>

>

>

> , " kdsips " <kdsips> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Respected Sir,

> > Thanks for the reply.

> > From the discussion once we see that Rahu is malefic (even though

> it

> > was placed in a good house , but because of affliction of its

> > dispositor, the malefic nature is highlighted) in this case which is

> > better, Rahu with less strength due to old age or infancy or rahu

> with

> > more strenghth.??

> >

> > Can we universally say that Rahu being malefic generally will give

> > good results(in a sense that it will give less malefic results)with

> > less srength(even if the dispositor is not afflicted and Rahu is

> > placed in good house) ,if it is weak in strength ?? .

> >

> >

> > Regards

> >

> > Dev

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Once we say that Rahu is malefic and --- In

> ,

> > <siha> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Hello Dev,

> > >

> > > I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message

> appended

> > below.

> > >

> > > Best wishes,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > " kdsips " <kdsips>

> > >

> > > Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:37 PM

> > > Mystery of Rahu??

> > >

> > >

> > > > Dear Sir,

> > > > I am little struck in this kindly forgive my ignorance and

> clarify

> > > > the doubt .Rahu is one of the most mysterious planet. It is

> generally

> > > > malefic but can give benefic result if its dispositor is

> benefic and

> > > > Rahu itself is placed in a benefic house.

> > > >

> > > > 1 In this case , i.e Dispositor a benefic and rahu itself

> placed in a

> > > > benefic house, WILL AFFLICTION TO DISPOSITOR make RAHU

> a " COMPLETE "

> > > > MALEFIC giving malefic results similar to the situation if

> it is

> > > > placed in a malefic house with malefic dispositor

> > >

> > > YES.

> > >

> > > OR will RAHU STILL

> > > > be capable of giving " MIXED results " ( not too good not too

> bad)??

> > > >

> > > LITTLE CHANCE.

> > >

> > > > 2 In the above case is it advisable to strengthened rahu by

> wearing a

> > > > gem , gomed .

> > >

> > > NO.

> > >

> > > > Regards

> > > >

> > > > Dev

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sincestrengthing of dispositoriI am STRUC

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Sir,

 

 

What is the difference b/w rahu tansit over natal ketu and ketu

transit over natal rahu ,wrt rahu transit over natal rahu and ketu

tansit over natal ketu.

 

Does it matter in which house is this event takes place?? how

 

 

Regards

 

Dev

 

 

, " fraser " <fraser@p...> wrote:

>

> Hello Dev,

> Rahu gives good results during its sub-periods only if:

> i)Its not in the dusthana houses

> ii)Its mare than 5degs away from the MEP

> iii)Its not afflicting other planets and is not afflicted.

> iv)Its depositor is strong.

>

> Regarding your question, about strength.

> Rahu is strong on counts mentioned above.

> Infancy and old age should not matter at all, I think.....

> We invite 's comment.

> Regards,

> Fraser.

>

>

>

>

> , " kdsips " <kdsips> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Respected Sir,

> > Thanks for the reply.

> > From the discussion once we see that Rahu is malefic (even though

> it

> > was placed in a good house , but because of affliction of its

> > dispositor, the malefic nature is highlighted) in this case which is

> > better, Rahu with less strength due to old age or infancy or rahu

> with

> > more strenghth.??

> >

> > Can we universally say that Rahu being malefic generally will give

> > good results(in a sense that it will give less malefic results)with

> > less srength(even if the dispositor is not afflicted and Rahu is

> > placed in good house) ,if it is weak in strength ?? .

> >

> >

> > Regards

> >

> > Dev

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Once we say that Rahu is malefic and --- In

> ,

> > <siha> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Hello Dev,

> > >

> > > I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message

> appended

> > below.

> > >

> > > Best wishes,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > " kdsips " <kdsips>

> > >

> > > Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:37 PM

> > > Mystery of Rahu??

> > >

> > >

> > > > Dear Sir,

> > > > I am little struck in this kindly forgive my ignorance and

> clarify

> > > > the doubt .Rahu is one of the most mysterious planet. It is

> generally

> > > > malefic but can give benefic result if its dispositor is

> benefic and

> > > > Rahu itself is placed in a benefic house.

> > > >

> > > > 1 In this case , i.e Dispositor a benefic and rahu itself

> placed in a

> > > > benefic house, WILL AFFLICTION TO DISPOSITOR make RAHU

> a " COMPLETE "

> > > > MALEFIC giving malefic results similar to the situation if

> it is

> > > > placed in a malefic house with malefic dispositor

> > >

> > > YES.

> > >

> > > OR will RAHU STILL

> > > > be capable of giving " MIXED results " ( not too good not too

> bad)??

> > > >

> > > LITTLE CHANCE.

> > >

> > > > 2 In the above case is it advisable to strengthened rahu by

> wearing a

> > > > gem , gomed .

> > >

> > > NO.

> > >

> > > > Regards

> > > >

> > > > Dev

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sincestrengthing of dispositoriI am STRUC

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Dev,

 

Both transits are painful and they are more painful if they are in the

malefic houses.

 

Best wishes,

 

 

 

 

 

-

" kdsips " <kdsips

 

Friday, December 16, 2005 12:22 PM

Re: Mystery of Rahu??

 

 

>

>

>

> Hello Sir,

>

>

> What is the difference b/w rahu tansit over natal ketu and ketu

> transit over natal rahu ,wrt rahu transit over natal rahu and ketu

> tansit over natal ketu.

>

> Does it matter in which house is this event takes place?? how

>

>

> Regards

>

> Dev

>

>

> , " fraser " <fraser@p...> wrote:

>>

>> Hello Dev,

>> Rahu gives good results during its sub-periods only if:

>> i)Its not in the dusthana houses

>> ii)Its mare than 5degs away from the MEP

>> iii)Its not afflicting other planets and is not afflicted.

>> iv)Its depositor is strong.

>>

>> Regarding your question, about strength.

>> Rahu is strong on counts mentioned above.

>> Infancy and old age should not matter at all, I think.....

>> We invite 's comment.

>> Regards,

>> Fraser.

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> , " kdsips " <kdsips> wrote:

>> >

>> >

>> > Respected Sir,

>> > Thanks for the reply.

>> > From the discussion once we see that Rahu is malefic (even though

>> it

>> > was placed in a good house , but because of affliction of its

>> > dispositor, the malefic nature is highlighted) in this case which is

>> > better, Rahu with less strength due to old age or infancy or rahu

>> with

>> > more strenghth.??

>> >

>> > Can we universally say that Rahu being malefic generally will give

>> > good results(in a sense that it will give less malefic results)with

>> > less srength(even if the dispositor is not afflicted and Rahu is

>> > placed in good house) ,if it is weak in strength ?? .

>> >

>> >

>> > Regards

>> >

>> > Dev

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > Once we say that Rahu is malefic and --- In

>> ,

>> > <siha> wrote:

>> > >

>> > >

>> > > Hello Dev,

>> > >

>> > > I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message

>> appended

>> > below.

>> > >

>> > > Best wishes,

>> > >

>> > >

>> > >

>> > > -

>> > > " kdsips " <kdsips>

>> > >

>> > > Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:37 PM

>> > > Mystery of Rahu??

>> > >

>> > >

>> > > > Dear Sir,

>> > > > I am little struck in this kindly forgive my ignorance and

>> clarify

>> > > > the doubt .Rahu is one of the most mysterious planet. It is

>> generally

>> > > > malefic but can give benefic result if its dispositor is

>> benefic and

>> > > > Rahu itself is placed in a benefic house.

>> > > >

>> > > > 1 In this case , i.e Dispositor a benefic and rahu itself

>> placed in a

>> > > > benefic house, WILL AFFLICTION TO DISPOSITOR make RAHU

>> a " COMPLETE "

>> > > > MALEFIC giving malefic results similar to the situation if

>> it is

>> > > > placed in a malefic house with malefic dispositor

>> > >

>> > > YES.

>> > >

>> > > OR will RAHU STILL

>> > > > be capable of giving " MIXED results " ( not too good not too

>> bad)??

>> > > >

>> > > LITTLE CHANCE.

>> > >

>> > > > 2 In the above case is it advisable to strengthened rahu by

>> wearing a

>> > > > gem , gomed .

>> > >

>> > > NO.

>> > >

>> > > > Regards

>> > > >

>> > > > Dev

>> > > >

>> > > >

>> > > >

>> > > > Sincestrengthing of dispositoriI am STRUC

>> > > >

>> > > >

>> > > >

>> > > >

>> > > >

>> > > >

>> > > >

>> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...