Guest guest Posted August 27, 2006 Report Share Posted August 27, 2006 Dear Professor and list members, Is there very much difference in the results of a sub period lord that is only weak but not afflicted and one that is both weak and afflicted? In my experience, weak planets don't seem to bring about disasterous results in their sub periods. Am I wrong? It seems that they must be both weak and afflicted to bring inauspicious results. Is this the general concensus? Thankyou and best regards, John Dorio Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2006 Report Share Posted August 27, 2006 Hello John, Your understanding is right. This is amply explained in the learning material on my website. Best wishes, - " John Dorio " <johndorio Sunday, August 27, 2006 6:48 AM Weak and/ or Afflicted Planets > Dear Professor and list members, > > Is there very much difference in the results of a sub > period lord that is only weak but not afflicted and > one that is both weak and afflicted? > > In my experience, weak planets don't seem to bring > about disasterous results in their sub periods. Am I > wrong? It seems that they must be both weak and > afflicted to bring inauspicious results. Is this the > general concensus? > > Thankyou and best regards, > John Dorio > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.