Guest guest Posted February 17, 2007 Report Share Posted February 17, 2007 Dear Professor and respected astrologers, I am now preparing for the calculating of Strength of Planet based on SA. Please check for me what I am preparing is correct or not. (1) I assign the score to each planet including Asc. (2) Planet at its own house, score will be 25 points. (3) Planet at its MT house, score will be 50 points. So. It will get 75 in total. (4) Planet at its Exaltation sign gets +50 points and Debilation sign get -50. (5) Planet at between 5-25 degree will get +100 and score will be 0 at 0 degree and 30 degree. The Slope of its will 20 point/degree. (6) Planet at the friend's house get +25 point and enemy's house -25 point. (7) Planet at 1,5,9 house get +50 degree and same way to those at 1,4,7,10. (8) Planet at 6,8,12 will get -100 points. (9) Planet in Exaltation sign in Nawamsa +25, and debilation sign in Nawansa is -25. (10) To check against with dispositor, my understanding is if planet itself is weak, dispositor could not help and it will get only what he already has. But its dispositor is weak, planet have to share its strength to dispositor. Eg. Planet score is 200 and its dipositor is 25. So, the planet will get only (200+25)/2 =112.5 point. It there is no dispositor, planet will get its own score. (11) After that, I make the set point for 50 point. Higher than 50 point are Strong, Very Strong and Extremely Strong, Lower than 50 points are Weak, Very Weak and Extremely Weak. (12) How can I score with Affliction? How do you think of my work? Is it acceptable? Thank you very much for your advice sir, Khin Maung Soe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2007 Report Share Posted February 17, 2007 Hello Khin Maung Soe, The planetary influences cannot be calculated like this except a little estimation. The contribution of a strong planet may be 1000 points or even 5000 points while an MMP's influence may be -1000 points or more with reference to a unit of 100 points. So, in my view one should develop understanding by experience in stead of trying to bind infinite things. Best wishes, - " Khin Maung Soe " <kmsoe2001 Saturday, February 17, 2007 10:27 AM Strength Calculation Score | Dear Professor and respected astrologers, | I am now preparing for the calculating of Strength of Planet based | on SA. | Please check for me what I am preparing is correct or not. | (1) I assign the score to each planet including Asc. | (2) Planet at its own house, score will be 25 points. | (3) Planet at its MT house, score will be 50 points. So. It will | get 75 in total. | (4) Planet at its Exaltation sign gets +50 points and Debilation | sign get -50. | (5) Planet at between 5-25 degree will get +100 and score will | be 0 at 0 degree and 30 degree. The Slope of its will 20 | point/degree. | (6) Planet at the friend's house get +25 point and enemy's | house -25 point. | (7) Planet at 1,5,9 house get +50 degree and same way to those | at 1,4,7,10. | (8) Planet at 6,8,12 will get -100 points. | (9) Planet in Exaltation sign in Nawamsa +25, and debilation | sign in Nawansa is -25. | (10) To check against with dispositor, my understanding is if | planet itself is weak, dispositor could not help and it will get | only what he already has. But its dispositor is weak, planet have to | share its strength to dispositor. Eg. Planet score is 200 and its | dipositor is 25. So, the planet will get only (200+25)/2 =112.5 | point. It there is no dispositor, planet will get its own score. | (11) After that, I make the set point for 50 point. Higher than | 50 point are Strong, Very Strong and Extremely Strong, Lower than 50 | points are Weak, Very Weak and Extremely Weak. | (12) How can I score with Affliction? | | How do you think of my work? Is it acceptable? | Thank you very much for your advice sir, | | Khin Maung Soe | | | | | | Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2007 Report Share Posted February 17, 2007 Hi Professor and Khin Maung Soe, You may recall Professor, that I tried this sometime last year using various valuation methods. I agree, it's mostly pointless to quantify in this way. By the time I was one-tenth through lining up my equations I had a good enough grasp to not bother finishing it. It's a fantastic learning experience though; it, 'forces,' the learning. This is especially true when you start assigning negatives to the afflictions and other weaknesses. Best is to go over as many case studies as you can with the basics in full grasp. Best regards, Vyas Munidas - <siha Saturday, February 17, 2007 2:38 AM Re: Strength Calculation Score Hello Khin Maung Soe, The planetary influences cannot be calculated like this except a little estimation. The contribution of a strong planet may be 1000 points or even 5000 points while an MMP's influence may be -1000 points or more with reference to a unit of 100 points. So, in my view one should develop understanding by experience in stead of trying to bind infinite things. Best wishes, - " Khin Maung Soe " <kmsoe2001 Saturday, February 17, 2007 10:27 AM Strength Calculation Score | Dear Professor and respected astrologers, | I am now preparing for the calculating of Strength of Planet based | on SA. | Please check for me what I am preparing is correct or not. | (1) I assign the score to each planet including Asc. | (2) Planet at its own house, score will be 25 points. | (3) Planet at its MT house, score will be 50 points. So. It will | get 75 in total. | (4) Planet at its Exaltation sign gets +50 points and Debilation | sign get -50. | (5) Planet at between 5-25 degree will get +100 and score will | be 0 at 0 degree and 30 degree. The Slope of its will 20 | point/degree. | (6) Planet at the friend's house get +25 point and enemy's | house -25 point. | (7) Planet at 1,5,9 house get +50 degree and same way to those | at 1,4,7,10. | (8) Planet at 6,8,12 will get -100 points. | (9) Planet in Exaltation sign in Nawamsa +25, and debilation | sign in Nawansa is -25. | (10) To check against with dispositor, my understanding is if | planet itself is weak, dispositor could not help and it will get | only what he already has. But its dispositor is weak, planet have to | share its strength to dispositor. Eg. Planet score is 200 and its | dipositor is 25. So, the planet will get only (200+25)/2 =112.5 | point. It there is no dispositor, planet will get its own score. | (11) After that, I make the set point for 50 point. Higher than | 50 point are Strong, Very Strong and Extremely Strong, Lower than 50 | points are Weak, Very Weak and Extremely Weak. | (12) How can I score with Affliction? | | How do you think of my work? Is it acceptable? | Thank you very much for your advice sir, | | Khin Maung Soe | | | | | | Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2007 Report Share Posted February 17, 2007 The calculations which Mr Khin Maung Soe is not applicable to SA due to 1)Planet in Exaltation can be in old age . It becomes weak .We cannot allocate points to planet in exaltation . 2) Planets in 1,5, 9 can have points only if they are FBs that too in MEP.FMs in trines will spoil the horoscopes 3) Similarly in Kendras 4) FBs in eigth house will aspect th second house. It is good for status. The point wise allocation is done by classical astrologers .One Mr P.V.R Raidu has done like this .It is meaningless Best wishes SG --- Vyas Munidas <muni> wrote: > Hi Professor and Khin Maung Soe, > > You may recall Professor, that I tried this sometime > last year using various > valuation methods. I agree, it's mostly pointless to > quantify in this way. > By the time I was one-tenth through lining up my > equations I had a good > enough grasp to not bother finishing it. > > It's a fantastic learning experience though; it, > 'forces,' the learning. > This is especially true when you start assigning > negatives to the > afflictions and other weaknesses. > > Best is to go over as many case studies as you can > with the basics in full > grasp. > > > Best regards, > > Vyas Munidas > > > - > <siha > > Saturday, February 17, 2007 2:38 AM > Re: Strength Calculation Score > > > > Hello Khin Maung Soe, > > The planetary influences cannot be calculated like > this except a little > estimation. > > The contribution of a strong planet may be 1000 > points or even 5000 points > while an MMP's influence may be -1000 points or more > with reference to a > unit of 100 points. So, in my view one should > develop understanding by > experience in stead of trying to bind infinite > things. > > Best wishes, > > > > - > " Khin Maung Soe " <kmsoe2001 > > Saturday, February 17, 2007 10:27 AM > Strength Calculation Score > > > | Dear Professor and respected astrologers, > | I am now preparing for the calculating of Strength > of Planet based > | on SA. > | Please check for me what I am preparing is correct > or not. > | (1) I assign the score to each planet including > Asc. > | (2) Planet at its own house, score will be 25 > points. > | (3) Planet at its MT house, score will be 50 > points. So. It will > | get 75 in total. > | (4) Planet at its Exaltation sign gets +50 points > and Debilation > | sign get -50. > | (5) Planet at between 5-25 degree will get +100 > and score will > | be 0 at 0 degree and 30 degree. The Slope of its > will 20 > | point/degree. > | (6) Planet at the friend's house get +25 point and > enemy's > | house -25 point. > | (7) Planet at 1,5,9 house get +50 degree and same > way to those > | at 1,4,7,10. > | (8) Planet at 6,8,12 will get -100 points. > | (9) Planet in Exaltation sign in Nawamsa +25, and > debilation > | sign in Nawansa is -25. > | (10) To check against with dispositor, my > understanding is if > | planet itself is weak, dispositor could not help > and it will get > | only what he already has. But its dispositor is > weak, planet have to > | share its strength to dispositor. Eg. Planet score > is 200 and its > | dipositor is 25. So, the planet will get only > (200+25)/2 =112.5 > | point. It there is no dispositor, planet will get > its own score. > | (11) After that, I make the set point for 50 > point. Higher than > | 50 point are Strong, Very Strong and Extremely > Strong, Lower than 50 > | points are Weak, Very Weak and Extremely Weak. > | (12) How can I score with Affliction? > | > | How do you think of my work? Is it acceptable? > | Thank you very much for your advice sir, > | > | Khin Maung Soe > | > | > | > | > | > | Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2007 Report Share Posted February 18, 2007 Dear Professor, Mr. Sadasivan and Mr. Vyas Munidas Thank you very much for your guidance. I understand that the astrology is combination of Art and Science and because of its divine nature, it is not easy to quatify with mathematical formula. Some kind of enlightenment might be necessary. However, as Mr. Vyas Munidas says, it is now the driving force for me to learn the Astrolgy in this way and I still want to try out until it stop me. I appreciate your valuable advice and will keep in my mind. With Thanks and Regards, Khin Maung Soe. SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN <sadasivan_g wrote: The calculations which Mr Khin Maung Soe is not applicable to SA due to 1)Planet in Exaltation can be in old age . It becomes weak .We cannot allocate points to planet in exaltation . 2) Planets in 1,5, 9 can have points only if they are FBs that too in MEP.FMs in trines will spoil the horoscopes 3) Similarly in Kendras 4) FBs in eigth house will aspect th second house. It is good for status. The point wise allocation is done by classical astrologers .One Mr P.V.R Raidu has done like this .It is meaningless Best wishes SG --- Vyas Munidas <muni> wrote: > Hi Professor and Khin Maung Soe, > > You may recall Professor, that I tried this sometime > last year using various > valuation methods. I agree, it's mostly pointless to > quantify in this way. > By the time I was one-tenth through lining up my > equations I had a good > enough grasp to not bother finishing it. > > It's a fantastic learning experience though; it, > 'forces,' the learning. > This is especially true when you start assigning > negatives to the > afflictions and other weaknesses. > > Best is to go over as many case studies as you can > with the basics in full > grasp. > > > Best regards, > > Vyas Munidas > > > - > <siha > > Saturday, February 17, 2007 2:38 AM > Re: Strength Calculation Score > > > > Hello Khin Maung Soe, > > The planetary influences cannot be calculated like > this except a little > estimation. > > The contribution of a strong planet may be 1000 > points or even 5000 points > while an MMP's influence may be -1000 points or more > with reference to a > unit of 100 points. So, in my view one should > develop understanding by > experience in stead of trying to bind infinite > things. > > Best wishes, > > > > - > " Khin Maung Soe " <kmsoe2001 > > Saturday, February 17, 2007 10:27 AM > Strength Calculation Score > > > | Dear Professor and respected astrologers, > | I am now preparing for the calculating of Strength > of Planet based > | on SA. > | Please check for me what I am preparing is correct > or not. > | (1) I assign the score to each planet including > Asc. > | (2) Planet at its own house, score will be 25 > points. > | (3) Planet at its MT house, score will be 50 > points. So. It will > | get 75 in total. > | (4) Planet at its Exaltation sign gets +50 points > and Debilation > | sign get -50. > | (5) Planet at between 5-25 degree will get +100 > and score will > | be 0 at 0 degree and 30 degree. The Slope of its > will 20 > | point/degree. > | (6) Planet at the friend's house get +25 point and > enemy's > | house -25 point. > | (7) Planet at 1,5,9 house get +50 degree and same > way to those > | at 1,4,7,10. > | (8) Planet at 6,8,12 will get -100 points. > | (9) Planet in Exaltation sign in Nawamsa +25, and > debilation > | sign in Nawansa is -25. > | (10) To check against with dispositor, my > understanding is if > | planet itself is weak, dispositor could not help > and it will get > | only what he already has. But its dispositor is > weak, planet have to > | share its strength to dispositor. Eg. Planet score > is 200 and its > | dipositor is 25. So, the planet will get only > (200+25)/2 =112.5 > | point. It there is no dispositor, planet will get > its own score. > | (11) After that, I make the set point for 50 > point. Higher than > | 50 point are Strong, Very Strong and Extremely > Strong, Lower than 50 > | points are Weak, Very Weak and Extremely Weak. > | (12) How can I score with Affliction? > | > | How do you think of my work? Is it acceptable? > | Thank you very much for your advice sir, > | > | Khin Maung Soe > | > | > | > | > | > | Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.