Confusion and relief in analysis of professional setback and business ventures

December 21, 2009

Dear ,

I shall be grateful to you for your response on my analysis of professional

setback and future business inclinations and potential below.I apologise for

the length of the email but most of it shows analytical reasoning backing

the conclusions arrived and I seek your indulgence.

The analytical results earlier seemed confusing but applying SA principles

removed the confusion and showed a path but some confusions remained. I seek

your help to ensure my analysis and understanding is right.

Birth details : 25-Sep-1960 3:30 am Lucknow, India 80E55 26N51

Current Dasa : Ke/Me

Lagna : 5Le20

The chart on the whole shows promise specially in profession, status, wealth

and general well being

*Part A: Professional setback:* Temporary job in end-June 2008 with

potential of longer duration but lost the job in 31-Dec-2008 both in Ke/Sa.

As expected, Ke dasa has not been satisfactory on the whole. In the current

Ke/Me - from mid Aug 2009 for a year - natal Me being exalted though

slightly weak due to old age and no other Triple Transit Triggering

influences was expected to provide relief in profession. There have, since,

been hopes but nothing has materialized so far. This was confusing. However

resorting to a full SA profession analysis revealed a different picture.

Here it is:

Profession determinants are as follows:

Primary determinant (for Le asc): Me

Additional primary determinant (Dasamsa asc): Me and no debilitations in

Dasamsa

Secondary determinants (Sun is conj 2H and Ma asp 2H): Su, Ma

Sunlike planets (Lords of 2H, 3H and 9H): Me, Ve, Ma

Relevant planets for profession are therefore: Me, Ve, Su, Ma with Me and Ma

appearing multiple times and therefore more important?

Q1. Ma is secondary determinant and is also sun like. It is 9HL, well placed

and strong and close to MEP of 11H. This is very good, shows high impact and

perhaps covers the age related weaknesses of other relevant planets. Is this

right?

Q2. Is well placed unafflicted and strong Ma also the reason for a good

earlier Me main dasa or is Me itself the reason for it?

Transits of 20-Dec-2009 show that Ma is badly placed and is debilitated.

This could mean two things:

Q3. The sun like and natal strong planet Ma being doubly weak in transit due

to debilitation and bad placement in 12H is not able to support other

professional determinants. This could be the result of nothing happening in

this Ke/Me dasa?

Q4. Something concrete should have happened in Ke/Me in exalted though

slightly old age planet dasa of Me in a malefic main dasa of Ke. Since

nothing has happened it seems the exaltation alone is not sufficient to

overcome the old age related weakness even though old age is slight?

Q5. Ma 9HL is placed in 12H ie. foreign lands and could give benefits there.

However, significator of foreign lands natal 12HL Mo is aspected by transit

Ke and therefore not able to support its 12H signification, therefore,

profession in foreign lands is ruled out till the affliction of transit Ke

on natal Mo is over?

Q6. Remedial measure to strengthen Me may have helped in the transit

weakness? So also placating Ke if not being done already?

*Part B: Business ventures:*

Q1. You have mentioned that one should not enter into business ventures if

planets governing losses influence houses 4,2,10,3,11 and there lords. Such

a planet is Mo and does not influence mentioned houses or lords. So entering

into business ventures is alright subject to below?

Q2. Su, Mo, 2H, 10H, 4H are not under influence of Ra. In fact Ra influences

Sa the 7HL. With inclinations for business in dasas of lords of houses of

1, 10, 3 i.e. Su and Ve, the coming in of Ve main dasa mid next year should

have the inclinations surfacing?

Q3. The strong position of 9HL Ma is very helpful for the ventures in this

case?

Q4. The general relevant planets are Me, Ve, Ma, Sa and in addition Mo as it

is placed in 3H alongwith Ve. The age related weakness of Me is affecting 2H

as well as Su as Me is the dispositor. Strengthening of Me will strengthen

Su as well as Me as 2H. Ma is already strong. Ve is directly impacting 3H

MEP and strengthing it will take care of its weakness. We need to strengthen

Me and Ve for good effect?

Q5. Placating Ra will take care of affliction to Sa?

Q6. Mo is the confusing one. You have mentioned that planets in 3H give

business inclinations. But Mo is the MMP in this case and placed in 3H

though away from MEP. Strengthening Mo could only create trouble with

expenses or reduce them (?) while improving the chances of foreign lands

related business. Does the answer remain in placating Mo to take care of

malefic effects and at the same time strengthening Mo to enable its good

significations?

Q7. Ve being in own house and on MEP of 3H should perhaps be more effective

than Me which is exalted and away from MEP in 2H and it is thus possible

that Ve main dasa would be much better than Me main dasa? It indicates that

business ventures could be more successful than a regular job or employment?

The remedies above would help even more?

Q8. Presence of Mo in 3H though away from MEP could also result in expenses

in Mo related activities such as administration and management and also

emotions related such as donations to good causes?

I thank you in anticipation of your time and efforts in this.

Regards

Love

December 21, 2009

Hello Mr. Tandon,

I add my replies to your Qs in your appended msg.

-

Love Tandon

SystemsApproachToVedic Astrology

Monday, December 21, 2009 10:23 AM

[systemsApproachToVedic Astrology] Confusion and relief in analysis of

professional setback and business ventures