Guest guest Posted April 4, 2010 Report Share Posted April 4, 2010 Dear Professor, Am I correct to say, if a planet is already strong in Rasi and NOT debilitated in Navamsa then it is considered as strong in Rasi even though it is badly placed, afflicted by Rahu-Ketu and MMP in Navamsa? If the same strong planet is Prime Determinant or Significator for spouse, then only we will need to see the bad placement and affliction in Navamsa apart from debilitation. Am I correct in above? Thanks in advance, Asaithambe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2010 Report Share Posted April 4, 2010 Hello dear Mr. Asaithambe, Your understanding is right. Navamsa bad placement becomes relevant only if the birth time is known precisely. - Asai SystemsApproachToVedic Astrology Sunday, April 04, 2010 12:40 PM [systemsApproachToVedic Astrology] DC for Strength of planets Dear Professor, Am I correct to say, if a planet is already strong in Rasi and NOT debilitated in Navamsa then it is considered as strong in Rasi even though it is badly placed, afflicted by Rahu-Ketu and MMP in Navamsa? If the same strong planet is Prime Determinant or Significator for spouse, then only we will need to see the bad placement and affliction in Navamsa apart from debilitation. Am I correct in above? Thanks in advance, Asaithambe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.