Guest guest Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 Dear Sir, I agree with you on your valuable opinion. Once I wanted from him to give me a print-out page with the data (i.e. date of birth, time of birth, place of birth)put by him to see the accuracy of the KP chart by his software. Because to reconcile the KP chart accuracy with the proper KP methodology. However, after few days what I have got from him i.e. a chart cast by KP method is full of mistakes. That day I decided not to purchase his software. Please dont purchase any software which are selling in market openly specially for KP. Since I am researching on KP so I must warn each and everybody of KP Astrologer please think think and think before purchasing any KP software. Becuase thus by purchasing inaccurate software of KP astrology, KP cannot prove due to the mistakes inbuilt in the software. SIDDHARTHA KP RESEARCHER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 Gentlemen, A suggestion - Problem seems to be with the software, so blame the software not the person and why 'label' a person. Let us be fair. Mohan Pahujani logbags [logbags]Saturday, July 03, 2004 1:49 PM Subject: The fraud Pundit PandeyDear GroupI am writing to complain about the so called Pundit Pandey and his software Mobile Kundli.When I was considering this program I asked the "Pundit" if it did true solar return (Varshapala). He explained his program did this and more.I was after a program that did KP and true solar returns with true node position.After purchasing his program I found it not only did not even do a correct solar return, it was riddled with mistakes and faults. Firslty the Varshapala does not work at all.The planets are not in celestial order in most of the charts. i.e Mercury could be at 25 degrees Gemini and Saturn 5 degrees Gemini but it will show Mercury first in the sign.The atlas is very bad for America. All towns have no state given and the program seems to think +8.00 is the correct timezone for all America.The timezone cannot be used manually either to fix this. You can fiddle with the 2 hours daylight saving time if you know the U.S times well but basically it is hopeless.Having no manual timezone you cannot relocate a chart for a person who has moved country. You cannot put the longitude in manually as it will automatically calculate the place given. You cannot leave it blank. No choice of true or mean nodeThe dashas are incorrct by 3 days with the KP ayanamsha.It could be a good program if they pulled the finger out and fixed it. I have had it for a while now and no free update as promised. After I purchased the software Pundit Pandey simply disappeared and will never answer my emails. One of his staff keeps telling me there will be a free update soon but as the program was released in 2002 and has not been updated yet. I won't hold my breath. Basically Pundit Pandey is a bloody liar he lied to me and my friend Henry Jackson who is a leading KP astrologer in England. Henry had previously warned me about this so called "Pundit" and his lies but I had forgotten about it. I would like to here from the Pundits mouth why he won't fix his software or answer my mails. At $140 USD it should be a perfectly working product. Leo Palm seems a 100% better product. He is quite happy to take my money for a program that is faulty. He is a fraud and should not be using the name Pundit. He is a liar as two of us have found out. In the West we have consumer laws to protect us from people falsely advertising a product. India would be best to do the same.disgusted Andrew LynnThailand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 Siddhartha ji, I am always in favor of open discussions and this is no exception. I guess you might be knowing that I am one of the moderators of this group. I would have moderated messages after last mail or discontinued the thread itself. But I found it a great place for getting opinion. I wanted to discuss with Mr. Lynn also but I thought it is not a good place to discuss about our software. We never tried to use this group for any promotional purpose so why to use it for demotion. Especially if the language of the person is so bad. Even I didn't expect what you have written from astrologer of your caliber. While writing a hate mail to any software, you must write - What software you are talking about? (We are selling total of six softwares) What version of software you did test? At what time you tested the software? (I guess it is quite an old story) What discrepancy did you find in the software? What are the softwares you are using (and satisfied with)? and, With which software/method you tested it for accuracy? Telling something with data is always good otherwise it is a useless talk. Just blaming someone is not the right thing. If you can tell about discrepancy in our software, we can remove that in next version. I just want to tell you that softwares take time to develop. Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey P.S.: Mohan ji, thanks for your support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2004 Report Share Posted July 7, 2004 My Dearest and Respected Punitji I got your letter. Actually I did not mean to say you what you have meant. However, it is not your fault, it is the fault of the software-makers. But being a KP astrologer I have just informed my opinion. Any software at the preliminary stage might go wrong. But after rigorous testing process it comes to be right. It is neither your fault nor you are responsible for this. But we can say at least the software does not work in right way. It needs to be modified. I have tested many renowned softwares at the preliminary stage they are also full of mistakes. Generally, the software-makers accept the opinions of different experienced astrologers and thus modify and change. So why should not accept this universal truth! If I were the software maker the same event may happen to me. However, respected Punitji, you try to modify your software by the software engineer - I think the slight mistake must be vanished. Please don't take it otherwise. Actually I did not want to hurt you. I have made my simple say in the letter. I apologise you if I hurt you consciously or unconsciously. Yours cordially, SIDDHARTHA --- Punit Pandey <punitp wrote: > Siddhartha ji, > > I am always in favor of open discussions and this is > no exception. I > guess you might be knowing that I am one of the > moderators of this > group. I would have moderated messages after last > mail or discontinued > the thread itself. But I found it a great place for > getting opinion. > > I wanted to discuss with Mr. Lynn also but I thought > it is not a good > place to discuss about our software. We never tried > to use this group > for any promotional purpose so why to use it for > demotion. Especially > if the language of the person is so bad. > > Even I didn't expect what you have written from > astrologer of your > caliber. While writing a hate mail to any software, > you must write - > What software you are talking about? (We are selling > total of six softwares) > What version of software you did test? > At what time you tested the software? (I guess it is > quite an old story) > What discrepancy did you find in the software? > What are the softwares you are using (and satisfied > with)? and, > With which software/method you tested it for > accuracy? > > Telling something with data is always good otherwise > it is a useless > talk. Just blaming someone is not the right thing. > If you can tell > about discrepancy in our software, we can remove > that in next version. > I just want to tell you that softwares take time to > develop. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > P.S.: Mohan ji, thanks for your support. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2004 Report Share Posted July 8, 2004 dear shubhamji if you want best KP software pls. contect mr. A.R.Raichur.his email add. is < anant_1608 > you can gat best and most accuret software. if you want you can give my reff. to him. kanakkumar bosmia , Shubham Mondal <shubham_mondal> wrote: > > My Dearest and Respected Punitji > > I got your letter. Actually I did not mean to say you > what you have meant. However, it is not your fault, > it is the fault of the software-makers. But being a > KP astrologer I have just informed my opinion. Any > software at the preliminary stage might go wrong. But > after rigorous testing process it comes to be right. > It is neither your fault nor you are responsible for > this. But we can say at least the software does not > work in right way. It needs to be modified. I have > tested many renowned softwares at the preliminary > stage they are also full of mistakes. Generally, the > software-makers accept the opinions of different > experienced astrologers and thus modify and change. > So why should not accept this universal truth! If I > were the software maker the same event may happen to > me. > However, respected Punitji, you try to modify your > software by the software engineer - I think the > slight mistake must be vanished. > > Please don't take it otherwise. Actually I did not > want to hurt you. I have made my simple say in the > letter. I apologise you if I hurt you consciously or > unconsciously. > > Yours cordially, > > SIDDHARTHA > > > > > > --- Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > > Siddhartha ji, > > > > I am always in favor of open discussions and this is > > no exception. I > > guess you might be knowing that I am one of the > > moderators of this > > group. I would have moderated messages after last > > mail or discontinued > > the thread itself. But I found it a great place for > > getting opinion. > > > > I wanted to discuss with Mr. Lynn also but I thought > > it is not a good > > place to discuss about our software. We never tried > > to use this group > > for any promotional purpose so why to use it for > > demotion. Especially > > if the language of the person is so bad. > > > > Even I didn't expect what you have written from > > astrologer of your > > caliber. While writing a hate mail to any software, > > you must write - > > What software you are talking about? (We are selling > > total of six softwares) > > What version of software you did test? > > At what time you tested the software? (I guess it is > > quite an old story) > > What discrepancy did you find in the software? > > What are the softwares you are using (and satisfied > > with)? and, > > With which software/method you tested it for > > accuracy? > > > > Telling something with data is always good otherwise > > it is a useless > > talk. Just blaming someone is not the right thing. > > If you can tell > > about discrepancy in our software, we can remove > > that in next version. > > I just want to tell you that softwares take time to > > develop. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > P.S.: Mohan ji, thanks for your support. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2004 Report Share Posted July 8, 2004 Siddhartha ji, Don't worry about that. I always take such things positively. It is always good to know opinoin of expert astrologers. But I guess, you have seen/ used some old version of our software. Our both the softwares i.e. Mobile Kundli and Varahamihira are best sellers especially among the KP astrologers. I myself is a software engineer and a KP astrologer. So for me it would be a insult to have problems especially when it comes to KP module. I am repeating it again that if you know any bug or defect in present version, please let me know, I'll get it corrected. Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:29:46 -0700 (PDT), Shubham Mondal <shubham_mondal wrote: > > My Dearest and Respected Punitji > > I got your letter. Actually I did not mean to say you > what you have meant. However, it is not your fault, > it is the fault of the software-makers. But being a > KP astrologer I have just informed my opinion. Any > software at the preliminary stage might go wrong. But > after rigorous testing process it comes to be right. > It is neither your fault nor you are responsible for > this. But we can say at least the software does not > work in right way. It needs to be modified. I have > tested many renowned softwares at the preliminary > stage they are also full of mistakes. Generally, the > software-makers accept the opinions of different > experienced astrologers and thus modify and change. > So why should not accept this universal truth! If I > were the software maker the same event may happen to > me. > However, respected Punitji, you try to modify your > software by the software engineer - I think the > slight mistake must be vanished. > > Please don't take it otherwise. Actually I did not > want to hurt you. I have made my simple say in the > letter. I apologise you if I hurt you consciously or > unconsciously. > > Yours cordially, > > SIDDHARTHA > --- Punit Pandey <punitp wrote: > > Siddhartha ji, > > > > I am always in favor of open discussions and this is > > no exception. I > > guess you might be knowing that I am one of the > > moderators of this > > group. I would have moderated messages after last > > mail or discontinued > > the thread itself. But I found it a great place for > > getting opinion. > > > > I wanted to discuss with Mr. Lynn also but I thought > > it is not a good > > place to discuss about our software. We never tried > > to use this group > > for any promotional purpose so why to use it for > > demotion. Especially > > if the language of the person is so bad. > > > > Even I didn't expect what you have written from > > astrologer of your > > caliber. While writing a hate mail to any software, > > you must write - > > What software you are talking about? (We are selling > > total of six softwares) > > What version of software you did test? > > At what time you tested the software? (I guess it is > > quite an old story) > > What discrepancy did you find in the software? > > What are the softwares you are using (and satisfied > > with)? and, > > With which software/method you tested it for > > accuracy? > > > > Telling something with data is always good otherwise > > it is a useless > > talk. Just blaming someone is not the right thing. > > If you can tell > > about discrepancy in our software, we can remove > > that in next version. > > I just want to tell you that softwares take time to > > develop. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > P.S.: Mohan ji, thanks for your support. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2004 Report Share Posted July 9, 2004 Punit ji, I have a small clarification as you are an expert in KP and I am trying to learn. In case I am working on a horary question and some how I could not complete my analysis then in that case what change I have to do e.g. do I have to seek new number and start all over again or I look for RPs of the time when I sit again to complete my exercise. I am getting mixed up here. Can you guide? Mohan Pahujani / Joytish Acharya; B.E. (Mech.); DBM; FIE; C. Engr; Punit Pandey [punitp]Friday, July 09, 2004 12:05 AM Subject: Re: The fraud Pundit PandeySiddhartha ji,Don't worry about that. I always take such things positively. It isalways good to know opinoin of expert astrologers. But I guess, youhave seen/ used some old version of our software. Our both thesoftwares i.e. Mobile Kundli and Varahamihira are best sellersespecially among the KP astrologers.I myself is a software engineer and a KP astrologer. So for me itwould be a insult to have problems especially when it comes to KPmodule. I am repeating it again that if you know any bug or defect inpresent version, please let me know, I'll get it corrected.Thanks & Regards,Punit PandeyOn Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:29:46 -0700 (PDT), Shubham Mondal<shubham_mondal wrote:> > My Dearest and Respected Punitji> > I got your letter. Actually I did not mean to say you> what you have meant. However, it is not your fault,> it is the fault of the software-makers. But being a> KP astrologer I have just informed my opinion. Any> software at the preliminary stage might go wrong. But> after rigorous testing process it comes to be right.> It is neither your fault nor you are responsible for> this. But we can say at least the software does not> work in right way. It needs to be modified. I have> tested many renowned softwares at the preliminary> stage they are also full of mistakes. Generally, the> software-makers accept the opinions of different> experienced astrologers and thus modify and change. > So why should not accept this universal truth! If I> were the software maker the same event may happen to> me.> However, respected Punitji, you try to modify your> software by the software engineer - I think the> slight mistake must be vanished.> > Please don't take it otherwise. Actually I did not> want to hurt you. I have made my simple say in the> letter. I apologise you if I hurt you consciously or> unconsciously.> > Yours cordially,> > SIDDHARTHA> > > > > > > > --- Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:> > Siddhartha ji,> > > > I am always in favor of open discussions and this is> > no exception. I> > guess you might be knowing that I am one of the> > moderators of this> > group. I would have moderated messages after last> > mail or discontinued> > the thread itself. But I found it a great place for> > getting opinion.> > > > I wanted to discuss with Mr. Lynn also but I thought> > it is not a good> > place to discuss about our software. We never tried> > to use this group> > for any promotional purpose so why to use it for> > demotion. Especially> > if the language of the person is so bad.> > > > Even I didn't expect what you have written from> > astrologer of your> > caliber. While writing a hate mail to any software,> > you must write -> > What software you are talking about? (We are selling> > total of six softwares)> > What version of software you did test?> > At what time you tested the software? (I guess it is> > quite an old story)> > What discrepancy did you find in the software? > > What are the softwares you are using (and satisfied> > with)? and, > > With which software/method you tested it for> > accuracy?> > > > Telling something with data is always good otherwise> > it is a useless> > talk. Just blaming someone is not the right thing.> > If you can tell> > about discrepancy in our software, we can remove> > that in next version.> > I just want to tell you that softwares take time to> > develop.> > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > Punit Pandey> > > > P.S.: Mohan ji, thanks for your support.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2004 Report Share Posted July 9, 2004 Dear Pahu, I take liberty to intervene here. As per Prof. Krishnamurthy, when such a situation comes to rework a horary chart : Keep the number same but take the new configuration of planets at the time you work out next. The RPs at that time would help you. Vijay Kumar - Pahujani, Mohan ' ' Friday, July 09, 2004 8:51 AM RE: The fraud Pundit Pandey Punit ji, I have a small clarification as you are an expert in KP and I am trying to learn. In case I am working on a horary question and some how I could not complete my analysis then in that case what change I have to do e.g. do I have to seek new number and start all over again or I look for RPs of the time when I sit again to complete my exercise. I am getting mixed up here. Can you guide? Mohan Pahujani / Joytish Acharya; B.E. (Mech.); DBM; FIE; C. Engr; Punit Pandey [punitp]Friday, July 09, 2004 12:05 AM Subject: Re: The fraud Pundit PandeySiddhartha ji,Don't worry about that. I always take such things positively. It isalways good to know opinoin of expert astrologers. But I guess, youhave seen/ used some old version of our software. Our both thesoftwares i.e. Mobile Kundli and Varahamihira are best sellersespecially among the KP astrologers.I myself is a software engineer and a KP astrologer. So for me itwould be a insult to have problems especially when it comes to KPmodule. I am repeating it again that if you know any bug or defect inpresent version, please let me know, I'll get it corrected.Thanks & Regards,Punit PandeyOn Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:29:46 -0700 (PDT), Shubham Mondal<shubham_mondal wrote:> > My Dearest and Respected Punitji> > I got your letter. Actually I did not mean to say you> what you have meant. However, it is not your fault,> it is the fault of the software-makers. But being a> KP astrologer I have just informed my opinion. Any> software at the preliminary stage might go wrong. But> after rigorous testing process it comes to be right.> It is neither your fault nor you are responsible for> this. But we can say at least the software does not> work in right way. It needs to be modified. I have> tested many renowned softwares at the preliminary> stage they are also full of mistakes. Generally, the> software-makers accept the opinions of different> experienced astrologers and thus modify and change. > So why should not accept this universal truth! If I> were the software maker the same event may happen to> me.> However, respected Punitji, you try to modify your> software by the software engineer - I think the> slight mistake must be vanished.> > Please don't take it otherwise. Actually I did not> want to hurt you. I have made my simple say in the> letter. I apologise you if I hurt you consciously or> unconsciously.> > Yours cordially,> > SIDDHARTHA> > > > > > > > --- Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:> > Siddhartha ji,> > > > I am always in favor of open discussions and this is> > no exception. I> > guess you might be knowing that I am one of the> > moderators of this> > group. I would have moderated messages after last> > mail or discontinued> > the thread itself. But I found it a great place for> > getting opinion.> > > > I wanted to discuss with Mr. Lynn also but I thought> > it is not a good> > place to discuss about our software. We never tried> > to use this group> > for any promotional purpose so why to use it for> > demotion. Especially> > if the language of the person is so bad.> > > > Even I didn't expect what you have written from> > astrologer of your> > caliber. While writing a hate mail to any software,> > you must write -> > What software you are talking about? (We are selling> > total of six softwares)> > What version of software you did test?> > At what time you tested the software? (I guess it is> > quite an old story)> > What discrepancy did you find in the software? > > What are the softwares you are using (and satisfied> > with)? and, > > With which software/method you tested it for> > accuracy?> > > > Telling something with data is always good otherwise> > it is a useless> > talk. Just blaming someone is not the right thing.> > If you can tell> > about discrepancy in our software, we can remove> > that in next version.> > I just want to tell you that softwares take time to> > develop.> > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > Punit Pandey> > > > P.S.: Mohan ji, thanks for your support.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2004 Report Share Posted July 9, 2004 Mohan ji, I am not expert in KP. Astrology is so vast, people like me can never say us 'expert astrologer.' Mr. Vijay has already given the answer. Mine answer is same. IMO, is is better to cast horoscope again based on the supplied number. Regards, Punit Pandey - Pahujani, Mohan <mlpahuja Fri, 9 Jul 2004 04:21:23 +0100 RE: The fraud Pundit Pandey " " Punit ji, I have a small clarification as you are an expert in KP and I am trying to learn. In case I am working on a horary question and some how I could not complete my analysis then in that case what change I have to do e.g. do I have to seek new number and start all over again or I look for RPs of the time when I sit again to complete my exercise. I am getting mixed up here. Can you guide? Mohan Pahujani / Joytish Acharya; B.E. (Mech.); DBM; FIE; C. Engr; Punit Pandey [punitp] Friday, July 09, 2004 12:05 AM Re: The fraud Pundit Pandey Siddhartha ji, Don't worry about that. I always take such things positively. It is always good to know opinoin of expert astrologers. But I guess, you have seen/ used some old version of our software. Our both the softwares i.e. Mobile Kundli and Varahamihira are best sellers especially among the KP astrologers. I myself is a software engineer and a KP astrologer. So for me it would be a insult to have problems especially when it comes to KP module. I am repeating it again that if you know any bug or defect in present version, please let me know, I'll get it corrected. Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:29:46 -0700 (PDT), Shubham Mondal <shubham_mondal wrote: > > My Dearest and Respected Punitji > > I got your letter. Actually I did not mean to say you > what you have meant. However, it is not your fault, > it is the fault of the software-makers. But being a > KP astrologer I have just informed my opinion. Any > software at the preliminary stage might go wrong. But > after rigorous testing process it comes to be right. > It is neither your fault nor you are responsible for > this. But we can say at least the software does not > work in right way. It needs to be modified. I have > tested many renowned softwares at the preliminary > stage they are also full of mistakes. Generally, the > software-makers accept the opinions of different > experienced astrologers and thus modify and change. > So why should not accept this universal truth! If I > were the software maker the same event may happen to > me. > However, respected Punitji, you try to modify your > software by the software engineer - I think the > slight mistake must be vanished. > > Please don't take it otherwise. Actually I did not > want to hurt you. I have made my simple say in the > letter. I apologise you if I hurt you consciously or > unconsciously. > > Yours cordially, > > SIDDHARTHA > --- Punit Pandey <punitp wrote: > > Siddhartha ji, > > > > I am always in favor of open discussions and this is > > no exception. I > > guess you might be knowing that I am one of the > > moderators of this > > group. I would have moderated messages after last > > mail or discontinued > > the thread itself. But I found it a great place for > > getting opinion. > > > > I wanted to discuss with Mr. Lynn also but I thought > > it is not a good > > place to discuss about our software. We never tried > > to use this group > > for any promotional purpose so why to use it for > > demotion. Especially > > if the language of the person is so bad. > > > > Even I didn't expect what you have written from > > astrologer of your > > caliber. While writing a hate mail to any software, > > you must write - > > What software you are talking about? (We are selling > > total of six softwares) > > What version of software you did test? > > At what time you tested the software? (I guess it is > > quite an old story) > > What discrepancy did you find in the software? > > What are the softwares you are using (and satisfied > > with)? and, > > With which software/method you tested it for > > accuracy? > > > > Telling something with data is always good otherwise > > it is a useless > > talk. Just blaming someone is not the right thing. > > If you can tell > > about discrepancy in our software, we can remove > > that in next version. > > I just want to tell you that softwares take time to > > develop. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > P.S.: Mohan ji, thanks for your support. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2004 Report Share Posted July 12, 2004 Dear Bosmiaji Thank you for your cordial response. Are you a KP Astrologer? If you are - Please come to the forefront to make discussion over KP methodolodogy to make it more and more accurate. The software you have advised is also retained by me. But it is DOS based. I do not know whether they have upgraded to window version or not? Please keep mailing Cordially yours, SIDDHARTHA --- kanbosastro <kanbosastro wrote: > dear shubhamji > > if you want best KP software pls. contect mr. > A.R.Raichur.his email > add. is < anant_1608 > you can gat best > and most accuret > software. > > if you want you can give my reff. to him. > > kanakkumar bosmia > > > > , Shubham Mondal > <shubham_mondal> wrote: > > > > My Dearest and Respected Punitji > > > > I got your letter. Actually I did not mean to say > you > > what you have meant. However, it is not your > fault, > > it is the fault of the software-makers. But being > a > > KP astrologer I have just informed my opinion. > Any > > software at the preliminary stage might go wrong. > But > > after rigorous testing process it comes to be > right. > > It is neither your fault nor you are responsible > for > > this. But we can say at least the software does > not > > work in right way. It needs to be modified. I > have > > tested many renowned softwares at the preliminary > > stage they are also full of mistakes. Generally, > the > > software-makers accept the opinions of different > > experienced astrologers and thus modify and > change. > > So why should not accept this universal truth! If > I > > were the software maker the same event may happen > to > > me. > > However, respected Punitji, you try to modify your > > software by the software engineer - I think the > > slight mistake must be vanished. > > > > Please don't take it otherwise. Actually I did not > > want to hurt you. I have made my simple say in the > > letter. I apologise you if I hurt you consciously > or > > unconsciously. > > > > Yours cordially, > > > > SIDDHARTHA > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > > > Siddhartha ji, > > > > > > I am always in favor of open discussions and > this is > > > no exception. I > > > guess you might be knowing that I am one of the > > > moderators of this > > > group. I would have moderated messages after > last > > > mail or discontinued > > > the thread itself. But I found it a great place > for > > > getting opinion. > > > > > > I wanted to discuss with Mr. Lynn also but I > thought > > > it is not a good > > > place to discuss about our software. We never > tried > > > to use this group > > > for any promotional purpose so why to use it for > > > demotion. Especially > > > if the language of the person is so bad. > > > > > > Even I didn't expect what you have written from > > > astrologer of your > > > caliber. While writing a hate mail to any > software, > > > you must write - > > > What software you are talking about? (We are > selling > > > total of six softwares) > > > What version of software you did test? > > > At what time you tested the software? (I guess > it is > > > quite an old story) > > > What discrepancy did you find in the software? > > > What are the softwares you are using (and > satisfied > > > with)? and, > > > With which software/method you tested it for > > > accuracy? > > > > > > Telling something with data is always good > otherwise > > > it is a useless > > > talk. Just blaming someone is not the right > thing. > > > If you can tell > > > about discrepancy in our software, we can remove > > > that in next version. > > > I just want to tell you that softwares take time > to > > > develop. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > P.S.: Mohan ji, thanks for your support. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail - 50x more storage than other > providers! > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2004 Report Share Posted July 13, 2004 I am using the demo version of Mr. raichur's software. he has made improvement that is now it works for horary also. Good results so far. regards, AnurodhShubham Mondal <shubham_mondal wrote: Dear BosmiajiThank you for your cordial response. Are you a KPAstrologer? If you are - Please come to the forefrontto make discussion over KP methodolodogy to make itmore and more accurate. The software you have advisedis also retained by me. But it is DOS based. I do notknow whether they have upgraded to window version ornot? Please keep mailingCordially yours,SIDDHARTHA--- kanbosastro <kanbosastro wrote:> dear shubhamji> > if you want best KP software pls. contect mr.> A.R.Raichur.his email > add. is < anant_1608 > you can gat best> and most accuret> software.> > if you want you can give my reff. to him.> > kanakkumar bosmia> > > > > > > > > > > , Shubham Mondal > <shubham_mondal> wrote:> > > > My Dearest and Respected Punitji> > > > I got your letter. Actually I did not mean to say> you> > what you have meant. However, it is not your> fault,> > it is the fault of the software-makers. But being> a> > KP astrologer I have just informed my opinion. > Any> > software at the preliminary stage might go wrong.> But> > after rigorous testing process it comes to be> right.> > It is neither your fault nor you are responsible> for> > this. But we can say at least the software does> not> > work in right way. It needs to be modified. I> have> > tested many renowned softwares at the preliminary> > stage they are also full of mistakes. Generally,> the> > software-makers accept the opinions of different> > experienced astrologers and thus modify and> change. > > So why should not accept this universal truth! If> I> > were the software maker the same event may happen> to> > me.> > However, respected Punitji, you try to modify your> > software by the software engineer - I think the> > slight mistake must be vanished.> > > > Please don't take it otherwise. Actually I did not> > want to hurt you. I have made my simple say in the> > letter. I apologise you if I hurt you consciously> or> > unconsciously.> > > > Yours cordially,> > > > SIDDHARTHA> > > > > > > > > > > > --- Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote:> > > Siddhartha ji,> > > > > > I am always in favor of open discussions and> this is> > > no exception. I> > > guess you might be knowing that I am one of the> > > moderators of this> > > group. I would have moderated messages after> last> > > mail or discontinued> > > the thread itself. But I found it a great place> for> > > getting opinion.> > > > > > I wanted to discuss with Mr. Lynn also but I> thought> > > it is not a good> > > place to discuss about our software. We never> tried> > > to use this group> > > for any promotional purpose so why to use it for> > > demotion. Especially> > > if the language of the person is so bad.> > > > > > Even I didn't expect what you have written from> > > astrologer of your> > > caliber. While writing a hate mail to any> software,> > > you must write -> > > What software you are talking about? (We are> selling> > > total of six softwares)> > > What version of software you did test?> > > At what time you tested the software? (I guess> it is> > > quite an old story)> > > What discrepancy did you find in the software? > > > What are the softwares you are using (and> satisfied> > > with)? and, > > > With which software/method you tested it for> > > accuracy?> > > > > > Telling something with data is always good> otherwise> > > it is a useless> > > talk. Just blaming someone is not the right> thing.> > > If you can tell> > > about discrepancy in our software, we can remove> > > that in next version.> > > I just want to tell you that softwares take time> to> > > develop.> > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > P.S.: Mohan ji, thanks for your support.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail - 50x more storage than other> providers!> > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2004 Report Share Posted July 14, 2004 at present only raichur's softwear alone is best. i have tested so meny but.raichur's is best. latest version of raichur's softwear us ayamansa as par the articals of mr. subramaniyam wich was publish in annual 2003.artical clear t all dout about aynamsha. no any one other softwear can use this aynamsha. only the weekness of softwear is " dos baise " . kanak bosmia , Anurodh Kumar <anurodh1> wrote: > I am using the demo version of Mr. raichur's software. he has made improvement that is now it works for horary also. > Good results so far. > regards, > Anurodh > > Shubham Mondal <shubham_mondal> wrote: > Dear Bosmiaji > > Thank you for your cordial response. Are you a KP > Astrologer? If you are - Please come to the forefront > to make discussion over KP methodolodogy to make it > more and more accurate. The software you have advised > is also retained by me. But it is DOS based. I do not > know whether they have upgraded to window version or > not? > > Please keep mailing > > > Cordially yours, > SIDDHARTHA > > > --- kanbosastro <kanbosastro@s...> wrote: > > dear shubhamji > > > > if you want best KP software pls. contect mr. > > A.R.Raichur.his email > > add. is < anant_1608 > you can gat best > > and most accuret > > software. > > > > if you want you can give my reff. to him. > > > > kanakkumar bosmia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Shubham Mondal > > <shubham_mondal> wrote: > > > > > > My Dearest and Respected Punitji > > > > > > I got your letter. Actually I did not mean to say > > you > > > what you have meant. However, it is not your > > fault, > > > it is the fault of the software-makers. But being > > a > > > KP astrologer I have just informed my opinion. > > Any > > > software at the preliminary stage might go wrong. > > But > > > after rigorous testing process it comes to be > > right. > > > It is neither your fault nor you are responsible > > for > > > this. But we can say at least the software does > > not > > > work in right way. It needs to be modified. I > > have > > > tested many renowned softwares at the preliminary > > > stage they are also full of mistakes. Generally, > > the > > > software-makers accept the opinions of different > > > experienced astrologers and thus modify and > > change. > > > So why should not accept this universal truth! If > > I > > > were the software maker the same event may happen > > to > > > me. > > > However, respected Punitji, you try to modify your > > > software by the software engineer - I think the > > > slight mistake must be vanished. > > > > > > Please don't take it otherwise. Actually I did not > > > want to hurt you. I have made my simple say in the > > > letter. I apologise you if I hurt you consciously > > or > > > unconsciously. > > > > > > Yours cordially, > > > > > > SIDDHARTHA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > > > > Siddhartha ji, > > > > > > > > I am always in favor of open discussions and > > this is > > > > no exception. I > > > > guess you might be knowing that I am one of the > > > > moderators of this > > > > group. I would have moderated messages after > > last > > > > mail or discontinued > > > > the thread itself. But I found it a great place > > for > > > > getting opinion. > > > > > > > > I wanted to discuss with Mr. Lynn also but I > > thought > > > > it is not a good > > > > place to discuss about our software. We never > > tried > > > > to use this group > > > > for any promotional purpose so why to use it for > > > > demotion. Especially > > > > if the language of the person is so bad. > > > > > > > > Even I didn't expect what you have written from > > > > astrologer of your > > > > caliber. While writing a hate mail to any > > software, > > > > you must write - > > > > What software you are talking about? (We are > > selling > > > > total of six softwares) > > > > What version of software you did test? > > > > At what time you tested the software? (I guess > > it is > > > > quite an old story) > > > > What discrepancy did you find in the software? > > > > What are the softwares you are using (and > > satisfied > > > > with)? and, > > > > With which software/method you tested it for > > > > accuracy? > > > > > > > > Telling something with data is always good > > otherwise > > > > it is a useless > > > > talk. Just blaming someone is not the right > > thing. > > > > If you can tell > > > > about discrepancy in our software, we can remove > > > > that in next version. > > > > I just want to tell you that softwares take time > > to > > > > develop. > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > P.S.: Mohan ji, thanks for your support. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail - 50x more storage than other > > providers! > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2004 Report Share Posted July 14, 2004 mr. bosmia, We have all three KP ayansamsa in our software Varhamihira i.e. KP Old, KP New and customizable one. So don't say that no other software supports it. And mind you, the ayanamsa published in KP annual issue is not accepted by all astrolgoers. Regards, Punit Pandey - kanbosastro <kanbosastro Wed, 14 Jul 2004 01:49:09 -0000 Re: The fraud Pundit Pandey at present only raichur's softwear alone is best. i have tested so meny but.raichur's is best. latest version of raichur's softwear us ayamansa as par the articals of mr. subramaniyam wich was publish in annual 2003.artical clear t all dout about aynamsha. no any one other softwear can use this aynamsha. only the weekness of softwear is " dos baise " . kanak bosmia , Anurodh Kumar <anurodh1> wrote: > I am using the demo version of Mr. raichur's software. he has made improvement that is now it works for horary also. > Good results so far. > regards, > Anurodh > > Shubham Mondal <shubham_mondal> wrote: > Dear Bosmiaji > > Thank you for your cordial response. Are you a KP > Astrologer? If you are - Please come to the forefront > to make discussion over KP methodolodogy to make it > more and more accurate. The software you have advised > is also retained by me. But it is DOS based. I do not > know whether they have upgraded to window version or > not? > > Please keep mailing > > > Cordially yours, > SIDDHARTHA > > > --- kanbosastro <kanbosastro@s...> wrote: > > dear shubhamji > > > > if you want best KP software pls. contect mr. > > A.R.Raichur.his email > > add. is < anant_1608 > you can gat best > > and most accuret > > software. > > > > if you want you can give my reff. to him. > > > > kanakkumar bosmia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Shubham Mondal > > <shubham_mondal> wrote: > > > > > > My Dearest and Respected Punitji > > > > > > I got your letter. Actually I did not mean to say > > you > > > what you have meant. However, it is not your > > fault, > > > it is the fault of the software-makers. But being > > a > > > KP astrologer I have just informed my opinion. > > Any > > > software at the preliminary stage might go wrong. > > But > > > after rigorous testing process it comes to be > > right. > > > It is neither your fault nor you are responsible > > for > > > this. But we can say at least the software does > > not > > > work in right way. It needs to be modified. I > > have > > > tested many renowned softwares at the preliminary > > > stage they are also full of mistakes. Generally, > > the > > > software-makers accept the opinions of different > > > experienced astrologers and thus modify and > > change. > > > So why should not accept this universal truth! If > > I > > > were the software maker the same event may happen > > to > > > me. > > > However, respected Punitji, you try to modify your > > > software by the software engineer - I think the > > > slight mistake must be vanished. > > > > > > Please don't take it otherwise. Actually I did not > > > want to hurt you. I have made my simple say in the > > > letter. I apologise you if I hurt you consciously > > or > > > unconsciously. > > > > > > Yours cordially, > > > > > > SIDDHARTHA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > > > > Siddhartha ji, > > > > > > > > I am always in favor of open discussions and > > this is > > > > no exception. I > > > > guess you might be knowing that I am one of the > > > > moderators of this > > > > group. I would have moderated messages after > > last > > > > mail or discontinued > > > > the thread itself. But I found it a great place > > for > > > > getting opinion. > > > > > > > > I wanted to discuss with Mr. Lynn also but I > > thought > > > > it is not a good > > > > place to discuss about our software. We never > > tried > > > > to use this group > > > > for any promotional purpose so why to use it for > > > > demotion. Especially > > > > if the language of the person is so bad. > > > > > > > > Even I didn't expect what you have written from > > > > astrologer of your > > > > caliber. While writing a hate mail to any > > software, > > > > you must write - > > > > What software you are talking about? (We are > > selling > > > > total of six softwares) > > > > What version of software you did test? > > > > At what time you tested the software? (I guess > > it is > > > > quite an old story) > > > > What discrepancy did you find in the software? > > > > What are the softwares you are using (and > > satisfied > > > > with)? and, > > > > With which software/method you tested it for > > > > accuracy? > > > > > > > > Telling something with data is always good > > otherwise > > > > it is a useless > > > > talk. Just blaming someone is not the right > > thing. > > > > If you can tell > > > > about discrepancy in our software, we can remove > > > > that in next version. > > > > I just want to tell you that softwares take time > > to > > > > develop. > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > P.S.: Mohan ji, thanks for your support. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail - 50x more storage than other > > providers! > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2004 Report Share Posted July 14, 2004 dear panday ji, i never say that you software is not good.and i dont want to discuss abut aynamsa. i sow previous messsg. you are all ways very aggressive about you software.and i dont want to more diss. thanx kanak bosmia , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > mr. bosmia, > > We have all three KP ayansamsa in our software Varhamihira i.e. KP > Old, KP New and customizable one. So don't say that no other software > supports it. And mind you, the ayanamsa published in KP annual issue > is not accepted by all astrolgoers. > > Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > > - > kanbosastro <kanbosastro@s...> > Wed, 14 Jul 2004 01:49:09 -0000 > Re: The fraud Pundit Pandey > > > > > at present only raichur's softwear alone is best. i have tested so > meny but.raichur's is best. > > latest version of raichur's softwear us ayamansa as par the articals > of mr. subramaniyam wich was publish in annual 2003.artical clear t > all dout about aynamsha. > > no any one other softwear can use this aynamsha. > > only the weekness of softwear is " dos baise " . > > kanak bosmia > > > > > > > > > > > , Anurodh Kumar <anurodh1> > wrote: > > I am using the demo version of Mr. raichur's software. he has made > improvement that is now it works for horary also. > > Good results so far. > > regards, > > Anurodh > > > > Shubham Mondal <shubham_mondal> wrote: > > Dear Bosmiaji > > > > Thank you for your cordial response. Are you a KP > > Astrologer? If you are - Please come to the forefront > > to make discussion over KP methodolodogy to make it > > more and more accurate. The software you have advised > > is also retained by me. But it is DOS based. I do not > > know whether they have upgraded to window version or > > not? > > > > Please keep mailing > > > > > > Cordially yours, > > SIDDHARTHA > > > > > > --- kanbosastro <kanbosastro@s...> wrote: > > > dear shubhamji > > > > > > if you want best KP software pls. contect mr. > > > A.R.Raichur.his email > > > add. is < anant_1608 > you can gat best > > > and most accuret > > > software. > > > > > > if you want you can give my reff. to him. > > > > > > kanakkumar bosmia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Shubham Mondal > > > <shubham_mondal> wrote: > > > > > > > > My Dearest and Respected Punitji > > > > > > > > I got your letter. Actually I did not mean to say > > > you > > > > what you have meant. However, it is not your > > > fault, > > > > it is the fault of the software-makers. But being > > > a > > > > KP astrologer I have just informed my opinion. > > > Any > > > > software at the preliminary stage might go wrong. > > > But > > > > after rigorous testing process it comes to be > > > right. > > > > It is neither your fault nor you are responsible > > > for > > > > this. But we can say at least the software does > > > not > > > > work in right way. It needs to be modified. I > > > have > > > > tested many renowned softwares at the preliminary > > > > stage they are also full of mistakes. Generally, > > > the > > > > software-makers accept the opinions of different > > > > experienced astrologers and thus modify and > > > change. > > > > So why should not accept this universal truth! If > > > I > > > > were the software maker the same event may happen > > > to > > > > me. > > > > However, respected Punitji, you try to modify your > > > > software by the software engineer - I think the > > > > slight mistake must be vanished. > > > > > > > > Please don't take it otherwise. Actually I did not > > > > want to hurt you. I have made my simple say in the > > > > letter. I apologise you if I hurt you consciously > > > or > > > > unconsciously. > > > > > > > > Yours cordially, > > > > > > > > SIDDHARTHA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > > > > > Siddhartha ji, > > > > > > > > > > I am always in favor of open discussions and > > > this is > > > > > no exception. I > > > > > guess you might be knowing that I am one of the > > > > > moderators of this > > > > > group. I would have moderated messages after > > > last > > > > > mail or discontinued > > > > > the thread itself. But I found it a great place > > > for > > > > > getting opinion. > > > > > > > > > > I wanted to discuss with Mr. Lynn also but I > > > thought > > > > > it is not a good > > > > > place to discuss about our software. We never > > > tried > > > > > to use this group > > > > > for any promotional purpose so why to use it for > > > > > demotion. Especially > > > > > if the language of the person is so bad. > > > > > > > > > > Even I didn't expect what you have written from > > > > > astrologer of your > > > > > caliber. While writing a hate mail to any > > > software, > > > > > you must write - > > > > > What software you are talking about? (We are > > > selling > > > > > total of six softwares) > > > > > What version of software you did test? > > > > > At what time you tested the software? (I guess > > > it is > > > > > quite an old story) > > > > > What discrepancy did you find in the software? > > > > > What are the softwares you are using (and > > > satisfied > > > > > with)? and, > > > > > With which software/method you tested it for > > > > > accuracy? > > > > > > > > > > Telling something with data is always good > > > otherwise > > > > > it is a useless > > > > > talk. Just blaming someone is not the right > > > thing. > > > > > If you can tell > > > > > about discrepancy in our software, we can remove > > > > > that in next version. > > > > > I just want to tell you that softwares take time > > > to > > > > > develop. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: Mohan ji, thanks for your support. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail - 50x more storage than other > > > providers! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2004 Report Share Posted July 14, 2004 Bosmia ji, There is nothing to be agreesive or not to be agreesive. I was just telling the about ayanamsa. We are also involved with lots of KP astrologers that's why I can tell you. You should not say " no other software use that ayanamsa " without seeing all the softwares :-). That was the only objection. Regards, Punit Pandey - kanbosastro <kanbosastro Wed, 14 Jul 2004 06:34:00 -0000 Re: The fraud Pundit Pandey dear panday ji, i never say that you software is not good.and i dont want to discuss abut aynamsa. i sow previous messsg. you are all ways very aggressive about you software.and i dont want to more diss. thanx kanak bosmia , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > mr. bosmia, > > We have all three KP ayansamsa in our software Varhamihira i.e. KP > Old, KP New and customizable one. So don't say that no other software > supports it. And mind you, the ayanamsa published in KP annual issue > is not accepted by all astrolgoers. > > Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > > - > kanbosastro <kanbosastro@s...> > Wed, 14 Jul 2004 01:49:09 -0000 > Re: The fraud Pundit Pandey > > > > > at present only raichur's softwear alone is best. i have tested so > meny but.raichur's is best. > > latest version of raichur's softwear us ayamansa as par the articals > of mr. subramaniyam wich was publish in annual 2003.artical clear t > all dout about aynamsha. > > no any one other softwear can use this aynamsha. > > only the weekness of softwear is " dos baise " . > > kanak bosmia > > > > > > > > > > > , Anurodh Kumar <anurodh1> > wrote: > > I am using the demo version of Mr. raichur's software. he has made > improvement that is now it works for horary also. > > Good results so far. > > regards, > > Anurodh > > > > Shubham Mondal <shubham_mondal> wrote: > > Dear Bosmiaji > > > > Thank you for your cordial response. Are you a KP > > Astrologer? If you are - Please come to the forefront > > to make discussion over KP methodolodogy to make it > > more and more accurate. The software you have advised > > is also retained by me. But it is DOS based. I do not > > know whether they have upgraded to window version or > > not? > > > > Please keep mailing > > > > > > Cordially yours, > > SIDDHARTHA > > > > > > --- kanbosastro <kanbosastro@s...> wrote: > > > dear shubhamji > > > > > > if you want best KP software pls. contect mr. > > > A.R.Raichur.his email > > > add. is < anant_1608 > you can gat best > > > and most accuret > > > software. > > > > > > if you want you can give my reff. to him. > > > > > > kanakkumar bosmia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Shubham Mondal > > > <shubham_mondal> wrote: > > > > > > > > My Dearest and Respected Punitji > > > > > > > > I got your letter. Actually I did not mean to say > > > you > > > > what you have meant. However, it is not your > > > fault, > > > > it is the fault of the software-makers. But being > > > a > > > > KP astrologer I have just informed my opinion. > > > Any > > > > software at the preliminary stage might go wrong. > > > But > > > > after rigorous testing process it comes to be > > > right. > > > > It is neither your fault nor you are responsible > > > for > > > > this. But we can say at least the software does > > > not > > > > work in right way. It needs to be modified. I > > > have > > > > tested many renowned softwares at the preliminary > > > > stage they are also full of mistakes. Generally, > > > the > > > > software-makers accept the opinions of different > > > > experienced astrologers and thus modify and > > > change. > > > > So why should not accept this universal truth! If > > > I > > > > were the software maker the same event may happen > > > to > > > > me. > > > > However, respected Punitji, you try to modify your > > > > software by the software engineer - I think the > > > > slight mistake must be vanished. > > > > > > > > Please don't take it otherwise. Actually I did not > > > > want to hurt you. I have made my simple say in the > > > > letter. I apologise you if I hurt you consciously > > > or > > > > unconsciously. > > > > > > > > Yours cordially, > > > > > > > > SIDDHARTHA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > > > > > Siddhartha ji, > > > > > > > > > > I am always in favor of open discussions and > > > this is > > > > > no exception. I > > > > > guess you might be knowing that I am one of the > > > > > moderators of this > > > > > group. I would have moderated messages after > > > last > > > > > mail or discontinued > > > > > the thread itself. But I found it a great place > > > for > > > > > getting opinion. > > > > > > > > > > I wanted to discuss with Mr. Lynn also but I > > > thought > > > > > it is not a good > > > > > place to discuss about our software. We never > > > tried > > > > > to use this group > > > > > for any promotional purpose so why to use it for > > > > > demotion. Especially > > > > > if the language of the person is so bad. > > > > > > > > > > Even I didn't expect what you have written from > > > > > astrologer of your > > > > > caliber. While writing a hate mail to any > > > software, > > > > > you must write - > > > > > What software you are talking about? (We are > > > selling > > > > > total of six softwares) > > > > > What version of software you did test? > > > > > At what time you tested the software? (I guess > > > it is > > > > > quite an old story) > > > > > What discrepancy did you find in the software? > > > > > What are the softwares you are using (and > > > satisfied > > > > > with)? and, > > > > > With which software/method you tested it for > > > > > accuracy? > > > > > > > > > > Telling something with data is always good > > > otherwise > > > > > it is a useless > > > > > talk. Just blaming someone is not the right > > > thing. > > > > > If you can tell > > > > > about discrepancy in our software, we can remove > > > > > that in next version. > > > > > I just want to tell you that softwares take time > > > to > > > > > develop. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: Mohan ji, thanks for your support. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail - 50x more storage than other > > > providers! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2004 Report Share Posted July 15, 2004 --- Anurodh Kumar <anurodh1 wrote: > I am using the demo version of Mr. raichur's > software. he has made improvement that is now it > works for horary also. > Good results so far. > regards, > Anurodh > > My Dearest Anurodhji After a lot of months I got your warm touch through this letter. How about you? Why you have not seen these days? Is everything OK? What is your new inventions in KP methodology? Since I am connected with an Engineering Company working with computer so I have to be busy at least 10 hours in my office work and in the leisure hours at home and holidays I keep myself busy so generally I did not get find full time like all of you. However, except the software you have mentioned I am also using the other software E-Kundli. It is good for KP Calculative purpose. This E-Kundli gives us the detailed report of KP calculation. Keep e-mailing. Thanking you, Cordially yours SIDDHARTHA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.