Guest guest Posted January 10, 2005 Report Share Posted January 10, 2005 Dear members, While reading KP reader 3 in pages 445-447 regarding Vimsottary dasa it says that results in dasa lord 'D' period are as per houses owned by dasa lord and its star lord. In all paragraphs it has not mentioned anything about the house occupied by the dasa lord and its star lord. Now i am confused because every where else we are considering house occupied and owned both. Does it mean that for reading dasa results we don't have to consider house owned? Could any body please clarify. Thanks and regards Mukesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2005 Report Share Posted January 11, 2005 Dear Mukesh Ggupta, Hopefully it will be clear by studying again " DOUBT 3 " under the heading " Kendra Adhipathya and a few more doubts " in the same KP Reader III,( 1984, Part 2, pp 288-296), in your book perhaps pp 456- 464. Best regards, tw , " mukesh gupta " <mukeshgupta@b...> wrote: > BlankDear members, > > While reading KP reader 3 in pages 445-447 regarding Vimsottary dasa it says that results in dasa lord 'D' period are as per houses owned by dasa lord and its star lord. In all paragraphs it has not mentioned anything about the house occupied by the dasa lord and its star lord. Now i am confused because every where else we are considering house occupied and owned both. Does it mean that for reading dasa results we don't have to consider house owned? > > Could any body please clarify. > > Thanks and regards > > Mukesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2005 Report Share Posted January 11, 2005 Dear TW, Thanks for the valuable help. regards, Mukesh - tw853 Tuesday, January 11, 2005 7:59 AM Re: Clarification Vimsottary dasa Dear Mukesh Ggupta,Hopefully it will be clear by studying again "DOUBT 3" under the heading "Kendra Adhipathya and a few more doubts" in the same KP Reader III,( 1984, Part 2, pp 288-296), in your book perhaps pp 456-464. Best regards,tw , "mukesh gupta" <mukeshgupta@b...> wrote:> BlankDear members,> > While reading KP reader 3 in pages 445-447 regarding Vimsottary dasa it says that results in dasa lord 'D' period are as per houses owned by dasa lord and its star lord. In all paragraphs it has not mentioned anything about the house occupied by the dasa lord and its star lord. Now i am confused because every where else we are considering house occupied and owned both. Does it mean that for reading dasa results we don't have to consider house owned?> > Could any body please clarify.> > Thanks and regards> > Mukesh--- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus Tool] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus Tool] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.