Guest guest Posted January 17, 2005 Report Share Posted January 17, 2005 Dear Senior KP Members, Below is my translation on what I have understood so far - as per the recent discussion taking place about Ruling Planets. Is my understanding correct on what has been discussed so far? What about #4? Thanks. All the Best, Sandy Crowther http://www.jupitersweb.com Notes on KP: 1. Sublords of both Ascendant and Moon are recently also being included as RP’s. 2. KP Hindu aspects apply no orb usage (as Western aspects do). 3. Planets being posited in the same star and sub of an RP, create another RP (could be in different signs). 4. The aspects of an RP also create other RP’s, using Hindu aspects. (OK…What about Western aspects? Are they considered? I’m not at all clear on this, and why the dichotomy is relative to this particular RP teaching of KP when I thought KP utilized both eastern and western aspects? So why subdivide the KP ruling when it comes to determining RP’s? Can someone please elaborate?) 5. Rahu is an agent of Ketu when Rahu is in Ketu’s star (and vice-versa). 6. If Ketu is in Saturn’s sign and Saturn is a RP, Ketu is also considered a RP. (For example: Consider Rahu as being not in Aries or Scorpio, but rather in Mars’ sign.) 7. If the nodes are in the signs of the Day Lord planet, they must also be considered as RP’s. (Example: Prashna occurred on Sunday and Ketu is in Leo. Ketu is therefore an RP.) 8. We consider the nodes as agents , working for other planets. If in the previous example (#7) RP Ketu is conjunct Jupiter, according to the aspect, Jupiter will also be a RP, but Ketu being an agent of Jupiter (by aspect/conjunction) will actually be working for Jupiter, and therefore there is no need of considering Jupiter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2005 Report Share Posted January 17, 2005 Dear Sandy, My comment with Bold letter regards kanak bosmia >"Sandy Crowther" <sandycrowther > > > Notes on KP...OK? >Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:01:37 -0500 > >Dear Senior KP Members, > > > >Below is my translation on what I have understood so far - as per the recent >discussion taking place about Ruling Planets. Is my understanding correct on >what has been discussed so far? > > > >What about #4? Thanks. > > > > All the Best, > > Sandy Crowther > >http://www.jupitersweb.com <http://www.jupitersweb.com/> > > > > > >Notes on KP: > > > >1. Sublords of both Ascendant and Moon are recently also being >included as RP's. > >2. KP Hindu aspects apply no orb usage (as Western aspects do). > >3. Planets being posited in the same star and sub of an RP, create >another RP (could be in different signs). > >4. The aspects of an RP also create other RP's, using Hindu aspects. >(OK.What about Western aspects? Are they considered? I'm not at all clear on >this, and why the dichotomy is relative to this particular RP teaching of KP >when I thought KP utilized both eastern and western aspects? So why >subdivide the KP ruling when it comes to determining RP's? Can someone >please elaborate?) Leave this metter on individual experience.some use western and some use hidu aspect.all have personal experience. so discossion will going on and on...... >5. Rahu is an agent of Ketu when Rahu is in Ketu's star (and >vice-versa). > >6. If Ketu is in Saturn's sign and Saturn is a RP, Ketu is also >considered a RP. (For example: Consider Rahu as being not in Aries or >Scorpio, but rather in Mars' sign.) > >7. If the nodes are in the signs of the Day Lord planet, they must >also be considered as RP's. (Example: Prashna occurred on Sunday and Ketu is >in Leo. Ketu is therefore an RP.) > >8. We consider the nodes as agents , working for other planets. If in >the previous example (#7) RP Ketu is conjunct Jupiter, according to the >aspect, Jupiter will also be a RP, but Ketu being an agent of Jupiter (by >aspect/conjunction) will actually be working for Jupiter, and therefore >there is no need of considering Jupiter. > Claim your Space NOW! Have fun sharing blogs, photos and music lists online. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 Dear Sandy There has been a lot of discussion on Ruling Planets. I have already posted a Note on this. The inclusion of sub, and sub-sub is a recent innovation. Only one Senior KP astologer Shre Kuppu Ganapathy has used the sub-sub to fix the correct Birth Time. In the Book RP & KP where 41 articles have been written, 39 have used only the 5 RPs mentioned by KSK. one has used the sub, and one has mentioned about Rahu/ketu being the RP when he is in sign of RPs. THERE IS NO SYSTEMATIC report for deviating from what has been fixewd by Prof KSK, and including so many other items. Regarding RAHU and Ketu KSK has clearly stated that they act as agents of the 1.planets with which they are conjunct. 2. with the planets which cast aspect on them. 3. with the lord of the sign where are situated, in that order. When Rahu is conjunt with a Planet, Ketu is in opposition. So Both Rahu and Ketu act as agents of that Planet. 2. Hindoo aspects have no orbs. They are sign to sign 3. Creation of RP by any aspect applies only to RAHU/KETU not other planets. If however, the 2 planets are in RAPT CONJUNCTION (SAME SIGN,STAR AND SUB-LORDS), they will act for each other.Sandy Crowther <sandycrowther wrote: Dear Senior KP Members, Below is my translation on what I have understood so far - as per the recent discussion taking place about Ruling Planets. Is my understanding correct on what has been discussed so far? What about #4? Thanks. All the Best, Sandy Crowther http://www.jupitersweb.com Notes on KP: 1. Sublords of both Ascendant and Moon are recently also being included as RP’s. 2. KP Hindu aspects apply no orb usage (as Western aspects do). 3. Planets being posited in the same star and sub of an RP, create another RP (could be in different signs). 4. The aspects of an RP also create other RP’s, using Hindu aspects. (OK…What about Western aspects? Are they considered? I’m not at all clear on this, and why the dichotomy is relative to this particular RP teaching of KP when I thought KP utilized both eastern and western aspects? So why subdivide the KP ruling when it comes to determining RP’s? Can someone please elaborate?) 5. Rahu is an agent of Ketu when Rahu is in Ketu’s star (and vice-versa). 6. If Ketu is in Saturn’s sign and Saturn is a RP, Ketu is also considered a RP. (For example: Consider Rahu as being not in Aries or Scorpio, but rather in Mars’ sign.) 7. If the nodes are in the signs of the Day Lord planet, they must also be considered as RP’s. (Example: Prashna occurred on Sunday and Ketu is in Leo. Ketu is therefore an RP.) 8. We consider the nodes as agents , working for other planets. If in the previous example (#7) RP Ketu is conjunct Jupiter, according to the aspect, Jupiter will also be a RP, but Ketu being an agent of Jupiter (by aspect/conjunction) will actually be working for Jupiter, and therefore there is no need of considering Jupiter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 Dear Anant Raichur and Group, Mr. Anant Raichur - Thanks so much for sharing your experience and KP knowledge. I have only (so far) the 6 KP Readers and the K.P. & Astrology Journals for 2002 and 2004, (but I have yet had the time to read/absorb all the material). I do hear mention of the two books Ruling Planets and KP and Astrosecrets and KP quite frequently on this list, so those two books will be my next KP purchases (when I catch up with what I already have yet to read.) One thing I noted about the journal publications K.P. & Astrology…I have d to quite a few Astrology Journals/Magazines over the years, (both eastern and western) and have been both pleased and disappointed with the content of some issues. So I find it quite refreshing to have the K.P. Journals focused singularly and strictly on the teachings of K.P. (especially when that is my current area of astrological focus J). With most astrological journals/magazines, the authors of the articles focus on a variety of astrological systems or eastern teachings OR eastern/western teachings and techniques, with no specific or dedicated focus on any particular astrological system. So these K.P. Journals are fine streamed and welcome editions to learning and reading about just K.P., and contain some very interesting articles that can be easily understood by the western mind...(another BIG plus J.) These K.P. Journals were recently brought to my attention by Yogesh Rao Lajmi (thank you J) when he mentioned (just a short while back) that he had written an article (great predictive article) that was published in the 2004 edition of K.P. & Astrology (using your Raichur K.P. Software, (which was kindly mentioned at the end of his article) entitled “When Will I Get A Job”? So I find these K.P. articles great to read just before retiring, as most of the articles are short and directly to the point. All the Best, Sandy Crowther http://www.jupitersweb.com anant raichur [anant_1608] Tuesday, January 18, 2005 2:00 AM Re: Notes on KP...OK? Dear Sandy There has been a lot of discussion on Ruling Planets. I have already posted a Note on this. The inclusion of sub, and sub-sub is a recent innovation. Only one Senior KP astologer Shre Kuppu Ganapathy has used the sub-sub to fix the correct Birth Time. In the Book RP & KP where 41 articles have been written, 39 have used only the 5 RPs mentioned by KSK. one has used the sub, and one has mentioned about Rahu/ketu being the RP when he is in sign of RPs. THERE IS NO SYSTEMATIC report for deviating from what has been fixewd by Prof KSK, and including so many other items. Regarding RAHU and Ketu KSK has clearly stated that they act as agents of the 1.planets with which they are conjunct. 2. with the planets which cast aspect on them. 3. with the lord of the sign where are situated, in that order. When Rahu is conjunt with a Planet, Ketu is in opposition. So Both Rahu and Ketu act as agents of that Planet. 2. Hindoo aspects have no orbs. They are sign to sign 3. Creation of RP by any aspect applies only to RAHU/KETU not other planets. If however, the 2 planets are in RAPT CONJUNCTION (SAME SIGN,STAR AND SUB-LORDS), they will act for each other. Sandy Crowther <sandycrowther wrote: Dear Senior KP Members, Below is my translation on what I have understood so far - as per the recent discussion taking place about Ruling Planets. Is my understanding correct on what has been discussed so far? What about #4? Thanks. All the Best, Sandy Crowther http://www.jupitersweb.com Notes on KP: 1. Sublords of both Ascendant and Moon are recently also being included as RP’s. 2. KP Hindu aspects apply no orb usage (as Western aspects do). 3. Planets being posited in the same star and sub of an RP, create another RP (could be in different signs). 4. The aspects of an RP also create other RP’s, using Hindu aspects. (OK…What about Western aspects? Are they considered? I’m not at all clear on this, and why the dichotomy is relative to this particular RP teaching of KP when I thought KP utilized both eastern and western aspects? So why subdivide the KP ruling when it comes to determining RP’s? Can someone please elaborate?) 5. Rahu is an agent of Ketu when Rahu is in Ketu’s star (and vice-versa). 6. If Ketu is in Saturn’s sign and Saturn is a RP, Ketu is also considered a RP. (For example: Consider Rahu as being not in Aries or Scorpio, but rather in Mars’ sign.) 7. If the nodes are in the signs of the Day Lord planet, they must also be considered as RP’s. (Example: Prashna occurred on Sunday and Ketu is in Leo. Ketu is therefore an RP.) 8. We consider the nodes as agents , working for other planets. If in the previous example (#7) RP Ketu is conjunct Jupiter, according to the aspect, Jupiter will also be a RP, but Ketu being an agent of Jupiter (by aspect/conjunction) will actually be working for Jupiter, and therefore there is no need of considering Jupiter. Groups Links · To visit your group on the web, go to: / · To from this group, send an email to: - · Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2005 Report Share Posted January 19, 2005 Sandy Crowther <sandycrowther wrote: Dear Anant Raichur and Group, Mr. Anant Raichur - Thanks so much for sharing your experience and KP knowledge. I have only (so far) the 6 KP Readers and the K.P. & Astrology Journals for 2002 and 2004, (but I have yet had the time to read/absorb all the material). I do hear mention of the two books Ruling Planets and KP and Astrosecrets and KP quite frequently on this list, so those two books will be my next KP purchases (when I catch up with what I already have yet to read.) One thing I noted about the journal publications K.P. & Astrology…I have d to quite a few Astrology Journals/Magazines over the years, (both eastern and western) and have been both pleased and disappointed with the content of some issues. So I find it quite refreshing to have the K.P. Journals focused singularly and strictly on the teachings of K.P. (especially when that is my current area of astrological focus J). With most astrological journals/magazines, the authors of the articles focus on a variety of astrological systems or eastern teachings OR eastern/western teachings and techniques, with no specific or dedicated focus on any particular astrological system. So these K.P. Journals are fine streamed and welcome editions to learning and reading about just K.P., and contain some very interesting articles that can be easily understood by the western mind...(another BIG plus J.) These K.P. Journals were recently brought to my attention by Yogesh Rao Lajmi (thank you J) when he mentioned (just a short while back) that he had written an article (great predictive article) that was published in the 2004 edition of K.P. & Astrology (using your Raichur K.P. Software, (which was kindly mentioned at the end of his article) entitled “When Will I Get A Job”? So I find these K.P. articles great to read just before retiring, as most of the articles are short and directly to the point. All the Best, Sandy Crowther http://www.jupitersweb.com anant raichur [anant_1608] Tuesday, January 18, 2005 2:00 AM Subject: Re: Notes on KP...OK? Dear Sandy There has been a lot of discussion on Ruling Planets. I have already posted a Note on this. The inclusion of sub, and sub-sub is a recent innovation. Only one Senior KP astologer Shre Kuppu Ganapathy has used the sub-sub to fix the correct Birth Time. In the Book RP & KP where 41 articles have been written, 39 have used only the 5 RPs mentioned by KSK. one has used the sub, and one has mentioned about Rahu/ketu being the RP when he is in sign of RPs. THERE IS NO SYSTEMATIC report for deviating from what has been fixewd by Prof KSK, and including so many other items. Regarding RAHU and Ketu KSK has clearly stated that they act as agents of the 1.planets with which they are conjunct. 2. with the planets which cast aspect on them. 3. with the lord of the sign where are situated, in that order. When Rahu is conjunt with a Planet, Ketu is in opposition. So Both Rahu and Ketu act as agents of that Planet. 2. Hindoo aspects have no orbs. They are sign to sign 3. Creation of RP by any aspect applies only to RAHU/KETU not other planets. If however, the 2 planets are in RAPT CONJUNCTION (SAME SIGN,STAR AND SUB-LORDS), they will act for each other.Sandy Crowther <sandycrowther wrote: Dear Senior KP Members, Below is my translation on what I have understood so far - as per the recent discussion taking place about Ruling Planets. Is my understanding correct on what has been discussed so far? What about #4? Thanks. All the Best, Sandy Crowther http://www.jupitersweb.com Notes on KP: 1. Sublords of both Ascendant and Moon are recently also being included as RP’s. 2. KP Hindu aspects apply no orb usage (as Western aspects do). 3. Planets being posited in the same star and sub of an RP, create another RP (could be in different signs). 4. The aspects of an RP also create other RP’s, using Hindu aspects. (OK…What about Western aspects? Are they considered? I’m not at all clear on this, and why the dichotomy is relative to this particular RP teaching of KP when I thought KP utilized both eastern and western aspects? So why subdivide the KP ruling when it comes to determining RP’s? Can someone please elaborate?) 5. Rahu is an agent of Ketu when Rahu is in Ketu’s star (and vice-versa). 6. If Ketu is in Saturn’s sign and Saturn is a RP, Ketu is also considered a RP. (For example: Consider Rahu as being not in Aries or Scorpio, but rather in Mars’ sign.) 7. If the nodes are in the signs of the Day Lord planet, they must also be considered as RP’s. (Example: Prashna occurred on Sunday and Ketu is in Leo. Ketu is therefore an RP.) 8. We consider the nodes as agents , working for other planets. If in the previous example (#7) RP Ketu is conjunct Jupiter, according to the aspect, Jupiter will also be a RP, but Ketu being an agent of Jupiter (by aspect/conjunction) will actually be working for Jupiter, and therefore there is no need of considering Jupiter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.