Guest guest Posted March 6, 2005 Report Share Posted March 6, 2005 TO ALL MEMBERS OF THIS GROUP, I AN AFRAID THE ABOVE SUBJECT HAS CREATED MUCH CONTROVERSY IN THE GROUP WHICH IN MY HUMBLE OPINION IS NOT NECESSARY SINCE THE INVENTOR OF KP SYSTEM JYOTISH MARTHAND, JYOTISH MANNAN, PROF: LATE SHRI K.S.KRISHNAMURTHITJI HIMSELF HAS DECIDED ABOUT THIS AND I AM QUOTING FROM KP READER VOL.1, NOV'74 EDITION, PAGE 96. I QUOTE: " FOR CONVENIENCE AND FOR EASY CALCULATION OF SUB SUB PERIODS 360 DAYS ARE TAKEN, AS THE DIFFERENCE IS NEGLIGIBLE. BUT 365 1/4 DAYS MUST BE TAKEN. " UNQUOTE. SINCE WE ARE ALL FOLLOWERS OF KP AND WHAT GURUJI HAS WRITTEN ABOVE IS AXIOMATIC AND DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY IMPROVEMENT IN ANY MANNER, I HOPE AND REQUEST THAT THIS CONTROVERSY MAY BE PUT TO REST. kpk3010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.