CKV rule verification

[Guest guest]

Dear forum members,

 

Ever since I joined this forum about a week ago, I have witnessed

several wieghted discussions on KP principles. I feel this is the

right spirit to the we can all learn as a group.

 

Some time ago, the CKV rule was proposed which seems to be resonably

accurate. Let us apply this to as many cases as possible to test the

validity and analyse deviations.

 

In response to my earlier post, 100% of the responses said that the

birth details I mentioned are correct. Can somebody apply the CKV

rule and check the gender of my younger sibling and my child? We can

then cross-check with reality and analyse deviation.

I mention my details again: DOB 6-Jan-75. Time: 10:45 AM. place:

Thane(Thana) Maharashtra.

 

[Note this is not aploy to extract a free reading. I already have a

younger sibling and a child :-))]

 

Regards,

Rupesh

[Guest guest]

Dear Rupesh,

The CKV rule suggests that your birth time requires correction. Using

the standard 1, 4, 9 cusps and using KP 2003 ayanamsa for Thana (lat:

19:12 North, 72:58 East), the nearest rectified time is 10:44:32 am.

For this rectified time, your younger sibling (3rd cusp) is predicted

as Male, and your first child (5th cusp) is predicted as Female.

 

Pls share with us the true genders.

 

Regards,

Rangarajan

 

, " rupeshkaslay " <rupeshkaslay>

wrote:

>

>

> Dear forum members,

>

> Ever since I joined this forum about a week ago, I have witnessed

> several wieghted discussions on KP principles. I feel this is the

> right spirit to the we can all learn as a group.

>

> Some time ago, the CKV rule was proposed which seems to be resonably

> accurate. Let us apply this to as many cases as possible to test the

> validity and analyse deviations.

>

> In response to my earlier post, 100% of the responses said that the

> birth details I mentioned are correct. Can somebody apply the CKV

> rule and check the gender of my younger sibling and my child? We can

> then cross-check with reality and analyse deviation.

> I mention my details again: DOB 6-Jan-75. Time: 10:45 AM. place:

> Thane(Thana) Maharashtra.

>

> [Note this is not aploy to extract a free reading. I already have a

> younger sibling and a child :-))]

>

> Regards,

> Rupesh

[Guest guest]

" The CKV rule suggests that your birth time requires correction. "

 

fellow members, I feel that since we are trying to validate the CKV

rule, we should not be using it to adjudt the birth-time. That would

be like mixing cause and effects.

 

Regards,

Rupesh

 

, " Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy "

<ranga@m...> wrote:

>

> Dear Rupesh,

> The CKV rule suggests that your birth time requires correction. Using

> the standard 1, 4, 9 cusps and using KP 2003 ayanamsa for Thana (lat:

> 19:12 North, 72:58 East), the nearest rectified time is 10:44:32 am.

> For this rectified time, your younger sibling (3rd cusp) is predicted

> as Male, and your first child (5th cusp) is predicted as Female.

>

> Pls share with us the true genders.

>

> Regards,

> Rangarajan

>

[Guest guest]

To Rupesh and other members

 

The Birth time satisfies ASC-MOON Star connection.

 

CKV is satisfied for 4th and 9th

 

As per CKV rule Sibling is Male and so is Child(1st)

rupeshkaslay <rupeshkaslay wrote:

Dear forum members,Ever since I joined this forum about a week ago, I have witnessed several wieghted discussions on KP principles. I feel this is the right spirit to the we can all learn as a group.Some time ago, the CKV rule was proposed which seems to be resonably accurate. Let us apply this to as many cases as possible to test the validity and analyse deviations.In response to my earlier post, 100% of the responses said that the birth details I mentioned are correct. Can somebody apply the CKV rule and check the gender of my younger sibling and my child? We can then cross-check with reality and analyse deviation.I mention my details again: DOB 6-Jan-75. Time: 10:45 AM. place: Thane(Thana) Maharashtra.[Note this is not aploy to extract a free reading. I already have a younger sibling and a child

:-))]Regards,Rupesh

[Guest guest]

Hello,

 

Rangarajan-ji adjusted the birthtime and predicted Sibling=MALE and

Child=FEMALE

 

Raichurji used the time as-is and predicted Sibling=MALE and

Child=MALE.

 

actual: Younger Sibling=FEMALE and Child=MALE.

 

We need to discuss and find a solution to the deviation.

 

Meanwhile, can we try the other test-case (regarding overseas travel).

We can all benefit from the discussions on both the case-studies.

 

Regards,

Rupesh

[Guest guest]

Dear Rupesh,

I think the precondition for applying the CKV rule to predict

genders is that the birth time should satisfy the rule. In your case

I noticed a mismatch and hence used the rule to rectify the birth

time first. I am interested to know how Shri.Raichur arrived at his

answer.

 

We definitely need to evaluate the rule on sizeable data before we

accept or reject it.

 

Regards,

Rangarajan

 

 

, " rupeshkaslay "

<rupeshkaslay> wrote:

>

>

> " The CKV rule suggests that your birth time requires correction. "

>

> fellow members, I feel that since we are trying to validate the

CKV

> rule, we should not be using it to adjudt the birth-time. That

would

> be like mixing cause and effects.

>

> Regards,

> Rupesh

>

> , " Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy "

> <ranga@m...> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Rupesh,

> > The CKV rule suggests that your birth time requires correction.

Using

> > the standard 1, 4, 9 cusps and using KP 2003 ayanamsa for Thana

(lat:

> > 19:12 North, 72:58 East), the nearest rectified time is 10:44:32

am.

> > For this rectified time, your younger sibling (3rd cusp) is

predicted

> > as Male, and your first child (5th cusp) is predicted as Female.

> >

> > Pls share with us the true genders.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Rangarajan

> >