Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

vedic or non-vedic/ Shri Kiranjit ji

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dr. sahib; lalkitab is not unvedic and shashtri jyotish is not 100%

traditional (what u call vedic). yawan or foriegn influence has been

acknowledged in the texts .varahmir, neelkanthi etc.

the parashar granths are also believed to be about 5-6 centuries old.

lalkitab in its approach is very much vedic compared with these

texts.

secondly pt. RupChand joshi has himself written that the method of

understanding these books is of ABHAYAS. he advised to revise these

books again and again and it shall reveal it's secrets. pt ji didn't

gave his name in any of the publications so the condition of

understanding him as a prior condition to understand lk seems to be

far streched.

i hope some member with sound knowledge of facts will throw light on

the subject 1. what is the criteria for a text to be called vedic?

2. whether lalkitab has any nonvedic concepts?

 

kulbirbains

 

> , kiranjit kumar

> <kapatjal@> wrote:

> >

> > 'lagan sarnee madras time jo aaj kal hindustaan men chal raha

hai-

> ke mutabik bani hui hai-is liye jin gair- mulak ke mukamaat

> hindustan se bataraf paschim dikhlaye gaye hain-wahan ki

paidayish

> ke wakt men agar tafaut(that is how i could read the word) ka wakt

> jama karen to jawab ka hindsa hindustan men paidayesh hone ka wakt

> samjha jayega-isi tarah hindustan se bataraf poorab ke mukamaat ki

> paidayesh ke wakt se agar tafaut wakt ka hindsa tafreek kar den to

> jawab ka hindsa hindustan men paidayish hone ka wakt gina jaayega.

> > guzishta saalon men green witch se time madras ko diya jaata

tha-

> aaj kal poona ko wahan se wakt jaata hai-wahi madras wala time

> standard time kahlaata hai.'THIS IS HOW FIRST PAGE OF THE BOOKLET

> READS.rest r the tables and i hope to post these pages soon .I am

> not very apt at computers;so the delay .

> > Miglani ji, LK is a complete system in itself;to understand it

> one has to be of the level of Roop Lal Ji. In fact, It is not

meant

> for vedic astrologers. How can one mix one system with the other

> when so far v have not been able to understand even the grammer

part

> of lk fully. Vedic astrology is so comprehensive and complete in

> itself; why do vedic astrologers hanker after it.LK is meant for

> laymen who after getting their horoscope prepared,can do the

needful

> themselves.Before knowing Lk;one has to know respected pundit

> ji;only then one may understand lk system.

> > sincerely,

> > kiranjeet

> >

> >

> >

> > Catch up on fall's hot new shows on TV. Watch previews,

> get listings, and more!

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...