Varshphal and Lagan / Kalsi ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Varun Ji & Kulbir Ji,I have quoted what is written in book. From your belief it may be concluded that1. Well is not the object of Khana 42. Well is object of Khan No. 4 3. Lines written for Ketu No. 4 in 1942 and 1941(KETU 4THE JAB HUA -KUTTA KOO-EN MEIN HO- Page 197 Gutka) does not hold good and are misprints and are to be ignored.

4. Khana no 4 Objects given in Page 76 of Armaan 1940 edition are misprint and be ignored.5.Moon No 4- Page 80 Gutka (Objects given under Heading-Taalaab, Koo-aan , Chashma) are wrong and misprint and to be ignored

My opinion is different and opposite to yours, You may call it my belief YoursShiv Dev KalsiOn 10/28/07, varun_trvd <

varun_trvd wrote:

Respected Kalsi ji, I would request you not to jump to conclusions. I never quote from the Teekas. If I have to quote, I will quote from the original Urdu editions. Although we accept the quotations from Hindi teekas also, and do not consider them as 'dalda' books. Most of us were introduced to the Lal Kitab through those very 'dalda' books and we recognise their contribution towards the knowledge of the Lal Kitab. Now coming back to my quotation : For house # 4 " Char taraf ka pani duniya, doodh samandar dariya hai "

Page 23 line 15 of 1942 edition Page 15 line 2 of 1941 gutaka. Verify yourself. As for your considering a well as the 4th house, you might continue believing that. At least I have nothing to say about your belief.

Regards, Varun Trivedi.

, " Shivdev Kalsi " <shivdev.kalsi wrote: > > Kulbir Ji & Varun Ji, It is better to cite Original text rather than > " Teeka " done by other person on it. > As far as I read the Book , in Armaan at page no 76,' well' is given Khana > No 4 object of Moon.I could not find reference of Darya or samunder in it. I > also cite Ketu No. 4 in Gutka. Both above are refering 4th item as 'Well'. > You have studied Lalkitab deeply,may judge better